[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
sheds

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 13515)
Message
File  []
close
SAUSAGE.jpg
135151351513515
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13515 Anonymous
10th December 2015
Thursday 8:44 pm

ID: 7389f1
13515 Silly Sausage Thread
Ban appeals, supplication and fry-ups.
Expand all images.
>> ID: 759e31 No. 13516 Anonymous
10th December 2015
Thursday 8:50 pm

ID: 759e31
13516 spacer
That sausage to fork ratio looks off, to me.
>> ID: 964e03 No. 13517 Anonymous
10th December 2015
Thursday 9:51 pm

ID: 964e03
13517 spacer
I'm permabanned on my office PC with a static IP for posting a link in /iq/ to some pointless fuckabout website. I'd complain, because it was definitely within a standard deviation of the average thread quality of /iq/, but I've actually gotten something like four chapters of my thesis written since.

Thanks, shape-shifting reptilians, you stopped me from being as much of a silly sausage.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13518 Anonymous
10th December 2015
Thursday 10:20 pm

ID: 7389f1
13518 spacer
>>13517

Probably flagged as spam.
>> ID: db9398 No. 13523 Anonymous
11th December 2015
Friday 7:26 am

ID: db9398
13523 spacer

SPAM UP.jpg
135231352313523
>>13518
>> ID: 612f62 No. 13524 Anonymous
11th December 2015
Friday 4:30 pm

ID: 612f62
13524 spacer
Why can't I access /A/?
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13528 Anonymous
11th December 2015
Friday 6:06 pm

ID: 7389f1
13528 spacer
>>13524

Some boards are blocked to foreign IPs for legal reasons/It's a conspiracy. It depends on who you ask.
>> ID: 964e03 No. 13535 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 1:29 am

ID: 964e03
13535 spacer
>>13518
Can I have it reversed, then, please? I'm fed up of getting erections at my desk from Supernanny.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13536 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 8:04 am

ID: 7389f1
13536 spacer
>>13535

It shows a 503 forbidden, not a ban page. Nice try, though.
>> ID: 6a67df No. 13537 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 2:53 pm

ID: 6a67df
13537 spacer
>>13536
Forbidden is 403, you fat-handed twat.
>> ID: 964e03 No. 13538 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 4:22 pm

ID: 964e03
13538 spacer
>>13536
No, it definitely tells me I'm banned forever.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13539 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 5:11 pm

ID: 7389f1
13539 spacer
>>13538

Ok then, mystery solved.
>> ID: 612f62 No. 13548 Anonymous
13th December 2015
Sunday 9:09 pm

ID: 612f62
13548 spacer
>>13528
"Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /A/ on this server."

Any ideas?
>> ID: 6a67df No. 13553 Anonymous
13th December 2015
Sunday 10:09 pm

ID: 6a67df
13553 spacer
>>13548
Do you still geofag to the US?
>> ID: 612f62 No. 13556 Anonymous
14th December 2015
Monday 12:11 am

ID: 612f62
13556 spacer
>>13553
Still? Only >>13524 and >>13548 was me.

Anyway, no, I don't, and I could access the other boards fine. Unblocked now, so thanks.
>> ID: 710a06 No. 13558 Anonymous
14th December 2015
Monday 5:22 pm

ID: 710a06
13558 spacer
Slightly off topic, but I am on a work computer. I noticed 5 separate posts on /sentry/ from different parts of Malaysia.

This is of interest to me as I will be in Malaysia over the next couple of weeks. I will be fucking busy, but was wondering whether .gs will be available to me.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13559 Anonymous
14th December 2015
Monday 5:30 pm

ID: ae268c
13559 spacer
>>13558
Everything but the porn.
>> ID: d7bb1f No. 13561 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 1:42 pm

ID: d7bb1f
13561 spacer
Could the m0dz please stop locking so many threads? If it's vacuous trash reminiscent of the other place fair enough, but just because the OP of >>/b/398357 is a pathetic excuse for an adult doesn't mean the entire thread needs to shut down. We're not being actively damaged by discussing the matter. Then again it did belong in /emo/ anyway. Point is, if you think about it, posters being twats have resulted in some of the most entertaining events in the history of .gs.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 376958 No. 13562 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 2:12 pm

ID: 376958
13562 spacer
>>13561

I'm of the school of thought that you need discourse to create stimulation. If when someone posted something everyone agreed with it, although that is a good post the conversation comes to a halt pretty rapidly and offers no new knowledge, or experience. The thread you mentioned being a good example of a view which creates discourse.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13563 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 2:13 pm

ID: 7389f1
13563 spacer
>>13561

If you stop dodging wordfilters and put your threads in the correct boards, we'll stop locking them and banning you.
>> ID: c1c78a No. 13564 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 2:22 pm

ID: c1c78a
13564 spacer
>>13561
>posters being twats have resulted in some of the most entertaining events in the history of .gs.

Twats like bike thief and crab killer or wonks like ambulancelad and the lad who freaked out because his mum asked him to order a takeaway and he didn't know how had a certain level of gravitas or endearment.

The OP of that thread was just an arseclown.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13565 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 2:58 pm

ID: 7389f1
13565 spacer
It needs to be said, regardless of the arseclownery of the OP as that isn't what he was banned for; wrongthink is not a punishable offence, if he had posted on /emo/ the thread would have been left alone. /emo/ threads go in /emo/ not /b/, it's as simple as that.
>> ID: 89ed24 No. 13566 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 3:02 pm

ID: 89ed24
13566 spacer
>>13564

This is true to a point, but I think it's a slipper slope and before you know it you have Nepali cunts spamming pie threads and telling everyone how they are are posting from Nepal.
>> ID: 4ed52e No. 13567 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 3:07 pm

ID: 4ed52e
13567 spacer
>>13563
Your wordfilters are shite, and I haven't started a thread in months, let alone in the wrong board. Anyway I do have things to do today so maybe a day off of .gs would do me good, cheers m@dm8s
>> ID: 607023 No. 13568 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 3:07 pm

ID: 607023
13568 spacer

357-clarkson.jpg
135681356813568
>>13566

>I think it's a slipper slope and before you know it you have Nepali cunts spamming pie threads and telling everyone how they are are posting from Nepal.

What do you call a Nepalese man wearing a warm indoor shoe?

A slipper slope


(My apologies for posting that in /shed/)
>> ID: e09ba8 No. 13569 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 3:22 pm

ID: e09ba8
13569 spacer

what.jpg
135691356913569
>>13566
>> ID: 82b741 No. 13575 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 6:49 pm

ID: 82b741
13575 spacer

Screenshot_2016-01-13-18-39-07.png
135751357513575
Not a proxy, just posting from mobile.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13576 Anonymous ## Mod ##
13th January 2016
Wednesday 7:42 pm

ID: ae268c
13576 spacer
>>13575
That happens to me, too. I decided to put up with it as the mobile networks were routinely used to post CP spam. It's a pain in the arse but I'd rather wait until I get home to post than risk more CP being posted.
>> ID: 82b741 No. 13577 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 8:10 pm

ID: 82b741
13577 spacer
>>13576
Fair enough but does the ban really have to be indefinite, then?
>> ID: ae268c No. 13578 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 8:37 pm

ID: ae268c
13578 spacer
>>13577

Yes, unless you have a better solution?

"din" whoever you are, if you know what posts in /x/ are child pornography then you should probably report them for deletion instead of bragging about it on a connection that can be traced back to you personally. Moron.
>> ID: 230b52 No. 13579 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 8:57 pm

ID: 230b52
13579 spacer
>* din (dindin@7C60E300.F2386D93.30738E0A.IP) has joined
><din> well
><din> because of the way posting and reporting posts corresponds
><din> i can't actually report anything on /x/ with a foriegn IP
><din> remember, foreigners arent allowed to go there
><din> and i have always dilligently reported that shit because i don't want it on there
><din> you lot are just pissy because you're all lazy drunkards on the dole
><shape-shifting reptilian> but you can view it?
><din> and you know, actually stopping people from getting in trouble might fall in your purview
><din> but you'd fail ont hat end
><din> yeah
><din> i remember reporting shit before and it would go away
><shape-shifting reptilian> you can view a thread that was way past the first page despite that being forbidden to foreigners in exactly the same way as the report function is?
><din> i'm fairly certain i did report it some time ago anyway
><din> but i don't know if the thing would go through
><din> i remember finding the magical thread
><shape-shifting reptilian> We're generally over-cautious in removing anything that might be CP, if you had reported it, it would have gone
><din> well that entire thread should be disappeared tbh
><shape-shifting reptilian> it has been
><din> porn is horrible
><din> bye
><din> oh wait, i'd also appreciate it if you deleted the post referring to me
><shape-shifting reptilian> that's why you try so hard to bypass the wall to view the x boards is it?
><shape-shifting reptilian> you're not making a lot of sense right now mate
><din> i have to impose my sense of morality on others
><din> to ensure that i can keep due dilligence against such crimes, i keep my eye on the entire pornography industry
><shape-shifting reptilian> that's cool, I'll impose mine on you by leaving the post up then. thanks for drawing my attention to the thread, all the same.
><din> :(
>* din has quit (Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client)

Please, if you know or suspect a post to be of child pornography, report it for deletion rather than making yourself complicit in the viewing and production of it. Or rather than being a complete nutcase.
>> ID: 82b741 No. 13580 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 9:46 pm

ID: 82b741
13580 spacer
>>13578
I'm just saying how do you know that IP is going to be used to post CP forever and ever? I presume the posters of it are smart and dedicated enough to realise they need to change IPs frequently, even if they could somehow hold onto a single mobile network IP for themselves - and we know that they can't because I got assigned it today.

>making yourself complicit in the viewing and production of it
Oh please don't try and scare us with this pseudolegal nonsense. By this logic, reporting it would be essentially sending you evidence you could pass onto the police that we have, in fact, viewed it and reproduced it on our screen, so it would actually be against our own interests to do so.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 4b8381 No. 13581 Anonymous
16th January 2016
Saturday 7:13 pm

ID: 4b8381
13581 spacer
>>13580

>reporting it would be essentially sending you evidence you could pass onto the police that we have, in fact, viewed it and reproduced it on our screen, so it would actually be against our own interests to do so

This is truth. The only sensible thing to do if you see CP is browse away and tell nobody.
>> ID: c24914 No. 13582 Anonymous
16th January 2016
Saturday 7:15 pm

ID: c24914
13582 spacer
>>13581
The site would record that you viewed it and didn't report it, making you complicit in its distribution.
>> ID: ae75c9 No. 13583 Anonymous
17th January 2016
Sunday 12:34 am

ID: ae75c9
13583 spacer
>>13582

Just because a hyperlink for an image was visited doesn't mean that the content was actually displayed on the screen.
>> ID: 165961 No. 13584 Anonymous
17th January 2016
Sunday 3:22 am

ID: 165961
13584 spacer
>>13582
>>13583
The whole "displayed on the screen" thing only comes into play if you have your cache disabled.
>> ID: 998895 No. 13585 Anonymous
17th January 2016
Sunday 12:54 pm

ID: 998895
13585 spacer
>>13582

I don't see how that could possibly be the mens rea and actus reus, that would mean that if someone set up an enormous poster in a public place of kiddy fiddling everyone who viewed it would be guilty of viewing child porn. That is of course assuming people are even aware they are seeing child porn. which I assume in most of the instances that would occur on britfags and not cleaned up immediately would be where people reasonably assumed they were over 18.
>> ID: 5a1ca7 No. 13586 Anonymous
17th January 2016
Sunday 1:30 pm

ID: 5a1ca7
13586 spacer
>>13585
The press don't care about things like mens rea. As far as they're concerned the police have nicked a wrong'un, and he's trying to weasel his way out of it.
>> ID: f009cc No. 13587 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 2:35 pm

ID: f009cc
13587 spacer
>>13585
The example you give is different, because it's only the person who made and distributed the poster that is guilty of an offence. As >>13583 and >>13584 have said, in this case when we're discussing "viewing" images, we are (I think) referring to the offence "making" an indecent image, which precedent has held includes "causing an image to appear on a screen". So by loading the page in your browser, you have caused the image to appear on your monitor and thus have "made an indecent image". Plus of course the file in your cache counts as possession.

The people looking at the poster, by contrast, have neither made nor possess the image in any legal sense of those words.
>> ID: 4732ca No. 13588 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 3:22 pm

ID: 4732ca
13588 spacer
>>13587
>So by loading the page in your browser, you have caused the image to appear on your monitor and thus have "made an indecent image".
This is such a load of bollocks. Not you claiming it, but that this is the way things are.
>> ID: 8e591d No. 13589 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 3:44 pm

ID: 8e591d
13589 spacer
>>13588
This interpretation was dreamt up as a specific anti-loophole for a case of someone who had deliberately visited a site and deliberately viewed the images, but deliberately disabled caching in the browser. It came around the same time that people were openly calling individuals working at ISPs "child pornographers in chief". I think it may have been the same case that prompted the swift creation of an exemption for law enforcement.
>> ID: 10386f No. 13590 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 4:11 pm

ID: 10386f
13590 spacer
>>13589

No doubt the Masons had something to do with that. Tracing the board? More like tracing the outline of the dead, nonced child while on the phone to the Grand Master confirming if he was, indeed, accounted for all Saturday night.

Oh, wait. This is a ban appeal thread in /shed/. What a silly sausage I am.
>> ID: 66d57b No. 13591 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 4:52 pm

ID: 66d57b
13591 spacer
Whatever. Just report shit for deletion for the sake of not being a cunt.
>> ID: 914a2f No. 13597 Anonymous
2nd February 2016
Tuesday 10:00 pm

ID: 914a2f
13597 spacer
>>13515
>>13515
Mercy, lads. One whole week is a long time. The guy I work for makes in a day what I make in a whole week. This is triggering me.
>> ID: 914a2f No. 13598 Anonymous
2nd February 2016
Tuesday 10:01 pm

ID: 914a2f
13598 spacer
>>13597
>>/emo/22539
>> ID: 0ff111 No. 13599 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 1:50 am

ID: 0ff111
13599 spacer
>>/x/40106

A whole week! for posting "foreign' memes"‽ A week for what is surely a slap on the wrist offense? I demand justice! JUSTICE!
>> ID: ae268c No. 13600 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 1:58 am

ID: ae268c
13600 spacer
>>13599
Keep it in your trousers next time.
>> ID: 9a4ad1 No. 13601 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 2:23 am

ID: 9a4ad1
13601 spacer
>>13600

Sir! the fact that the right honorable shape-shifting reptilian, who I assumed banned me. Had made clear it was a 'definite would' in their mind, implies it is not the issue that I had taken it out of my trousers. If anything it appears the issue was that I hadn't!
>> ID: ae268c No. 13602 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 2:26 am

ID: ae268c
13602 spacer
>>13601
You've already been unbanned you prat. The original ban length was 1 second.
>> ID: b180bd No. 13603 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 4:58 am

ID: b180bd
13603 spacer
>>13599
>>13602

Well meme'd shape-shifting reptilianm8s. I wish we had more epic mem- sorry I meant 'inside jokes' and genuinely hilarious jokes on this imageboard that totally isn't a chan.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: b78689 No. 13604 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 11:01 am

ID: b78689
13604 spacer
You have been banned from posting on all boards for the following reason:

Will you ever learn? >>/v/20368

It depends, is it a grammar issue? It usually is, but I'm blind to them so I can't tell.
>> ID: e09ba8 No. 13605 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 7:04 pm

ID: e09ba8
13605 spacer
>>13604
>I'm blind to them

So what precisely then would be the point of explaining it to you?
>> ID: c7c3be No. 13606 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 8:10 pm

ID: c7c3be
13606 spacer
Does that sausage look a bit phallic to anyone else? When I scroll past it's easy to mistake the right end for glans.
>> ID: ed3bf0 No. 13607 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 8:31 pm

ID: ed3bf0
13607 spacer

Screenshot_2016-02-14-20-26-44-1-1.jpg
136071360713607
>>13515
This is a bit excessive. I feel like I'm being targeted and bullied.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13608 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 8:36 pm

ID: ae268c
13608 spacer

Lengths.png
136081360813608
>>13604
>is it a grammar issue?
I would assume so, but the ban had expired by the time I saw your comment earlier today so I'm not sure why you mind - unless it was removed.

>>13606
Don't most sausages look phallic?

>>13607
Judging by image related, you got off lightly.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13609 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:00 pm

ID: 439c00
13609 spacer
>>13607

>bullied

Fuck, someone phone ACAS.
>> ID: 78c44b No. 13610 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:18 pm

ID: 78c44b
13610 spacer
You'll have to clue me in, shape-shifting reptilians. What's 'tedious and /pol/ about discussing the protests about the 'male and pale' BAFTAs, especially in light of similar protests/controversy about the Oscars and Grammys?

Now if I'd posted something inflammatory or you thought we're mindless racists then I could sort of see where you'd be coming from, but I hope neither of those were the case. Then again, I have heard that at least one shape-shifting reptilian is overzealous in respect of shutting down debate they don't like.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13611 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:18 pm

ID: ae268c
13611 spacer
>>13610
>Why is it only black people who seem to take umbrage at this and is this just going to keep going?
>> ID: 010990 No. 13612 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:26 pm

ID: 010990
13612 spacer
>>13611
In my opinion that's not inflammatory and that certainly wasn't my intent if that's how you feel. It's a genuine curiosity as to why it only seems to be black people who complain over this. I'm quite naïve when it comes to race.

Besides, I think you should trust the rest of the user base to call me out if I'm being out of line rather than stifling the discussion altogether. Please don't permaban EE again.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13613 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:27 pm

ID: 439c00
13613 spacer
>>13610

>I have heard

What is it about this particular phrase that pretty much guarantees that the proceeding sentence will be conjecture and that the poster wont cite their sources?
>> ID: ae268c No. 13614 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:29 pm

ID: ae268c
13614 spacer
>>13612
Your opinion is not relevant.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13616 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:44 pm

ID: 439c00
13616 spacer
>>13612


Just my tuppence's' worth, but It sounds like you want Carte Blanche to bait the user base and start flame wars, not create discussion like you claim. Are you that mentalistlad we keep hearing about?

The shape-shifting reptilians exist specifically to stop shit like that from happening, or at least ideally they do, so in deleting a thread which leads with "Why are blacks so thin skinned?" what are they doing that is draconian or oppressive? That certainly doesn't imply constructive discussion to me.

Have a fucking whinge there, cuz.
>> ID: b78689 No. 13617 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 10:34 pm

ID: b78689
13617 spacer
>>13605

that I may see
>> ID: d000d1 No. 13619 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 10:44 pm

ID: d000d1
13619 spacer
>>13613
It'll be elsewhere on /shed/. I think there's been at least two or three occasions, but the most notorious one was when the entire EE network was permabanned because someone posted an innocuous link about an Asian child grooming gang in the Rotherham thread, which certainly wasn't offensive in any way and simply stated the facts. IIRC the shape-shifting reptilian's justification was that someone else was being racist, which was true because they ended up having a massive teary over it, so all debate must be silenced because of patterns of posts.

>>13616
I see your point. I'm not the mentalist but I was probably a bit rash and didn't think through how I'd worded the thread. Honesty, I wasn't trying to start a cunt-off over race.
>> ID: 05e1f0 No. 13620 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 11:50 pm

ID: 05e1f0
13620 spacer
>>13616
>Why are blacks so thin skinned?
Is that seriously what it said? Fucking hell, keep it up shape-shifting reptilians.
>> ID: a360fc No. 13621 Anonymous ## Mod ##
14th February 2016
Sunday 11:57 pm

ID: a360fc
13621 spacer
Please stop banning that huge subnet, at least until admin whitelists my IP. Cheers.
>> ID: e701d0 No. 13622 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 12:18 am

ID: e701d0
13622 spacer
>>13621
During the most raucous period of the Cultural Revolution, the Red Guards had turned on their own leadership and denounced them. I suspect something similar has happened in this communist dictatorship. Ha.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13623 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 12:20 am

ID: 439c00
13623 spacer
>>13621

Does maroon have the only key to the shed or something? What a strange situation.
>> ID: 05e1f0 No. 13624 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 12:36 am

ID: 05e1f0
13624 spacer
>>13623
Now I'm picturing purple yelling and banging on the door a la Fred Flintstone.
>> ID: a360fc No. 13625 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 12:51 am

ID: a360fc
13625 spacer
>>13623

OOPS. My colour tag was a bit off, apparently. That's supposed to be indigo.

Please don't behead me for impersonating the king.
>> ID: 64a8c4 No. 13627 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 1:17 am

ID: 64a8c4
13627 spacer
>>13626
That should be a semicolon, not a full colon.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13629 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 1:37 am

ID: 439c00
13629 spacer
>>13627

Audible mirth. What makes it unsuitable in that context?
>> ID: e09ba8 No. 13630 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:03 am

ID: e09ba8
13630 spacer
>>13627
Yeah good luck with that one mate, he can't even work out the past participle of "to go".
>> ID: 05e1f0 No. 13631 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:04 am

ID: 05e1f0
13631 spacer
>>13625
>>13626
Who the fuck is indigo? And I thought shape-shifting reptilians were only allowed to post in red? What is going on? Is the site still called britfa.gs?

Also
>I've went
Ban yourself forever.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13632 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:12 am

ID: 439c00
13632 spacer
>>13631

I thought there was a bloody coup happening before my very eyes. You'll have to forgive me for slipping into regional colloquialism in the heat of the moment.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13633 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:14 am

ID: 439c00
13633 spacer
>>13631

P.S.

>Who the fuck is indigo?

http://britfa.gs/help/
>> ID: 64a8c4 No. 13634 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:14 am

ID: 64a8c4
13634 spacer
>>13629
Full colons are for plural, semicolons are for singular.
>> ID: 05e1f0 No. 13636 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:19 am

ID: 05e1f0
13636 spacer
>>13633
Yeah, there's no indigo there genius.
>> ID: e09ba8 No. 13638 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:22 am

ID: e09ba8
13638 spacer

everythingispermitted.png
136381363813638
>>13636
>> ID: 89806e No. 13639 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:24 am

ID: 89806e
13639 spacer
Look at all this petty infighting. And this is the group of teenagers who decide what gets put up on here and what doesn't. Ban the lot of them I say.
>> ID: a360fc No. 13640 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:38 am

ID: a360fc
13640 spacer
>>13636

Well that's hurt my feelings.

>>13639

There's no infighting. If there was I'd have already challenged him to a duel.
>> ID: 290d49 No. 13642 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:39 am

ID: 290d49
13642 spacer

banned.png
136421364213642
Well this is annoying as I definitely wasn't posting from a proxy, as a simple whois lookup of the IP in question would have revealed. At least two posts of mine were deleted too; although if this is some kind of hatchet job I would have preferred that to be made clear in the ban message rather than the ineffectively nebulous 'Proxy'.

Sigh.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13643 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:44 am

ID: 439c00
13643 spacer
>>13642

How is Brazil this time of year?
>> ID: 290d49 No. 13644 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:46 am

ID: 290d49
13644 spacer
>>13643

I would say something about "30 degree heat" but I'd hate to be tarred with the same brush as HongKongLad.
>> ID: 60c736 No. 13645 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:48 am

ID: 60c736
13645 spacer
>>13642
I don't understand why you think a WHOIS result can indicate the absence of a proxy server.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13646 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:51 am

ID: 439c00
13646 spacer
>>13644

Saying anything at all, rather than deflecting, would be a great start.
>> ID: 290d49 No. 13648 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:56 am

ID: 290d49
13648 spacer
>>13645
I guess because most proxies are hosted on servers not on home internet ISP ranges. That said, a simpler way to prove the absence of a proxy server would be a simple port scan. I wonder if this was an automated ban because I have to reset my ADSL router three or four times a day.

>>13646

That wasn't a deflection, it was a joke about it being hot but not wanting to moan/brag (delete as appropriate) about it. Brazil's a pretty big country but up here in the north-east it's bloody hot, and will continue to be until about April when it'll be slightly less hot but a hell of a lot rainier.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13649 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 1:06 am

ID: 439c00
13649 spacer
>>13648

You are greatly over estimating what a whois lookup is capable of revealing to a non-native about a foreign IP range.

I've seen you posting from Brazil for a while now and you've not really done anything ban worthy, however I can't whitelist your IP as that is an admin level function and your ban will need to remain in place as The Wall is effectively up for the foreseeable future.

Anyone else looking to post from a foreign IP will have to get whitelisted by an admin as we've had more child porn posted. Sorry folks, blame the arseholes who post this shit.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13650 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 1:08 am

ID: ae268c
13650 spacer
>>13648
Over a dozen IPs from actual proxies were banned in the last 24 hours. You were included in that because you were posting from a remote location during the spate. That's all.
>> ID: 290d49 No. 13651 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 1:13 am

ID: 290d49
13651 spacer
>>13649
>>13650

Totally understandable, no one wants CP on here. Just checked banned.php and I seem to be unbanned again so cheers lads.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13652 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 1:15 am

ID: ae268c
13652 spacer
>>13651
No problem. Sorry about the mix-up.
>> ID: 96d4c8 No. 13653 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 10:44 am

ID: 96d4c8
13653 spacer
Not him but wondering what >>/e/21412 was banned for? I see nothing spelling and grammar-wise and the post itself is of course a Day Today reference.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13654 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 7:31 pm

ID: 439c00
13654 spacer
>>13653

The site was hacked by a drunken Gerry Adams.
>> ID: a98fb9 No. 13671 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 8:42 pm

ID: a98fb9
13671 spacer
In the Europe thread somebody has been banned for the Americanisation in the spelling of defence I presume, but you've done nothing to:

A) The lad accusing everybody of dolphin rape (although I can understand you leaving this if perhaps just to let him be entitled to his opinion).
B) The lads completely shitting it up by talking like edgy 'lEL So Randumb XD' 15 year olds about babies and how well they like them done.

I'm just wondering why the discrepancy?
>> ID: 4372b0 No. 13672 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:18 pm

ID: 4372b0
13672 spacer
>>13671

No one reported any of the other posts. Even if they did there is no guarantee we'd have done anything.

It's not our job to police people's opinions, despite a few mentalists claiming otherwise which is no secret, so from that point forward it's not a massive leap of logic to assume either we didn't see it or we consider bad spelling and grammar tantamount to posting Child Pornography.

Perhaps, we don't even care. Delete as applicable to fit your own personal bias. Why do you care?
>> ID: 58057f No. 13673 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:25 pm

ID: 58057f
13673 spacer
>>13672

>Why do you care?

Not them, but people resent what they consider unfair treatment, particularly by those with power.
>> ID: a98fb9 No. 13674 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:36 pm

ID: a98fb9
13674 spacer

154f4e3b63131fd1ae366aa1b5825c8f.jpg
136741367413674
>>13672

>Why do you care?

It'd be nice if the website owners (for which I am genuinely grateful for providing this website) would perhaps not waste their time being supercilious about spelling and perhaps stop people turning threads into the equivalent of 'the other place', as people post random videos of babies and talk shit about how they like the colour of different races of baby.

Just seems to take away from the content and seems ridiculous, as ridiculous as this place can be, that you'd ban somebody over a letter difference but not ban people posting absolute drivel about cooking babies in a thread about the EU referendum.

It makes it hard to read actual content and discourages proper posting.

Perhaps you don't care, but I just don't understand why you'd care about spelling but not grossly childish behaviour, of which I'm inclined to believe is far worse than any Americanisation in spelling that comes as part of an effort to contribute.

Just my two pence. Maybe I shouldn't care, particularly if the shape-shifting reptilians are just the 'we do what we want with the power aren't we quirky' type.
>> ID: 7346b1 No. 13676 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:45 pm

ID: 7346b1
13676 spacer
>>13674
What is your problem with babies?
>> ID: 4372b0 No. 13677 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:46 pm

ID: 4372b0
13677 spacer
>>13674

>Delete as applicable to fit your own personal bias.

Facetiousness a virgin concept, lad?
>> ID: a98fb9 No. 13678 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:49 pm

ID: a98fb9
13678 spacer
>>13676

It's not a problem with babies, it's just utter shit when people are acting like teenagers saying how they like their babies more cooked, in a thread where we're trying to talk about the EU referendum. I just don't get it.

This place prides itself on having a culture unlike 4chan some days but then defends those very same characteristics the others.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 4372b0 No. 13679 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:59 pm

ID: 4372b0
13679 spacer
>>13678

Presumably, those lads who started talking about bug chasing in a completely unrelated thread, starting one of our most endemic and beloved site jokes, should have been banned for being crass or arse-pisser banned for derailing an /emo/ thread about "How to dump my girlfriend?"

Take a step back from the computer and get some perspective, lad. You're being a tad histrionic.
>> ID: fd6725 No. 13680 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 10:06 pm

ID: fd6725
13680 spacer
>>13671
Bad spelling/grammar's always been a bannable offense. I was the one that got banned and I wouldn't even have noticed it if I wasn't, I was knackered. Fair play. As for the others, just ignore the idiots and don't get baited. They can be stupid if they want.
>> ID: 58057f No. 13681 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 10:06 pm

ID: 58057f
13681 spacer
>>13678
>(A good day to you Sir!)

AH! NOW WE SEE THE VIOLENCE INHERENT IN THE SYSTEM!
>> ID: 4372b0 No. 13682 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 10:14 pm

ID: 4372b0
13682 spacer
>>13681


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3l-mRWtBGsA

DANCE OFF, BRO!
>> ID: 165961 No. 13683 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 10:34 pm

ID: 165961
13683 spacer
>>13681
Bloody peasant.
>> ID: 5e929f No. 13685 Anonymous
26th February 2016
Friday 8:21 pm

ID: 5e929f
13685 spacer
>>13684

Words cannot express the mirth currently being exuded from my person.
>> ID: 7346b1 No. 13686 Anonymous
26th February 2016
Friday 9:32 pm

ID: 7346b1
13686 spacer
>>13685
He was probably drunk. Or a massive racist.
>> ID: 152303 No. 13852 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 1:02 am

ID: 152303
13852 spacer
Permbanned today from iq for daddies cummies thread.

Not really sure why , seemed like the level of copypasta crap /iq/ was designed for. Is the subject matter consider too sensitive or something?
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13854 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 10:46 am

ID: 171a1b
13854 spacer
>>13852

/iq/ you made the assumption of thinking is a) a shitposting board; it isn't, and b) thinking 4chan copy pasta was acceptable on this site. I'll unban you if you promise to think up your own shit jokes or life imitating /iq/ in the future.

If you act like an obnoxious 4chan immigrant, we'll treat you like one.
>> ID: 97277f No. 13855 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 1:18 pm

ID: 97277f
13855 spacer
>>13854

I'd argue your interpretation of the nature of the acceptable content of Iq is painfully inaccurate mod lad, are you new here? Have 5 BROs ever even sent you a BROFIST? Bet use never been the stuff of britchan legend.

I wanna appeal to the purple head judge. And them to declare daddies getting cummies isn't finest high quality iq content. Then I'll accept it isn't. Because at the moment I feel like you are a child trying to tell a veteran of a war what life was like during it.
>> ID: 0cc80c No. 13856 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 1:44 pm

ID: 0cc80c
13856 spacer
>>13855
You irritate me.
>> ID: 97277f No. 13857 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 2:34 pm

ID: 97277f
13857 spacer
>>13856

I'm not surprised, I'm not in the best of moods for getting permanent banned from all boards for what I perceive to be no good reason.
>> ID: 39293e No. 13858 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 2:49 pm

ID: 39293e
13858 spacer
>>13857
Keep it up, lad. You're definitely helping your case, I'm sure of it.
>> ID: 97277f No. 13859 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 3:21 pm

ID: 97277f
13859 spacer
>>13858

Is there a reason why you are trying to have a cunt off with me lad?
>> ID: eaabd4 No. 13860 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 5:10 pm

ID: eaabd4
13860 spacer
>>13859
I'm not any of the people involved so far, but continuing to argue about the legitimacy of the ban with such a patronising tone after being offered an unban doesn't seem like the smartest of moves.
>> ID: 97277f No. 13861 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 6:35 pm

ID: 97277f
13861 spacer
>>13860

My reasoning is twofold, firstly a permban from the whole site for a post that wasn't to the mods taste in iq of all places is absurdly heavy handed.

Secondly a patronizing lecture on what should be in iq that isn't even accurate.

I feel stupid for even having to defend the post, but when I've been permbanned my options are protest, grovel or fuck off forever. I feel it was exactly in keeping with the tone and intentions of iq so I'm not going to grovel. At some point I will stop protesting and just fuck off forever. But not before letting it be known that I think this is absurd.
>> ID: 8cc952 No. 13862 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 6:39 pm

ID: 8cc952
13862 spacer
>>13861
I'll review the ban when I'm back at my terminal.
>> ID: 97277f No. 13863 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 6:50 pm

ID: 97277f
13863 spacer
>>13860

Or put it another way lad pick any of your posts that seemed perfectly reasonable imagine getting permbanned for it and how you react.
>> ID: 39293e No. 13864 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 7:32 pm

ID: 39293e
13864 spacer
>>13863
But your post evidently wasn't "perfectly reasonable", was it?
>> ID: 4ac578 No. 13865 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 8:21 pm

ID: 4ac578
13865 spacer
To be fair I thought /iq/ was a shitposting board. It's been described in the past as "a barrel of toxic waste bubbling quietly in the corner". I'm not going to pretend seeing some bollocks about cummies appear in star didn't irritate me but I thought the point of /iq/ was you could post pretty much anything without fear of a ban. I'm surprised to now learn /iq/ has standards of some description.
>> ID: 97277f No. 13866 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 8:34 pm

ID: 97277f
13866 spacer
>>13864
That's some broken always reinforce the status quo logic you've got there.

In the eyes of unreasonable men. No. In the eyes of the average iq user on the other hand...

There is a post that plays "oh yes daddy" automatically a few pages down. I don't see how that or any other thread I could cherry pick from the back pages of iq, is acceptable and mine was a permban offence.
>> ID: ba99f9 No. 13867 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 8:36 pm

ID: ba99f9
13867 spacer

HQuMeKv.jpg
138671386713867
>>13865
>> ID: 3641b9 No. 13868 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 9:38 pm

ID: 3641b9
13868 spacer
>>13865
Same. I found it quite disturbing the first time it was posted, but then it's /iq/ so fair game. It wasn't banned then so I'm not quite sure why it would be banned this time.
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13869 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 9:59 pm

ID: 171a1b
13869 spacer
>>13866

It was reported, and so acted. You're not the only user of this site. We've had problems with paedos before, I don't make the rules and /iq/ isn't exempt from that particular one. If you'd been paying attention to your IP you'd have noticed I'd reduced it to a week pending your reaction to my chastisement.

You've done nothing to endear me towards trusting you so why should I?
>> ID: 97277f No. 13871 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 10:57 pm

ID: 97277f
13871 spacer
>>13869

Feelings mutual. That's why I am appealing to higher powers. Also you might wanna keep your story straight as to why you banned me. Since apparently it was originally 4chanphobia now it's paedogeddon.
>> ID: 9d8234 No. 13872 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 11:01 pm

ID: 9d8234
13872 spacer
>>13869
>We've had problems with paedos before, I don't make the rules and /iq/ isn't exempt from that particular one.
His post was clearly about BDSM rather than noncery.

>I'd reduced it to a week pending your reaction to my chastisement.
Get a grip, Stanfordprisonmodlad.
>> ID: 152c54 No. 13873 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 11:15 pm

ID: 152c54
13873 spacer
>>13871
Please don't pretend you're entitled to any sort of due process here. You won't grovel, and protest doesn't seem to be working out for you, given it's only making you sound even more of a bellend. What was that third option again?

Are you sure you don't want to reconsider grovelling?
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13874 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 11:17 pm

ID: 171a1b
13874 spacer
>>13871

It was both. Neither are acceptable.
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13875 Anonymous ## Mod ##
7th July 2016
Thursday 11:20 pm

ID: 171a1b
13875 spacer
>>13871

Listen to the grown ups. For the record, if I was to describe it and I hope this is the final word on the subject, /iq/ is self-referentially absurd, not a shitposting board.

If you don't have the savvy to understand and decipher the meaning and nuance of that, and therefore the content permitted, I'm happy for you to fuck off.

Conversation over. .gs is not a democracy.
>> ID: 97277f No. 13877 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 11:28 pm

ID: 97277f
13877 spacer
>>13874

Oh okay so you were going to allow me to be a nonce on here as I didn't post anything that felt too much like a 4chan meme and cowed to your righteous rule. Is that what you are saying?

Bullshit. You are playing revisionst. If you honestly believe that, you would have stated it as a reason and not considered the appeal at all.
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13878 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 11:33 pm

ID: 171a1b
13878 spacer
>>13877

I assumed you were new, bans are a teaching method.

If you were an itinerant shitposter you wouldn't have appealed; job done. You did so I humoured you. I did so on the basis you could learn what is and isn't acceptable, but you don't appear to be a learning animal.
>> ID: 724983 No. 13879 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 11:40 pm

ID: 724983
13879 spacer
>>13877

Genuinely the first time on .gs I've seen someone talk their way out of an unban.

Very audible mirth.
>> ID: 97277f No. 13880 Anonymous
7th July 2016
Thursday 11:59 pm

ID: 97277f
13880 spacer
>>13878

Is the lesson that the modding is inconsistent, one month a post is fine, next a near identical thread is permban. And don't question the contradictions, because that the lesson here.
>> ID: 5b36c0 No. 13881 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 12:06 am

ID: 5b36c0
13881 spacer
>>13880

Yes. The mods are capricious gods, in whose shadow we tremble.
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13882 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 12:15 am

ID: 171a1b
13882 spacer

Autoban 9000.jpg
138821388213882
>>13880

Look, the Autoban9000 is broken alright. He got pissed and went mental. Now you know.
>> ID: 724983 No. 13883 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 12:24 am

ID: 724983
13883 spacer
>>13882

You Sneaky Sneaky bastard!
>> ID: bed676 No. 13884 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 12:39 am

ID: bed676
13884 spacer
I want a fucking sausage.
>> ID: 4ac578 No. 13885 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 1:45 am

ID: 4ac578
13885 spacer
>>13875
>/iq/ is self-referentially absurd
I for one haven't got the foggiest what that is supposed to mean, but then I don't post on /iq/ anyway.
>> ID: df37b3 No. 13886 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 3:31 am

ID: df37b3
13886 spacer
>>13885

I think it means irc and mod clique in jokes only. For 6 years I assumed it meant posts in the nature of britchan. But evidently I don't know. I think that faggles shitskin searchfag took over at some point and banned anything fun.

Britfa.gs moar liek shitfa.gs
>> ID: af1782 No. 13887 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 3:59 am

ID: af1782
13887 spacer
>>13886

You have to ask yourself, "why do I give a shit about being banned from an anonymous image board only three people use?"
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13888 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 10:29 am

ID: 171a1b
13888 spacer
>>13886

>I think it means irc and mod clique in jokes only.

You're such a Queen. Draaaaaaaamaaaaaa!
>> ID: 51d0f2 No. 13889 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 11:05 am

ID: 51d0f2
13889 spacer
Can somebody explain what people are arguing about here ? I don't follow at all.
>> ID: 165961 No. 13890 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 11:56 am

ID: 165961
13890 spacer
>>13889
Someone got banned for posting a thread that wasn't even up to /iq/ standards and proceeded to throw a massive teary over it.
>> ID: 3d2020 No. 13891 Anonymous
8th July 2016
Friday 12:02 pm

ID: 3d2020
13891 spacer
>>13889

Someone can't take their little ban on the chin and shed a few tears and then came back all entitled and shit and well lets face it cummies is a shitpost too far in my opinion.
>> ID: 817c01 No. 13892 Anonymous
11th July 2016
Monday 9:59 pm

ID: 817c01
13892 spacer
Oh you chaps are just lovely.
>> ID: 818452 No. 13893 Anonymous
11th July 2016
Monday 11:11 pm

ID: 818452
13893 spacer
>>13892
Halved for having been the lesser of the two.
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13896 Anonymous ## Mod ##
12th July 2016
Tuesday 12:16 am

ID: 171a1b
13896 spacer
Ok, Huddersfieldlad.

How do you want to do this? Permaban or cut the 5-year-old shitposting? I don't mind you pretending to be Russian, but at least go method. Russians always apologise for bad grammar and post fighter jets with their tunes, not frog memes.
>> ID: 16e808 No. 13897 Anonymous
12th July 2016
Tuesday 1:44 am

ID: 16e808
13897 spacer
What the fuck is 'cummies'?
>> ID: 4ac578 No. 13898 Anonymous
12th July 2016
Tuesday 1:50 am

ID: 4ac578
13898 spacer
>>13897
Infantilised way of referring to semen, for people engaging in that form of sexual roleplay.

Yeah, I know.
>> ID: b0b563 No. 13899 Anonymous
26th July 2016
Tuesday 7:59 pm

ID: b0b563
13899 spacer
I've just had to reset my router because I was banned for 'they're/their' but the sentence I seem to have been banned for was:

> 'Okay it's just that we have 30 other graduates of a similar level to you willing to do this for the national holidays to show us their willing. Are you in?'

But 'their willing' is grammatically correct in every sense. I can see how they're would fit, but their also fits, because it shows possession and association of something. It is their willing (to do something).

No different from saying their car, their house, their desire, their willing.

Get it together, mod-lads.
>> ID: b0b563 No. 13900 Anonymous
26th July 2016
Tuesday 8:08 pm

ID: b0b563
13900 spacer
>>13899

Also, why can't you post a ban appeal when you're banned in the ban appeal thread, or is that the joke?
>> ID: 818452 No. 13901 Anonymous
26th July 2016
Tuesday 8:48 pm

ID: 818452
13901 spacer
>>13899
It was a ban report, I didn't pay close attention.
>> ID: b4cf58 No. 13902 Anonymous
26th July 2016
Tuesday 11:43 pm

ID: b4cf58
13902 spacer
>>13901

I put a lot of effort into trying to be halfway witty when I snitch the less literate than myself, you scoundrel.
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13903 Anonymous
27th July 2016
Wednesday 4:04 pm

ID: 171a1b
13903 spacer
Most bans come from ban reports. Fight amongst yourselves if you must, but we've got a bohemian grove party to attend and it's Lizard People only.
>> ID: 688830 No. 13904 Anonymous
27th July 2016
Wednesday 6:35 pm

ID: 688830
13904 spacer
>>13899
I'm the person who reported you and I'm afraid you are not correct, the noun you are looking for is willingness. Thanks for playing!

For what it's worth, I personally think bans for grammar and spelling are overzealous, but fuck it, if I'm going to get banned for such a stupid thing then I might as well report everyone else out of spite.
>> ID: 48387e No. 13905 Anonymous
27th July 2016
Wednesday 8:16 pm

ID: 48387e
13905 spacer
>>13904
There's only one thing for it. Send >>13899 back to his router!
>> ID: 165961 No. 13906 Anonymous
27th July 2016
Wednesday 8:56 pm

ID: 165961
13906 spacer

wellend.png
139061390613906
>>13904
"willing" as a noun has been known for almost two centuries, if not more.
>> ID: fff1a8 No. 13907 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 9:33 am

ID: fff1a8
13907 spacer
>>13904

Please ban this cunt for:

A) reporting me and getting me banned when my post was grammatically correct.
b) Still insisting that it wasn't correct, when willing has been used for a long, long time, as evidenced by >>13906 .

What an annoying little cunt you are though. Have you really never heard of people showing willing? If there's one thing worse than a wrong cunt, it's a cunt whose wrong but supercilious due to the fact that they still think they're right.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 688830 No. 13909 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 11:20 am

ID: 688830
13909 spacer
>>13907
>Have you really never heard of people showing willing?
Nope. Saying it must be correct because it's old can be used to justify all kinds of errors. We don't tolerate incorrect '-ize' spellings here, for instance.

And by the way:
>a cunt whose wrong
>> ID: 165961 No. 13910 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 11:27 am

ID: 165961
13910 spacer
>>13909
>Nope.
Not him, but I'm definitely going to take the word of some random bloke on the internet who hasn't heard of something over a printed dictionary. That definitely makes sense. Also, I've never heard of "whom" so that too must be wrong.
>> ID: 818452 No. 13911 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 12:16 pm

ID: 818452
13911 spacer
Pack it in, ladies.
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13912 Anonymous ## Mod ##
28th July 2016
Thursday 12:26 pm

ID: 171a1b
13912 spacer

Dear oh dear oh dear..png
139121391213912
>>13907

>If there's one thing worse than a wrong cunt, it's a cunt whose wrong but supercilious due to the fact that they still think they're right.

I agree.
>> ID: 688830 No. 13913 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 12:35 pm

ID: 688830
13913 spacer
>>13911
But we were encouraged to "fight amongst ourselves"!

>>13910
The word lol is in a printed dictionary. The word 'literally' with the meaning of 'figuratively' is in a printed dictionary. The use of both would be banned here. Printed dictionaries are clearly not infallible scripture.

And anyway, that was the question he asked me and I answered it. You shouldn't be having a go at me if you don't consider the question relevant.
>> ID: 688830 No. 13914 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 12:36 pm

ID: 688830
13914 spacer
While I'm in the ban thread, I was just banned for an hour for posting a 'blacklisted link', which was gmu dot edu. I was posting a link in the thread by the Kyrgyzstani lad to the Speech Accent Archive which is hosted on that domain because I thought it might help him. So why is this blacklisted?
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13916 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 12:44 pm

ID: 171a1b
13916 spacer
>>13914

Brian (You know, the site) has a blacklist of links which have either been spammed in the past or are known to be high risk.

I'll remove it, it was an automatic ban no trouble. I suggest you find an alternative way of communicating that info, though.
>> ID: beb05d No. 13917 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 12:45 pm

ID: beb05d
13917 spacer
>>13914
BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT ANY KYRGYZ BASTARDS COMING OVER HERE.
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13918 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 12:55 pm

ID: 171a1b
13918 spacer
>>13913

>But we were encouraged to "fight amongst ourselves"!

Square go, no circles. Queensbury rules. FIGHT!
>> ID: 165961 No. 13919 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 1:03 pm

ID: 165961
13919 spacer
>>13913
You seem to be going to a lot of effort to defend a false report for grammar.
>> ID: 8f2cb7 No. 13920 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 5:50 pm

ID: 8f2cb7
13920 spacer
>>13909
>Have you really never heard of people showing willing?
> Nope.

Not him, but if you've never heard of someone "showing willing" then you're either lying, foreign, or are a bit of a thicko.
>> ID: 508711 No. 13921 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 10:59 pm

ID: 508711
13921 spacer
>>13920
>, or

What is the official board position on the use of the Oxford comma?
>> ID: 165961 No. 13922 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 11:14 pm

ID: 165961
13922 spacer
>>13921
One would assume that if it's good enough for Oxford then it's good enough for here.
>> ID: 508711 No. 13923 Anonymous
28th July 2016
Thursday 11:46 pm

ID: 508711
13923 spacer
>>13922

But not good enough for Cambridge, the University of Oxford Public Affairs Directorate Writing and Style Guide, The Times or The Economist.

Besides Oxford's a complete dump.
>> ID: 1b1696 No. 13924 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 12:08 am

ID: 1b1696
13924 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZW7bB8D_mAY
>> ID: 5b36c0 No. 13925 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 12:08 am

ID: 5b36c0
13925 spacer
>>13923

We should solve this like gentlemen - with a mass brawl in a Wetherspoons car park.
>> ID: 165961 No. 13926 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 12:13 am

ID: 165961
13926 spacer
>>13923
>But not good enough for Cambridge, the University of Oxford Public Affairs Directorate Writing and Style Guide, The Times or The Economist.
When they've published a near-complete record of the English language then maybe they can have an opinion.
>> ID: dc6c1f No. 13927 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 2:06 pm

ID: dc6c1f
13927 spacer
I posted a perfectly grammatically correct post and somebody reported it because they thought 'show willing' should be 'show willingness' for some reason.

The mod didn't pick up on this and banned me for using the wrong pick from 'they're/their' even though that was correct. I raised that in this thread and he said he wasn't paying attention when in reality he just made a mistake but was too up his own arse to admit it.

Some lad then said that he reported me over the 'show willing' comment and the mod, backtracking, has started to pretend that was the reason and that regardless of a common phrase, that has also been a fixture of the English language for hundreds of years and is not in anyway archaic, that only his special interpretation of the English language is allowed and the dictionary is full of shit.


TL;DR - Mod banned somebody over grammar despite it being correct and is having a teary about it and pretending he's the grammar expert, not the people who literally write the dictionary and is probably not as smart as he likes to think he is.

Feel free to throw another teary and ban me again, I'm not gonna come back (in before the 'haha don't come back then lol!' comments).
>> ID: 818452 No. 13929 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 2:32 pm

ID: 818452
13929 spacer

Capture.png
139291392913929
>>13927
What are you on about? I unbanned you when you pointed out the ban was mistaken. It looks like you were given a very short ban for other reasons in the meantime, but that has expired or been removed. The only current bans are for the nepalese, spambots and something else.
>> ID: 171a1b No. 13930 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 3:10 pm

ID: 171a1b
13930 spacer
>>13929

Yeah, I banned him for being a shitehawk/using excessive verbiage and then having the bare-faced cheek to use whose instead of who's, which is simply not cricket.

It was not for very long. If you scroll up you'll see it, as I posted a screenshot of it for posterity and ritual humiliation.
>> ID: d80efc No. 13931 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 5:39 pm

ID: d80efc
13931 spacer
>>13929

What is up with that >>/nom/12025 ban reason? it reads like conspiracy theory word salad.
>> ID: 64b30b No. 13932 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 5:42 pm

ID: 64b30b
13932 spacer
>>13931
>word salad
Seems appropriate for /nom/.
>> ID: 818452 No. 13933 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 6:08 pm

ID: 818452
13933 spacer

Capture.png
139331393313933
>>13931
The post in question.
>> ID: c234c3 No. 13934 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 6:53 pm

ID: c234c3
13934 spacer
>>13933

I knew their was a reason for me going balded!
>> ID: 02bce9 No. 13935 Anonymous
29th July 2016
Friday 7:00 pm

ID: 02bce9
13935 spacer
>>13931
>it reads like conspiracy theory word salad.

If you want to take a gander at how shampoo is corrupting your brain have a read of >>/poof/3281.
>> ID: 4c0409 No. 13938 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 5:56 pm

ID: 4c0409
13938 spacer
Isn't a week-long ban for getting around a word filter a bit much?
>> ID: 818452 No. 13939 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 8:24 pm

ID: 818452
13939 spacer
>>13938
Maybe, but apparently you can get around it so it doesn't matter all that much. You should have known better.
>> ID: 165961 No. 13940 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 8:32 pm

ID: 165961
13940 spacer
>>13939
Not him, but IIRC "all boards" doesn't include /shed/ precisely so that offenders have somewhere to grovel.
>> ID: 818452 No. 13941 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 8:38 pm

ID: 818452
13941 spacer
>>13940
You recall incorrectly.
>> ID: 165961 No. 13942 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 9:17 pm

ID: 165961
13942 spacer
>>13941
That would rather raise the question of the point of a ban appeals thread in which the banned cannot post.
>> ID: 3568f1 No. 13943 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 9:35 pm

ID: 3568f1
13943 spacer
>>13942
Most people post from their phones, so you have the option of switching from mobile Internet to WiFi, or simply turning the WiFi off for a few minutes and turning it on again. No idea if you can do that with mobile internet, but I don't think the mods would want to blanket ban that for ban evasion because of the whole EE debacle.

Also, bans should start from the time the post is made rather than when the mods get around to actioning it.
>> ID: fe1614 No. 13944 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 9:36 pm

ID: fe1614
13944 spacer
>>13942

Now you're catching on.
>> ID: 818452 No. 13945 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 10:12 pm

ID: 818452
13945 spacer
>>13942
It was discussed as a planned feature but never implemented for the same reason as all the other good ideas never were.
It is possible to ban someone from all boards except /shed/ by ticking the box for each individual board instead of the "all boards" box but that's a pain in the arse and you have to remember not to tick the ones for the secret boards; purple told me off for failing to do that.

>>13943
>Also, bans should start from the time the post is made rather than when the mods get around to actioning it.
They do. If you're banned for a day for a post an hour after it was made, it means the ban was an hour and a day.
Seriously, what?
>> ID: f26d6b No. 13947 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 10:39 pm

ID: f26d6b
13947 spacer
>>13945
>a planned feature but never implemented for the same reason as all the other good ideas never were
A bit like this, ho ho? >>/b/404502
>> ID: 818452 No. 13948 Anonymous
18th August 2016
Thursday 11:00 pm

ID: 818452
13948 spacer
>>13947
... yes? I guess. What?
>> ID: eaabd4 No. 13949 Anonymous
19th August 2016
Friday 12:57 am

ID: eaabd4
13949 spacer
>>13943
.gs is on my phone network's 'blacklist' for whatever reason and I don't fancy being put on May's special list of wrong 'uns just to shitpost on here.
>> ID: b69d17 No. 13950 Anonymous
19th August 2016
Friday 2:43 am

ID: b69d17
13950 spacer
>>13949
When I had a PAYG phone with Orange it was hit or miss whether this site could be accessed, due to a sporadic block on content deemed unsuitable for under 18s, but I nerve had an issues once I went on a monthly contract with them.
>> ID: badd56 No. 13951 Anonymous
19th August 2016
Friday 4:36 pm

ID: badd56
13951 spacer
>>13950
Virgin media never flagged .gs as an adult site so I used to browse /x/ on my phone when out and about. Not because I wanted to look at porn, but because it felt like thumbing my nose at the filter.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14167 Anonymous
30th April 2017
Sunday 5:52 pm

ID: 2082fa
14167 spacer
Afternoon, mods.

Any chance you can lift my ban on /emo/ for posting >>/emo/24841, please? I didn't think I'd get in trouble for referencing one of our previous posters.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14168 Anonymous
30th April 2017
Sunday 7:40 pm

ID: ec74d0
14168 spacer
>>14167
You were banned for shitposting in /emo/.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14169 Anonymous
30th April 2017
Sunday 7:58 pm

ID: 2082fa
14169 spacer
>>14168
I'm all for keeping /emo/ free of cunt-offs and cuntery, but I'd have thought that, when the discussion drifts towards mobile phones and rape, that's the opportune time to reference the lad from here who went on trial for rubbing his iPhone against his infant daughters fanny and couldn't see what he'd done wrong.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14171 Anonymous
30th April 2017
Sunday 8:52 pm

ID: ec74d0
14171 spacer
>>14169
Perhaps you should have reported the posts drifting towards mobile phones and rape instead of joining in. Regardless, ban lifted.
>> ID: d80efc No. 14172 Anonymous
2nd May 2017
Tuesday 5:04 pm

ID: d80efc
14172 spacer
>>14171

Same deal, I was a silly shitposting sausage may I have my Emo priviliages back? post >>/emo/24859
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14173 Anonymous
2nd May 2017
Tuesday 5:26 pm

ID: ec74d0
14173 spacer
>>14172
Yes but only if you promise to learn to spell privileges.
>> ID: db1008 No. 14174 Anonymous
2nd May 2017
Tuesday 5:32 pm

ID: db1008
14174 spacer
>>14172
Privily Argh-Jess.
>> ID: 80b2bd No. 14175 Anonymous
3rd May 2017
Wednesday 12:14 am

ID: 80b2bd
14175 spacer
Since everyone's begging, can I have access to /emo/ too? I really need to help the stupid balding woman.
>> ID: ba9334 No. 14358 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 4:00 pm

ID: ba9334
14358 spacer
Modlad, why did I get banned for a post from 13th of September? I don't even remember making that post, but in any case, isn't it a bit heavy-handed to give me a 2 week ban for basically nothing? Do you hate Christmas?
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14359 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 4:25 pm

ID: ec74d0
14359 spacer
>>14358
You seem to be getting around it just fine. Which makes it tricky to tell which ban was you, should someone deign to remove it.
>> ID: 07bf4a No. 14360 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 4:40 pm

ID: 07bf4a
14360 spacer
>>14359
I'm surprised foreign IPs are not ban. I thought we had a great wall and all.

Anyway Scrooge, why is it difficult to tell which one I am? Have you gone a banning spree again? Where's your Christmas spirit?

>You have been banned from posting on all boards for the following reason:

>Naw lad >>/b/412762

>Your ban was placed on December 1, 2017, 3:28 pm, and will expire on December 15, 2017, 3:28 pm.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14361 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 4:58 pm

ID: ec74d0
14361 spacer

why.png
143611436114361
>>14360
>why is it difficult to tell which one I am?
Are you blind?
>> ID: d2f0f2 No. 14362 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 5:39 pm

ID: d2f0f2
14362 spacer
>>14358

Paedos are attracted to any talk of legitimising their criminal disorder whether it's a joke or not, we've had a couple of persistant ones in the past. Like nonce moths to a child.
>> ID: 620217 No. 14363 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 7:39 pm

ID: 620217
14363 spacer
>>14362
Not either of them, but I'm curious as to what you think handing out two-week bans for obviously-jokey posts almost three months after the fact is supposed to achieve. I'm all for shutting down anything that's going to attract the crabs as and when it happens, but this seemed a bit like trying to lock the stable door after the farm has long since fallen into the sea.
>> ID: 18220f No. 14364 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 7:46 pm

ID: 18220f
14364 spacer
>>14362

>nonce moths to a child

Alright, Chris!

>>14363

Alright, nonce!
>> ID: da4720 No. 14365 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 8:00 pm

ID: da4720
14365 spacer
>>14362
So... No chance of lifting the ban then?
>> ID: 01d591 No. 14366 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 8:07 pm

ID: 01d591
14366 spacer
>>14362

Mods will be first up against the wall when the peado revolution comes!
>> ID: 01d591 No. 14367 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 8:07 pm

ID: 01d591
14367 spacer
>>14362

Mods will be first up against the wall when the peado revolution comes!
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14368 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 9:14 pm

ID: ec74d0
14368 spacer
>>14365
I didn't notice the post date when I placed the bans, so I'll take them off. >>14363 makes a fair point.
>> ID: c041d0 No. 14369 Anonymous
2nd December 2017
Saturday 5:49 pm

ID: c041d0
14369 spacer
>>14368

Are you implying there's another mod here?
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14370 Anonymous
2nd December 2017
Saturday 6:26 pm

ID: ec74d0
14370 spacer
>>14369

What?
>> ID: be1393 No. 14373 Anonymous
20th December 2017
Wednesday 12:04 am

ID: be1393
14373 spacer
I hope you respect that I have waited for my ban to expire before I made this post.

But I feel like the pedophobia here is becoming a witch hunt.

Calling someone for making moral absolutist statements is not the same thing as promoting nonces. It was such an obvious point I was making that that someone else made the exact same point with the exact same example after my post was removed.

This post is obviously mostly fuelled by bitterness of being singled out for punishment, and I'd have prefer it was handled differently, but it failed as a deterrent and preventing conversation from moving in that direction anyway. I'd like that at the very least be considered in how to handle such situations in future. Even if the solution is just to delete a post and have a mod make a comment after to sign post to others "danger 'ere be dragons" that would stop the conversation heading that way anyway like it did this time.

Moan tickbox ticked for moan.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14374 Anonymous
20th December 2017
Wednesday 12:08 am

ID: ec74d0
14374 spacer
>>14373
Mods are fallible humans and don't have as much time to spend on deciding whether or not to place a ban as you have while languishing and waiting for a ban to expire, going over and over why you feel it was unjust.
It's nice that you thought to wait for it to expire but there's not much point in waiting if your complaint is something reasonable and thought out. It's a bit late for us to do anything about it now.
>> ID: be1393 No. 14375 Anonymous
20th December 2017
Wednesday 12:36 am

ID: be1393
14375 spacer
>>14374

My key point is one of criticism that I think rule enforcement is over zealous, I didn't want it to be seen as ban evading just to attack the moderation.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14376 Anonymous
20th December 2017
Wednesday 1:05 am

ID: ec74d0
14376 spacer
One, the whole argument about kiddie fiddling discussion is one we've been over many, many times so bigger bans get handed out for it because it's not as though you're likely to have not seen it before. Two, you're smart enough to get around the ban if you want to, so unless it's long, it's not much more than a temporary inconvenience.
>> ID: a7fb53 No. 14377 Anonymous
20th December 2017
Wednesday 1:46 am

ID: a7fb53
14377 spacer
Honestly, the reason we ban anything that even sort of looks like pro paedoism is that there's a group of people who will jump on anything that looks like support for their cause, and it gets bad, quickly. You might've been caught in the crossfire,but it was for a reason.

Just be glad you didn't get a months ban for a spelling mistake like the good old days.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: a7fb53 No. 14378 Anonymous
21st December 2017
Thursday 8:46 am

ID: a7fb53
14378 spacer
>>14377

You bastard.
>> ID: 4260c9 No. 14379 Anonymous
21st December 2017
Thursday 2:21 pm

ID: 4260c9
14379 spacer
>>14378
It wasn't my ban, but I think that was an incorrect hyphenation, entirely justified.


(sageru for sarcasm)
>> ID: a7fb53 No. 14380 Anonymous
21st December 2017
Thursday 8:33 pm

ID: a7fb53
14380 spacer
>>14379

His ban reason was "what's". I'm just disappointed.

Sage for meta ban discussion in the ban thread.
>> ID: ec87c5 No. 14405 Anonymous
9th January 2018
Tuesday 8:32 pm

ID: ec87c5
14405 spacer
Isn't a year long ban a bit much? You silly mod.

I'm sure your mum's got a bigger cock than you.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 3b02ea No. 14435 Anonymous
11th February 2018
Sunday 12:08 am

ID: 3b02ea
14435 spacer
Re: >>415408
>Cheers for the factoid, Reddit.

I feel I was entirely justified in posting that. His insight was irrelevant to the discussion and entirely missed the jab at Americans obsessed with the Troubles from a distance - ironically himself engaging in whataboutism.

Why reddit? Because it was a worthless comment that would be seen on the popular website 'Reddit' to attract 'karma' in that smug undergrad confidence that desperately needs to be beaten down by the world. It is one of the reasons why the site does not work.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit

Furthermore, 'fresh off the boat'? Yeah, sure thing. I know you've always wanted to keep .gs tidy but I think you cocked up here.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 3995f6 No. 14436 Anonymous
11th February 2018
Sunday 12:27 am

ID: 3995f6
14436 spacer
>>14435
Bloody hell what a scab picking self-torturing moaner you are, hope you get banned every time you post.
>> ID: 55ef49 No. 14437 Anonymous
11th February 2018
Sunday 1:12 am

ID: 55ef49
14437 spacer
>>14435
Good grief.
>> ID: 76955d No. 14438 Anonymous
11th February 2018
Sunday 8:04 am

ID: 76955d
14438 spacer
>>14435

You're embarrassing yourself.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14439 Anonymous
11th February 2018
Sunday 9:13 am

ID: 2082fa
14439 spacer

fSHL904.gif
144391443914439
>>14435
>> ID: 3a8b5e No. 14440 Anonymous
11th February 2018
Sunday 2:22 pm

ID: 3a8b5e
14440 spacer
>>14435
You call that supplication?
>> ID: 1c3d9b No. 14441 Anonymous
11th February 2018
Sunday 4:27 pm

ID: 1c3d9b
14441 spacer
>>14435
You'll soon learn not to mock Reddit on here best beloved. Most of the mods and a good chunk of the users here are secretly poster boys for that foul den of emasculation and me-tooism.
>> ID: 3a8b5e No. 14443 Anonymous
11th February 2018
Sunday 5:08 pm

ID: 3a8b5e
14443 spacer
>>14441
Calling something or someone "reddit" is not mocking reddit, it's harbouring a gale force cognitive dissonance and projetile vomiting it when you feel insecure. Forum wars can fuck off.
>> ID: 76955d No. 14444 Anonymous
11th February 2018
Sunday 6:37 pm

ID: 76955d
14444 spacer
>>14441

That reminds me, what happened to us getting post voting here?
>> ID: 1c3d9b No. 14445 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 1:28 am

ID: 1c3d9b
14445 spacer
>>14444

Maroon can't code beyond a handful of JS and CSS which doesn't even stop youtube videos from being force-loaded in the background even if you've set "text links only" or "no embedding" in /o/.

It's the same reason there's still no HTTPS and recycle.php is still riddled with SQL injection bugs.
>> ID: e3757a No. 14446 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 3:07 am

ID: e3757a
14446 spacer
>>14445

Are you asking people here on the site to help out? There's plenty of people here who do software. I'm sure there'd be worries/concerns about trust or security - letting outsider(s) at the PHP - but a solution can probably be found.
>> ID: d896de No. 14448 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 4:57 pm

ID: d896de
14448 spacer
>>14445
Mate you don't know what I can and can't code. I can see why you'd level such an accusation because those problems are completely trivial to fix. I was definitely guilty of lethargy in the past but I've not had server access since 2016.
>> ID: 2d2275 No. 14449 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 5:47 pm

ID: 2d2275
14449 spacer
>>14444

Datalounge has a "Wit and Wisdom" feature where you can click "WW" on someone's post and they'll get a notification saying "1 person liked your post" or however many people liked it. It's just a nice feature and everyone's anonymous and only the poster can see how many likes it got so it doesn't lead to people posting lowest-common denominator stuff in a quest for likes. It's just nice to receive the notification or click "WW" when you'd only have something as inane to say as "lol" or "+1".
>> ID: 76955d No. 14450 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 6:18 pm

ID: 76955d
14450 spacer
>>14445>>14448

I don't know what's going on here but it feels very Jeremy Kyle.
>> ID: 76955d No. 14451 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 6:22 pm

ID: 76955d
14451 spacer
>>14449

That does sound nice. I don't feel like even a visible +1 here would pervert the posting styles of people, though that might just be me romanticising .gs again. Maybe something daft like getting a gold star after a decent number of votes would work, especially if the stars were really shite looking ones or 2nd class stamps. If nothing else it'd serve as a way to highlight posts of the year.
>> ID: 3a8b5e No. 14452 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 6:56 pm

ID: 3a8b5e
14452 spacer
>>14450
On Today's Show: Human Dairylea Triangle with out of date "knowledge" attempting to discredit the show because he's gay and impotentbanned from the chipshop; lie detector results after the break.

To answer your query more directly, imagine being stalked by a vulnerable lad, who you supported, who got banned from the local chipshop for telling school kids to go kill themselves. He follows you home one day, overhears you talking to your Nan on the phone while on the bus and assumes it's your Mum and then screams "you're mum has a cock, she's not a real woman" at you all the way home, then every time you leave the house, then outside your work and outside your toilet cubicle in the works lav and via email for 10 years. Finally, your patience runs out. Then, that same person comes into your work looking for your manager to make a complaint about you because you eventually reported him to the police and now he wants you fired for not being professional. "Dealing with my shit is your job!", he screams, but you haven't been in support for years. He doesn't know that, he can never know that, because he snorts bath salts and his short term memory is ruined. You understand he will never escape this hellscape, so to try and placate him you negotiate with the chipshop on his behalf but as soon as he gets back in he calls the lass behind the counter a cumdumpster and gets banned again.

That is daftlad in a nutshell.
>> ID: b73876 No. 14453 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 7:05 pm

ID: b73876
14453 spacer
>>14450

But at de en ov da dae this sites interface iz starting to look a bit shite. It needs some serious overhaul to make it mobile friendly.
>> ID: 76955d No. 14454 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 7:23 pm

ID: 76955d
14454 spacer
>>14452

I get the sense you're making a very direct metaphor but I'm still confused. Is this what I get for not lurking the IRC anymore?

also why do I keep seeing really shitty posts from yank IPs? Is it Piers Morgan again?
>> ID: 3a8b5e No. 14455 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 7:36 pm

ID: 3a8b5e
14455 spacer
>>14454
>Piers is the biggest shitposter on .gs
This explains everything, but no it's probably paedo/lab/. I'm sure he is a yank.
>> ID: 76955d No. 14457 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 7:45 pm

ID: 76955d
14457 spacer
>>14455

That'd account for the sizeable chip on his shoulder.

At least Piers would have more variety.
>> ID: 4acf97 No. 14458 Anonymous
12th February 2018
Monday 9:41 pm

ID: 4acf97
14458 spacer
>>14454

The IRC has somehow actually died by now. It's almost a shame.
>> ID: 052d44 No. 14468 Anonymous
24th February 2018
Saturday 10:31 pm

ID: 052d44
14468 spacer
>>13875

>[website] is not a democracy.

When you find yourself typing these words, it's time to go and have a breath of fresh air, and evaluate your priorities in life.

Anyway I'm just posting here to apologise to Tubby McLard-Mod whom I have evidently offended. Sorry lad, I didn't mean to, but it's not my fault you're a fat sack of shit.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 3a8b5e No. 14469 Anonymous
24th February 2018
Saturday 10:39 pm

ID: 3a8b5e
14469 spacer
>>14468
>priorities in life.
Ironic, really.
>> ID: 2dc476 No. 14470 Anonymous
24th February 2018
Saturday 10:49 pm

ID: 2dc476
14470 spacer
>>14468

When you get an hour long ban with the reason simply written as 'fat shaming', when you're gabbing on in a thread about fat shaming, and take it seriously, I don't even know what to say.
>> ID: 3a8b5e No. 14471 Anonymous
24th February 2018
Saturday 10:58 pm

ID: 3a8b5e
14471 spacer
>>14470
>I don't even know what to say.
TIGER STYLE!
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14472 Anonymous
24th February 2018
Saturday 11:01 pm

ID: 2082fa
14472 spacer
>>14470
There speaks the voice of thin privilege.
>> ID: 2dc476 No. 14473 Anonymous
24th February 2018
Saturday 11:05 pm

ID: 2dc476
14473 spacer
>>14472

Represent! Chop his head off, kid
>> ID: 27831a No. 14474 Anonymous
25th February 2018
Sunday 2:31 am

ID: 27831a
14474 spacer
>>14468
>7th July 2016
Why, yes, quibbling over that post was a brilliant idea.
>> ID: 2dc476 No. 14475 Anonymous
25th February 2018
Sunday 3:14 am

ID: 2dc476
14475 spacer
>>14474

He was just here to whinge about an hour long joke ban.
>> ID: e5a87a No. 14483 Anonymous
25th February 2018
Sunday 5:58 pm

ID: e5a87a
14483 spacer
Wow you lot are still patting yourselves on the back over banning someone that was blatantly asking for it?

I think the word is T R I G G E R E D
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14486 Anonymous
25th February 2018
Sunday 6:50 pm

ID: 2082fa
14486 spacer
>>14483
>blatantly asking for it

Quit victim blaming.
>> ID: 2dc476 No. 14487 Anonymous
25th February 2018
Sunday 7:00 pm

ID: 2dc476
14487 spacer
>>14483

He wasn't asking for it, again, he got a joke ban. A ONE HOUR BAN that he still felt the need to whinge about. It was not a real ban, which is why it's funny.

Get educated mate
>> ID: be1393 No. 14488 Anonymous
26th February 2018
Monday 1:20 am

ID: be1393
14488 spacer
>>14487

I have always found comedy bans lose their charm right around the time that you have written a long post hit send and then all of that effort is lost to the void when the nanny bint appears. Much like bullying and other abuses of power, the victim rarely sees the funny side of it.
>> ID: e5a87a No. 14489 Anonymous
26th February 2018
Monday 1:33 am

ID: e5a87a
14489 spacer
>>14487

I mean I do laugh at a joke ban but the real funny part here is that obviously the fat thing has hit a nerve.
>> ID: 2dc476 No. 14490 Anonymous
26th February 2018
Monday 2:49 am

ID: 2dc476
14490 spacer
>>14489

It really didn't though
>> ID: 3a8b5e No. 14491 Anonymous
26th February 2018
Monday 3:23 am

ID: 3a8b5e
14491 spacer
>>14489
All the mods are skinny twink boys with tight arses... trust me.
>> ID: e3757a No. 14496 Anonymous
27th February 2018
Tuesday 9:14 am

ID: e3757a
14496 spacer
>>14491
I would like to learn more & to subscribe to your newsletter.

(On a side note, when is the britfa underground gay collective - who I know exist here, at least at some hours of the day - going to get /y/ going again? InCase-posting-lad, we have the exact same tastes.)
>> ID: 9f45c1 No. 14497 Anonymous
27th February 2018
Tuesday 12:06 pm

ID: 9f45c1
14497 spacer
>>14491
How many have you pissed in?
>> ID: 3a8b5e No. 14498 Anonymous
27th February 2018
Tuesday 1:07 pm

ID: 3a8b5e
14498 spacer
>>14496
>britfa underground gay collective
The gay illuminati? Some say, you can invoke their majesty by pissing through a sock into a post box while standing in the East corner of the room facing the North Star. Wealth and prosperity await for those brave enough to dream.
>> ID: c563fa No. 14499 Anonymous
27th February 2018
Tuesday 2:33 pm

ID: c563fa
14499 spacer
>>14498

It's called the gay agenda, numbnuts. Conspiracy theory 101.
>> ID: 566e89 No. 14500 Anonymous
27th February 2018
Tuesday 2:42 pm

ID: 566e89
14500 spacer
>>14498
They're called the bumderati.
>> ID: 326ba2 No. 14501 Anonymous
27th February 2018
Tuesday 5:55 pm

ID: 326ba2
14501 spacer
>>14500

We prefer the term glitterati, because we are faaaaaaaabulous.
>> ID: 4973dc No. 14699 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 7:55 pm

ID: 4973dc
14699 spacer

Screenshot_20180804-171406_Chrome.jpg
146991469914699
You don't remove these mobile network bans that innocents like me get caught in do you? Just thought I'd check.
>> ID: 4260c9 No. 14700 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 7:57 pm

ID: 4260c9
14700 spacer
>>14699
It's not a bad idea to expire some really old bans. IP address ranges have moved around so much.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14701 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 7:57 pm

ID: 2082fa
14701 spacer
>>14699
64 tabs open.
>> ID: d51454 No. 14702 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 7:59 pm

ID: d51454
14702 spacer
>>14699

Yeah, go on then, since it's christmas.
>> ID: d51454 No. 14703 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 8:01 pm

ID: d51454
14703 spacer

Screenshot_20180804-200046.png
147031470314703
>>14701

I have so many open it's given up even showing a number.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14704 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 8:14 pm

ID: 2082fa
14704 spacer
Are we all phone posters these days?
>> ID: d51454 No. 14705 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 8:16 pm

ID: d51454
14705 spacer
>>14704

I browse on my phone when I'm away from the computer, as I'm chronically dependent on this place.

I usually don't post on my phone though as brian doesn't like it.
>> ID: 4973dc No. 14706 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 10:12 pm

ID: 4973dc
14706 spacer
>>14701
Yeah it's because it's a new phone, sorry. Usually I have the smiley face like in >>14703 from having about five hundred or so.
>> ID: 4973dc No. 14707 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 10:14 pm

ID: 4973dc
14707 spacer
>>14700
There's not really any reason for an IP ban to be literally indefinite, is there? Is purps really worried about that coin miner spamming .gs until the heat death of the universe?
>> ID: d51454 No. 14708 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 10:55 pm

ID: d51454
14708 spacer
>>14707

>There's not really any reason for an IP ban to be literally indefinite, is there?

Not really, but permabanning someone just feels right. It's funny to ban a real person forever for whatever reason, and with the CP posters or spammers it just seems like the logical thing to do, even though it's not, really.

Probably even a year is too long for the maximum, considering how much IPs shift about. But by the same token, the majority of people will find themselves free of their IP ban the next time they reset their router.
>> ID: 4973dc No. 14709 Anonymous
5th August 2018
Sunday 12:00 am

ID: 4973dc
14709 spacer
>>14708
It's like condemning a house because it got flooded once.
>> ID: d51454 No. 14710 Anonymous
5th August 2018
Sunday 11:11 am

ID: d51454
14710 spacer
>>14709

It's more like hanging a man because he went to 4chan once, which seems appropriate.
>> ID: d0ca1e No. 14744 Anonymous
1st October 2018
Monday 6:20 pm

ID: d0ca1e
14744 spacer
>>/b/420898
>that's also gone to shit; endless screenshots of random people on Twitter or obscure blogs, usually espousing some nonsense identity politics, presented as if it's a mainstream view.

>>/b/420904
>I've very little idea what they stand for
>there's so many morons on the internet offering their unqualified opinion on matters they don't understand it's like shooting fish in a barrel for them.
>the alt-right gaining credibility despite the fact their message doesn't go much beyond "look at what's wrong with what they've said."

I've just been banned by a mod who has then gone on to echo my message but with different wording. A bit less of the kneejerk reactions, please. It would be appreciated.
>> ID: 676f33 No. 14745 Anonymous
1st October 2018
Monday 7:32 pm

ID: 676f33
14745 spacer
>>14744

It was probably the image wot dun it.
>> ID: 3294ba No. 14746 Anonymous
1st October 2018
Monday 7:59 pm

ID: 3294ba
14746 spacer
I’m almost 101% certain I didn’t post anything in that thread regarding what you were discussing. Have a word with yourself. You’re a bit if shit detective.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14747 Anonymous
1st October 2018
Monday 8:19 pm

ID: 2082fa
14747 spacer
>>14745
I did deliberate whether to use it, but I thought it encapsulated the point about both BLM choosing questionable posterboys and the way the likes of /pol/ focus in on aspects like this to trivialise the entire movement. Don't post the xkcd image. You know the one I mean.

My experience of this place is that we usually don't have to qualify every single statement we make in case someone jumps up and down with a kneejerk reaction when they see words they don't like because they haven't attempted to grasp the concept they're in.

>>14746
>You’re a bit if shit detective.

Perhaps, but the edgelord ban message was very similar to the only reply to my post in the narrow timeframe between making it and wielding the banhammer. It was also repeating the same sentiments I was making in my posts.

Is everything alright, modlad? You're seeming a bit too testy to even make fully comprehensible sentences.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 79e478 No. 14751 Anonymous
1st October 2018
Monday 9:32 pm

ID: 79e478
14751 spacer
>>14747
I think you’re banned, lad. Take the hint.
>> ID: d80d47 No. 14753 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 9:50 am

ID: d80d47
14753 spacer
>>14751
Who'd have thought that someone would post about being banned in the ban appeals thread?
>> ID: 3e9f39 No. 14754 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 10:29 am

ID: 3e9f39
14754 spacer
>>14753
It's a paradox. A site wide ban includes shed, but the mods allow evading to appeal assuming you're not a cock end, which a cursory scroll back will show you. I can't remember the last time I caught a ban longer than 24hrs, so the lad must really be chaffing about not getting to espouse the virtues of the alt-right for a day to mash his fists into the keyboard this hard.
>> ID: 9b6a8b No. 14755 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 10:29 am

ID: 9b6a8b
14755 spacer
>>14753
Due to new policy, now only people who have not been banned can post in any thread.

Oh wait, that's exactly how it's meant to fucking work in the first place.
>> ID: 433625 No. 14756 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 10:51 am

ID: 433625
14756 spacer
>>14754

>I can't remember the last time I caught a ban longer than 24hrs, so the lad must really be chaffing about not getting to espouse the virtues of the alt-right for a day to mash his fists into the keyboard this hard.

I've always found the most frustrated thing about being banned here is when I write a long and detailed post in another thread only to find out that that effort was wasted as the message was lost to the ether. It teaches you not to put effort into posts, and is why I hated 'comedy bans'. Would be nice if there was a way the site alerted you before hand, as a (A good day to you Sir!) on the relevant post doesn't cut it usualy.
>> ID: 9b6a8b No. 14758 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 11:07 am

ID: 9b6a8b
14758 spacer
>>14756
Huh, usually I find that if I click back in my browser and try to reply to the same post again, my post is preserved in the post box which I can then ctrl+c to preserve. I've also gotten into the habit of typing my post out in Notepad if it's a long one to make sure the formatting/readability isn't too awful, but then again I'm an anal retentive nunchuck whose main source of validation comes from placing comedy bans on poor and unsuspecting souls. I like your idea of an IP's ban message being displayed when they first try to access the board they're banned from and the ban length, if only because it would be a constantly present reminder of their being a silly sausage and rub it in even more. What's that? Ah, yes, I am vindictive and petty, and also have fabulous eyebrows. Thank you for noticing.
>> ID: 3294ba No. 14759 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 11:22 am

ID: 3294ba
14759 spacer
>>14758
Do you even microblade, brah?
>> ID: 15f3da No. 14760 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 11:31 am

ID: 15f3da
14760 spacer
>>14754
>getting to espouse the virtues of the alt-right

I must have missed that part.
>> ID: ea72d5 No. 14761 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 11:37 am

ID: ea72d5
14761 spacer
>>14756
>It teaches you not to put effort into posts

It may have taught you that, but posts going missing, moreover as a result of crap internet connections in my case, long ago taught be to highlight the whole thing and copy it when I start to get beyond a paragraph.

>>14760
This isn't the time nor the place, but there was a definite through-line in that post that there was something righteous about the myriad "Femcel Beta Gets PWNED By Kekistani Chad" videos that clog up the political bit of YouTube.
>> ID: 9adc51 No. 14762 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 12:04 pm

ID: 9adc51
14762 spacer
>>14761
I not only failed to spot that, I perceived the exact opposite. So here we are.
>> ID: 5601bc No. 14763 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 12:34 pm

ID: 5601bc
14763 spacer
>>14762
Me neither. It was the usual Britfa "both sides are flawed, at least I get to act superior to both" sneer we have now and then.

I'd say this is exactly the place for it if there are things which are apparently off limits. We all know there's a hypersensitive mod after the whole banning the entire O2 mobile network debacle years back but it's quite worrying if we're unable to discuss and analyse the tactics of the alt-right which have been so successful for them, or any other subject for that matter which the mods don't want to even be touched upon, because a mod will misunderstand and fly off the handle when it's quite clear they weren't being endorsed.
>> ID: 3294ba No. 14764 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 12:50 pm

ID: 3294ba
14764 spacer
>>14762
>They're very effective at pointing out hypocrisy and the massive holes in the logic of others and there's so many morons on the internet offering their unqualified opinion on matters they don't understand it's like shooting fish in a barrel for them. They seem to have really hit their stride when Black Lives Matter were making headlines

Great bunch of lads, the alt-right. What they are good at is trolling, winding people up. Top bants! They target the lowest possible hanging fruit and, get this, hold them up as proof the left is shit haha, while ignoring the politics of men like Christopher Hitchens, Stephen Fry and Jordan Peterson, because they talk sense and agree with them on certain specific issues, so they're honorary Aryans! They're not enormous hypocrites though, highlighting ignorance that most people already realise is ignorance is what "bluepilled" "shills" say to try and undermine them. The people they "sissify" on issues aren't already racsist or homophobic, you're mad m8, and claiming something like "are cats effective at killing rats when the toxoplasmosis gondi does most of the work for them?" makes you a kike.

Also, to pump the brakes on the facetiousness train, their arguments aren't just "Your logic is inherently flawed, m'lady" they tend to revolve around hanging gay people, transgender people, bisexual people, anyone to the left politically of Assad, "roasties", women in general, etc. There is a lot of talk of hanging and the day of the rope. Highly effective group of top bants lads there, m8, winding up trannies on twitter.

So yeah, probably a good idea to take the advice of
>"Try thinking outside of whatever hellish political box you've sequestered yourself in when articulating ideas." (Which is good advice for every one, frankly)
Internalise it, go outside for a bit and then move on with your life after your 24hr ban expires at 5pm, you daft shite.
>> ID: 3e9f39 No. 14765 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 12:59 pm

ID: 3e9f39
14765 spacer
>>14763
>O2 mobile network
That was range banned because of paedolab, as was Orange for a while. How many times do we need to have this conversation before people stop casting it up as bad moderation or using it for historical revisionism? One poster got the whole of Australia range-banned off 4chan once; one mobile network is small time in comparison. Shit happens.
>> ID: 5601bc No. 14766 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 1:07 pm

ID: 5601bc
14766 spacer
>>14764
What actually is your point? Someone doesn't like the alt-right but I dislike them in a different way so I'll ban them? I guess it feeds back into the whole thing about most cunt-offs here being about two people agreeing over something but bickering over semantics.

>>14765
There was a definite mobile phone network range ban because of something that wasn't noncery; it was around the time of ISIS, Rotherham or something else actually newsworthy. The posts themselves weren't actually offensive, but a mod did go on a full meltdown and start ranting about patterns of posts; I think someone else around the same time had shitposted about eskimos but the two were unrelated.
>> ID: 3294ba No. 14767 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 1:26 pm

ID: 3294ba
14767 spacer
>>14766
The patterns of posts lad wasn't a mod, to my knowledge. I remember a madlad claiming to have profiles on different posters based on how they typed and the topics they chose to reply to, I'm sure there was other things, is that what you're remembering? I just assumed he was, well, mental. That's not something we pay attention to at all. We can see who posts what in the sentry as we get full IP info and not just a geolocation, so if someone was on a campaign of shitposting we wouldn't need text analysis software to notice a pattern, it would be immediately obvious.

I think you might be confalting seperate events. Range bans are exceedingly rare. The only recent range ban drama is in this very thread, with Indigo getting locked out and that was due to the mentalistlad who used to make bizarre ARE Emily style posts about former IRC users and claim the mods were out to get him.
>> ID: a69bfe No. 14768 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 1:41 pm

ID: a69bfe
14768 spacer
>>14767
No, it was definitely a modlad. I think they believed they'd identified the one true shitposter and then promptly decided to range ban the entire fucking network because he kept ban evading on his phone.

Hang on, let me scroll up. I bet we've discussed it in here previously...

>>13619
>the most notorious one was when the entire EE network was permabanned because someone posted an innocuous link about an Asian child grooming gang in the Rotherham thread, which certainly wasn't offensive in any way and simply stated the facts. IIRC the shape-shifting reptilian's justification was that someone else was being racist, which was true because they ended up having a massive teary over it, so all debate must be silenced because of patterns of posts.

So be careful what you post then there's shitposting about or you'll get mistaken for him.
>> ID: 9adc51 No. 14769 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 1:48 pm

ID: 9adc51
14769 spacer
Raising the issue of a half-remembered wide-ranging ban from years back is a mod conspiracy to deflect from the current issue at hand.
>> ID: 3294ba No. 14770 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 2:07 pm

ID: 3294ba
14770 spacer
>>14768
This post just says someone was accidentally banned in a range ban meant to stop someone else from posting, or am I being thick here?

Do you remember how quickly it was resolved? That sounds heavy handed, granted, but it would depend on how heavy the shitposting was over the period of time he had to deal with it, as we sometimes take breaks and others have to pull the slack. The mod in question could have been playing whack-a-mole with proxies for as much as a week before we came to help and cracked or got baited by something posted elsewhere, like IRC. I've banned and deleted threads once before, because I was sure it was an IRC shitposter as they bragged and said it was them and made myself look like a tit in the process. Never happened again, though; you live and learn. I also banned purps once (to my knowledge, he shitposts constantly) which was not my finest moment.

All debate should not be silenced because of patterns of posts, though. That is what wordfilters were invented for.
>> ID: 3e9f39 No. 14771 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 2:08 pm

ID: 3e9f39
14771 spacer
>>14769
Have a whinge there, cuz.
>> ID: 44b403 No. 14772 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 2:47 pm

ID: 44b403
14772 spacer
>>14769
I believe we're trying to discredit the mods by saying at least one of them has form for overreacting on certain subjects which can be a bit sensitive, such as the likes of Rotherham or the alt-right, so they can get a bit trigger happy when they see words they don't like without bothering with the context they're used in.

>>14770
The range ban came about because of someone posting a news link about child sex grooming; largely harmless in itself but the mod involved was determined there was a massive anti-eskimo conspiracy going on.

Anyway:

>debate should not be silenced

That's all that needs to be said.
>> ID: 676f33 No. 14774 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 5:53 pm

ID: 676f33
14774 spacer
Very occasionally we'll get someone posting here who pretty clearly has an agenda. It's hard to notice unless you're a mod and can sort posts by IP, but when you look at someone's posts and they've made fifteen in the last day and they're all tangentially related to debating the age of consent, the picture becomes a lot clearer.

We get posters like this trying to nudge the discussion to sexy 14 year olds or why black people are bad every so often, and it's certainly best to just get rid of them. You see this a lot on other, lesser boards, people test the waters to see if there's any other posters willing to follow them down their rabbit hole. It works on other boards because they don't get banned for it there - but that's why other boards are so shitted up.

Whether it's the same person who comes back each time, I couldn't personally say - perhaps it's more likely to be just some random channer who has found us in a list of imageboards and has just came up and posted like they would on whatever shithole they came from.

Either way, I've never seen an unjustified range ban on here. I've been a mod since April 2011 (no really, I checked) and I think I've seen about four in that time.

I hate to use this tired old saying but if you don't like that we restrict these sorts of discussions, you will find plenty of other places on the internet where you are fully free to engage in them, and I'd invite you to go and do just that. The britfa.gs party line has never really changed, either you like the style we have curated or you don't.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14775 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 6:24 pm

ID: 2082fa
14775 spacer
>>14774
>I hate to use this tired old saying but if you don't like that we restrict these sorts of discussions, you will find plenty of other places on the internet where you are fully free to engage in them, and I'd invite you to go and do just that. The britfa.gs party line has never really changed, either you like the style we have curated or you don't

The issue in this case is that someone was banned for pointing out what the alt-right do, whilst expressing that they disagree with them and how vacuous it is, but evidently done so in a way that a mod didn't like.

Either way, this has been done to death and it's so tedious I don't even know why I'm adding to it.
>> ID: 0ee98c No. 14776 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 7:26 pm

ID: 0ee98c
14776 spacer
>>14774
That's a lovely and articulate post but the use of the word 'curated' in the final line gave me a smirk. I had a nice hand-crafted fried egg butty in Dalston the other day for a tenner, curated by a young gentleman with a finely waxed beard.
>> ID: 676f33 No. 14777 Anonymous
2nd October 2018
Tuesday 10:32 pm

ID: 676f33
14777 spacer
>>14776

I've never heard curated used in the context of food, I know the egg butty bit is a joke but I hope there's nobody out there calling their menu a curated experience.

This is why I don't go to London very much.
>> ID: f7106d No. 14778 Anonymous
7th October 2018
Sunday 9:54 pm

ID: f7106d
14778 spacer

>YOU ARE BANNED :'(


>:'( You have been banned from posting on all boards for the following reason:

>Absolutely disgusting >>/iq/61724

>Your ban was placed on October 7, 2018, 12:34 am, and will not expire.


I was undeniably being a deliberate silly sausage, but perm ban seems a bit much for a all be it silly post in /iq/ that I hoped would be taken in good humour. it took a lot of willpower to not use an emoji in this post I hope that is appreciated.
>> ID: f6ecc3 No. 14779 Anonymous
8th October 2018
Monday 9:36 am

ID: f6ecc3
14779 spacer
>>14770
Every single one of us has banned purps at some point. Why, I ban him just to say hello at Christmas so he can feel a shred of affection for once from this pustule of a website. Season's greetings, mate, how're the kids?
>> ID: 7025cf No. 14780 Anonymous
9th October 2018
Tuesday 10:58 am

ID: 7025cf
14780 spacer
>>14778

come on mods, least you could do is reply to my grovelling even if it is just to tell me to piss off.
>> ID: b36415 No. 14781 Anonymous
9th October 2018
Tuesday 1:22 pm

ID: b36415
14781 spacer
>>14780
👍
>> ID: 433625 No. 14782 Anonymous
9th October 2018
Tuesday 1:31 pm

ID: 433625
14782 spacer

youarenotbanned.jpg
147821478214782
>>14781
😆👌
>> ID: 93caff No. 14818 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 10:07 am

ID: 93caff
14818 spacer
Why is discussing Diane Abbott off limits?
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14819 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 10:10 am

ID: 173e15
14819 spacer
>>14818

Because she's our queen.
>> ID: 559117 No. 14820 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 10:30 am

ID: 559117
14820 spacer
>>14819

As a quite serious point I wouldn't have given that thread a second look but the fact that it has been locked with no clear explaination causes a Streisand effect that makes me wonder why.
>> ID: c33202 No. 14821 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 11:28 am

ID: c33202
14821 spacer
>>14820
I can't remember any unsavoury events on here in respect of Diane Abbott, or any other large black woman for that matter.
>> ID: e7b451 No. 14822 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 6:35 pm

ID: e7b451
14822 spacer
>>14820
>>14821
Echoing this. If you're going to ban any discussion of a sitting member of the Shadow Cabinet (and one who openly courts media attention) then, well, it's not going to work is it. Just close down /pol/ if you're going to be like that.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14824 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 7:35 pm

ID: 173e15
14824 spacer
>>14822

>Just close down /pol/ if you're going to be like that

It wasn't posted in /pol/ though.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14825 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 7:56 pm

ID: 2082fa
14825 spacer
>>14824
Every board is the same these days thanks to /*/sfw/.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14826 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 8:12 pm

ID: 173e15
14826 spacer
>>14825

The block capitals still give it away though.
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14827 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 12:08 am

ID: 34f520
14827 spacer
>>14818
Post in /pol/ not /iq/, you'll notice a remarkable downtick in the number of politics threads that get locked.

Sounds far fetched, but it's guaranteed.
>> ID: 433625 No. 14828 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 12:34 pm

ID: 433625
14828 spacer
>>14827

Little protip for you, stating the reason why you locked a thread rather than saying "Stop replying to these threads, I've warned you all before about this." and you'll notice a remarkable downtick in the number of post questioning why threads get locked.
Sounds far fetched, but it's guaranteed.
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14829 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 12:46 pm

ID: 34f520
14829 spacer
>>14828
"No u"? Really? I expect a higher calibre of shitposting from you lot, have a word with yourselves.
>> ID: 433625 No. 14831 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 6:32 pm

ID: 433625
14831 spacer
>>14829
>"no u"
That’s quite a good point, but how aboutinstead of trying to turn this into a cussing match you think about what is the most constructive way to run the site. I'm not telling you what you must do I'm only trying to be helpful. If it feels like my post was obnoxious, maybe you should think about how you communicate points because I was just reflecting your delivery back.
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14832 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 7:47 pm

ID: 34f520
14832 spacer
>>14831
You massive teary bumder.
>> ID: 433625 No. 14834 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 10:38 pm

ID: 433625
14834 spacer
>>14832

U wot. Go and have a winge there cuz.
>> ID: 1b4f08 No. 14835 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 7:02 am

ID: 1b4f08
14835 spacer
So...

Why is discussing Diane Abbott off limits?
>> ID: 33a0e6 No. 14836 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 7:09 am

ID: 33a0e6
14836 spacer
>>14835
The same reason a lot of things are off limits. It just descends into endless tedium.
>> ID: 433625 No. 14837 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 11:08 am

ID: 433625
14837 spacer
>>14835

I think a 15 year old was left in charge. It is the most logical explaination.
>> ID: 433625 No. 14838 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 11:09 am

ID: 433625
14838 spacer
>>14836

Life descends into an endless tedium. I fail to see your point.
>> ID: 106814 No. 14839 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 2:45 pm

ID: 106814
14839 spacer
>>14836
U wot m8?
>> ID: 433625 No. 14841 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 3:39 pm

ID: 433625
14841 spacer
>>14827

so that was a lie...
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14842 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 3:44 pm

ID: 173e15
14842 spacer
>>14841

Yeah it was. What're you gonna do about it?
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14843 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 4:48 pm

ID: 34f520
14843 spacer
>>14841
Thread isn't locked. OP was banned for being racist.

Are you lads merely pretending to be retarded or is there something else at work here?
>> ID: ff9b23 No. 14844 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 4:53 pm

ID: ff9b23
14844 spacer
>>14843
So what's that red circle next at the top of the thread and 'Sorry, this thread is locked and can not be replied to' message if you try to post in it all about then?
>> ID: 433625 No. 14845 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:07 pm

ID: 433625
14845 spacer
>>14844

They just removed it and are gaslighting rather than admitting fault.
>> ID: ff9b23 No. 14846 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:10 pm

ID: ff9b23
14846 spacer
>>14845
Haha, oh wow.
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14847 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:17 pm

ID: 34f520
14847 spacer
>>14845
I unlocked it. Whoever locked it has done it and ran without explaining themselves.

There is more than one mod, m8.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14848 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:21 pm

ID: 173e15
14848 spacer
>>14847

I had assumed it was locked because of the reasons highlighted by >>/pol/84841. In a remarkable turn of events, one shit thread about Abbot has turned into three separate shit threads/conversations about her.
>> ID: 433625 No. 14849 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:22 pm

ID: 433625
14849 spacer
>>14847

You know We can see you have the same ID as >>14843 right?

So did you just assume the thread wasn't locked?
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14850 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:25 pm

ID: 34f520
14850 spacer
>>14848
It 's almost like the OP wanted that meta shitshow so he could justify shitting up /iq/ instead. Stay on topic going forward, don't reply to bait. It's not fucking difficult, lads.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14851 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:27 pm

ID: 173e15
14851 spacer
>>14850

Why unlock the meta shitshow then?
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14852 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:27 pm

ID: 34f520
14852 spacer
>>14849
Yes, when I checked I was suprised.
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14853 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:28 pm

ID: 34f520
14853 spacer
>>14851
Experiment. Don't make me regret it please.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14854 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:30 pm

ID: 173e15
14854 spacer
>>14853

I reserve the right to all future told-you-so's
>> ID: ff9b23 No. 14855 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:36 pm

ID: ff9b23
14855 spacer
>>14848
>one shit thread about Abbot

What was wrong with the first thread?
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14856 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:38 pm

ID: 34f520
14856 spacer
>>14854
Fair. I'll accept them humbly, should they need invoked.

Addressing everyone: FYI I will start to lock meta shitshows, even on /pol/, if you all continue to reply to bait though. /pol/ posting on /iq/ will continue to be deleted. Good chat.
>> ID: 2bd691 No. 14857 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 6:49 pm

ID: 2bd691
14857 spacer
>>14856
Just so we're crystal clear:-

- Posting something that is a blatant piss-take and clearly isn't to be taken seriously is not allowed.

- Posting something that encourages the incel mindset, which includes very negative and harmful views of women, is fine and dandy.

I just want to know where we stand.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14858 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 6:58 pm

ID: 173e15
14858 spacer
>>14857

>Posting something that encourages the incel mindset, which includes very negative and harmful views of women, is fine and dandy.

Did you not see the lad get banned for posting exactly that?
>> ID: e75472 No. 14859 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 7:03 pm

ID: e75472
14859 spacer
>>14858
Based on some of the other posts in that thread I assumed he'd been singled out for being a little bit too 4chan; we seem to have a number of newchaps recently who haven't yet grasped that isn't the done thing around here.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14860 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 7:20 pm

ID: 173e15
14860 spacer
>>14859

Posting anything unhelpful or excessively negative in /emo/ is banworthy, always has been, and incels don't historically last very long here on the other boards, either.
>> ID: 433625 No. 14861 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 8:35 pm

ID: 433625
14861 spacer

Snakes everywhere.jpg
148611486114861
>>14857

I see you complaining about incels on here all the time, but I don't think I've ever seen one. You aren't one those SJW snowflake cucks I've heard so much about are you?
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14862 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 8:45 pm

ID: 34f520
14862 spacer
>>14861
>SJW snowflake cucks
Please don't.
>> ID: 063458 No. 14863 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 7:12 am

ID: 063458
14863 spacer
Am I allowed to post MUD IN THEIR BLOOD, SHIT ON THEIR SKIN, etc., or is that now a bannable offence?
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14864 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 9:27 am

ID: 173e15
14864 spacer
>>14863

Why are you pretending like this is the first time you're discovering you can get banned for inane or whimsical reasons?
>> ID: 433625 No. 14865 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 11:46 am

ID: 433625
14865 spacer
>>14862
I calls it as I sees it.
>> ID: 44f57b No. 14866 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 4:27 pm

ID: 44f57b
14866 spacer
>>14864
It depends on the PMS level of the mod. If you follow the trend, there are a lot of senseless bans every about 28 days

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 433625 No. 14867 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 4:47 pm

ID: 433625
14867 spacer
>>14866
>(A good day to you sir!)

Right gentlemen start the clock!
>> ID: 44f57b No. 14868 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 4:48 pm

ID: 44f57b
14868 spacer
>>14866

I guess it’s pretty high right now

(A good day to you Sir!)
(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14869 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 6:24 pm

ID: 34f520
14869 spacer
>>14866
>>14868
Puntuate your pissing posts properly, or I swear on me Mum m8.
>> ID: 688fed No. 14870 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 6:56 pm

ID: 688fed
14870 spacer
>>14869
Was this intentional?
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14871 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 6:57 pm

ID: ec74d0
14871 spacer
>>14870
It looks punintentional to me.
>> ID: 34f520 No. 14872 Anonymous
24th January 2019
Thursday 7:22 pm

ID: 34f520
14872 spacer
>>14870
It's a proud .gs tradition to put a spelling mistake in your post when calling out someone's poor punctuation or grammar. Sad as it is, I've been waiting like 8 months to use that joke which is testament to you all keeping the standard of posting high. I need a hobby.
>> ID: ed6260 No. 14873 Anonymous
26th January 2019
Saturday 3:58 pm

ID: ed6260
14873 spacer

download (32).jpg
148731487314873
I assumed verile young stud was a generic term for vegetarians and not something exclusive to the Other Place. I'm sure I heard Stephen Merchant say it in an advert recently.
>> ID: ed6260 No. 14874 Anonymous
26th January 2019
Saturday 4:00 pm

ID: ed6260
14874 spacer
>>14873
Also, nice.
>> ID: e48c5a No. 14875 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 12:50 am

ID: e48c5a
14875 spacer
>>13515
hahaha. It's been a while.
>> ID: b8d19e No. 14876 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 1:22 am

ID: b8d19e
14876 spacer
>>14875
How many grams deep are you right now, Sniffany?
>> ID: d004e2 No. 14877 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 2:23 am

ID: d004e2
14877 spacer
>>14876
I think you might be mistaking me for someone else lad.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14878 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 2:30 am

ID: 173e15
14878 spacer
>>14875

I thought it was you but didn't say anything because I thought it was funny too, especially because you have far more elegant ways of doing what you got got for.

is this too meta?
>> ID: e48c5a No. 14879 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 2:33 am

ID: e48c5a
14879 spacer
>>14878
Nah, me getting banned is always amusing.

(A good day to you Sir!)
(A good day to you Sir!)
(A good day to you Sir!)
(A good day to you Sir!)
(A good day to you Sir!)
(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 4c4389 No. 14880 Anonymous
11th February 2019
Monday 7:13 pm

ID: 4c4389
14880 spacer
Thanks, lads.
>> ID: dc6309 No. 14881 Anonymous
11th February 2019
Monday 8:59 pm

ID: dc6309
14881 spacer
>>14880

Thads.
>> ID: ccb751 No. 14882 Anonymous
11th February 2019
Monday 9:42 pm

ID: ccb751
14882 spacer
>>14881
Thaddeus.
>> ID: 42abbb No. 14883 Anonymous
11th February 2019
Monday 10:09 pm

ID: 42abbb
14883 spacer
>>14882
Christ, you've just reminded me of MadThad0890. I wonder if he's out of prison yet.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14884 Anonymous
11th February 2019
Monday 11:18 pm

ID: ec74d0
14884 spacer
>>14883
Kiwifarms have all the latest.
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/thaddeus-mcmichael-madthad0890.9665/page-18
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14885 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 12:40 am

ID: 173e15
14885 spacer

Capture.png
148851488514885
Nobody likes a grass, anon
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14886 Anonymous
13th February 2019
Wednesday 7:28 pm

ID: 2082fa
14886 spacer
I know that lad was semi-literate but it seems a bit harsh to have deleted all his posts.
>> ID: b8d19e No. 14887 Anonymous
13th February 2019
Wednesday 9:54 pm

ID: b8d19e
14887 spacer
>>14886
Did you want something or are you just mumping your gums about us deleting barely legible drech with "tfw" and meme arrows? We delete that kind of stuff quite regularly as a matter of course, so it seems like an odd hill to die on.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14888 Anonymous
13th February 2019
Wednesday 11:00 pm

ID: ec74d0
14888 spacer
>>14887
>odd hill to die on.
This phrase is getting a lot of use lately. Not here, just around.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14890 Anonymous
19th February 2019
Tuesday 7:05 pm

ID: 2082fa
14890 spacer
>>14889
Didn't they even report them for the egregious spelling on display? They went crying to the mods because someone disagreed with them?

Christ, lads. Sort yourselves out.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14891 Anonymous
19th February 2019
Tuesday 7:14 pm

ID: 173e15
14891 spacer
>>14890

It was for bypassing a wordfilter (saying terroris.t) but I have my doubts that this was what it was really about. Considering the entire discussion was about terrorism I thought it was fair enough.

I realise it could have been though and I read too much into it, which is why I deleted that post and you've RUINED EVERYTHING
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14892 Anonymous
19th February 2019
Tuesday 7:18 pm

ID: ec74d0
14892 spacer
>>14891
Bypassing the word filter like that has always been ban worthy here.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14893 Anonymous
19th February 2019
Tuesday 7:19 pm

ID: 173e15
14893 spacer
>>14892

Oops.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14912 Anonymous
2nd April 2019
Tuesday 10:49 pm

ID: 2082fa
14912 spacer

134612.jpg
149121491214912
Is an automatic one hour ban for certain words even necessary these days? I'd have thought the report function was enough to keep shitposters in check.
>> ID: 6a2974 No. 14914 Anonymous
3rd April 2019
Wednesday 10:57 pm

ID: 6a2974
14914 spacer
>>14912
You'd think, wouldn't you?

Personally I'd allow the posts themselves, but replace the word with I'M A MASSIVE BELLEND WHO SHOULD FUCK OFF BACK TO 4CHAN. The ban would remain automatic though.
>> ID: 33a0e6 No. 14915 Anonymous
3rd April 2019
Wednesday 11:02 pm

ID: 33a0e6
14915 spacer
>>14914
> but replace the word with I'M A MASSIVE BELLEND WHO SHOULD FUCK OFF BACK TO 4CHAN
Maybe just replace the entire content of the post with that.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14916 Anonymous
4th April 2019
Thursday 7:04 am

ID: 2082fa
14916 spacer
>>14914>>14915
I thought we'd agreed on kettles?
>> ID: 433625 No. 14917 Anonymous
4th April 2019
Thursday 12:26 pm

ID: 433625
14917 spacer
>>14916

AROUND A KETTLE NEVER SETTLE!
>> ID: 968008 No. 14918 Anonymous
4th April 2019
Thursday 12:46 pm

ID: 968008
14918 spacer
>>14917
AROUND A POT MAKE SURE YOU DON'T GET SHOT.
>> ID: 534a29 No. 14919 Anonymous
6th April 2019
Saturday 12:56 am

ID: 534a29
14919 spacer
Oh, come on, I was just tired and grumpy.
>> ID: 723658 No. 14920 Anonymous
6th April 2019
Saturday 7:52 am

ID: 723658
14920 spacer
AROUND A CAFETIÈRE ALWAYS TAKE CARE
>> ID: 694176 No. 14921 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 7:38 pm

ID: 694176
14921 spacer
Isn't a week long ban for getting around a wordfilter a bit excessive? I'd have thought a one day ban, tops, would suffice.

This isn't ban evasion, either. I'm simply at someone else's house.
>> ID: 33a0e6 No. 14922 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 8:52 pm

ID: 33a0e6
14922 spacer
>>14921
>Isn't a week long ban for getting around a wordfilter a bit excessive?
I'd say you got off rather lightly there.
>> ID: 694176 No. 14923 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 9:20 pm

ID: 694176
14923 spacer
>>14922
Let's face it, the wordfilters are little more than forced memes from the mods. Some of them, such as losing the rhyming from "only a nonce needs a quick response", are objectively poorer than the words they've replaced.
>> ID: 173e15 No. 14924 Anonymous
18th April 2019
Thursday 6:53 am

ID: 173e15
14924 spacer
>>14923

The wordfilters are mostly there to discourage the same tedious discussions of race, chronic masturbators, and fisherman's breakfasts from repeating over and over.
>> ID: 694176 No. 14925 Anonymous
18th April 2019
Thursday 7:40 am

ID: 694176
14925 spacer
>>14924
If that's the case then we need a lot more ones about trannies.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14929 Anonymous
4th May 2019
Saturday 3:58 pm

ID: 2082fa
14929 spacer
I've been banned from /lit/ and I've genuinely no idea what for as the post appears to have been deleted.

>>/lit/6972
>> ID: 63046e No. 14930 Anonymous
4th May 2019
Saturday 4:52 pm

ID: 63046e
14930 spacer
>>14929
The mod didn't leave a report reason, unfortunately. He'll be along, hopefully. Your patronage is important to us. Please hold.
>> ID: 63046e No. 14931 Anonymous
4th May 2019
Saturday 4:59 pm

ID: 63046e
14931 spacer

5084E6E2-3427-4B24-AB96-134DA2BC29E7.png
149311493114931
>>14929
Ah, now I see. Do you remember now? Promise to have a word with yourself and i'll remove it for you.
>> ID: 2082fa No. 14932 Anonymous
4th May 2019
Saturday 5:32 pm

ID: 2082fa
14932 spacer
>>14931
Oh, the feet. I do like the word, though.
>> ID: 27e183 No. 14965 Anonymous
17th May 2019
Friday 7:33 pm

ID: 27e183
14965 spacer

laughing at lelds.png
149651496514965
I'm apparently permabanned for this post (now deleted): http://britfa.gs/spo/res/4917.html#8824

Does something really count as spam if you only post it once? I had no idea ten lines of ASCII was such a mortal sin. /spo/ is on life support anyway, nobody seems to have discussed the footy at all in my absence despite a truly remarkable couple of weeks. Anyway lesson learned, won't happen again etc.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 14967 Anonymous
18th May 2019
Saturday 10:03 am

ID: ec74d0
14967 spacer

qqqqqqqqqqq.png
149671496714967
>>14965
You did a very convincing "random foreign shitposter" act.
>> ID: 45c0dd No. 15038 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 5:35 pm

ID: 45c0dd
15038 spacer
Lad banning me forever because you don't like the word cuck. Even though it made perfect sense in the flow of conversation seems an over reaction. In reality don't you think you are really trying to ban not me but part of yourself.🤔

Also I am not gay, you're gay. And I find your hetronormative micro agreesions of using it as an insult deeply troubling. Particularly in the context of a person who doesn't like the word cuck. Holds a mirror up to itself if you ask me.

Obviously I don't expect you to listen to me given I'm sure everything I say to question your judgement will probably only make you double down on your position. But it would be nice to be let back in at some point.
>> ID: ac35cb No. 15039 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 6:04 pm

ID: ac35cb
15039 spacer

cry_baby_taschentuecher_01.jpg
150391503915039
>>15038
Here you go, lad.
>> ID: f18b3c No. 15040 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 6:30 pm

ID: f18b3c
15040 spacer
>>15038


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm4R32nSo8s
>> ID: 45c0dd No. 15041 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 7:00 pm

ID: 45c0dd
15041 spacer
>>15039

It must be terribly disappointing that you haven't triggered me at all. I can only apologise. Obviously you have some growing up to do.
>> ID: 33a0e6 No. 15042 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 7:08 pm

ID: 33a0e6
15042 spacer
>>15041
You're not fooling anyone, tearylad.
>> ID: 3be52e No. 15043 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 7:42 pm

ID: 3be52e
15043 spacer
>>15038
Foam from his mouth,
Steam from his Ears!
He’s done it, he has,
He’s trolled him to tears!

>> ID: 2c8217 No. 15044 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 8:25 pm

ID: 2c8217
15044 spacer

>> ID: 45c0dd No. 15045 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 8:29 pm

ID: 45c0dd
15045 spacer
Obviously me suggesting perm banning me for saying cuck in a contextual joke might be a bit harsh, is just me being trolled to tears.

Clearly no one wants to discuss it properly, only sneer. Pity I liked this place over the years but obviously that doesn't really matter does it. Time for a new hobby.
>> ID: f18b3c No. 15046 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 8:36 pm

ID: f18b3c
15046 spacer
>>15045
The mods certainly can be unduly harsh and hand out disproportionate punishments at times, but you don't have to be such a fadge about it.
>> ID: b90f68 No. 15047 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 8:38 pm

ID: b90f68
15047 spacer
I know it's not the point of this thread, but I don't understand how people can get like that. .gs has plenty of in house memes and whatever, but imagine if every time you posted you had an uncontrollable compulsion to include one or more of them and not just on .gs, but everywhere you went on the imageboard sphere and perhaps even beyond. It's bloody horrible.
>> ID: f18b3c No. 15048 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 8:41 pm

ID: f18b3c
15048 spacer
>>15047
>It's bloody horrible

That's what made revengelad so dastardly.
>> ID: 3be52e No. 15049 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 8:45 pm

ID: 3be52e
15049 spacer
>>15045
This thread is for ban appeals, supplication and fry ups. Your posts constitute neither, you teary bumder.

Tip yourself into the big cup of tea.
>> ID: 45c0dd No. 15050 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 9:00 pm

ID: 45c0dd
15050 spacer
>>15049

The term 'Appeals' covers disputes of sentencing and points of law. If you don't want people appealing dont call it appealing.
>> ID: 3be52e No. 15051 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 9:42 pm

ID: 3be52e
15051 spacer
>>15050
What a tedious bore you are, Nigel.
>> ID: 33a0e6 No. 15052 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 9:48 pm

ID: 33a0e6
15052 spacer
>>15050
>The term 'Appeals' covers disputes of sentencing and points of law.
Of which, as my honourable and learned friend pointed out, you've made neither of substance.
>> ID: 45c0dd No. 15053 Anonymous
15th September 2019
Sunday 11:54 pm

ID: 45c0dd
15053 spacer
>>15052

Sir I assure you I am highly appealing. What I was doing was entertaining a perspective of an chronic masturbator given the very subject was in discussion as learned men are known to do with a nod and a wink. Unfortunately said nod and a wink function was broken in the posting settings on the site and I fear was taken quite literally.

What I became aware of though due to this misadventure was the use of perm banning which I feel as leaned men it is a mistake to resort to. After all the here rules are uncodified and this seems therefore an unreasonably heavy punishment for a miss step I would happy take a lesser punishment on the chin, but I simply must protest all uses of the perm ban not for that which is a gross violation of the english legal system or automated spamming. And this is the point I protest not the ban for that is a learning experience but permanency allows for no reason. How could one possibly cease to be a silly sausage if one is never permitted the opportunity of growth?
>> ID: cad645 No. 15055 Anonymous
16th September 2019
Monday 1:39 am

ID: cad645
15055 spacer
>>15053

For someone who claims to have been here for years, you sure do write like an outsider. The fact you seemed surprised at a dodgy ban sort of gives the game away too.

If you can't work out how to evade our bans you're not our sort of people anyway.
>> ID: f18b3c No. 15056 Anonymous
16th September 2019
Monday 8:05 am

ID: f18b3c
15056 spacer
His appealing?
More like squealing.
His appealing?
It's appalling.
It's so galling.
It must be a chore, being so bumsore.
Off you fuck, stop being such a bore.
>> ID: b90f68 No. 15057 Anonymous
16th September 2019
Monday 8:24 am

ID: b90f68
15057 spacer
>>15048
Not for me, I mean it must be horrible being like that. I don't really care.
>> ID: a51f79 No. 15058 Anonymous
17th September 2019
Tuesday 12:53 pm

ID: a51f79
15058 spacer
>>15055
>For someone who claims to have been here for years, you sure do write like an outsider
They write like a fucking spastic, if they'd been here for years we'd all be spastics too by now. I think that's how it works, anyway.

"Perm banning" is an entertaining mistake, though.
>> ID: 1e7e5c No. 15059 Anonymous
17th September 2019
Tuesday 1:17 pm

ID: 1e7e5c
15059 spacer

Dierdre Barlow 80s perm glasses.jpg
150591505915059
>>15058
>Perm banning

FREE THE PERM. FREE DEIDRE RASHID.
>> ID: 84d4ac No. 15060 Anonymous
22nd September 2019
Sunday 10:08 am

ID: 84d4ac
15060 spacer
So if a modlad could dial back my permaban for facetious jewbashing that'd be nice. Turns out my IP is static for the foreseeable because virgin are cunts, and if I have to phone post for the rest of my life it will severely degrade the grammatical quality of the website.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 15061 Anonymous
22nd September 2019
Sunday 11:43 am

ID: ec74d0
15061 spacer
>>15060
You'll have to be more specific.
>> ID: ea717c No. 15062 Anonymous
1st October 2019
Tuesday 4:33 am

ID: ea717c
15062 spacer
I think I fully deserved my ban.

I talk a lot of shit when I've been drinking but the truth is these days I havn't run any of my scripts for yonks. I probably could circumvent it if I really wanted. But maybe not. Maybe the IoT has got tighter security these days.

I've got an actual tech job now (for the first time ever, after decades of skiddy shit XD) so I've told myself to behave.

Anyway.

I was a knob and I deserved it. I know we'll never agree on anything but I still like you.
>> ID: cad645 No. 15063 Anonymous
1st October 2019
Tuesday 8:07 pm

ID: cad645
15063 spacer
>>15062

I'm not sure which ban you're on about, were you the paedo or the doxxer?
>> ID: 543456 No. 15064 Anonymous
1st October 2019
Tuesday 8:18 pm

ID: 543456
15064 spacer
>>15062
Blatant Psyops by the mods.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 15065 Anonymous
1st October 2019
Tuesday 9:22 pm

ID: ec74d0
15065 spacer
>>15063
I already removed it.
>> ID: 325b2e No. 15081 Anonymous
7th October 2019
Monday 5:56 am

ID: 325b2e
15081 spacer
>>15063>>15063
Paedo or doxer, fucking hell. I was neither.

Just your regular old me myself and i2 with some drunk and high /pol/ tier posts.
>> ID: a3e772 No. 15082 Anonymous
7th October 2019
Monday 6:00 am

ID: a3e772
15082 spacer
>>15081
Honestly I get it. I was a redboard poster before I ever found this place. I don't really fit in here.

My ban isn't removed by the way. Something about pulled? Leave it there.
>> ID: a3e772 No. 15083 Anonymous
7th October 2019
Monday 6:01 am

ID: a3e772
15083 spacer
>>15082
>pulled
This fucking phone. Meant pielad.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password