[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
dandy

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 4736)
Message
File  []
close
trousers-MAIN_1519892a.jpg
473647364736
>> No. 4736 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 8:06 pm
4736 Trousers
I am 6 ft and of a normal skinny build but I find that when I buy black trousers for work I always feel that the crotch is way too low and looks weird.

I don't have this problem with jeans.

If you look at the attached picture the trousers in the top row seem strange to me. The bottom left seems a little more acceptable but still slightly too low for my liking.

Does anyone know of a specific brand of trouser or shop that would sell something with a decent crotch level?

Or am I just obsessing too much?
Expand all images.
>> No. 4737 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 8:10 pm
4737 spacer
>>4736

Normal or skinny build? Not the same thing. You are obsessing too much and trousers generally have a taller waist than jeans which sit on the hips, sometimes very low. Formal trousers are generally made correctly for the material, fit, use and movement.

Unless you are a skinny girl with no willy.
>> No. 4739 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 8:52 pm
4739 spacer
>>4737

Normal more than skinny.

It just looks weird. If your knob doesn't go down that far there is no need for the crotch to.
>> No. 4740 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 9:01 pm
4740 spacer
>>4739

> If your knob doesn't go down that far

It is your wife I feel sorry for.
>> No. 4741 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 9:12 pm
4741 spacer
>>4739

Admitting you have a tiny penis on the internet. That's pretty bad, considering.
>> No. 4742 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 9:28 pm
4742 spacer
>>4741

I don't. But flaccid it ain't 8 inches long so there is no need for a crotch by me knees.
>> No. 4743 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 9:34 pm
4743 spacer
>>4742

You poor thing. you might as well chop it off with a pair of scissors and have done with it.
>> No. 4744 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 9:41 pm
4744 spacer
>>4742
>flaccid it ain't 8 inches long
Lad. You wanna take this to /emo/? We're there for you.
>> No. 4745 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 9:43 pm
4745 spacer
Sounds like this is the kind of guy who if he was shaving his pubes he'd have to do it while peeing so he didn't cut the wrong strand off.
>> No. 4746 Anonymous
25th November 2013
Monday 10:07 pm
4746 spacer
>>4736

Reiss do ball hugging trousers if that's your bag mate. Try them on first though eh? They usually have decent discounts in the sales too and every shop will have a "Sale Rail".
>> No. 4747 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 7:50 am
4747 spacer

Twitter-realrickyhatton-Me-wearing-flintoff11-jac-.png
474747474747
Sounds like OP needs proper clothes for proper blokes.
>> No. 4748 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 4:49 pm
4748 spacer
Skinnylad with kinda opposite problem, where can I get pants (underwear I mean I'm no yanklad) that have small waist size but aren't tight as hell around the crotch? I mean I'm fairly sure that waist size and penis size are independent variables but clothes companies don't seem to realise this...
>> No. 4749 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 4:53 pm
4749 spacer
>>4748

>I mean I'm fairly sure that waist size and penis size are independent variables

Then you would be wrong.
>> No. 4750 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 4:54 pm
4750 spacer
Fatcunt here. Hung like a donkey.
>> No. 4751 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 4:56 pm
4751 spacer
>>4750

But when did you last see it, eh?
>> No. 4752 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 7:53 pm
4752 spacer
>>4749
If we're discounting people under the age of 18, how are they in any way connected?
>> No. 4753 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 7:59 pm
4753 spacer
>>4752

They are. Not in a linear fashion, but they are.
>> No. 4754 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 8:53 pm
4754 spacer
>>4752
By your pubic bone, technically.
>> No. 4755 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 8:58 pm
4755 spacer
>>4753
and your evidence for this is...?
>> No. 4756 Anonymous
26th November 2013
Tuesday 9:04 pm
4756 spacer
>>4755

Knowing women.
>> No. 4759 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 7:51 am
4759 spacer
>>4753
So I should get fatter to enlarge my Jeremy Johnson. Right.
>> No. 4760 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 4:30 pm
4760 spacer
>>4759

Just ignore him
>> No. 4761 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 4:32 pm
4761 spacer
>>4759
It seems more reasonable that he'd be suggesting the opposite.
>> No. 4767 Anonymous
1st January 2014
Wednesday 4:30 am
4767 spacer
>>4761
That is correct. I'm not him, but I've heard that as you get more rotund, the fatty tissue around the base of the penis can expand to the point where your John Thomas is smaller in practice, if not in theory.

"I've heard".
>> No. 4768 Anonymous
1st January 2014
Wednesday 5:52 am
4768 spacer
The distance from waistband to crotch is called the rise. Trousers cut to be worn at the waist will have a considerably greater rise than those worn at the hip. If you're after low rise trousers, you want to be shopping somewhere young and trendy - H&M, Topman, Zara et al.

Also, black is a faux pas if you're not a waiter or a funeral director. Unless your work dress code strictly requires black trousers, go for navy or charcoal instead.
>> No. 4769 Anonymous
1st January 2014
Wednesday 4:54 pm
4769 spacer
>>4756
Unless you are personal friends with Jordan I doubt the sample size is statistically significant

>n=3, subject was sampled 3 times
>> No. 4770 Anonymous
2nd January 2014
Thursday 9:23 am
4770 spacer
>>4768

>Also, black is a faux pas if you're not a waiter or a funeral director.

Funny that so many people who work wear black trousers. I do, only because virtually every male I have worked with does. I am trying to branch out though.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password