[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BOO!

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 4326)
Message
File  []
close
fourhundredthousand huge Ds.jpg
432643264326
>> No. 4326 Anonymous
2nd March 2016
Wednesday 4:23 pm
4326 spacer
https://tompride.wordpress.com/2016/03/01/uk-courts-allow-cover-up-of-eton-child-porn-criminal-to-protect-his-wealthy-family/

>UK courts have allowed an Eton schoolboy to use a false name to protect his wealthy family from scandal.

>Andrew Picard managed to escape jail time despite being convicted of creating and distributing sickening child pornography involving children as young as 2 years old.

>But Picard’s real name is Andrew Boeckman – Picard is his mother’s maiden name.

>Boeckman’s father is extremely wealthy lawyer-to-the-bankers Philip J Boeckman. But almost all references to the name Boeckman in connection with the case have been deleted from the internet – presumably under threat of legal action.


How often do these cover ups happen?
Expand all images.
>> No. 4327 Anonymous
2nd March 2016
Wednesday 4:29 pm
4327 spacer
>>4326
If this is true, then the court will have allowed it by order and you would be breaking the law by repeating it.
>> No. 4328 Anonymous
2nd March 2016
Wednesday 4:48 pm
4328 spacer
>>4326
Money wins.
>> No. 4329 Anonymous
2nd March 2016
Wednesday 5:12 pm
4329 spacer
Don't see the issue here really. At least his lawyers had the sense to request it.
>> No. 4330 Anonymous
2nd March 2016
Wednesday 5:21 pm
4330 spacer
It's not just money, it's reputation. If this had happened with a family from a council estate I doubt the judge would have been moved by their pleas for anonymity until they were firebombed from their home.

What's worse is I can't imagine a serious scenario in which the family is even vaguely culpable for their son's actions, but this kind of special treatment makes them look slimier than I'd believe they are if they just had the noncy son.

Class gets you so much for free in this damnable country, it's ghastly.
>> No. 4331 Anonymous
2nd March 2016
Wednesday 5:35 pm
4331 spacer
>>4329
Do we know that they requested it? Normally, the name you're charged under is the name you're arrested under. It may be that he became known to the police under that name and it stuck. Certainly I've known people known by different parts of their name depending on what they're doing. An old boss of mine used her maiden name professionally and her married name for personal purposes. (Understandable when you live in Wales and your married name is Jones.) Then there's that notorious tax dodger the IRS has been chasing by the name of Alexander de Pfeffel Johnson.
>> No. 4332 Anonymous
2nd March 2016
Wednesday 5:42 pm
4332 spacer
>>4331
Giving a false name to the police is illegal.

>>4330
"I can't imagine" is not a valid argument. This article is clearly emotionally motivated, the reasoning the court had would be worth looking at were it out there, as would the prospensity of this happening in other cases.
>> No. 4333 Anonymous
2nd March 2016
Wednesday 5:44 pm
4333 spacer
>>4330
> I can't imagine a serious scenario in which the family is even vaguely culpable for their son's actions

Not saying this is necessarily the case, but in a lot of rich families the children don't always have the best upbringing, with expensive toys and boarding schools replacing actual affection from parents too busy with their high-flying careers. I don't think it's a massive leap to suggest lack of parental affection can lead a child to have skewed views of love and relationships when they grow up.

Again, not saying this is necessarily the case - but it's entirely within the realm of possibility that they would be at least 'vaguely culpable' as you put it.
>> No. 4334 Anonymous
2nd March 2016
Wednesday 6:01 pm
4334 spacer
>>4332
>Giving a false name to the police is illegal.
No, it's not. Unless of course this chap was stopped in relation to anti-social behaviour, evading a train fare, or a traffic offence, then he could have perfectly legally given any name he liked, or none at all.
>> No. 4335 Anonymous
4th March 2016
Friday 9:56 pm
4335 spacer
>>4326 The DM covered it and hasn't taken it down:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3291869/Eton-College-student-caught-2-000-indecent-images-children-computer-encouraged-youngsters-strip-webcam.html

In fact, google was full of links.
>> No. 4336 Anonymous
4th March 2016
Friday 10:13 pm
4336 spacer
Captain Picard is never a good sign.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password