[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
food

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 12855)
Message
File  []
close
c7e3084a0b6b0c7b9f090980dfbf790f.png
128551285512855
>> No. 12855 Anonymous
18th November 2018
Sunday 3:06 pm
12855 spacer
Cooking instructions are maddeningly verbose to me. I just read an article on how to cook rice that somehow stretched to 200 words, when it could have been summarised in "rinse if you want to, cover it with water in a lidded pot and boil it until it's soft".

Are there any decent websites that just tell you, stick X in gredient in Y pan for Z minutes? What's the cooking equivalent of a Hayne's manual?
Expand all images.
>> No. 12856 Anonymous
18th November 2018
Sunday 3:13 pm
12856 spacer
Cooking blogs have to write an entire article about the recipe, as a small list of ingredients and a method alone would tank their search engine prioritisation. Google doesn't seem to like to push 'low effort' webpages, which is what the algorithms see a recipe alone as.

I've never seen one of these sites that doesn't, somewhere on the page, display said simple list of ingredients and a step-by-step list of the method.
>> No. 12857 Anonymous
18th November 2018
Sunday 5:33 pm
12857 spacer
>>12855
Haynes do cookbooks, m8.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password