[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
food

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 13834)
Message
File  []
Embed  
close
lionel-richtea.jpg
138341383413834
>> No. 13834 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 8:18 pm
13834 spacer
What's happened to chocolate rich tea biscuits? I can't find them anywhere.
Expand all images.
>> No. 13835 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 8:22 pm
13835 spacer
Same reason Uncle Ben's is now known as Ben's Original; corporate pandering to BLM because they believe it's good PR.
>> No. 13836 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 8:41 pm
13836 spacer
>>13835
Being as angry as you are all the time must be exhausting.
>> No. 13837 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 8:49 pm
13837 spacer
>>13836
What?
>> No. 13838 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 9:12 pm
13838 spacer
There's no such thing, if there were I'd be morbidly obese.

>>13837
He was saying you're an arsehole.
>> No. 13839 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 9:33 pm
13839 spacer
>>13838
>He was saying you're an arsehole.

I'd have thought that would have been given.
>> No. 13840 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 10:14 pm
13840 spacer

front_en.7.full[1].jpg
138401384013840
>>13838
>There's no such thing, if there were I'd be morbidly obese.

Dare you image search "chocolate rich tea biscuits"?
And even if they didn't exist, those Liebnitz things are very similar to the things wot do very much exist.
>> No. 13841 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 12:20 pm
13841 spacer
>>13840
SHOULD they exist though? I think that's a reasonable debate.
>> No. 13842 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 1:01 pm
13842 spacer
>>13841

Yes, and no it isn't.
>> No. 13843 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 2:19 pm
13843 spacer
>>13841
Rich tea biscuits are sick of being debated by people like you for simply existing. It's not a game, you're talking about real life biscuits here.
>> No. 13844 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 2:24 pm
13844 spacer
>>13843
This is CULTURAL APPROPRIATION.

Digestives are the only reasonable chocolate biscuit. It's bad enough that the HOB NOB guys have decided to get in on the game, but rich tea is too much.

DIGESTIVES MATTER.
>> No. 13845 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 2:35 pm
13845 spacer
>>13844
Also 'biccy' is not a slur. Just because people don't use it when referring to Jaffa Cakes doesn't mean it's a biscophobic term of abuse.

What even is the difference between digestives and rich tea anyway? Can we stop with the ridiculous biscuitical correctness and just start admitting that they are the same?
>> No. 13846 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 2:49 pm
13846 spacer
>>13845
I don't trust Digestives. They make up only a fifth of the biscuits shelf space, but account for 90% of all biscuit sales.

Don't even get me started on Jaffa Cakes, who are "biscuits" only when it suits them.
>> No. 13847 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 2:49 pm
13847 spacer
>>13845

That's despicable erasure of the unique and distinctive digestive culture.
>> No. 13848 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 3:18 pm
13848 spacer
>>13846
What about jaffa lollies?

https://groceries.morrisons.com/products/morrisons-jaffa-chocolate-orange-lollies-317638011
>> No. 13849 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 6:06 pm
13849 spacer
>>13834
Is this meant to be Paddy McGuiness?
>> No. 13850 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 7:27 pm
13850 spacer
>>13849
It's Benedict McVitiesbatch
>> No. 13851 Anonymous
28th September 2020
Monday 11:19 pm
13851 spacer

factory-cartoon-wafer-biscuit-machine-biscuits-obl.png
138511385113851
>>13849
This is him. Pretty, but a cartoon wafer of a biscuit and therefore unsatisfying.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password