[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BOO!

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 4521)
Message
File  []
close
they said i was crazy.jpg
452145214521
>> No. 4521 Anonymous
10th July 2018
Tuesday 12:27 pm
4521 PIZZAGATE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBtAWquCFqo

I believe him.

I expect the reputation management crew to be here any minute.
Expand all images.
>> No. 4522 Anonymous
10th July 2018
Tuesday 12:32 pm
4522 spacer
18 minutes long? Fucks sake, someone condense this for me
>> No. 4523 Anonymous
10th July 2018
Tuesday 1:06 pm
4523 spacer
>>4522
I thought that too. The first few minutes are just audio, if you want the gist skip till the talking head bit pops up then give it five minutes and you'll be up to speed.
>> No. 4524 Anonymous
10th July 2018
Tuesday 1:17 pm
4524 spacer
He is incoherent and is assuming we know or care about whatever the backstory is behind his complaints already. I know who Bill Maloney is, a child abuse obsessed filmmaker who seems to have backed the wrong horse a few times now. I don't know what Mr Harvey is trying to say here but it seems clear he has spent too much time trawling weird online shit and doesn't like the coppers much. Please OP, a summary.
>> No. 4525 Anonymous
10th July 2018
Tuesday 4:45 pm
4525 spacer
I assume it is related to this which is a bit more coherant


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_bJlnp-pRs

It seems to be he feels he was phone hacked, has proof of it, and no one seems to care.

There also seems to be some element about setting him up in ways to discredit him.
>> No. 4526 Anonymous
10th July 2018
Tuesday 6:53 pm
4526 spacer

Screenshot_20180710-185231.png
452645264526
>>4525
Thanks Brian.
>> No. 4527 Anonymous
10th July 2018
Tuesday 7:12 pm
4527 spacer
>>4525
>It seems to be he feels he was phone hacked, has proof of it, and no one seems to care.

>There also seems to be some element about setting him up in ways to discredit him.

Also he goes on about child abuse by music industry figures in a lot of his videos and mentions Tom Watkins quite a lot...
>> No. 4528 Anonymous
13th July 2018
Friday 9:37 pm
4528 spacer
skip to 11 minutes 40 in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIWJRxpp4jU
>> No. 4539 Anonymous
30th July 2018
Monday 6:47 pm
4539 spacer
Well he's proved he's not on drugs, as that's what some online commentators have said.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxYzgFirCkg

I guess they'll just stick with crazy now.
>> No. 4540 Anonymous
31st July 2018
Tuesday 4:30 am
4540 spacer
>>4539
Remember that we're talking about a man who somehow managed to run himself over with a car from the driving seat.
>> No. 4541 Anonymous
31st July 2018
Tuesday 3:02 pm
4541 spacer
>>4540
Can you honestly tell me you don't think Tom Watkins is a masonic pedo?
>> No. 4545 Anonymous
31st July 2018
Tuesday 4:02 pm
4545 spacer
>>4541

I hadn't had cause to think about Tom Watkins for years but since it turned out B2K and NSYNC were getting molested, it seems pretty obvious.
>> No. 4546 Anonymous
31st July 2018
Tuesday 4:03 pm
4546 spacer
He's making Danniella Westbrook look like the sensible one.
>> No. 4549 Anonymous
31st July 2018
Tuesday 6:28 pm
4549 spacer
>>4540

I think he must have hit his head. Hard.
>> No. 4553 Anonymous
31st July 2018
Tuesday 8:59 pm
4553 spacer
>>4540
>>4546
>>4549
Ok, lovely ad homs lads.

Now pick specifics of what he is saying that you think are untrue. I'll wait.
>> No. 4558 Anonymous
31st July 2018
Tuesday 9:13 pm
4558 spacer
>>4553

All of it, because there's no evidence. That's how the burden of proof works.
>> No. 4571 Anonymous
1st August 2018
Wednesday 12:30 pm
4571 spacer
>>4558

That's what I find a bit strange about historical sex crimes going to court, when the only people in the world who know what happened are the two people who were in that room.
>> No. 4572 Anonymous
1st August 2018
Wednesday 2:36 pm
4572 spacer
>>4558
>All of it, because there's no evidence. That's how the burden of proof works.
Nice avoiding of the question, masonlad.

Try again.
>> No. 4582 Anonymous
1st August 2018
Wednesday 7:12 pm
4582 spacer
>>4572
>masonlad
U fucking wot?
>> No. 4583 Anonymous
1st August 2018
Wednesday 8:00 pm
4583 spacer
>>4572
He didn't avoid the question. To wit, he not only answered the question, but explained his rationale too.
>> No. 4584 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 4:45 am
4584 spacer
>>4583
I asked him to pick something specific. He said "all of it". That's about as unspecific as it gets.
>> No. 4585 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 9:22 am
4585 spacer
>>4584

I believe they are asking for you to provide evidence for any of it.

Brian Harvey's delivery is hysterical in the non comedic sense. It makes it feel like it is more trouble than it is worth to decipher why he believes what he believes, and that he lacks mental capacity.
>> No. 4586 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 9:31 am
4586 spacer
>>4584

If he doesn't believe any of what he's saying, then that's the most accurate response possible. Why cherry pick statements when you think the entire thing is bollocks?
>> No. 4588 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 1:20 pm
4588 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgsIzMDL3H8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ms1FEU9FRk8
>> No. 4589 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 3:46 pm
4589 spacer
>>4588
Came here to post this, very glad to see someone beat me to it.
>> No. 4590 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 4:14 pm
4590 spacer
>>4588

"I'm really confused, man." - Brian Harvey

Seriously, I feel sorry for the bloke. He's clearly not in a good place mentally and he's got caught up in an internet shit pit that's just making everything worse. He's stuck in a cycle of paranoia -> feeding the trolls -> getting trolled -> paranoia and he has no obvious route out. The whole situation is just very sad.
>> No. 4591 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 6:27 pm
4591 spacer

tom2.png
459145914591
I wouldn't hesitate to believe Tom Watkins molested bands. I mean look at him. Doesn't the narrator strongly imply it at 3:34 here?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HroCwMkTsm4
>> No. 4592 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 6:38 pm
4592 spacer
I keep wanting to call him Tom Watson though and thinking

>Tut tut. Tom Watson shouldn't have molested East 17.
>> No. 4593 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 6:40 pm
4593 spacer
Speaking of which, why is "Stay Another Day" a Christmas song? The lyrics don't mention anything about Christmas at all.
>> No. 4595 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 7:05 pm
4595 spacer
>>4593
It was Christmas #1, has "Christmas bells" at the end and snow is falling in the video.
>> No. 4597 Anonymous
2nd August 2018
Thursday 8:16 pm
4597 spacer
>>4592
No he's keeping them safe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4oNjTuTz-8
>> No. 4598 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 7:08 am
4598 spacer
>>4595

Snow wasn't falling in the first version of the video and Eminem's Stan was Christmas number one too.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykEOf0m5eeQ
>> No. 4599 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 7:18 am
4599 spacer
>>4593

YouGov has taken this question rather seriously.

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2017/12/14/stay-another-day-christmas-song/
>> No. 4600 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 10:46 am
4600 spacer
>>4599
Not seriously enough to avoid posting a completely contradictory article that mixes up the survey answers and the percentages they received.
>> No. 4601 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 3:13 pm
4601 spacer
>>4590
You must have not watched the videos. It's not paranoia when the cops come round and tell you your life is in danger.
>> No. 4602 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 3:23 pm
4602 spacer
>>4601

The assumption is this is someone who has seen his youtube videos and is messing about. How else would the coppers know about a death thread before him? If you genuinely intend to threaten someone you typically contact the victim.
>> No. 4603 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 3:31 pm
4603 spacer
>>4602
What, so they can take steps to avoid you killing them? That seems ill-advised.
>> No. 4604 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 3:33 pm
4604 spacer
>>4602

Wasting police time seems like a risky method of trolling. Would they have done a CrimeStoppers anonymous tip or something?

My other thought was what if Brian, or one of his friends, called the police so he could make that video and get more credibility, but he's an Oscar-worthy actor if so.
>> No. 4605 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 3:35 pm
4605 spacer
>>4601

It's a big jump "someone, somewhere has made a death threat against me" to "Rupert Murdoch is trying to kill me". Osman warnings are issued to all sorts of people for all sorts of reasons, but they're mostly in relation to stalking and drug gangs. The Met issue hundreds of such warnings every year. They're essentially an arse-covering measure, used when the police have some information that a threat has been made, but lack sufficient evidence to arrest or charge anyone.

I'm not much of a Bayesian, but what do you reckon the odds are of "a massive conspiracy to silence someone that has somehow completely failed to silence them" versus "a nutter on the internet has made a death threat against someone who used to be in a boy band"? How are those probabilities affected by the prior knowledge that the former boy band member in question spends a large proportion of their time talking to nutters on the internet?
>> No. 4606 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 3:35 pm
4606 spacer
>>4603

Less ill-advised than telling the police to tell the victim. Aren't death threats normally more about intimidation?
>> No. 4607 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 3:39 pm
4607 spacer
>>4605


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lERwKaKZ6RA

He said he's on benefits for mental health issues on his newest video at 2:53.
>> No. 4608 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 3:52 pm
4608 spacer
>>4604

>Wasting police time seems like a risky method of trolling.

It's also an extremely popular method, as evidenced by the epidemic of swatting. If you stream on Twitch, having your house raided by armed police is practically a rite of passage.

If you have tens or hundreds of thousands of followers online, it's a near-certainty that some proportion of those followers are seriously mentally ill in a way that poses a danger to others. If your followers are disproportionately likely to hold eccentric or paranoid beliefs, those odds drastically increase.

Most public figures take certain steps to protect themselves. The world contains a surprisingly large number of people who think that the CIA is sending them secret messages via the football results, or that Emily Maitlis is being held hostage by the BBC and is asking to be rescued by blinking messages in morse code. The accessibility of social media erodes many of the barriers used by public figures to insulate themselves from the more disturbed and dangerous elements of the general public.
>> No. 4609 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 5:13 pm
4609 spacer
>>4606
Normally the problem is other people finding out and telling the police.
>> No. 4610 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 11:21 pm
4610 spacer
I notice those coppers who showed up to tell him about the death threats never displayed their officer numbers.
>> No. 4611 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 11:26 pm
4611 spacer
>>4610
The one of the left definitely did and had his rank and surname embroidered on his chest.
>> No. 4612 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 11:26 pm
4612 spacer
>>4610

You can see Beardy's numbers there on his shoulder in literally the first two seconds of the video, and throughout the rest - you can't make them out though on camera because he's been made to stand two meters back behind a bin.
>> No. 4613 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 11:27 pm
4613 spacer
>>4610
What are you on about you mental. They were never asked to display their numbers.
>> No. 4614 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 11:43 pm
4614 spacer
Anyone else find it funny that when the coppers came round to tell him of the death threat they also warned him he was not allowed to defend himself and would be dealt with "according with the law" if he even attempted to?

I suppose that's what they do for all of these kinds of things but it still seems funny. And not funny haha.
>> No. 4615 Anonymous
3rd August 2018
Friday 11:59 pm
4615 spacer
>>4614

They didn't do that. They explained at length that he has the legal right to defend himself. They said that he didn't have the right to do anything that would be illegal anyway, e.g. walking about in the street with a sword.
>> No. 4616 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 12:23 am
4616 spacer
>>4614
Are people posting in this thread without watching the video?
>> No. 4617 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 12:46 am
4617 spacer
>>4614

It's amazing that you had the exact same reaction as Harvey did, yet even he managed to understand what they were saying once they clarified it for him.

Try harder, mate.
>> No. 4618 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 8:27 am
4618 spacer

Capture5.png
461846184618
>>4610
>>4611
>>4612

The people in the chat of his next video thought they were fake police.
>> No. 4619 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 10:55 am
4619 spacer
Do we know exactly what he tweeted to be charged with malicious communications?
>> No. 4620 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 1:38 pm
4620 spacer
I just know it involves Ian Puddick who sounds like another um... character.

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Ian_Puddick
>> No. 4621 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 1:47 pm
4621 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiCRvH_ZvU4
>> No. 4622 Anonymous
4th August 2018
Saturday 2:15 pm
4622 spacer
>>4621

That's actually a really good track. It's a shame it's about this conspiracy shite.
>> No. 4623 Anonymous
5th August 2018
Sunday 1:11 am
4623 spacer
I think he has spent too many late nights smoking dope and reading conspiracy sites.
>> No. 4624 Anonymous
5th August 2018
Sunday 3:07 am
4624 spacer
>>4623
> I think he has spent too many late nights smoking dope and reading conspiracy sites.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxYzgFirCkg
>> No. 4627 Anonymous
6th August 2018
Monday 4:02 pm
4627 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JC6cngPy6Ws
>> No. 4642 Anonymous
15th August 2018
Wednesday 5:20 pm
4642 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWLdJZLrYw4
>> No. 4661 Anonymous
19th August 2018
Sunday 4:06 am
4661 spacer

tom.png
466146614661
>>4592
>>4597
>> No. 4662 Anonymous
19th August 2018
Sunday 11:59 am
4662 spacer
Would it be unethical to feed him .gs memes to see if he talks about them in videos?

At the very least we should get him in touch with ARE emily.
>> No. 4663 Anonymous
19th August 2018
Sunday 12:09 pm
4663 spacer
>>4662

How? His twitter's gone and he seems to completely ignore the chat on his live videos and his comments are disabled.
>> No. 4664 Anonymous
19th August 2018
Sunday 12:15 pm
4664 spacer
>>4663

Send him a letter.
>> No. 4668 Anonymous
19th August 2018
Sunday 1:06 pm
4668 spacer
>>4642

I'm pretty convinced this is a performance art piece at this point.
>> No. 4669 Anonymous
19th August 2018
Sunday 5:22 pm
4669 spacer
>>4663
He listens to the discussion on his channel page.

People wartned him about not using the computers he got back from the coppers (I believe someone brought him up to speed on air gapped malware) and he has listened and is doing exactly that as his latest videos show.
>> No. 4670 Anonymous
19th August 2018
Sunday 6:08 pm
4670 spacer
>>4669

You sound like you really believe the coppers are out to get him?

It must be nice to believe the Met are competent enough to be part of any sort of conspiracy. In my experience they just handcuff you to a wheely bin and kick the fuck out of you.
>> No. 4705 Anonymous
7th November 2018
Wednesday 12:35 pm
4705 spacer
He;s gone all quiet on youtube and disabled all ways to comment there (even on his account page). I think the frighteners might finally have been beaten into him.
>> No. 4706 Anonymous
7th November 2018
Wednesday 1:02 pm
4706 spacer
>>4705

Or he's finally got the help that he so clearly needs.
>> No. 4707 Anonymous
7th November 2018
Wednesday 3:59 pm
4707 spacer
>>4705

He's on twitter. He's disabled it repeatedly, so google doesn't find it very easily.

https://twitter.com/W2WE17
>> No. 4708 Anonymous
7th November 2018
Wednesday 4:02 pm
4708 spacer
>>4705

He first went very quiet in the run up to his court case, which got thrown out. I seem to remember him saying his solicitor told him to shut up and thought maybe Brian continued seeing that as good advice thereafter.
>> No. 4709 Anonymous
7th November 2018
Wednesday 5:55 pm
4709 spacer
>>4670
> In my experience they just handcuff you to a wheely bin and kick the fuck out of you.

Paddington Green mob?
>> No. 4722 Anonymous
11th January 2019
Friday 9:20 am
4722 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzGe1fxhcic
>> No. 4747 Anonymous
22nd March 2019
Friday 5:17 am
4747 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5ZczRHoVJ4
>> No. 4759 Anonymous
27th March 2019
Wednesday 2:58 pm
4759 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qyn-AK93SJQ
>> No. 4760 Anonymous
27th March 2019
Wednesday 5:39 pm
4760 spacer
>>4759
His box has gone.
>> No. 4761 Anonymous
28th March 2019
Thursday 5:47 am
4761 spacer
I can believe Tom Watkins raped a member of East 17 and that Brian got his phone hacked but I don't know how that relates to paedophiles, Ian Puddick, Bill Maloney etc. I wish he would do that dot-connecting video he promised.
>> No. 4762 Anonymous
28th March 2019
Thursday 1:58 pm
4762 spacer
>>4761

That's schizophrenia for you m8. Too many joins, not enough dots.
>> No. 4763 Anonymous
6th April 2019
Saturday 8:21 pm
4763 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9Q4no67X4k
>> No. 4764 Anonymous
6th April 2019
Saturday 9:07 pm
4764 spacer

bh.png
476447644764
>>4762

I thought the problem might just be he's not very articulate and doesn't put all the information out in one place, but his reasoning at about 16 minutes here makes my head spin.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiPIRY4nes4
>> No. 4765 Anonymous
15th April 2019
Monday 6:42 am
4765 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIb2N0fbk1s
>> No. 4766 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 12:59 am
4766 spacer
Can someone give me a TL;DR, because I can't be arsed watching all these videos but I'm dead curious.

Is it just another ex-celecrity losing his marbles?
>> No. 4767 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 1:56 am
4767 spacer
>>4766

I would if I could it is too incoherant to work out, something about himself believing he was a victim of the phone hacking scandal but no one doing anything about it mostly.
>> No. 4768 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 2:04 am
4768 spacer
>>4766

*>Is it just another ex-celecrity losing his marbles?*

Pretty much, yeah. He has a history of serious mental illness going back to at least 2005, possibly related to his prodigious drug and alcohol use when he was at the height of his fame. Things seem to have come to a head over the last few years and he has been repeatedly hospitalised. It's all rather sad.

He thinks that there's some sort of conspiracy involving the music industry and the police, he keeps making malicious communications online which he keeps getting arrested for, so it just goes round and round in a cycle of paranoia and police involvement, stoked by an internet mob of conspiracy theorists.

https://www.nme.com/news/music/east-17-2-1208376
>> No. 4769 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 8:04 am
4769 spacer
Stolen from http://goodf.forumotion.com/t1611-brian-harvey

>I was hoping he would put up a video laying out the complicated time line ,
>but here goes,
>He bought a case against the news of the World for the phone hacking thing.
>His solicitor, won his case but kept back some documents that Proved far worse than hacking,
>Phone TAPPING !!!!
>forward a few years, and he is helping Bill maloney ( Bill maloney -- truth for Money , part of the Truther Industrial Complex )
>interview Andrew Ash. Abuse Victim,
>He is the one that accused Edwina Curry, of inviting him to lick her curry pot.
>( My apologies )
>During the Interview , Andrew Ash was read out a List of names of people who had participated in these Corrupt parties, involving sex with those underage..
>BILL Baloney Added the name of Harveys EX Solicitor to the list ,
>Knowing that if Harvey Named him there was absolute Proof that he was in fact Innocent.

>Brian Harvey says the reason for them SETTING him UP is because of the Evidence he now has , that the solicitor held Back to protect the news of the World
>Phone Tapping, ( a much greater crime than Hacking someones voice mail aparently )
>and a CRIME on the Part of richard mallet the solicitor.

>Around the time that Harvey made the Videotaped interview of andrew ash , Ian Puddick , gave him the money to Buy a high quality Video recorder. ( a Ninja ) 500 QUID;
>Later Brian has found DIRECT links between Puddick and the people who Phone Tapped him origially.
>He claims they are
>ALL in it together.
>( wouldnt surprise me )
>As I said it's complicated. but Brian sounds like an honest guy to me.
>> No. 4770 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 8:27 am
4770 spacer
>>4769

I'm not trawling through all of his videos to find it but he keeps waving around a screenshot of a tweet by Ian Puddick saying the police force used to be great and his dad was counter-terrorism. Brian thinks that discredits Ian's story he went to the papers about that he owned a plumbing company and his wife had an affair with someone very high-profile and then he got persecuted by counter-terrorism. He hasn't considered that Ian might be a lying attention whore.

He says counter-terrorism were also investigating the phone hacking thing as royals got hacked.

Last time he was in hospital voluntarily, he was allowed to come and go and he and family members were taking turns tending to his dogs. He came home and a dog had pissed and shit on the kitchen floor then was locked in its crate it couldn't have got locked in itself and all of his family members said they hadn't been there that day and he feels someone broke in his house to mess with him and only counter-terrorism has the power to do that. I didn't know the counter-terrorism job-description includes coercing dogs to piss and shit on kitchen floors.

He said he could see people watching him from across the road and has a screenshot from Zoopla saying the property was empty at the time so feels that was the authorities.
>> No. 4771 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 8:51 am
4771 spacer
This is a bit shorter.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXbm8DwQqYI
>> No. 4772 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 9:09 am
4772 spacer
I keep feeling like this might have some merit if only he would put all the information in one place, like on a blog or something.
>> No. 4773 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 3:12 pm
4773 spacer
He's posted 11 videos today and is live-streaming again now.
>> No. 4774 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 3:39 pm
4774 spacer
What is this schizophrenic garbage?
>> No. 4775 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 4:02 pm
4775 spacer
>>4774

Brian Harvey made the news by posting a startling string of videos but if you're asking what he's claiming exactly, it's too convoluted to easily tell.
>> No. 4776 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 5:31 pm
4776 spacer
>>4774
Basically he has been stitched up like a kipper by the masons/paedolads in the entertainment industry.

He's tried to bring it to light, and has got shut the fuck down and labelled mad by anyone and everyone.

This, in its turn, is sending him genuinely mad.
>> No. 4777 Anonymous
17th April 2019
Wednesday 5:41 pm
4777 spacer
>>4776

He ran himself over in his own car in 2005, supposedly because he had eaten too many baked potatoes. Harvey's psychological problems are not new.
>> No. 4788 Anonymous
18th April 2019
Thursday 3:13 pm
4788 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThOzJ09wYLg
>> No. 4800 Anonymous
24th April 2019
Wednesday 1:50 am
4800 spacer
I thought that was a tin-foil hat.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fESq5xcEzqU
>> No. 4801 Anonymous
8th May 2019
Wednesday 7:39 am
4801 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJBbEqIFh7Q
>> No. 4802 Anonymous
8th May 2019
Wednesday 1:09 pm
4802 spacer
>>4801

Is he trying to get a copyright strike?
>> No. 4803 Anonymous
8th May 2019
Wednesday 2:58 pm
4803 spacer
>>4802

If he did, it would plainly be Rupert Murdoch in collusion with the police and YouTube causing his copyright strike. He made a diss song to his trolls using D12's Shit On You instrumental and it's completely disappeared now so I'd guess that was a copyright thing.
>> No. 4804 Anonymous
15th June 2019
Saturday 11:25 pm
4804 spacer
>>4803


>> No. 4805 Anonymous
18th June 2019
Tuesday 6:41 am
4805 spacer

>> No. 4806 Anonymous
18th June 2019
Tuesday 7:52 am
4806 spacer
>>4805

Definitely a good use of one's time to make diss songs about a youtuber with 211 subscribers.
>> No. 4807 Anonymous
18th June 2019
Tuesday 9:28 am
4807 spacer
>>4806
Before the song was released they had 213 subscribers.
>> No. 4808 Anonymous
25th June 2019
Tuesday 4:37 pm
4808 spacer

>> No. 4824 Anonymous
8th July 2019
Monday 6:11 am
4824 spacer

>> No. 4827 Anonymous
31st July 2019
Wednesday 9:54 am
4827 spacer
>>4521

He's less bald?


>> No. 4828 Anonymous
31st July 2019
Wednesday 11:28 am
4828 spacer
>>4827 > That background musics fucking annoying
>> No. 4829 Anonymous
2nd August 2019
Friday 6:26 pm
4829 spacer
Sounds like a plan.


>> No. 4830 Anonymous
9th August 2019
Friday 3:16 pm
4830 spacer

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password