[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BOO!

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 2890)
Message
File  []
close
I_wonder_what_boo_would_make_of_this.jpg
289028902890
>> No. 2890 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 5:12 pm
2890 Please explain what the fuck is going on here boo-lads
Mr Danczuk described the warning that came after a vote in the House of Commons on Monday night when a senior Conservative MP “stepped out of the shadows” to confront him.

He said: “I’d never spoken to him before my life but he blocked my way and ushered me to one side.

“He warned me to think very carefully about what I was going to say the next day before the Home Affairs Select Committee when I’d be answering questions on child abuse.

“’I hear you’re about to challenge Lord Brittan about when he knew about child sex abuse,’ he said. ‘It wouldn’t be a wise move', he advised me. 'It was all put to bed a long time ago.’ He warned me I could even be responsible for his death.

“We looked at each other in silence for a second. I knew straight away he wasn’t telling me this out of concern or the man’s welfare. There was no compassion in his voice.

Writing in the Mail on Sunday, he added: “As politicians made their way out of Westminster, I had no doubt that other conversations like this were taking place.

“Indeed this was confirmed when I spoke to other members of the Select Committee the next day. They’d been paid similar visits. Phone calls had been made.”

- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10949366/Simon-Danczuk-I-was-warned-not-to-challenge-Leon-Brittan-over-paedophile-dossier.html
Expand all images.
>> No. 2891 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 5:53 pm
2891 spacer
>>2890

This is the stuff revolutions are made of.

If it turns out their was a massive paedo conspiracy in Government and the House of Lords and it was covered up, there will be marches akin to the protests on the war and the Papers will got to a town we will never be able to come back from.

"The media that toppled a regime" is a tag line too delicious to pass up.
>> No. 2892 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 5:54 pm
2892 spacer
>>2891

>If it turns out their was a massive paedo conspiracy in Government and the House of Lords and it was covered up, there will be marches akin to the protests on the war and the Papers will got to a town we will never be able to come back from.
Nah, everyone is too fucking fat to revolt these days. I don't know whether the obesity epidemic is naturally occurring or the result of decades of planning by the elites, but the end result is the same either way.
>> No. 2893 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 6:06 pm
2893 spacer
>>2891
Nobody gives really any shit.
>> No. 2894 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 6:08 pm
2894 spacer
>>2893

How did you manage to massacre an entire language in such a short sentence?
>> No. 2895 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 6:15 pm
2895 spacer
>>2894
It's you who knows not English enough.
>> No. 2896 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 7:49 pm
2896 spacer
>>2891
ANY DAY NOW EH LAD?
>> No. 2897 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 7:58 pm
2897 spacer
I smell carpet. Sweeping is surely imminent.
>> No. 2898 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 8:09 pm
2898 spacer

icke.jpg
289828982898
>>2891
>If it turns out their was a massive paedo conspiracy in Government and the House of Lords and it was covered up
>If
>> No. 2899 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 8:39 pm
2899 spacer
No idea what's going on, but Norman Tebbit reckons there may have been a cover-up... http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/06/child-abuse-coverup-1980s-lord-tebbit
>> No. 2900 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 8:54 pm
2900 spacer
>>2899
Do you think he's just trying to get his retaliation in first?
>> No. 2901 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 9:44 pm
2901 spacer
>>2900
It's possible I suupose - my first thought is that he's old / nearly-dead enough that he no longer cares, so is simply telling the truth as he sees it, but given the alleged links to Number 10 all things are possible I suppose (wasn't one of her senior civil servants discredited for noncery some years back? Add that to her closeness to Savile and it's entirely plausible that warning shots are being fired by those who were part of those circles).

Sage for uninformed speculation.
>> No. 2902 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 9:56 pm
2902 spacer
>>2901
*Should have said something more like "those who were part of the circles around Maggie, not necessarily those who were part of paedophile rings - I'm no great fan of Tebbit, but I doubt very much he'd've had any active role in noncery or even the concealment thereof, though he seems to have at least suspected that some of those in Mrs T's inner circle had such roles.
>> No. 2903 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 10:01 pm
2903 spacer
>>2902
I think it's likely he had an inkling that there was rotten goings-on in Parliament and associated circles, but didn't act on those inklings in any meaningful way. Like, I suspect, many other people in that august institution.
>> No. 2904 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 10:03 pm
2904 spacer
There was a crazy period in the 1990s where Rochdale went through a completely bogus satanic abuse scare. Families were accused by Social Services of all manner of devil worshiping, that turned out to be nonsense. It's interesting that Paul Flowers was Vice President of Rochdale Social Services during that time.
>> No. 2905 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 10:32 pm
2905 spacer
>>2904
>Paul Flowers was Vice President of Rochdale Social Services during that time
You mean the Co(ke)-Op guy?
>> No. 2906 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 7:31 am
2906 spacer
>>2905

The crystal Methodist
>> No. 2907 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 7:51 am
2907 spacer
Sorry Modz, reposting as I have only just noticed this thread.

By the way lads, I thought I'd drop this link, as it took me a little bit of tracking down yesterday:

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/david-cameron-and-theresa-may-establish-a-national-inquiry-into-allegations-of-organised-child-abuse

It is Tom Watson MP's petition for a proper inquiry into the missing dossier.
>> No. 2908 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 8:55 am
2908 spacer
>>2907
I've signed already, although it's my understanding that change.org is a complete paper tiger and has no tangible effect. I don't know why ARE TOM didn't use http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/ instead.
>> No. 2909 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 9:02 am
2909 spacer
>>2908

Coz they'd lose the petition m7, innit.
>> No. 2910 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 1:30 pm
2910 spacer
>>2908
I've made the mistake(?) of signing petitions on several of these websites and now I get spammed by them constantly asking me to sign others. Change.org, 350.org, 38 Degrees, All Out, Oxfam, Greenpeace... I only bother to sign about 5% of them, but I can't bring myself to unsubscribe because they are all worthy causes.
>> No. 2911 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 3:57 pm
2911 spacer

0000704177_500[1].jpg
291129112911
>The head of the children's charity NSPCC is to head a review of historical child sex abuse allegations, Home Secretary Theresa May has announced.

It's fucking on now, chaps. Well, maybe not, but an inquiry of some shape is going to go down.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28189072
>> No. 2912 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 3:59 pm
2912 spacer
>>2911
I thought an inquiry had already been launched.
>> No. 2913 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 4:23 pm
2913 spacer
>>2912
Nah I think ARE Dave just asked one of his mates to have a "look".

An inquiry seems like a good idea. I somehow doubt the true extent of absolute corruption and inherent abuse of power within the establishment will come to light though.
I reckon it would all come crumbling down fairly swiftly if all the dirty doings of our rulers were to truly be exposed.
Still, better than nothing I guess.
>> No. 2914 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 4:27 pm
2914 spacer
>>2913
Just in time for election season too!
>> No. 2915 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 4:40 pm
2915 spacer
>>2914
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28189072

>A Hillsborough-style inquiry will also be held, led by an independent panel of experts on law and child protection.

>This would be wide-ranging and would not report before the next election.

Sadly it looks like Paedolection MMXV will not be upon us. Unless there are healthy amounts of 'leaks'.
>> No. 2916 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 5:11 pm
2916 spacer
>>2915
I'm not surprised it will get dragged out till after the election. It's all still pretty fucking mental though, will certainly be an interesting lead up to the elections regardless. It's crazy just seeing the different ways in which they're trying to spin this and reduce the damage as much as possible.
>> No. 2917 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 5:16 pm
2917 spacer
>>2916
I don't know about that, the Labour front benches were asking for this - ARE WATSON is the founder of the change.org petition, for example. It's highly likely that the Tories (and, as a plus, the Lib Dems too, what with Cyril Smith and so on) are going to be knee-deep in noncery whereas Labour have a comparatively squeaky clean reputation in that regard at least.
>> No. 2918 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 5:50 pm
2918 spacer
>>2917
It actually pains me quite a lot to be posting a link to the fucking mail, but..

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2681827/Labour-Lords-sex-attacks-12-children-Horrific-allegations-include-rape-sexual-assaults.html

I don't think any party is really squeaky clean. I'd imagine they're all in it up to their eyeballs. It's just interesting seeing all the different stuff being thrown out there, and who knows what's "truth" and what are attempts at obfuscation and interference.
Gove saying there won't be an inquiry, now there is. Lord Brittan being accused of the rape of a woman but not having any of the other rumoursnoncing being associated with him in the press. The Mail deflecting from the Thatcher cabinet to a Labour Lord etc etc.
A lot of the online discourse has been interesting as well. I don't think they're going to be able to put this to bed quite as easily as they used to although the internet is definitely a good tool for spreading all sorts of confusion.

Saying all that I don't think for a second that the full depth and breadth of just how rotten our entrenched elites are will be properly exposed at all. Nothing that would fundamentally undermine any major institution anyway, be that Westminster, royalty, the courts/police, social services or whatever else.
>> No. 2919 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 5:58 pm
2919 spacer
>>2918
>I'd imagine they're all in it up to their eyeballs.
Given are Ed and co's insistence on an inquiry, as opposed to the Tory/Lib Dem flim-flamming over yes-no-maybe-all-in-the-past-eh, I find it hard to believe that Labour MPs are going along with it and taking a punt that the filth won't investigate them also.
>> No. 2920 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:05 pm
2920 spacer
Maybe there was something to the BNP political broadcast, afterall.
>> No. 2921 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:09 pm
2921 spacer
>>2919

I've had some cunt at my local going on and on about the "hundreds" of paedos in the House of Parliament. I was going to post further but realised I was just playing into his hands. Enjoy your day lads.
>> No. 2922 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:14 pm
2922 spacer
>>2920

Dear God, can you imagine the political landscape after paedogate? With the liblabcon obliterated UKIP and the BNP would be the government and opposition on rotation, with the Greens playing the part of the third party.
>> No. 2923 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:21 pm
2923 spacer
>>2922
The Greens, who actually have an MP, would play third party to two parties that have never had an MP between them, one of which no longer has any MEPs?
>> No. 2924 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:22 pm
2924 spacer
>>2923
The Greens do have an MP, but you can't run the UK from Brighton.
>> No. 2925 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:26 pm
2925 spacer
>>2924

LIES!
>> No. 2926 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:30 pm
2926 spacer
>>2923

If the current political powers dissolved, historical records would be entirely obsolete. The Greens have an MP and UKIP/BNP don't, sure, but that's not the question. The questions is where would the current support for the three main parties go, and since the Tories have a plurality we can assume that most of the current voters would go for UKIP, the party which shares the most values with the Conservatives. Labour is very politically aligned with the BNP, they're just not as racist or as crazy. The Greens share most of their values and have the most similarity to the Lib Dems.
>> No. 2927 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:37 pm
2927 spacer
>>2926
Hmm... I'll grant your premise that tories would switch to UKIP, but I think fewer lefties are racist than you seem to, and suspect that the Greens would become the main left-of-centre party.

Not that this has anything to do with nonce-hunting in Westminster.
>> No. 2928 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:49 pm
2928 spacer
>>2927

Sorry, I don't think I was clear on the Labour/BNP thing. It's not that I think lefties are racists any more or less than the general rate, it's just the the BNP if you remove the racism very closely mirror Labour, or possibly more Old Labour (which most lefties prefer). If the BNP toned it down a bit during paedogeddon they could take droves of the labour supporters.

Perhaps it would be more of a 1. Ukip 2= BNP, Green with some Labour supporters who would refuse to have anything to do with the BNP making up the numbers for the Greens.
>> No. 2930 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 7:03 pm
2930 spacer
>>2928

But the same could be said for the Greens (basically old labour when you strip away their gimmick - environmentalism rather than racism, obviously) and I think that matters - most people are not particularly racist, so when given a choice between two parties with similar core policies and a gimmick they disagree with, they'll choose the one with the less actively offensive gimmick.

More to the point, I think the BNP vote is a spent force since the arrival of UKIP who cloak their racism better - those whose main focus is immigration would rally to UKIP, those who vote on other issues would go UKIP if they're right of centre and Green if left.

Sage for treating half-arsed "I reckon" as though it were solid prediction.
>> No. 2931 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 7:23 pm
2931 spacer

WTF1.jpg
293129312931
>>2926

>Labour is very politically aligned with the BNP
>> No. 2932 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 7:59 pm
2932 spacer
>>2927
>Not that this has anything to do with nonce-hunting in Westminster.

Yeah, this thread got derailed pretty quickly.
>> No. 2933 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 8:28 pm
2933 spacer
>>2932

The rails are over here:

Inquiry announced: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10951506/Theresa-May-launches-major-new-inquiry-into-child-sex-abuse-allegations.html

Former head of Paedophile Information Exchange kept stuff in Home Office filing cabinets whilst working there as an electrician: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10950563/Former-chair-of-Paedophile-Information-Exchange-claims-he-hid-material-in-locked-cabinets-at-the-Home-Office.html
>> No. 2934 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 8:40 pm
2934 spacer
Why are you people discussing ridiculous hypotheticals? Also, stop bringing up the greens in every thread, they're a political irrelevancy. And I live in Brighton, suburb of Hong Kong.

And to the lad above, labour are the most closely aligned political party to the bnp there is in mainstream politics.

But they're also an irrelevancy, the tories aren't going to die.
>> No. 2935 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 9:04 pm
2935 spacer
>>2934
>Why are you people discussing ridiculous hypotheticals?
Double-check where you are, lad.
>> No. 2936 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 9:08 pm
2936 spacer
>>2934

>And to the lad above, labour are the most closely aligned political party to the bnp there is in mainstream politics.

What ever you think you know about these two parties, you simply can't state something as controversial as "Labour is very politically aligned with the BNP" without backing it up.

What's obvious to you is certainly not obvious to me.
>> No. 2937 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 9:14 pm
2937 spacer
This kind of thing would never happen in Hong Kong.
>> No. 2938 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 10:06 pm
2938 spacer
>>2936
They differ only on socially liberal policies really.
>> No. 2939 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 11:57 pm
2939 spacer

yeah-thats-it-now-let-me-piss-in-your-arseflaps-wh.jpg
293929392939
Given this is boo, would it be reasonable to assume the sudden avalanche of derailment posts are the work of GCHQ lad going mental behind 16 proxies?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHKwzpwK8Ss

http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/more-than-10-politicians-on-list-held-by-police-investigating-westminster-paedophile-ring/

Time to stock up on the tinfoil lads! Tesco's do a blue stripe roll for about 80p
>> No. 2940 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 12:42 am
2940 spacer
>>2939
A Tesco Value tin-foil hat? Have some pirde, lad.
>> No. 2941 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 12:43 am
2941 spacer
>>2940
*pride
>> No. 2942 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:01 am
2942 spacer
As a country without any true revolution I don't believe the people of the United Kingdom have earned the right not to be raped by their power holders.
>> No. 2943 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:06 am
2943 spacer
>>2942

Eh?
>> No. 2944 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:11 am
2944 spacer

hghkjg.jpg
294429442944
There is evidence at least 20 prominent paedophiles - including former MPs and government ministers - abused children for "decades", a former child protection manager has claimed.

> Mr McKelvie - giving his first television interview for 20 years

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28203914
>> No. 2945 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:17 am
2945 spacer
>>2943

Any country whose peoples labour beneath the heel of a monarch are inherently accepting of rape by those in power.
>> No. 2946 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:18 am
2946 spacer
>>2942

Mate we've had like, half a dozen uprisings and civil wars since the middle ages.

It's not out of the question for it to happen again, but the question you have to ask is who exactly it would benefit. History has shown that revolutions only tend to throw one set of elites out and replace them with another who are by no means any better.
>> No. 2947 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:29 am
2947 spacer
>>2946

Then you have another revolution, and another, and another, until the inevitable and most deserved end.
>> No. 2948 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 2:31 am
2948 spacer
>>2942
Fuck off you zionist prick.

There was never a revolution that was truly led by the people.
>> No. 2949 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 2:47 am
2949 spacer
The smearing of Leon Brittan as a nonce began during the 1980s due to far-right factions within the security services who were unhappy about a Jew being in the Cabinet - this was covered in Private Eye at the time.
>> No. 2950 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 3:00 am
2950 spacer
>>2948
Well no, but then that's true for much of Europe as well. Succesful revolutions like the civil war here, or the French business tend to be led by whatever middle class is about at the time, and truly peasant-led ones like the Peasant's Revolt tend to be put down. That doesn't mean the English Civil War wasn't a genuine revolution though, or that the flourishing of radical ideas amongst genuinely working class groups like the Diggers and Levellers wasn't a thing...

The middles classes are people too you know, and (pre-universal education) tended to lead revolutions because they were generally better educated and had been exposed to a wider range of ideas, none of which makes them inherently bad people of unworthy of historical importance.

Sage for rising to such transparent bait.
>> No. 2951 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 3:53 am
2951 spacer
>>2950
It wasn't even bait my friend.

A lot of your comment I disagree with on the source of those revolution, but I know there just is no way to discuss it without being ridiculed.

History I don't believe has been told truthfully, and I'm not just on about biased accounts here. I'll remind you of a quote from Churchill (someone who knew more than he let on), "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."

If anyone dares to try and speak of or discuss the alternate history that some people wish to research or know of, they are ridiculed, smeared, boycotted.

Here's another quote, Voltaire this time. "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

I won't even mention, because any real mention of the trigger words gets shouted down as racism - which I find particularly abhorrent, as it is not a hate for a race, but a hate for an organisation.
>> No. 2952 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 6:27 am
2952 spacer
>>2918

While I am aware that I haven't finished reading the thread, I just want to jump in here: as on of the lads from the Winchester, I would like to make you fully aware that every one of us cunts worth a damn knows Brittan is a nonce. We just need the fucking proof. It is not a surprise the "dossier" went missing under his watch - he has a predilection for young boys. Very young boys. This is why we are currently hammering the shit out of him on both "dossier" and rape - we still do not (yet) have that fucking video of him at Elm House. But we know of it, please believe me on this. We fucking know of it and would quite happily sell our grandmas for a fucking copy, partially because we hate the cunt, and partially because, at the end of the day, we somehow manage to retain a small level of morality. Only a small bit, mind.
>> No. 2953 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 6:37 am
2953 spacer
>>2952
> lads from the Winchester
Not him, but I'm not following you. Was that an autocorrect mistake?
>> No. 2954 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 6:40 am
2954 spacer
>>2953

There was an autocorrect, I just play with it, because I like to think I am one of the boring old sods pissing my life away at a certain pub in London. I'm not, but it gives me a wry smile every time.
>> No. 2955 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 6:48 am
2955 spacer
>>2954
So did you actually mean Westminster?
>> No. 2956 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 8:29 am
2956 spacer

fear_the_duffle_bag_killer.jpg
295629562956
>>2949

GCHQ lad please go. And no, this thread is not about people stitching up Hebrews. The nose knows this.

> A victim of an alleged establishment paedophile ring told yesterday how he was ordered to wear a fairy costume before being abused.
The orphan was 13 when he and his 12-year-old brother were sent by staff at their children’s home to the Elm Guest House for ‘a treat’, it is claimed.
He said boys were plied with alcohol before being told to pose for pictures wearing girls’ clothing. The men at the guest house – said to include MPs and pop stars – would then abuse the children after pretending to play hide-and-seek, the victim said.
More than a decade after leaving care, the victim’s brother, Peter, killed himself six days after his 28th birthday.
A line in his suicide note which appeared to refer to his ordeal read: ‘I will get those b*******.’

Also: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/The_Pedophocracy - It wouldn't be a /boo thread without this spooky link
>> No. 2957 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 8:36 am
2957 spacer
>>2956

The page your link goes to could have been written by the Kipper at my local. FFS.
>> No. 2958 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 8:40 am
2958 spacer
>>2955

Nope.
>> No. 2959 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 9:28 am
2959 spacer
>>2955
j0urnolad filters to Ed WInchester or something I think.

>>2952
I'd like to believe that and I'm sure there are some decent sorts within the press and media in general just as there are within the wider political classes and establishment.
I just tend to think that you're working against entrenched power structures that are going to be hard to overcome.

I'd imagine any real evidence will be long gone by now or if it does still exist it's going to be being held by people not willing to let it go public. Also if the press were to somehow get a hold of some real solid evidence would it not be possible that they would just get told by the lawyers they can't publish for whatever reason? D-noticed or whatever?
I think the best we'll get is a few victims testimonies and they'll be discredited as much as is possible.

Also what I find just a bit sad is that the inquiries(and I may well have this all arse about tit) seem to just be about how the institutions failed, i.e. losing the files and that, and while I think those sorts of things should definitely be investigated I get the feeling that the actual brutal and fucked up crimes of people in power systematically abusing young vulnerable children might well get lost.
>> No. 2960 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 9:44 am
2960 spacer
>>2959

Indeed it does. Or did, anyway. Right, I fucking hate posting like this, but I am short on time, so...

>I'd like to believe that and I'm sure there are some decent sorts within the press and media in general just as there are within the wider political classes and establishment.
I just tend to think that you're working against entrenched power structures that are going to be hard to overcome.

Amira Hass was quoted by Robert Fisk in his excellent "The Great War for Civilisation" as saying that the role of journalists is to "monitor the structures of power". Some of do actually do this. It is hard, challenging and you risk being Rosened, but fuck 'em.

>I'd imagine any real evidence will be long gone by now or if it does still exist it's going to be being held by people not willing to let it go public. Also if the press were to somehow get a hold of some real solid evidence would it not be possible that they would just get told by the lawyers they can't publish for whatever reason? D-noticed or whatever?
I think the best we'll get is a few victims testimonies and they'll be discredited as much as is possible.

The Met have the video. Thank you NotW for causing a near complete cessation of relations with the Met. It is there, it has been seen, and I know the coppers who have seen it - from past work. They will be doing everything in their power to nail the cunt. It is incredibly difficult to work child abuse cases without becoming rather vindictive to those abusing children. I can personally vouch for this, and I hate children.

D-notices are national security only, and can be breached. No media lawyer (if provided with *proof*) of this would refuse to sign off. They may have a few sleepless nights, but that is what they are there to do.

>Also what I find just a bit sad is that the inquiries(and I may well have this all arse about tit) seem to just be about how the institutions failed, i.e. losing the files and that, and while I think those sorts of things should definitely be investigated I get the feeling that the actual brutal and fucked up crimes of people in power systematically abusing young vulnerable children might well get lost.

We shall see. Do not expect the pressure to die down though - the sheer loathing between the lads who work at the Winchester and politicians at the moment means all gloves are off. My phone has been going critical for the last week regarding this. There are scores to be settled...and given the attempts to regulate the press (rightly or wrongly) this is the kind of story where even the most muck-raking of hacks can prove what they do is in the Public Interest. FOR THE GREATER GOOD[.

Right I need to dash before the shops shut. Further questions welcome.
>> No. 2961 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 9:46 am
2961 spacer
>>2960

On an aside, I cannot believe I just posted that from my phone, while risking missing the shops shutting. Fucking Cardiff. Apologies for a couple of typos/missing words.
>> No. 2962 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 10:07 am
2962 spacer
>>2961
> Apologies for a couple of typos/missing words.
I just assumed you were drunk and illiterate, like all journalists.
>> No. 2963 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 11:16 am
2963 spacer
>>2960
>>2961
No worries Mr Winchester. Appreciate the long reply.

If the Met have the video then surely they could have prosecuted at anytime? Why have they just been sitting on it for the past couple decades?
I have fuck all understanding of this stuff so excuse me if I'm asking stupid questions.

In regards to D-notices and national security could an argument not be made(behind closed doors one would assume) that if the shit really hits the fan with this stuff then it might constitute a threat to "national security"/the rotten fuckers in power?

Can't really think of anything else specific at the moment but just to reiterate I hope you nail the cunts to the fucking wall.
>> No. 2964 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 11:28 am
2964 spacer
Interesting BBC article about possible involvement of Special Branch.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28201997

>A man claiming to be a former Home Office civil servant last week told the Sunday Express that not only was PIE receiving funding from the Home Office in the 1980s, it was doing so at the request of Special Branch, the intelligence-gathering arm of the police. And he believed the police were not interested in catching child abusers.

He said his superior told him that Special Branch "found it politically useful to identify people who were paedophiles... I was aware a lot of people in the civil service or political arena had an interest in obtaining information like that which could be used as a sort of blackmail."
>> No. 2965 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 11:38 am
2965 spacer

1665_(1).jpg
296529652965
/BOO!

http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/cia-mossad-mi5-and-kincora-boys-home.html
>> No. 2966 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 11:53 am
2966 spacer

_69826247_bishoppaulbutler-01.jpg
296629662966
"Over a month ago the Archbishop of Canterbury,with support of Cardinal Nichols and the president of the Methodist Church, wrote to the Home Secretary saying a full public inquiry is required into institutional child abuse, which I followed up in the House of Lords a few days ago.

A full public inquiry is required because under those terms people have to take oaths and therefore swear to tell the truth. My fear is the whole story won't come out without that.

We're absolutely clear that the Church of England and other churches need to be involved in this inquiry as we already know there are parts of our history that involve church people having committed abuse.

So we have to be investigated just like anybody else and there will probably be some unpleasant and difficult stories to handle and I accept that's part of the reality.

We think there is a real problem around institutional abuse, so schools, civil service, police, politicians and the church, we need to try and get to the bottom of why people can get into institutions and use those institutions as a safe place to abuse.

Victim survivors need justice and they need their story to be heard and, as a nation, we need to help them to move on."

> The Right Rev Paul Butler - The Bishop of Durham
>> No. 2967 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 12:02 pm
2967 spacer
"Regarding the destroying of Whitehall files, when I worked as a civil servant at the then DES in the late 70`s and early 80`s, I was sometimes given this onerous task.

It meant that files that had not been active for a while had to be speed read and a form ticked. Basically, any file which had information that was still relevant or pending i.e. a decision had been made but not yet carried out, or if the material might be of interest historically to future researchers.

If the file did not meet this criteria, it was destroyed and the form which was retained, signed and dated by the civil servant, would show why the decision had been reached. If it did meet either criteria, it would be sent to the archives.Also, registries where paper files were stored would undertake regular audits so all files could be accounted for. Any missing files would be flagged up and searched for.

These both left a paper trail which was signed and dated by the acting official. How could 120 files go walkies? How could they not be seen as pending?

Files could certainly be sent to other Government departments, but, as always with the civil service, the Registry would have a written record of where the file was sent and by whom.

Files were considered to be very important and their movements were logged assiduously. Time consuming but it protected us all. Any file that was moved or destroyed was recorded and dated. Lost files would spark panic and poor registry staff would have to hunt for them, even searching our desks!

Lost files would be tracked back to their last movement, the Registry having a separate log of these, and the official it was logged out to would be questioned. Paper trails everywhere, signed and dated! Civil service rules!"

> Penelope123 - Nutter from The Guardian's comment section
>> No. 2968 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 12:09 pm
2968 spacer
>>2966
> we need to try and get to the bottom of why people can get into institutions and use those institutions as a safe place to abuse.

It's simple really. The real people who rule the world make SURE that whenever a position of power opens up, they can put forward someone who is a kiddy fiddler. Then hang this sword of Damocles over their head in return for them doing as they wish.

Almost everyone (probably actually everyone) in the government has some grubby, dirty secret. I suppose in the old days the threat of being exposed as a homosexual was probably enough, these days that's accepted so they have to use the greatest taboo - peadophilia.

All these terrible places were run as sting operations to get blackmail material so that the real rulers of the world had fodder to manipulate with.
>> No. 2969 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 12:43 pm
2969 spacer
>>2968

It seems unlikely. If you put powerful people in the corner they tend not to react well. The instant you threaten them with the paedo stuff they'll launch a full scale war against these elites.

If you look at JFK for example, when he did that executive order thing basically ending the power of the banks, nobody outed him as a homo or a paedo, they just shot him.
>> No. 2970 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:21 pm
2970 spacer
>>2969
> If you look at JFK for example, when he did that executive order thing basically ending the power of the banks, nobody outed him as a homo or a paedo, they just shot him.
Which is a Last Resort. They would much rather he had toed the line.

> It seems unlikely.
So do a lot of things until they are known to be true.
>> No. 2971 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:25 pm
2971 spacer
>>2969
> The instant you threaten them with the paedo stuff they'll launch a full scale war against these elites.
I don't think you really get it do you. There are people and forces above government. You can't just launch a full scale war. For example - JFK.

And is the OP of this thread not giving you pause for thought?
>> No. 2972 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:31 pm
2972 spacer
>>2970
>>2971
I think the odds of some privileged old men who have never heard the word no turning to paedophillia to get their kicks are much greater than the odds of a few shadowy elites running paedo rings at the highest levels of world government and remaining undetected for centuries.
>> No. 2973 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:36 pm
2973 spacer
>>2972
Then explain why there haven't been any arrests of politicians yet over Yewtree. Plenty of entertainers fed to the dogs, but no one with any real power. Dead men obviously don't count, so they can release their names, and it's obvious from the names released this goes right to the top. I mean, come on, Ted fucking Heath! He was Prime Minister of England and protected by the secret services who knew he was a nonce! The only reason this happens is so that people with other interests can wield power over them.

I get the feeling neither of us is going to change our minds here, so I'll (probably) leave it at that.
>> No. 2974 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:39 pm
2974 spacer
>>2973

Perhaps the only difference in our perspectives is that you think x is protecting y, while I'm of the opinion that y is protecting itself.
>> No. 2975 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:46 pm
2975 spacer
>>2963

The Met only got it a couple of days ago - hence every hack in London hammering their contacts, desperate to get it.

And no, D-Notices would be ignored for something like this, even if "The Establishment" were to try for one.
>> No. 2977 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:53 pm
2977 spacer
>>2972
> I think the odds of some privileged old men who have never heard the word no turning to paedophillia to get their kicks are much greater than the odds of a few shadowy elites running paedo rings at the highest levels of world government and remaining undetected for centuries.
I'll just quote this from the Evening Standard.
"I believe that there is strong evidence ... that there’s been an extremely powerful elite among the highest levels of the political classes for as long as I have been alive — I’m 65 now.

“We are looking at the Lords, we are looking at the Commons, we are looking at the judiciary.”
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/peer-backs-claims-that-powerful-people-abused-children-in-homes-9591629.html
>> No. 2978 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 2:01 pm
2978 spacer

brittaneye1.jpg
297829782978
>>2956
I am not GCHQlad, here is the Private Eye clipping from circa 1984. Rabbitholes go deeper than expected.
>> No. 2979 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 2:05 pm
2979 spacer
>>2978
Funny thing is it wasn't a smear, it was the truth.

And the spooks only leveraged it when they wanted something.
>> No. 2980 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 2:06 pm
2980 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/v/p6HFknUsh9E
>> No. 2981 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 4:13 pm
2981 spacer
>>2980
I'll admit that in this context that song suddenly seems far more sinister than it did, but I'm reasonably sure that you have something more than that in mind, so would you mind explaining?
>> No. 2982 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 4:16 pm
2982 spacer
>>2981
what can one say? one can romanticise it in ‘images’ or one can talk about the ‘cold hard truth’….you cannot attain ‘the life of the soul’ if you are not ‘naturally born’.

if you are the product of a SIS experiment – granted, that is as SH I.T. as it can be….

you have to ‘make your peace with it’ somehow – as kate golby was to do….

…to make ‘war’ upon those that have souls….and then try to ‘harness them’ and ‘make them work for you’ as slaves – is the DEMONIC at work and to the nth degree….

….and the ‘angels’ take revenge in the end – as history tells us….recent history….they can write you terrible, terrible life scripts….do you really want that?

not that ‘those of us who were naturally born’ are angels or devils….it is just that we had that ‘spark from the beginning of creation’ – the ‘soul spark’ that came from another dimension – that was to begin our lives upon this planet….

the ill had realised ‘the above’…how to create ‘human beings without a soul’…’easily programmed robots’ in the main….’no mess and no fuss’ in relation to those with a soul, fighting back for all they were worth….to stop themselves from being enslaved.
>> No. 2983 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 4:24 pm
2983 spacer
>>2982
I hope you're having a lovely summer, Em.
>> No. 2984 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 4:30 pm
2984 spacer
>>2982
Ah. I'm afraid you've rather lost me, and I don't know who Kate Golby was, but... having read several of your blogs recently (assuming you're Are Emily, and if not you mimic her writing style very well) could you please take down the scans that display your name, address, mobile number etc. I know you think they're significant evidence of foul play by sinister forces, but they're also potentially dangerous should a scammer find them, and some of us worry about you...
>> No. 2985 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 4:32 pm
2985 spacer
Lady Butler-Sloss to chair abuse inquiry: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/08/lady-butler-sloss-chair-child-abuse-inquiry
>> No. 2986 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 4:47 pm
2986 spacer
>>2985
She both looks and sounds like a butch lesbian pedo. I smell a cover up.
>> No. 2987 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 5:10 pm
2987 spacer
>>2986
Butler Sloss is an odd pick to lead this inquiry.

I know it's the Daily Heil, but; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2357642/Judge-gave-James-Bulger-killer-Jon-Venables-secret-identity-casts-doubt-child-porn-sex-crimes-link.html

We might have expected an old fashioned fire-breathing nonce hater to be running the show but B.S has a history of claiming things like 'there was [no] evidence to show that paedophiles who seek out indecent images online also carry out physical assaults' ("‘There is no evidence that those who watch child porn go ahead and do it. Not to my knowledge. There may be evidence but I have not come across it").

It also seems pretty fucking stupid do drag an 80 year old out of retirement, given this inquiry could go on for years and years, and the leader of this inquiry could be called on to give evidence at a later date. This makes me suspicious.
>> No. 2989 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 5:11 pm
2989 spacer
>>2987
>*pretty fucking stupid to
>> No. 2990 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 5:33 pm
2990 spacer
>>2984

Not enough FULL CAPS to be ARE EM.

ACTIVATE GOLD PROTOCOL

>>2987

While obviously THE ESTABLISHMENT would try and avoid censure, B.S. is pretty fucking independent in her views. inb4 EXACTLY...
>> No. 2991 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 5:33 pm
2991 spacer
>>2985
It's not a public inquiry, so it means fuck all. The security services and Westminster will know about it.
>> No. 2992 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 5:40 pm
2992 spacer
>>2990
It's a direct quote from her blog.
>> No. 2993 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 5:51 pm
2993 spacer
>>2991

What?

>>2992

Apologies. Maybe the pills beginning to work.
>> No. 2994 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 5:54 pm
2994 spacer
>>2938

The BNP:

- Are against foreign wars on the off-chance one of our interventions might help Johnny Foreigner.
- Are up for deporting eskimos (because those Muzzahs are so intolerant, you see?).
- Wish to bring back hanging. (Pot-heads in particular piss them off no end.)
- Dismiss the fluffly notion that is multiculturalism.
- Are nationalistic and oppose the EU.
- Wish to nationalise pretty much everything (probably even yer bird). Plus, they outright reject the economically liberal Thatcher.

Labour:

- Are war-obsessed. Blowing up folk is how they spread their liberating message to the barbarians. After-all, it's of great importance that everyone receive the Word of R Tone.
- Absolutely love immigration. "Let 'em all in so they can undercut the jobs of our traditional voter base", they say.
- Love the increasingly quasi-Soviet EU.
- Not particularly tough on crime, and especially so when it comes to illegal substances. (They peddle the "addiction is an illness" line.)
- Embrace the free-market. Ever since Blair, the Labour leadership has had a massive Iron Lady-induced hard-on.

To claim that Labour and the BNP are closely aligned politically is just silly.
>> No. 2995 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 5:56 pm
2995 spacer
>>2994
>Are war-obsessed.

This is the same party that voted against bombing in Syria.

The rest of your post is just the usual Daily Heil comments section drivel.
>> No. 2996 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 6:04 pm
2996 spacer
>>2995

They voted against Syria because, as the opposition, they get the occasional opportunity to appear liberal and "aware of public concerns". Besides, nothing was going to happen unless the Americans agreed to strikes too and that wasn't going to happen.

Other than that, superb work, you really showed me.
>> No. 2997 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 6:06 pm
2997 spacer
>>2994
>>2995
>>2996

Give it a rest lads.
>> No. 2998 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 7:09 pm
2998 spacer
>>2994
>Are against foreign wars
>Are war-obsessed
Now stop that nonsense, lad. As ne fule no, you can't be for or against war as a policy position, other than in a cynical attempt to win votes. Unless you're a mentalist like Saddam, Putin, or Gaddafi, it just happens. When diplomacy fails you can hardly sit back and say 'never mind, have it your way'. There can be different views of exactly what a nation's interests are, but ultimately reality makes it impossible to make a blanket statement that you will or will not consider military action.
>> No. 2999 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 7:18 pm
2999 spacer
>>2994
> Pot-heads in particular piss them off no end.
There goes any chance they ever had of winning me over with their racist ways.
>> No. 3000 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 7:18 pm
3000 spacer

nn_miller_diana_061214.standard.jpg
300030003000
> Profile: Elizabeth Butler-Sloss

"...In her early career she stood while pregnant as Conservative candidate in the Labour stronghold of Vauxhall and lost, then set up and ran a nursery for toddlers at a basement in the Temple, one of the Inns of Court."

- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5307946.stm
>> No. 3001 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 7:28 pm
3001 spacer
>>3000
So:

>Paedo-friendly
>Tory-friendly
>Octogenarian

Great choice, Theresa!
>> No. 3002 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 8:17 pm
3002 spacer
>>2997

Original poster of "the BNP mirrors a lot of Old Labour's policies" here. I'd like to second this post.
>> No. 3003 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 12:48 pm
3003 spacer
>>3000
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28225043

>Sir Michael faced criticism after he sought to stop Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens from naming in Parliament a top diplomat - Sir Peter Hayman - as a paedophile in the early 1980s.

>But Lady Butler-Sloss said she was unaware of her brother's role as Attorney General during the paedophile controversy in the 1980s.

>"I know absolutely nothing about it," she told the BBC. "If people think I am not suitable then that's up to them."

Of course you didn't love. This "inquiry" is going to be an absolute whitewash.
Also I notice there was a flurry of "teenlad" sounding pointless posts and old bumped threads at some point last night and this thread seems to have fallen off the front page of /*/.
I'm sure it's just coincidence though.
>> No. 3005 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 1:13 pm
3005 spacer
>>3003

It's a bit of a stretch to think that GCHQ would be watching .gs, there can't be more than a couple of a hundred users. Even if they were then they would surely be aware that you can't slide things on .gs. I noticed that the string of shitposts coincided with some silly billy being banned for poorly phrased posts, so I think it was more probably the return of revengelad.

If it was GCHQlad though and the mod squad can prove it there might be a story in some of the officially sanctioned racial slurs used by the poster.
>> No. 3006 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 1:25 pm
3006 spacer
>>3003
One shitposter shitposts and out come the tinfoil hats. As if anyone important gives a fuck about this site.

Paranoia aside, "If people think I am not suitable then that's up to them" is a marvellous platitude. It must be nice to be able to deflect serious criticism like that.
>> No. 3007 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 1:27 pm
3007 spacer
>>3005
>>3006
Confirmed as GCHQ shills.

This is /boo/, after all.
>> No. 3009 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 1:41 pm
3009 spacer
>>3005
>>3006

Yeah fuck knows. It's probably a lot more likely that it was just some shitposting 12 year old from krautchan or something. I was just indulging my paranoid fantasies really, this is /BOO!/ after all.

Saying that I wouldn't completely dismiss the possibility that this place in on some list of monitored sites. It's anonymous nature means that people might feel more comfortable talking about things they otherwise might not. I don't think there's necessarily some poor sod in a dingy basement office having to read through all the shite posted here though.

Anyway to try and stay on topic this is quite interesting.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-28210538

Calls for the Kincora boys home stuff to be included in the inquiry. That is a whole other can of festering rotten worms. Worth a google if you want to read about some mind bogglingly awful stuff and the potential involvement of our own ever lovely security services.
>> No. 3010 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 1:56 pm
3010 spacer
FWIW, here's the story I heard about Leon Brittan back in 1998. The young woman who told it me was a fetish model involved in various slightly sordid and fun drug/S&M undergrounds at the time...she is now a middle-aged mother with anxiety problems and still sometimes in touch with me.

She was friends with two London gay fellows who were fairly deeply involved with the S&M underground of the mid-90s - bearing in mind this wasn't too long after Operation Spanner and the subculture had a necessarily clandestine atmosphere heightened by the paranoia associated with drug use. A persistent acquaintance from the scene tried to insist this couple came to 'special parties' and mentioned that well-known people would be present including most famously LB. The couple were amused at first but then the other guy said he would send a 'taster' of what you will experience at the parties. A courier delivered them a parcel containing what appeared to be a child's severed penis. The couple freaked the fuck out and decided to move out of their flat and were still talking about being followed a couple of years later when they told this story to my friend.

I still don't know what to make of this. Tales of actually murdering kids seems to unbelievable outside of films like Salo. Leaving it here as an an example of an old story about Leon Brittan which has been circulating not in police/journalism circles but on the fringes of the sexual underground. I can't really answer any more questions as this is all I can remember of what she told me back when we were young. It had a slight ring of folk myth/hysteria at the time but really, who knows.
>> No. 3011 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 2:13 pm
3011 spacer
>>3009
>Saying that I wouldn't completely dismiss the possibility that this place in on some list of monitored sites
I would completely dismiss the possibility that it isn't. The incredibly minor shit that can get law enforcement to start snooping on a site and its users is absurd.
>> No. 3012 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 2:43 pm
3012 spacer
>>3011

Snooping and monitoring are two completely different things though, there's no doubt that britchan and .gs have had police interference, for example that girl who got us taken offline a few years ago because someone posted a partial nip, I don't remember her name (and I didn't see the pictures, honest officer). That doesn't mean the police stuck around afterwards though, because we're not a constant security risk.

I'm convinced we have at least one serving police officer who comes here unofficially though, I remember someone saying they were quite recently.

Sage for derailing the thread even further.
>> No. 3013 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 2:52 pm
3013 spacer
>>3012

I think we did an experiment on /iq/ years ago by posting red flag phrases and key words for about 100 posts and if I remember rightly someone claiming to be an *actual* GCHQLad told us to stop being cunts and knock it off because we were blowing up his inbox.

It might have been a dream...
>> No. 3014 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 6:02 pm
3014 spacer
>>3009
Bloody hell. Sounds like Jersey's Haut de la Garenne only more so...
>> No. 3015 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 6:44 pm
3015 spacer
>>2977
Why does the link redirect to http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/church-leaders-unite-to-demand-full-inquiry-into-child-sex-abuse-9591629.html ?
>> No. 3016 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 6:45 pm
3016 spacer
>>3015
Haha, oh wow. Looks like any news story which mentions the shadowy elite who are responsible is getting scrubbed.
>> No. 3017 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 6:46 pm
3017 spacer
>>3015
Here's another article with that quote in, let's see if this stays up.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-2684281/EX-POLITICIANS-ABUSED-CHILDREN.html
>> No. 3018 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 10:06 pm
3018 spacer
Alright, I'm going to say it. An 80 year old anyone is not fit to be doing anything.

I think the best we can hope for is Butler-Sloss' dementia addled mind leads her to blurting out all the names she's buried under the carpet of filth they have rolled up in somewhere in Westminster.
>> No. 3019 Anonymous
9th July 2014
Wednesday 11:00 pm
3019 spacer
>>3018
>An 80 year old anyone is not fit to be doing anything.
Say that to my nan's face and she'll have at you with her walking stick. Unless you walk away at a brisk pace, in which case she has no hope of catching you.
>> No. 3020 Anonymous
11th July 2014
Friday 4:51 pm
3020 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28261957

>Cameron's reshuffle will be bigger than thought

>The consensus until now was that apart from a few Cabinet retirements, most of the changes would focus on refreshing the lower ministerial ranks. But I am told Mr Cameron is thinking big in the reshuffle that he is expected to carry out early next week.

>One source said: "I think it is going to be bigger than we thought."

>Another said: "Last time was a mini reshuffle. This will be a proper reshuffle. Prepare for rabbits out of a hat."

I'm sure this is just coincidence.
>> No. 3021 Anonymous
11th July 2014
Friday 5:11 pm
3021 spacer
>>3020

Do you think it's paedophiles in, non-paedophiles out, ? Or vice versa?
>> No. 3022 Anonymous
12th July 2014
Saturday 10:00 am
3022 spacer
>>3021
It'll be paedos in, paedos out, paedos shaken all about. A paedo Hokey Cokey, if you will.
>> No. 3023 Anonymous
12th July 2014
Saturday 10:57 am
3023 spacer
>>3021
I think they'll just use the opportunity to distance themselves from anyone with any sort of knowledge or connection to all this stuff. The bit that caught my eye was the fact that the chief whip is probably going.
>> No. 3024 Anonymous
12th July 2014
Saturday 7:56 pm
3024 spacer

Oi_Oi.jpg
302430243024
> Home Office defends Butler-Sloss amid claims of abuse cover-up

Reports claim retired judge excluded victim's account of alleged abuse by bishop in review because she 'cared about the Church'

- http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/12/home-office-defends-butler-sloss-bishop-cover-up
>> No. 3025 Anonymous
12th July 2014
Saturday 8:03 pm
3025 spacer
>>3024

>>3001 reporting. I fucking knew it. Glad it's all coming out now rather than mid-enquiry.
>> No. 3026 Anonymous
13th July 2014
Sunday 1:19 pm
3026 spacer

iz_it_cos_i_like_hebrews.jpg
302630263026
Lord Greville Janner was facing more than 20 allegations of historical child abuse, but now looks set to avoid prosecution after doctors said he was unfit to be quizzed because he has dementia.

The member of the House of Lords will not be interviewed or arrested by police investigating the alleged sexual assaults – which include claims of rape – on vulnerable boys in children’s homes.

One man said he was aged seven when the politician visited his care home and entertained him and the other youngsters there with magic tricks.

- http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/westminster-scandal-114-secret-files-on-paedophile-cases-missing/the-civil-servant-in-the-home-offices-pie-funding-inquiry-and-his-academic-articles-on-boy-love/councillorspolitical-party-affiliated/cover-ups/
>> No. 3027 Anonymous
13th July 2014
Sunday 1:22 pm
3027 spacer
There's lots of hearsay but where's the evidence?
>> No. 3028 Anonymous
13th July 2014
Sunday 2:20 pm
3028 spacer
>>3027

see

>>2967
>> No. 3029 Anonymous
13th July 2014
Sunday 2:28 pm
3029 spacer
>>3028
That's not direct evidence.
>> No. 3030 Anonymous
13th July 2014
Sunday 4:22 pm
3030 spacer
>>3029
What kind of magic tricks did you show the boys before you nonced them?
>> No. 3031 Anonymous
13th July 2014
Sunday 4:28 pm
3031 spacer
>>3030
I made them disappear.
>> No. 3032 Anonymous
13th July 2014
Sunday 5:11 pm
3032 spacer
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/margaret-thatcher-personally-covered-up-3848836

PACK YOUR FUCKING RICE EVERYONE.
>> No. 3033 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 1:01 pm
3033 BREAKING!
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/14/lady-butler-sloss-stands-down-child-abuse-inquiry

Sloss is los...t!
>> No. 3034 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 2:01 pm
3034 spacer
>>3033
And thank fuck for that. The Tory paedo massive shouldn't get away with it that easily.
>> No. 3035 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 6:33 pm
3035 spacer
>>3032

>Home Office spokesman said: “The integrity of Baroness Butler-Sloss is beyond reproach and we stand by her appointment unreservedly.”

>>3033

>Hours after the former solicitor general Vera Baird called on Butler-Sloss to stand down because her brother served as attorney general in the 1980s, when reports of child abuse were allegedly not examined properly, the former judge issued a statement announcing that she would withdraw from the post.

Fucking hell.
>> No. 3036 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 7:31 pm
3036 spacer

618_showbiz_jimmy_saville_5.jpg
303630363036
>>3035
It goes all the way to the top.
>> No. 3037 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 8:36 pm
3037 spacer

pedo ring.jpg
303730373037
>>3036
Indeed
>> No. 3038 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 8:48 pm
3038 spacer
>>3037
It's not just my latent conspiracy theorist kicking in, but if certain "harmless" celebs working in the '70s and '80s, all chummy with the powers that be, had any and all claims about child abuse made against them quashed by the police who simply didn't involve the CPS with any claim, then it reasonably follows that these disgusting rings were either a result of the powers that be or someone like Savile set it up to begin with.

I think this is a tenuous ground to base an argument on legally, but my heart and my head seem to both feel and think that there is a deeper connection with these paedophiles and the Royals.

I don't want to be woken up by size 13s vor Sonnenaufgang to bring me shackles instead of a cup of tea and bacon sarnie. But I do understand it's a simply human thing to see a few things and try to build connections between them - this just seems far too plausible, down to the calibre of people involved, a theory to let slip.
>> No. 3039 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 9:34 pm
3039 spacer
http://order-order.com/2014/07/14/the-reshuffle-all-the-sackings-as-they-happen/

Masses and masses of sackings in this 'reshuffle'. I honestly think many of them will be linked to kiddy fiddling, or negligence towards suspected child molestation.
>> No. 3040 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 10:32 pm
3040 spacer

hague.jpg
304030403040
>>3039
Confirmed.
>> No. 3041 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 11:13 pm
3041 spacer
>>3040

>Was Worlds Oldest Baby Molested By Saville!?
>> No. 3042 Anonymous
14th July 2014
Monday 11:23 pm
3042 spacer

411363-1024x576.jpg
304230423042
>>3039
Interesting that he's staying as leader of the house. The cynic in me suspects that this is so it looks like Disco Dave can properly fire him when it comes out in the press without looking too much like he knew all along.

How much of the government is expendable to stop it going further up the ladder? Should be interesting.

Also, if paedogeddon does occur in full, that's Scottish Independence in the bag then, isn't it? Then next stop on the freedom tour is Wales, where the spirit of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd will ride again on a horse made of the corpses of fired paedo tory ministers.
>> No. 3043 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 12:52 am
3043 spacer
>>3041

Ho Ho Ho. Not to worry, it's just a puppet.
>> No. 3044 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 12:53 am
3044 spacer
Politicians being what they are, what's being snuck through using this as a distraction? How does one find out?
>> No. 3045 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 12:58 am
3045 spacer
>>3044

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/emergency-data-law-government-railroading-through-legislation-on-internet-and-phone-records-9596695.html
>> No. 3046 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 1:05 am
3046 spacer
>>3045
Is that all? I don't think that was very sneaky.
>> No. 3047 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 1:07 am
3047 spacer
>>3045
Too obvious. There'll be some shitberg of a bill hiding somewhere which nobody will be looking at.
>> No. 3048 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 1:07 am
3048 spacer
>>3046

There is probably more but I am burned out on trying to comprehend the government.
>> No. 3049 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 1:12 am
3049 spacer
>>3045

The irony of imposing emergency data retention laws on the public whilst destroying all records of their own misdeeds is hilarious.

Next they'll give themselves some form of immunity against prosecution and celebrate with a three-day charity paedothon.
>> No. 3050 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 1:18 am
3050 spacer
>>3049
It's not really irony any more.
>> No. 3051 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 1:20 am
3051 spacer
>>3050

No, I suppose not. The word hypocrisy does get bandied about quite a lot though. Best to have a sense of humour... urgh.
>> No. 3052 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 1:22 am
3052 spacer
>>3051

Maybe, but "hypocrisy" seems a bit mild.
>> No. 3053 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 9:19 am
3053 spacer
Established names out, nobodies in. Hammond as Foreign Secretary, FFS. This reshuffle is noncesense.
>> No. 3054 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 9:33 am
3054 spacer
>>3049
I'm not sure what's worse, that the so-called "emergency" legislation is going to be forced through, even though it's not really an emergency, or the fact that ISPs have not in fact been deleting their records because the Home Office told them so. Surely all that would be needed for things such as this and the DEA to fall through would be for the major ISPs to make good on their principles and tell the government to fuck off.
>> No. 3055 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 12:35 pm
3055 spacer
>>3054
'Emergency' just means 'at short notice and within a short time period'
>> No. 3056 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 1:06 pm
3056 spacer
>>3055
Three months is neither of those things. In the past, legislation to handle unfavorable court judgments has been tabled in the immediate aftermath. Where was this legislation when the judgment was handed down in April?
>> No. 3057 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 1:09 pm
3057 spacer
>>3055
emergency /ɪˈməːdʒ(ə)nsi/ noun
a serious, unexpected, and often dangerous situation requiring immediate action.
>> No. 3058 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 2:04 pm
3058 spacer
>>3039
>>3040
I notice Ken Clark is being given his marching orders. Probably to do with all that Ben Fellows gubbins.
>> No. 3059 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 2:11 pm
3059 spacer
>>3053

Jesus Christ, Hammond as Foreign Secretary? Why not just make Grayling Minister of Trying Not To Be a Prick while you're at it.

And cool! A reactionary bigot in charge education, I can't wait.
>> No. 3060 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 6:28 pm
3060 spacer
>>3056
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/10/high-court-snoopers-charter
>> No. 3061 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 6:29 pm
3061 spacer
>>3059
>A reactionary bigot in charge education, I can't wait.

How will we be able to tell the difference?
>> No. 3062 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 6:30 pm
3062 spacer
>>3061
You'd be as clever as you think you are if what you said actually had any real implication.
>> No. 3063 Anonymous
15th July 2014
Tuesday 11:03 pm
3063 spacer

meme.png
306330633063
>>3020

over 9000 hours in photoshop or summit
>> No. 3064 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 11:24 am
3064 BREAKING NEWS
> UK police arrest 660 suspected paedophiles

"National Crime Agency detains suspected child abusers, including doctors and teachers, and takes more than 400 children into care...

... Of the 660 arrested, 39 were registered sex offenders but the vast majority of suspected paedophiles were off the police's radar. Those arrested include doctors, teachers, scout leaders, care workers and former police officers."

- http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/16/660-suspected-paedophiles-arrested-uk
>> No. 3065 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 11:26 am
3065 spacer
>>3064
But still no politicians. See? It's rotten to the core.
>> No. 3066 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 11:29 am
3066 spacer

Clive-Driscoll-Nonce-Hunter.jpg
306630663066
> Scotland Yard detective 'removed over plan to investigate child abuse claims'

He claimed that he was removed from his post after sharing his suspicions at a meeting with other officers.

"I certainly in a case conference disclosed suspects' names, 100%, but I was informed that was inappropriate and I would be removed from my post," he said.

"Whenever people spoke to you and shared their fears and their story about what they had seen, it was almost on the proviso that they wouldn't make a statement and that they would be scared if you released who those people were that were talking for fear of reprisals to both their selves and their families."

- http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/16/uk-detective-removed-post-alleged-child-abuse-claims
>> No. 3067 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 2:51 pm
3067 spacer
>>3064
It's a bit weird this. I think it's a political act which
A) defends the new snooping laws to protect are kids from paedos.
B) makes Theresa May's NCA massive look like they're great at doing the above.
C) deflects attention away from the current enquiry shambles.

Certainly it will scoop up dangerous individuals but I think the operation should have continued as an in-depth study of how these networks operate, rather than being ended with a one-time scoop up of a few hundred nonces/nonce wannabes.
>> No. 3068 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 2:55 pm
3068 spacer
>>3064
>"We urge all such men – young and old alike – to contact the helpline for help to stop their illegal and harmful behaviour.
>"Not only do children continue to be harmed by this inappropriate use of their images, but also the offender risks losing friends, family, job, reputation and more should their offending come to light. Call 0808 1000 900 for confidential help before it is too late."

Well that's one way to get put on a list
>> No. 3069 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 3:07 pm
3069 spacer
>>3068
Well yeah, they will go on a list, but I was heartened to hear the geezer on radio 4 actually encourage paedos to come forward and solicit help with their issues rather than just condemn them as SICK FILTH, LOCK EM ALL UP etc etc.
>> No. 3070 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 3:12 pm
3070 spacer

Babs-the-nonce-hunter.jpg
307030703070
> Barbara Castle drew up dossier on VIP paedophiles: File seized by Special Branch 'heavy mob'

"Special Branch officers seized a paedophile dossier naming Establishment figures drawn up by Labour peer Barbara Castle in the 1980s, it was claimed yesterday.

Officers citing ‘national security’ confiscated the file which listed 16 MPs along with senior policemen, headteachers and clergy, it was said.

The dossier was collated by the late Baroness Castle of Blackburn who handed it to Don Hale, the editor of her local newspaper, the Bury Messenger.

Mr Hale claimed a ‘heavy mob’ of Special Branch officers raided his office in 1984 and took away the file, threatening him with prison if he resisted."
>> No. 3071 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 3:17 pm
3071 spacer
>>3070
Well, that's frightening.
>> No. 3072 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 3:17 pm
3072 spacer
>>3068
>>3069
Which list exactly would they go on? You can't sign the Sex Offenders' Register if you haven't offended.
>> No. 3073 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 3:21 pm
3073 spacer
>>3072
The "watch this person they may be a nonce" list
>> No. 3074 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 3:22 pm
3074 spacer
>>3072
Maybe if it weren't such an exclusive club people would be less eager to meet its membership conditions.
>> No. 3075 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 4:07 pm
3075 spacer
>>3070

>Utopia soundtrack intensifies
>> No. 3076 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 6:16 pm
3076 spacer

1379424686001.jpg
307630763076
>>3067

The snooping laws have only just gone through and it sounds like that operation has been in the works for a while, so I guess they are just making legal what they have been doing all along.
>> No. 3077 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 6:19 pm
3077 spacer

spooky.jpg
307730773077
> In 1997 , the Conservative MP for Meriden, Iain Mills, was found dead in his flat in Dolphin Square, Pimlico.

" Initially there was confusion over the cause of death but Westminster’s creepy coroner Paul Knapman soon recorded a verdict of alcohol poisoning.

Iain Mills, MP, was apparently found with extreme levels of alcohol in his blood and was surrounded by gin bottles.

The media blamed his death on the stress of being a parliamentarian and it was assumed he’d had an alcohol problem for many years.

This was at odds however with members of his local constituency group who insisted he was a teetotaller and only ever drank orange juice during the 20 years they knew him.

His untimely death was soon forgotten and to this day is rarely mentioned, but that might be about to change.

Could it be that Iain Mills MP was aware of the high -level paedophile ring operating in Dolphin Square and this knowledge led to his death? "
>> No. 3078 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 7:39 pm
3078 spacer
>>3076
>The snooping laws have only just gone through
They've only just gone through because three months ago a court effectively took away powers that they'd had for a few years before that. This case coming out now seems an awful lot like an attempt to say to the public "See what came out of this? That's why we need these powers back!"
>> No. 3079 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 9:50 pm
3079 spacer
>>3067

I think it's all about the security services blackmailing NPs to do their bidding. They're turning up the heat.
>> No. 3080 Anonymous
16th July 2014
Wednesday 9:55 pm
3080 spacer
>>3079
Been saying that for ages, it's good leverage and they certainly know about it if it's going on.
>> No. 3081 Anonymous
17th July 2014
Thursday 2:25 pm
3081 spacer

And-then-I-called-that-fat-cunt-a-filthy-nonce.jpg
308130813081
> A former detective has said three investigations into Cyril Smith sex abuse allegations were stopped

Retired Det Sgt Jack Tasker, who served with Lancashire Police, carried out the third investigation, following two by the former Rochdale Borough force.

He claimed senior officers ordered him to hand over notes and warned he would be "in serious trouble" if he continued the investigation.

"It was obvious that someone quite high up, quite powerful, was making sure that Cyril Smith never appeared before a court. "
>> No. 3082 Anonymous
17th July 2014
Thursday 10:08 pm
3082 spacer
>>3009
UPDATE:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-28341109

>Peter Saunders, the head of a support organisation for victims of child abuse, said senior politicians were linked to the sex abuse allegations.

>He called for the east Belfast home to be part of a government inquiry into child sex abuse.

>Mr Saunders, the chief executive of Napac (National Association of People Abused in Childhood), said the crimes at Kincora had been "swept under the carpet for generations".

>He told BBC Radio Ulster's Good Morning Ulster: "I cannot name names on live radio, but there are certainly names of the highest profile connected with these outrageous crimes.

...

>On Wednesday, a former PSNI assistant chief constable said that allegations that British intelligence services were linked to Kincora "need to be investigated".

>Alan McQuillan said he had no proof of security service involvement, but that he believed that the claims were "potentially credible".

>Last week, Amnesty's NI director, Patrick Corrigan said there were fears that there were "many more victims and abusers" at Kincora, during the period between 1960 and 1980.

>He said: "Allegations have persisted that paedophilia at Kincora was linked to British intelligence services, with claims that visitors to the home included members of the military, politicians and civil servants, and that police investigations into abuse at Kincora were blocked by the Ministry of Defence and MI5."
>> No. 3083 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 5:29 am
3083 spacer
>>3082
> police investigations into abuse at Kincora were blocked by the Ministry of Defence and MI5.
You know MI5 and all the secret service agencies don't swear allegiance to the British people or the British government. They swear allegiance to protect the Royal family.
>> No. 3084 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 7:17 am
3084 spacer
>>3083
What.a.revelation. You're a genius mate.
>> No. 3085 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 7:28 am
3085 spacer
>>3083

That is... A good fucking point, lad. I'm surprised no one has mentioned this with regards to the cover ups.

I wouldn't be surprised if purple gets a knock on the door about this and told to delete stuff like the Ryan Giggs super injunction debacle, although I think he just did that so he wouldn't get a knock on the door rather than because of it come to think of it.
>> No. 3086 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 12:58 pm
3086 spacer
>>3085
Do you honestly think those at the top of MI5 think "well I can't possibly cover this up, I've sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen." Don't joke.

More important with respect to a possible cover up is the importance of the Monarchy as part of the British State and it's place in society.
>> No. 3087 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 2:06 pm
3087 spacer
>>3086

This is from 2011 but still somewhat relevant in regards to our ever benevolent Royal family.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/royal-family-granted-new-right-of-secrecy-2179148.html



>The Royal Family is to be granted absolute protection from public scrutiny in a controversial legal reform designed to draw a veil of secrecy over the affairs of the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William.

>Letters, emails and documents relating to the monarch, her heir and the second in line to the throne will no longer be disclosed even if they are in the public interest.
>> No. 3088 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 2:24 pm
3088 spacer
>>3086
> Do you honestly think those at the top of MI5 think "well I can't possibly cover this up, I've sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen." Don't joke.
What the fuck are you talking about? Why would they think they can't cover it up because of their oath?Surely they would think they CAN cover it up.

And the answer to whether I think that is the case is yes, 100%.
>> No. 3089 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 2:58 pm
3089 spacer
>>3088
>Why would they think they can't cover it up because of their oath?Surely they would think they CAN cover it up.
That's not what I said matey.

>And the answer to whether I think that is the case is yes, 100%.

Heh. Do you also think the armed forces spend their time wondering about the potential threats to the Queen today, and those taking the citizenship oath are spending their time wondering how best to serve their adopted monarch? Be realistic. At the very most those at the top will feel some sort of 'British duty' to protect the monarchy, if you think that's going to be secondary to their protection of the British State as a whole then that's just absurd. Things like >>3087 are cause for concern, however I highly doubt that'll be to protect things like a possible overthrow of the government by the Queen. Abuse allegations, maybe. You're on another planet if you think their number one priority is worrying about who might find out what goings on are happening at the palace though.
>> No. 3090 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 3:04 pm
3090 spacer
>>3089
>That's not what I said matey.
I'm not him but the problem is that what you said doesn't seem to make any sense.
>> No. 3092 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 4:33 pm
3092 spacer
>>3089

The monarchy is a massive cash cow, if you think that the people who run this country>>3089 don't want to protect that then you're dense.
>> No. 3093 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 4:34 pm
3093 spacer
>>3089
> Do you also think the armed forces spend their time wondering about the potential threats to the Queen
Yes...do you not?
> I highly doubt that'll be to protect things like a possible overthrow of the government by the Queen.
No one is saying the Queen wants to overthrow anything. Protecting her though - that's exactly what the oath is for.
> You're on another planet if you think their number one priority is worrying about who might find out what goings on are happening at the palace though.
GCHQ shill confirmed lads, disregard.

>>3090
He's just here to try and make it appear unrealistic and to muddy the waters, and to cast doubt on what is happening. Ignore him. Probably a copper/mason/Illuminati employee/The Great King Pindar, Ruler Of All Mankind sent here to shit up the thread because it's getting too close to the money.
>> No. 3094 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 4:49 pm
3094 spacer
>>3093
>Yes...do you not?
No, I don't. I think they spend their time assessing threats to the UK and their potential future involvements.

>No one is saying the Queen wants to overthrow anything. Protecting her though - that's exactly what the oath is for.
This is a hilarious belief you people have, you think anyone gives a moments thought to the oath after they've taken it?? Their only interest in protecting the monarch is for either leverage with ministers, blackmail, or for simple want to protect an important part of the State. It doesn't exist to guard the Queen, it exists to guard the country, oath or not, and that's what it does. Except when it's spying on its citizens of course.

>>3092
Not sure what that has to do with it.

>>3090
Yes it does. I didn't say they 'can't cover it up because of the oath', that would be bizarre. If they do cover shit up to do with the monarchy its either a) because it's part of their job to protect the monarchy, b) for leverage in government or c) to extract money from them or the govt. It's not some stupid personal protection service for the Queen and co, all this blabber about the oath is absent from how people actually damn well function.
>> No. 3095 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 5:04 pm
3095 spacer
>>3094

So tell us GCHQlad, how does an employee such as yourself view your responsibilities to the Crown?
>> No. 3096 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 5:12 pm
3096 spacer
>>3095
Why are you calling me that?
>> No. 3097 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 5:27 pm
3097 spacer
>>3094
>Yes it does.
No, it doesn't. It appears as though you misunderstood what you were responding to in the first place and are arguing on a tangent to the conversation.
>> No. 3098 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 5:42 pm
3098 spacer
>>3097
Like I said, he's here to try and muddy the issue. Ignore him.
>> No. 3099 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 5:52 pm
3099 spacer
>>3098
Are you Russian? They're notable for dismissing things they don't like.
>> No. 3100 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 6:12 pm
3100 spacer
I wonder which one of the royals done a noncing.
>> No. 3101 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 6:33 pm
3101 spacer
>>3100
All of them.
>> No. 3102 Anonymous
19th July 2014
Saturday 7:24 pm
3102 spacer
>>3099
Did you just insinuate that he's a foreign agent?
>> No. 3103 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 9:27 am
3103 spacer
Regardless of this GCHQ chap trying to muddy the waters, shall we have a recap?

The royals, including Prince Charles, The Queen, Prince Phillip, and probably Wills at the very least as well, are all involved in a satanic cult that favours ritual child abuse, and are protected by the security services. Many politicians are also involved as well, including people like Ken Clark, homosexual peadophile, who was recently sacked by Cameron because the allegations about him are threatening to become too public.

The royals are probably in it all for a laugh, but the brunt of politicians have been engineered/vetted for being into this sort of stuff so the security agencies/zionist agents have blackmail material against them, and can be forced to do their bidding.

Tony Blair and Cliff Richard are also cross-dressing peados too, according to some sources. The most verifiable one involving Cliff being the Elm Tree Guest House signing in book.

Right. That's a good start, what have I missed?
>> No. 3104 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 10:47 am
3104 spacer
>>3103
Lizards
>> No. 3105 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 11:20 am
3105 spacer
>>3104
David Icke and his lizards story are pretty obviously controlled opposition. They tell a great amount of truth, then throw the lizards stuff in to make it all sound unbelievable.
>> No. 3106 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 12:39 pm
3106 spacer
>>3103
Pretty sure Prince George is leading it.
>> No. 3107 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 12:47 pm
3107 spacer
>>3088
>>3090


He is saying the thought should be "This matter is too big/important for me to cover up, regardless of my oath to the Queen".

My worry is that those at the top of M15 and such organisations will be well aware of what can be done to them should they decide to go against their oath. They have, no doubt, had a hand in similar doings themselves.

As for the GCHQlad/muddy water accusations, these have been jumped upon and (seemingly) followed blindly on the basis of a misunderstood sentence. Who's to say the accusations aren't the work of 'GCHQ', acting on a opportune rift in the discussion (if they're the work of an organisation at all, rather than some anonymous guy whos fed off of another anonymous' * misinterpretation)?

* Is that the correct use of an apostrophe?
>> No. 3108 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 12:54 pm
3108 spacer
>>3107
If GCHQ monitors .gs it has better things to do than post here.

Probably


What would it achieve anyway?
>> No. 3109 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 1:29 pm
3109 spacer
>>3107
> these have been jumped upon and (seemingly) followed blindly on the basis of a misunderstood sentence.
No mate, this complete arsehole has posted multiple shitty posts where he purposefully misunderstands what is happening and says the opposite type of thing to try and make people end up discussing his idiocy instead of discussing the real problem at hand. He's either a complete idiot (probably true anyway) or a cunning zionist silver-tongue sent here to mess with us.

So tell me GCHQ lad, do you fuck kids yourself as well, or merely approve of those who do?
>> No. 3110 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 1:31 pm
3110 spacer
>>3108
> What would it achieve anyway?
There's an awful lot been said in this thread that certain people don't want said. If he can make the thread descend into a shitposting argument instead of an examination of the facts, it undermines the veracity of the allegations.

I wonder when the stuff about Blair (or should I say "Miranda") will come out.
>> No. 3111 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 1:53 pm
3111 spacer
>>3110
This is right. Leaks about how 'services' train operatives to derail discussion and fracture solidarity are actually more insidious than the surveillance in my opinion. Imagine if the Saffer Apartheid government had these capabilities.
>> No. 3112 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 1:55 pm
3112 spacer

miranda.png
311231123112

>> No. 3113 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:05 pm
3113 spacer
>>3111
The other place's /pol/ is well aware of this, there are some pics knocking round with loads of obvious shill posts collated. They weren't fooled either.
>> No. 3114 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:08 pm
3114 spacer
>>3113
I really can't tell anymore if we've decided to make /boo/ into a parody board, our mentally ill contingent is increasingly active or these are the sincerely held beliefs of perfectly rational and sane individuals.
>> No. 3115 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:13 pm
3115 spacer
>>3114
You have got to be kidding? You don't think they have people posting on 4chan?

It's a major hivemind of the internet. Of COURSE they want to influence opinion there, if they can.

I can't decide if you're simply a credulous fool or another paid poster.

They don't like the internet for exactly reasons like this thread. Look at the OP - look at many other posts.

They control the printed/broadcast media completely. You think they don't want to control the internet too? That's why there is all this talk of the death of anonymity. They don't want people to be able to post about the people in power fucking kids and starting wars, and posting the truth of why and where these things happen.
>> No. 3116 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:23 pm
3116 spacer
>>3114

Your definition of mental illness seems to be out of date by about 50 years. I hope it was an off the cuff comment and not a sincerely held belief of a perfectly rational and sane individual.

Let me guess, some of your best friends are mentally ill, right?
>> No. 3117 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:25 pm
3117 spacer
And, just like that, discourse is slided away from the matter at hand to something immaterial.
>> No. 3118 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:25 pm
3118 spacer
>>3116

I don't think it was an entirely serious claim.

As for paid GCHQ posters, heck, I'll do it, I've got nothing else on.
>> No. 3119 Anonymous ## Mod ##
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:33 pm
3119 spacer
Two of the posts made today in this thread are from British IP addresses which have never posted on any part of this website before.
>> No. 3120 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:34 pm
3120 spacer
>>3118

Same here. Can actual GCHQlad put our names on the short list for the next round of paid shill intake please?
>> No. 3121 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:35 pm
3121 spacer
>>3107
>the top of M15
It's called the A406 now, m8.
>> No. 3122 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:36 pm
3122 spacer
>>3120

Is one of them me? I've had some internet troubles and might have gotten a new IP address last night.
>> No. 3124 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:38 pm
3124 spacer
>>3119
I'm presuming one is me, since I'm at work and haven't posted here from work before.
>> No. 3125 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:39 pm
3125 spacer
>>3122
No and

>>3124
no.
>> No. 3126 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:39 pm
3126 spacer
>>3119
Thanks.

I'd imagine this will mean in the future they will make a few posts in other places first to legitimise themselves. I also imagine that they've been posting here long before today.
>> No. 3127 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:41 pm
3127 spacer
Either there are two sets of people trolling each other here or there's at least one set of idiots.

>>3115
>You have got to be kidding? You don't think they have people posting on 4chan?

No, I don't. They don't have the human resources to do this, at least from the UK.

>They don't like the internet for exactly reasons like this thread. Look at the OP - look at many other posts.

What about them? Do you think you're a danger to the establishment? Really?


What possible reason would they post on a elatively obscure board for? There's literally nothing to gain, heh.


SHILL SHILL SHILL
>> No. 3128 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:43 pm
3128 spacer
>>3119

>made today

So everything below
>>3102

I'm the one getting the accusation of working for them, I wish, I work in a goddamn warehouse.
>> No. 3130 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 2:51 pm
3130 spacer
>>3127
> They don't have the human resources to do this, at least from the UK.
I laughed so much I almost cried.
> What possible reason would they post on a elatively obscure board for?
Because they've been watching anonymous for quite some time now. They infiltrated them over the scientology stuff - that whole episode made them rather uneasy. What if all these people started protesting against the truth? Why, it could be very messy. Might even cut into their baby fucking schedule.
>> No. 3132 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:02 pm
3132 spacer
Anyway...

Here's some more stuff about a dead MPeadophile.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jul/19/police-investigate-sex-abuse-claims-labour-peer-viscount-tonypandy

>Police are investigating historical sex abuse allegations made against Labour peer Lord Tonypandy involving a nine-year-old boy.

Just stumbled on this as well. It's from 2008 and it's the mail so my sincere apologies, thought it was interesting nontheless.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1066171/Buckingham-Palace-butler-ran-paedophile-sex-ring-working-Royal-Family.html
>> No. 3133 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:05 pm
3133 spacer
I'm in two minds about western spies. On one hand they definitely do important and essentially good things, but they seem to be embroiled in so much bad shit that I can't honestly weigh up whether they're a net plus or minus.

https://www.youtube.com/v/C-CG5w4YwOI
>> No. 3134 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:14 pm
3134 spacer
>>3127

I don't understand how you can argue that this thread isn't a threat to the establishment, .gs has hundreds of unique users who read the site. This discussion is anonymous so people don't fear the consequences of what they say like they would in public or on facebook (which might be misguided, I'm sure GCHQ knows who we all are anyway) and so they can form opinions on the subject after a much more involved thought process. As most of us will know, it's must harder to change someone's opinion after they've made it than it is to stop them forming it in the first place. You also have to remember that people on .gs aren't just voices on the internet, they have family and friends, and when they talk to them they will use what they've picked up in this conversation to influence their opinions, those people will then form their own opinions and so on.

Nobody is suggesting that the next .gs pub crawl will turn in to a V style march on Westminister because of this thread, but it is another proverbial straw that the establishment would prefer to avoid. That said though, the mod post above doesn't prove anything, and we can't just all start going around with tinfoil hats on because there are two unique IPs in this thread, there could be any number of reasons for that, dynamic IPs, phones, work addresses, people here from 4chan or conspiracy forums, people here from googling the subject etc.

I think the real question is whether GCHQ and the like have the time or the inclination to post here. It's entirely possible and I don't want to rule out the possibility of malicious shitposting, but surely the security services would know that most threads on the internet devolve in to useless name calling and get derailed to a completely unrelated topic eventually even without their intervention. It seems like a complete waste of government money and time to me, which is why I think it's probably current policy.
>> No. 3135 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:20 pm
3135 spacer
>>3134
> most threads on the internet devolve in to useless name calling and get derailed to a completely unrelated topic eventually
I don't think this one is going to do that. Not if I have anything to do with it anyway.
>> No. 3136 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:21 pm
3136 spacer
>>3134

>.gs has hundreds of unique users

Fucking hell! There was only the three of us before you bloody rozzers showed up!
>> No. 3137 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:23 pm
3137 spacer
Just thought I would drop this in here.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-23695896

> Israel: Government pays students to fight internet battles

That's the /pol/ stuff I was on about earlier. And if anyone starts saying this is nothing to do with the UK, you can fuck right off. It's the same people basically. The freemason pedo cult are all controlled by the Zionists. That's why it was set up in the first place, to control politics.
>> No. 3138 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:24 pm
3138 spacer
>>3136
Only three of us actually post, although there are hundreds of lurkers. And one GCHQ shill.

I remember reading somewhere once that lurker/poster ratio is something like 95/5. I did just pull that out of my arse memory, but it's true that vastly more people read than post.
>> No. 3139 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:28 pm
3139 spacer
>>3137
The tricky thing about stuff like this is that if it were to be attempted in the UK, I think someone would eventually leak it to the press, either openly or anonymously, as has happened in Israel, Russia and so on. There is definitely some COINTELPRO-type stuff going on but I don't think it's likely that GCHQ et al has hundreds of pet British shills who they trust to not spill the beans. It has to be more complex.
>> No. 3140 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:29 pm
3140 spacer
>>3135

There's already a lot of useless namecalling going on and I'm confident that we'll be talking about what brand of tea they use at GCHQ by post 500.

I'd suggest issuing bans for anyone not talking about the actual issue, anyone using phrases like "you're a GCHQ shill/you're mentally ill" and just general baiting. Starting with me, obviously.
>> No. 3141 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:30 pm
3141 spacer
>>3134
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/14/gchq-tools-manipulate-online-information-leak

>Documents leaked by Edward Snowden reveal programs to track targets, spread information and manipulate online debates
>spread information and manipulate online debates
>> No. 3142 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:36 pm
3142 spacer
>>3133
I wouldn't give a shit what they are embroiled in, so long as they leave us westerners (the people they are supposed to protect) alone. Stop listening to me GCHQ, and give me a job. I am bilingual.
>> No. 3143 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:42 pm
3143 spacer
>>3137

I recall seeing a large amount of broken English in the Guardian comments section back when Papa Bear annexed the Crimea, all staunchly pro-Moscow of course, and thinking "could it be... nah, you're paranoid, mate". Then it was revealed about a month or two later they'd paid people to flood the Washington Post with that exact sort of thing, pretty much confirming they'd done it elsewhere.
>> No. 3144 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 3:42 pm
3144 spacer
>>3142
Applications are only accepted through Elm Tree Guest House. Hand in your CV there.
>> No. 3145 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 4:10 pm
3145 spacer
>>3142
> us westerners (the people they are supposed to protect)
They are not there to protect us, they are there to protect the elite. The international elite.

So far, it seems to be working out well enough. Which politicians have been arrested/exposed? Certainly none who are alive to take the heat.
>> No. 3146 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 4:22 pm
3146 spacer
>>3142
Don't bother, lad. If you apply for a job in national security, you're not allowed to tell anyone, not even your signing monkey in the JCP.
>> No. 3147 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 4:26 pm
3147 spacer
I actually applied to one of those jobs they advertised about 3/4 years ago looking for online security specialists. Got turned down on the grounds that I haven't worked in years, and probably over my convictions for da weed.

Pretty glad I didn't get the job with everything that's come out over the recent years. I don't think I would have been able to help myself going Snowden.

Anyway, it's obvious my barely relevant skills would probably not have been enough. Although they were more than a match for mumsnet. Yes, I know...
>> No. 3148 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 6:09 pm
3148 spacer
I couldn't work for the security services because it means they'd look at my life in detail and that makes me uncomfortable. They'll do it anyway but at least I can pretend they're not.
>> No. 3150 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 6:11 pm
3150 spacer
GCHQlad, put in a good word for me. I can fit in any urban area and I speak 3 languages. Hire me.
>> No. 3152 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 6:13 pm
3152 spacer
>>3150
My work security has a turnstile and a blippy card and some cones security puts up to discourage people from getting dropped off ON A PUBLIC FUCKING ROAD.
>> No. 3153 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 6:13 pm
3153 spacer
>>3150

I'm sure they already know that m8.
>> No. 3154 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 6:17 pm
3154 spacer
>>3152
If you don't get dropped off on a public road, won't you be walking off and into the secret area from a public road? What difference does this make?

Tell them I will never get dropped off on a public road, please. I need a job.
>> No. 3156 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 8:21 pm
3156 spacer
Former MP's son thinks his father was a prolific sexual predator who may have had links to a paedophile ring in Westminster:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/10978492/My-father-was-a-sexual-predator-like-Jimmy-Savile-says-son-of-former-Tory-MP.html
>> No. 3157 Anonymous
20th July 2014
Sunday 8:26 pm
3157 spacer
More Elm House "guests".

http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/sir-nicholas-fairbairn-in-child-abuse-scandal-link-1-3474912

>Lists of visitors to the Elm Guest House – which hosted parties in the 1980s where vulnerable boys were sexually assaulted after being plied with alcohol – are now in the hands of police officers.

>The hand-written documents, which have been seen by Scotland on Sunday, state that a number of politicians including “N Fairburn” and “C Smith” - who asked to be called “Tubby” - visited the property on 7 June 1982.

Also.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/westminster-abuse-inquiries-at-least-10-famous-politicians-named-again-and-again-by-child-abuse-helpline-callers-9590911.html

>Child protection campaigners say at least 10 “famous” current and former politicians will now face being investigated over allegations of historic abuse.

>The figures, including a number who are now dead, have been identified “again and again” by callers to child abuse helplines, it has been claimed.

Also also, I'm curious as to what the Ed Winchester lad who posted earlier in the thread had to say about this video that was supposedly in the hands of the police?

I hope you're not zipped up in a hold all m8.
>> No. 3158 Anonymous
23rd July 2014
Wednesday 12:37 pm
3158 spacer
>>3070
Found a bit more on this second dossier story here http://eassurvey.wordpress.com/2014/07/23/chilling-day-special-branch-swooped-to-seize-another-dossier-on-vip-abusers-16-mps-names-mentioned-in-1984-report-on-paedophile-lobbys-influence-in-westminster/

Two names are named, both of course now dead. Sir Rhodes Boyson and Sir Keith Joseph. Of course, it's only that blog naming them so who knows, could be quite slanderous.

There's an interview with him here.
http://www.itv.com/news/granada/story/2014-07-21/the-prison-threat-that-stopped-high-profile-child-abusers-being-revealed/

He says he will be willing to talk about everything with the inquiry. Wonder where that will get him.
>> No. 3159 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 4:57 pm
3159 spacer

article-2665297-02C8F9D00000044D-582_306x423.jpg
315931593159
Apparently Leonard Rossiter used to watch attempted homosexual rape now.

I notice the tone of the story is slightly more forgiving than usual.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2672922/Sex-predator-victim-great-celeb-witchhunt-Police-probe-46-year-old-allegation-against-late-comedy-genius-Leonard-Rossiter.html
>> No. 3160 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 7:28 pm
3160 spacer
>>3159

Who next? Ronnie Barker? Charlie Chaplin? Stan Laurel?
>> No. 3161 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 7:33 pm
3161 spacer
>>3160

Didn't Charlie Chaplin already bonk a lot of 14/15 year olds?
>> No. 3162 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 8:25 pm
3162 spacer
>>3161

Bloody hell. I didn't know that.
>> No. 3163 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 8:39 pm
3163 spacer

bloodyhell.png
316331633163
>>3159

Police to dig up infamour sex predator and hand cuff him to a lamp post outside of the BBC to ward off would-be sex pests, we asked the BBC for a comment but they simply told us to bugger off and not to call the police.
>> No. 3164 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 8:39 pm
3164 spacer
>>3161
Next you'll be telling me that Lewis Carol was a nonce!
>> No. 3165 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 8:55 pm
3165 spacer
All these names, but there's one thing I want to know.

They keep saying there are names of politicians active now.

Who do they mean? I think they established Ken Clarke is one.
>> No. 3166 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 9:33 pm
3166 spacer

1f368285af970000dda7849b40ad5c81_34644[1].jpg
316631663166
>>3165
It seems logical to me that most will be Tories. They all went to public schools where kiddy fiddling is known to have gone on, and many child abusers were themselves nonced as younguns so it makes sense to me. Just purge all the male Tories, god will look after his own. Do the same with the lib dems just to be sure.
>> No. 3167 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 9:41 pm
3167 spacer
>>3165
Big Fat Tobacco? Really?

Hague I can definitely see
>> No. 3168 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 9:53 pm
3168 spacer
>>3166

Go paint your Warhammers, Ed.

But yeah, he's probably right.
>> No. 3169 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 9:54 pm
3169 spacer
>>3162>>3164

Oh wait, are all those people already confirmed nonces?

Really, Ronnie Barker?
>> No. 3170 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 10:10 pm
3170 spacer
>>3169

Ronnie Barker wasn't a nonce AFAIK, but his son was a fugitive for many years to escape nonce-related charges.
>> No. 3171 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 11:02 pm
3171 spacer
>>3166

You assume noncery takes place in public schools, and seeing as ALL Tories must have gone to public schools (they say "one" n' shit after-all), they have obviously been turned into nonces themselves.

This is a logical chain of events to you?
>> No. 3172 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 11:07 pm
3172 spacer

YoungEisenhorn_Inquisitor[1].jpg
317231723172
>>3171
Innocence proves nothing, Torylad. Prepare for judgement.
>> No. 3173 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 11:12 pm
3173 spacer

MyHero.jpg
317331733173
>>3172

Think you can take me on, pleb?
>> No. 3174 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 11:17 pm
3174 spacer

guillotine_french_revolution[1].jpg
317431743174
>>3173
Justice knows every man's number, establishment cockroach!
>> No. 3175 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 11:18 pm
3175 spacer
>>3173
KAEC

Kill all etonian cunts.
>> No. 3176 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 11:20 pm
3176 spacer
>>3175
That's a pleonasm m8.
>> No. 3177 Anonymous
24th July 2014
Thursday 11:23 pm
3177 spacer

SaintBoris.jpg
317731773177
>>3174

Hold onto your eye balls, peasant! The Giant Water Cannon is in town (at least that's what the ladies call it, harharhar)
>> No. 3178 Anonymous
25th July 2014
Friday 6:19 am
3178 spacer
>>3157

>Also also, I'm curious as to what the Ed Winchester lad who posted earlier in the thread had to say about this video that was supposedly in the hands of the police?

What exactly would you like to know?
>> No. 3179 Anonymous
25th July 2014
Friday 10:10 am
3179 spacer
>>3178
Well have any journos seen this tape yet? Has it been verified to actually exist? and if it has how come we've seen/heard nothing about it? Why is it just being sat on?
etc

Also if you're the same Winchesterlad glad to hear you haven't been strung up under a bridge with bricks in your pockets or anything.
>> No. 3180 Anonymous
26th July 2014
Saturday 8:50 pm
3180 spacer
Lads, it's obvious there's a massive cover up going on here.

What can we do?

I mean this seriously.
>> No. 3181 Anonymous
26th July 2014
Saturday 8:52 pm
3181 spacer
>>3180
We can't do much. Just sit back and let them nonce away. Money talks, lad.
>> No. 3182 Anonymous
26th July 2014
Saturday 8:52 pm
3182 spacer
>>3181
I can't accept that.
>> No. 3183 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 6:38 am
3183 spacer
>>3179

Tape exists. No worries on that one. I hear differing reports as to what is on it though, and it is not very long. Let the CEOP boys deal with this one. No journo could see it without getting done for child porn in the UK, alas. If you've "seen/heard nothing about it" I would suggest you read more news media. I am also pretty certain who is on the tape, due to stuff that has been swirling around for years at the Winchester.

Knowing a few of the CEOP lads I can assure you that it is not being "sat on". They are serious fuckers.

>>3180

>Lads, it's obvious there's a massive cover up going on here.

I would suggest a massive cover up is falling to pieces, actually, but hey.
>> No. 3184 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 7:10 am
3184 spacer
>>3183
Go on then, give us a few names, lad.
>> No. 3185 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 7:27 am
3185 spacer
>>3184

His first name is Leon.
>> No. 3186 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 7:50 am
3186 spacer
>>3185
Does he kill people for a living?
>> No. 3187 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 9:39 am
3187 spacer
>>3183
> I would suggest a massive cover up is falling to pieces, actually, but hey.
I doubt it. They might throw out the odd scrap, but we know the really powerful people aren't being touched. I think Leon here is the exception that proves the rule - and that's if they even charge him with the pedo stuff, which isn't looking all that likely.
>> No. 3188 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 9:52 am
3188 spacer
>>3187

>which isn't looking all that likely.

Heh. Heh. Hehehehehe...oh how I wish I could tell you what is going on behind the scenes at the moment. Sorry for not providing info, and coming across like a cunt, but all I can say is that a certain Leon will be having some very sleepless nights.
>> No. 3189 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 10:10 am
3189 spacer
>>3188
Exception that proves the rule.

I sometimes wish I had some computer skills. If I did, I would probably make it a holy war of mine to infiltrate the emails and IT systems the government has to try and get to the bottom of this, but sadly I can't even install windows.
>> No. 3190 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 12:01 pm
3190 spacer

reckless.jpg
319031903190
Oh, and by the way, to everyone who said this whole pedo thing wasn't being used to control politicians, have a butchers at this letter sent to our dear old PM by Mark Reckless.
>> No. 3191 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 12:04 pm
3191 spacer

reckless2.jpg
319131913191
>>3190
2/2
>> No. 3192 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 12:12 pm
3192 spacer
>>3191
What is this, a letter for ants or something?
>> No. 3193 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 12:13 pm
3193 spacer

pm2 (1).jpg
319331933193
>>3190
2/2
>> No. 3194 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 12:59 pm
3194 spacer
>>3188
>oh how I wish I could tell you what is going on behind the scenes at the moment
I'm assuming you can't tell us because you don't know, since if you did know you certainly could tell us, you cunt.
>> No. 3195 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 1:04 pm
3195 spacer
>>3193

Ouch, fuck me, that is how you do it.

>>3194

Mainly because you wouldn't believe me, and the only way I could get you to believe me would be to identify myself. I have chosen to avoid that.

Look m7, I hate the fucking pigs, but I have a certain respect for those involved in investigating this kind of shit - they tend to resign very publicly if they get fucked around by the top brass. Check www.nickdavies.net and filter for "child abuse" articles.
>> No. 3196 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 1:10 pm
3196 spacer
>>3192
Sorry, the original image was too big so I tried shrinking it. I thought it was fine but I obviously fucked it up. I'll go fix that now.
>> No. 3197 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 1:12 pm
3197 spacer

reckless.jpg
319731973197
>>3196
>> No. 3198 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 1:18 pm
3198 spacer
>>3195
>You got me, actually I don't really know anything.
Thanks for confirming our suspicions.
>> No. 3199 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 1:23 pm
3199 spacer
>>3195

Does your bullshit get sold in metric or old money? It's just that I have a client who really wants to lie to some French people you see, and mixing the units is a bitch.
>> No. 3200 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 4:03 pm
3200 spacer

PSA.png
320032003200
So are they waiting til the end of the Commonwealth games for the next round of revelations, or will this have to wait til after the referendum?
>> No. 3201 Anonymous
27th July 2014
Sunday 4:41 pm
3201 spacer
>>3200

I do hope so, but right now all the news' airtime is indeed being taken up by Games, Planes and Automobiles*.

*The Merkava tank is a kind of automobile.
>> No. 3202 Anonymous
28th July 2014
Monday 11:24 pm
3202 spacer
Holy shit lads, have a look at this. This article was originally published in 2010

http://www.rense.com/general89/brownpd.htm

Bit of a read, but very very worth it.

Cliff notes:

* Dunblane was a masonic plot to kill those kids as they were beginning to talk - the school is linked to people in power, and they'd been bumming the kids there. All files and findings from the inquiry on it got locked up for 100 years on some special order.

* Blair, Mandelson, Gordon Brown and a bunch of others were part of or complicit in the pedo ring, and the FBI managed to get enough of them on a sting (paying for cp with credit cards) to blackmail the UK government into supporting the Iraq war.

* MI5. FBI and a whole bunch of other shadowy figures are behind it all. And they are working for someone very different than the British public.

And a whole bunch of other shit. Seriously, read it.
>> No. 3203 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 11:22 am
3203 spacer
The helpful tinfoil hat wearers over at /r/conspiracy have helpfully collated a list of all these stories in one place.

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/2boqzq/the_breaking_uk_vip_paedophile_scandal_what_we/

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/2by2aa/the_uk_breaking_pedophile_scandal_what_we_know_so/
>> No. 3204 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 11:31 am
3204 spacer
It's a few days old but didn't see it posted here.

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5330/audio-file-set-to-blow-lid-off-paedophile-scandal-at-westminster

>Audio file set to blow lid off paedophile scandal at Westminster: Customs officer recorded as he identifies ex-minister on seized video of child sex abuse

>At least two MPs have received an explosive audio recording that threatens to blow the lid off the paedophile scandal at Westminster.

>The digital recording is of an ex-Customs officer who positively identifies a former Conservative cabinet minister as being captured on a video of child sex abuse.

>In a potentially incendiary move, MPs are weighing whether to name the ex-minister who is captured on the video in Parliament.

>One MP told Exaro: “This could be a very important disclosure, and we need to address what we should do about it.”

>In March, Exaro revealed how Customs officials were trying to silence one ex-colleague, Maganlal Solanki, who seized the video at Dover’s Eastern Car Terminal in 1982.
>> No. 3205 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 11:52 am
3205 spacer
>>3202
"Mike James, an English patriot, is a blacklisted and surveilled former freelance journalist resident in Zionist-occupied Germany since 1992 with additional long-haul stays in East Africa, Poland and Switzerland. He advocates a Leaderless Resistance to destroy the Soviet European Union and is actively working towards a free and independent England."
Clearly anyone who describes himself this way is a model of rationality and objectitivity.
>> No. 3206 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 12:29 pm
3206 spacer
>>3205
Nevertheless, he raises some interesting points.

Why are the files related to Dunblane to be kept locked up for 100 years? The only time stuff normally gets that treatment is when it involves spies or national security. What could a bunch of kids being murdered by a freemason have to do with either of those I wonder.
>> No. 3207 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 2:02 pm
3207 spacer
>>3203
Wow. That is an unbelievable (well, sadly not) trove of information.

This made particularly interested reading.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon03.htm

Turns out the bloke who gave the speech was prosecuted for misdiagnosing patients by the American government a few years later, related to this. Also if you google him now, there's medical staff review site with only one review of him, where he's given 1 star out of 5 in all areas. Nothing suspect there.
>> No. 3208 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 3:31 pm
3208 spacer
>>3207
In fairness, he does make some extraordinary claims in that speech, and if the allegations against him were true you'd expect his professional reputation to be in tatters afterwards. The fact that genuine paedophile rings of rich and powerful people exist and have done so in the past doesn't automatically mean that the widely-discredited reports of satanic ritual abuse in the 80s are suddenly true...
>> No. 3209 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 4:04 pm
3209 spacer
>>3207
Hang on, are you sure he was prosecuted? I've done some further reading, and while it seems that several doctors at a hospital that was hugely influenced by the speech (http://mentalhealth.about.com/library/weekly/aa111097.htm), but D.C. Hammond himself seems to have just stopped talking about the issue (for whatever reason...) and gone back to research and practicing hypnotic shrinkage (http://therapists.psychologytoday.com/rms/name/D.+Corydon_Hammond_PhD,ECNS,BCN,QEEG-D_Salt+Lake+City_Utah_47737 and http://healthcare.utah.edu/fad/mddetail.php?physicianID=u0032313#tab1).
>> No. 3210 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 4:35 pm
3210 spacer
>>3208
Some of the Saville allegations include satanic ritual. Chanting and ceremonies etc.

It's really not that far a leap to imagine that people who enjoy raping and killing children are satanists.
>> No. 3211 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 4:52 pm
3211 spacer
>>3210
Hang on there a second. Rings of nonces obviously rape children, but when did the fact that they kill them also become an established fact? This thread has mostly been about possible paedophile rings within the U.K. 'Establishment', and suddenly that seems to have been conflated with older SRA-type stuff, which seems like a distraction to me - the SRA and false memory stuff is undoubtedly fascinating stuff, and worthy of a thread in its own right, but it's much more tenuous and implausible than what seems to be the unarguable fact that real rings of powerful people committed horrific abuse and covered it up. I've not spent much time talking to paedophiles, but I'd assume that most of them abuse kids for the sake of abusing kids, and not because they're part of some satanic cult. Aside from the fact that many of these claims are demonstrably false (I've just finished reading more on the psychiatric unit that was closed down mentioned in >>3209 and this article makes it clear how easily false memories can be created http://www.houstonpress.com/1995-07-06/news/diagnosis/full/) there's also the faint whiff of it somehow exusing or mitigating the actions of the abusers - 'the devil made me do it', 'the cult would have killed me if I refused' etc.
>> No. 3212 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 4:58 pm
3212 spacer
>>3211
To clarify, I'm not saying all memories of ritual abuse are false - some are undoubtedly real, because some people will always dress their perversions up in fancy clothes, and transgressive sex and the occult do have an undeniable link for those on the left hand path - but the overwhelming majority of such claims (when they were at their peak in the eighties and nineties, at least) were false memories created by generally well-meaning but misguided people, or possibly some form of protective distortion or mixture of real and imagined stuff that was taken at face value by therapists too eager to believe. http://mentalhealth.about.com/cs/dissociative/a/dabaterec.htm gives a reasonably balanced view of things, I think.

TL;DR I have no doubt horrible things have happened to ARE EM, but I still think she's a paranoid schizophrenic rather than a reliable witness.
>> No. 3213 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 5:00 pm
3213 spacer
>>3211
Ah, the old false memory smear.

Did you read the article in question? Without prompting, many many other professionals said they had patients reporting the same stuff he talked about.

You do realise why it's called the Greenbaum speech.
>> No. 3214 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 5:02 pm
3214 spacer
Yes, it's perfectly reasonable that all those children that were killed at Dunblane should get no justice, and the files related to it should be locked for 100 years.
>> No. 3215 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 5:31 pm
3215 spacer
>>3214
Apologies, I was probably being too broad in my comments. I'm not saying there isn't something very smelly indeed about Dunblane, and although I don't personally believe the funny handshake brigade to be quite the clandestine force for evil some people claim they are by their own admission a fraternal order that tends to have members amongst the levels of society we're talking about, and they do like to do each other favours and dress up in funny regalia so all sorts of things are at least possible. Freemason, to me at least, does not automatically equate to satanist.

>>3213

Again, I was probably talking too broadly and reacting too quickly. The Greenbaum speech makes extraordinary claims, as I said, and although I'm inclined to be sceptical I certainly don't dismiss it out of hand - my comments about Greenbaum in >>3208 were based on the false impression that he was directly involved in the Spring Shadows Glen scandal. As I tried to imply with my ellipsis in >>3209 it's at the very least interesting that someone who made such extraordinary claims should go quiet about them, and given the provable US experiments with mind control in things like MKULTRA it's not impossible that his claims are true or at least based on truth. Again, it's interesting, but without accepting the idea of an international mind-control element to the U.K. paedophile ring(s) (which I don't without some compelling evidence, and I'm not sure anyone has claimed anyway) I'm not sure what it's got to do with this thread.
>> No. 3216 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 5:44 pm
3216 spacer
>>3215
It may also be worth pointing out that while the various agencies responsible for child protection were investigating some of the SRA claims that were subsequently proven false (Cleveland and Orkney leap to mind) they weren't investigating the various establishment figures it's now being shown were systematically abusing kids (quite frequently particularly vulnerable and damaged kids at that).

Oh, and Dunblane may stink, but so does the transparent agenda of Mike James. I suppose it's possible his accusations have some truth to them, but I'd need to see some evidence from a source less obviously biased and agenda-driven.
>> No. 3217 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 6:10 pm
3217 spacer
>>3215
> it's at the very least interesting that someone who made such extraordinary claims should go quiet about them
Gee, I wonder why that might be?
>> No. 3218 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 6:20 pm
3218 spacer
>>3216
> transparent agenda of Mike James
What agenda are you speaking of?

Not being snarky, genuinely asking.
>> No. 3219 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 6:31 pm
3219 spacer
>>3218
He's clearly virulent anti-Blair/New Labour, which is fair enough I suppose but should still be taken into consideration. More concerning for me is the hysterical, unpleasant tone and subtext - there's some conflation of homosexuality and paedophilia going on, for a start, and there's and implicit disapproval of homsexuality as well... It reads like the kind of thing the Mail or the Express would publich if they had no fear of legal consequences, basically. Anyone who describes Peter Mandelson as a 'flamboyant homosexual' is either deluded or pushing some kind of moral agenda that simply disapproves of homosexuals in general. Mandelson's a shit, but he was outed by someone against his wishes, and the extent of his flamboyance that I can see is that he neither denies being gay not makes any attempt to hide it any more. He's about as un-scene, un-camp, and generally un-flamboyant about his sexuality as it's possible to be.
>> No. 3220 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 6:46 pm
3220 spacer
>>3218
Compare it with this article, for example http://www.nickdavies.net/1998/04/01/the-sheer-scale-of-child-sexual-abuse-in-britain/ - admittedly Nick Davies was writing about people several rungs further down the establishment ladder, so the claims are inherently less sensational, but the tone is much more measured. Though he's clearly outraged by what he's writing about, and the abuse itself is equally shocking and horrific (up to and including murder), he still writes like a journalist.
>> No. 3221 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 7:02 pm
3221 spacer
>>3220

Our Nick, as we refer to him, gets a free tab at the Winchester.
>> No. 3222 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 7:12 pm
3222 spacer
>>3221
Glad to hear it. Should that tab ever need clearing do let us know so we can have a whip-round - I can't be the only one who'd like to buy him a beer or several.
>> No. 3223 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 7:13 pm
3223 spacer
>>3219
>He's clearly virulent anti-Blair/New Labour
He also mentions "powerful peers" who were conservatives who put the squeeze on to keep silent.

I didn't really get any sense of a political bias in there to be honest. I think it's just that the times he was investigating involved a Labour government being in power.
>> No. 3224 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 7:29 pm
3224 spacer
>>3223
Fair enough, we're allowed to disgree.

>>3210

At risk of hammering the point home, the Nick Davies binge this thread has triggered has found this article from the nineties that shows how a conspiracy and cover up can happen without any hint of satanism, murder, or whatever else: http://www.nickdavies.net/1998/04/01/silencing-a-scandal-the-story-of-colin-smart/
>> No. 3225 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 8:07 pm
3225 spacer
>>3224

All of Our Nick's articles under the "child abuse' filter on his site are really worth a read.
>> No. 3226 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 8:13 pm
3226 spacer
>>3225
Yep, those are the ones I'm currently wading through and being horrified by.
>> No. 3227 Anonymous
1st August 2014
Friday 11:47 am
3227 spacer
BBC are getting on board.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-28228902

1 August 2014 Last updated at 02:56

>A survivor's story: Trapped in a subculture of child abuse
>By Laurence Cawley BBC News

Sample:

>"I was trafficked to Wrexham, Cornwall, Plymouth and London and forced to perform sex acts on men there."

>The person making the claim - we will call him Michael - was at the time a young teenager in the care of Suffolk County Council.

>Now in his late 30s, and still living in Suffolk, Michael's is a case which demonstrates the great difficulty survivors face in trying to get their voices heard.

>He told the authorities about the abuse 20 years ago. He claims nothing was done. He raised them again with both Suffolk Police and the county council again last year.

>Michael claims again, nothing has been done. Worse still, he maintains the authorities have actively worked to discredit him in order to ignore his claims.

>His allegations against the police and the county council have been put in detail to both organisations by the BBC. Suffolk Police said it would not comment on individual cases and the council said an investigation was under way.

>His account of abuse spans several years at different locations. On the surface these episodes of abuse might appear unrelated, but Michael believes they were connected in that an abuser who knew an abuser knew an abuser. And he was effectively passed along that chain.

>"It wasn't quite a paedophile ring," says Michael. "More an affiliation of abusers who all knew each other."

>The physical and sexual abuse, Michael says, began at the hands of his sister when he was aged between three and four and continued later when a boyfriend of his mother allegedly seriously sexually assaulted him.

>He was taken into local authority care aged 13 to be housed at a now-closed adolescent unit in Suffolk where, after refusing to perform a sex act on a visitor, he was locked in a cupboard for 32 hours. On finally being released, he was sexually assaulted.
>> No. 3228 Anonymous
1st August 2014
Friday 11:51 am
3228 spacer
>>3227
Fuck me, they're covering Kincora too.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-28597343

>Kincora abuse investigation stopped by MI5 says ex-army officer
1 August 2014 Last updated at 06:31

Sample:

>A former army intelligence officer has said he was ordered to stop investigating allegations of child sexual abuse at a boys' home in the 1970s.

>Brian Gemmell said a senior MI5 officer told him to stop looking into claims of abuse at Kincora Boys' Home in east Belfast.

>He said he presented a report on the allegations to the officer in 1975.

>In 1981, three senior care staff at the home were jailed for abusing 11 boys.

>It has been claimed that people of the "highest profile" were connected to abuse at the home.

>Mr Gemmell, who worked as an intelligence officer in Northern Ireland in the 1970s, has called for a fresh investigation into the home.

>He has previously spoken anonymously about his investigations into Kincora, but said he had decided to go public because he feels the allegations need to be investigated again.

>The former intelligence officer said that he learned details of what was happening inside the home while gathering information about loyalists.

>He said he was told he was running two agents who had close links to Kincora.
>> No. 3229 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 9:52 pm
3229 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LItAcLMRdA
>> No. 3230 Anonymous
4th August 2014
Monday 6:01 pm
3230 spacer
>>3229
Just started watching this, and I really hope it gets better - exsepted is not an acceptable typo in a film that wants to be taken seriously, and right now it's expecting me to read two seperate sets of text accusations whilst a vistim is also telling me stuff. My brain, like most people's, has trouble absorbing three things at once, and it already feels like I'm going to have to use freeze frame a huge amount to take everything in. Before you complain that these are petty quibbles, I don't think you are - if people can't understand what you're saying then it doesn't matter how shocking the material is, it gets you nowhere.
>> No. 3231 Anonymous
4th August 2014
Monday 7:07 pm
3231 spacer
>>3229
>>3230 here. Notes made whilst watching the film and finished immediately afterwards:

There's some interesting material, but it's very hard to watch because it's so badly put together. It's also so manipulative that I ended up feeling sorry for the people they were accusing - Harman's Newsnight footage leaps to mind, where they cut almost all her answers and left a stream of accusations - which is clearly not the desired effect. It didn't actually change my mind on anything, because like most of us in this thread I've been reading around the subject for a while now, but if I'd known nothing about the case except what I'd seen in mainstream souces in the past few months then I'd have ended up less convinced there were networks and cover ups than if I'd never seen it.

Actually there's some extremely powerful material in here that I hadn't seen before, and the cumulative effect of it is undeniable - a very strong circumstantial case is indeed being presented - but it's still very badly put together and too much to take in at one viewing (the triple-stream of information thing keeps happening, and in trying to read the scrolling subtitles I miss the details of what's going on in the main frame and the voiceover, and that's ignoring how frequently one of those three elements is so clumsily done it's distracting or unreadable). If only the same material had been given to a better film-maker.

Jesus christ. The string music over the German lady's account of her abuse is so loud that I'm struggling to hear what she's actually saying. What the fuck is wrong with this Burton twat? I have no idea if her accusations are true or not, but she clearly believes them and is clearly in pain and distressed by them, and he lacks the respect to let her fucking words be heard? The semi-literate blurb at the end shows how much of a self-regarding prick he is, but even so that's appalling hubris.
>> No. 3232 Anonymous
4th August 2014
Monday 10:48 pm
3232 spacer
>>3231

Its a shame that no actual journos are going anywhere near this story. The presentation quality of this content would be much improved.
>> No. 3233 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 1:26 am
3233 spacer
>>3232
Yeah, I watched it with the mrs and she had me rewind it a bunch of times so she could read some parts she'd missed while listening to stuff.

It was obviously interesting enough for her to ask to do that though. Lots of good info in there.
>> No. 3241 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 3:48 pm
3241 spacer
This seems well dodgy. False accusations against a child abuse witness, fuck all evidence, and still remanded...

http://wacedinburgh.wordpress.com/2014/07/31/abuse-witness-melanie-shaw-remanded-no-evidence-presented/

I imagine they were taking the piss when they sent her to a prison that is on Saville road.
>> No. 3242 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 4:13 pm
3242 spacer
>>3241
>False accusations
U wot? Isn't that for the trial to decide?
>> No. 3243 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 4:15 pm
3243 spacer
>>3232
Given that journos will happily cover a prominent local figure opening an envelope, that nobody's reporting it tends to suggest a non-story.
>> No. 3244 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 4:19 pm
3244 spacer
>>3243

I do tend to agree with the general thrust of your post.
>> No. 3245 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 4:21 pm
3245 spacer
>>3242
Did you read the article? There's zero evidence presented so far.

Also, have you learned nothing from this whole escapade? You strike me as really quite dim.

DERRRR THE PEOPLE IN POWER WILL MAKE SURE THE PEOPLE IN POWER ARE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE DERRRR

That's how I read your post.
>> No. 3246 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 4:28 pm
3246 spacer
>>3245
>There's zero evidence presented so far
The CPS will have had to present evidence to lay the charge in the first place. At the pre-trial hearing you don't normally get much evidence presented. Also, you're assuming that the article is both true and written by someone competent.
>> No. 3249 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 4:38 pm
3249 spacer
>>3246
Well I'll be keeping an eye on this case. Let's see how it pans out.
>> No. 3255 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 5:49 pm
3255 spacer
>>3243

like when the beeb blocked the Savile documentary?
>> No. 3262 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 6:44 pm
3262 spacer
>>3255
No. Had that been a non-story, there wouldn't have been a report to block.
>> No. 3264 Anonymous
5th August 2014
Tuesday 7:06 pm
3264 spacer
>>3180
>What can we do?

Short of marching en masse on Westminster, I think the only things we can do are keep ourselves informed and attempt to inform others.
And of course, to those with the skills and/or insider knowledge to hack or leak, you could be heros.
>> No. 3277 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 1:13 am
3277 spacer
>>3180

talk to people. Make them feel uncomfortable. Half of the reason these fuckers are allowed to operate is that 90% of people don't even really want to accept that this kind of abuse occurs.

These fuckers operate in the shadows and it is your duty to bring them to light.
>> No. 3283 Anonymous
12th August 2014
Tuesday 3:58 pm
3283 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JKtHcM05Dk

It's all gone a bit quiet innit lads?
>> No. 3284 Anonymous
12th August 2014
Tuesday 5:00 pm
3284 spacer
>>3283
Certainly has. I can't find fuck all that's been published that is relevant this week. Looks like a media blackout.

I bet they will drag the inquest out for two years, then sideline the story to page 7 on every paper, by special order.

I've not forgotten about this though. I don't intend to either.
>> No. 3285 Anonymous
12th August 2014
Tuesday 6:05 pm
3285 spacer
>>3284
>I can't find fuck all that's been published that is relevant this week
Because everything happens all the time.
>> No. 3286 Anonymous
12th August 2014
Tuesday 7:07 pm
3286 spacer
>>3285
This is quite a big thing. It shouldn't stop happening until everyone is brought to account.
>> No. 3287 Anonymous
12th August 2014
Tuesday 10:29 pm
3287 spacer
>>3286
What a silly thing to say. We heard nothing on the Pistorius trial for a few weeks because there simply weren't any new developments to report.
>> No. 3288 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 1:04 am
3288 spacer
>>3287
The Pistorius trial is nothing compared to this. To be honest I'm surprised bonfires haven't been built for the guilty yet.
>> No. 3289 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 1:25 am
3289 spacer
Is it just me or is one bloke continuously coming back here and posting about how awful it all is and we should hang everyone from the 80s just in case?
>> No. 3290 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 2:07 am
3290 spacer
>>3289
You've summed up the entire site in one sentence. Busted.
>> No. 3291 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 2:09 am
3291 spacer
Let me just put on record once more how awful it was that Noel Edmonds was able to get away with those despicable things for all those years.

That should do it, right?
>> No. 3292 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 4:11 am
3292 spacer
>>3291
Afraid not. No entertainer with an actual career is allowed to be brought to light.
>> No. 3293 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 7:38 am
3293 spacer
>>3289

Perhaps. However, everyone I've spoken to about has confirmed that the eighties were shite so maybe that's not such a drastic measure after all?
>> No. 3298 Anonymous
18th August 2014
Monday 3:32 pm
3298 spacer
Former equerry to Prince Philip arrested for historic noncing:

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/aug/18/sexual-abuse-charges-prince-philip-equerry
>> No. 3299 Anonymous
18th August 2014
Monday 4:10 pm
3299 spacer
>>3293
To be honest it's a shame we didn't get nuked. Would have done wonders for the countryside.
>> No. 3300 Anonymous
20th August 2014
Wednesday 11:36 am
3300 spacer

missing_cliff.png
330033003300
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-28861998

Oddly enough the article has no mention of either of them. I smell an edit war.
>> No. 3301 Anonymous
20th August 2014
Wednesday 7:22 pm
3301 spacer
>>3300
Every time I visit the BBC website, they're using quotation marks more and more often. Especially in the headlines.
>> No. 3302 Anonymous
20th August 2014
Wednesday 9:25 pm
3302 spacer
>>3300
Please explain what is going on here boo-lad
>> No. 3303 Anonymous
20th August 2014
Wednesday 10:53 pm
3303 spacer
>>3301

This is 'true' - today is the first time I recall reading about someone being beheaded in inverted commas. Horrific grammar indeed.

>>3302

I suspect this part of the fall-out from the dawn raid on Maison Richard, and the advance warning given to the beeb. It seems likely that some elements within the police care more about the privacy of this particular national treasure than others.

The "Most Read / Shared" panel on the BBC News website has become a source of entertainment in itself. Wait until the next establishment perv is unmasked; once they've decided they can print what the rest of the internet already knows, it'll appear at 10 below an article about potato blight and a weather report from 1997.
>> No. 3306 Anonymous
21st August 2014
Thursday 12:06 am
3306 spacer

rolph no.jpg
330633063306
>>3303

being beheaded in inverted commas sounds like the worst way to do it for sure.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 3309 Anonymous
24th August 2014
Sunday 2:09 am
3309 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/v/-QUuCWNyvv8

Not only was Savile a nonce and a necro, but he was in fact also a wizard.
>> No. 3310 Anonymous
24th August 2014
Sunday 2:20 am
3310 spacer
>>3309

It's all true.
>> No. 3311 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 6:37 pm
3311 spacer

cliffrichards.jpg
331133113311
If one had a personal army, one could attempt to get 'the young ones' into the top 40 more successfully by way of riposte. But one wouldn't suggest such a thing lest one raised the ire of our most magnanimous mods.
>> No. 3312 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 6:41 pm
3312 spacer
>>3311
That seems a little out of the realms of possibility for a chan of this size.
>> No. 3313 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 6:51 pm
3313 spacer
>>3312

I started a thread on /b/ on the otherchan which is curiously quiet.
>> No. 3314 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 6:54 pm
3314 spacer
Is crosschan linking verboten?
>> No. 3315 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 6:59 pm
3315 spacer

Tin_foil_hat_2.jpg
331533153315
>>3314

And now it's 404'd with no replies.
>> No. 3316 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 8:23 pm
3316 spacer
>>3309
>Was Jimmy Savile a wizard?
No, he definitely lost it before 30.
>> No. 3328 Anonymous
4th September 2014
Thursday 9:09 pm
3328 spacer

richards.jpg
332833283328
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2739272/Business-usual-Cliffs-year-best-selling-calendar.html

I bet he nonced that lemon.
>> No. 3329 Anonymous
5th September 2014
Friday 2:02 pm
3329 spacer

Woolf-pondering-nonces.jpg
332933293329
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29076504

>Lord Mayor Fiona Woolf to lead child abuse inquiry

Lord Mayor of London Fiona Woolf has replaced Lady Butler-Sloss as head of the UK government inquiry into historical child abuse.

Ms Woolf is a City lawyer and former president of the Law Society.

Ms Woolf, 66, is an expert in energy markets and has advised many governments and the World Bank on privatisation and energy reforms.

As the Lord Mayor of London, she acts as ambassador for the City of London and Britain's financial services industry around the world.

She will be assisted as head of the inquiry by Graham Wilmer, a child sexual abuse victim and founder of the Lantern Project, which helps victims of sex abuse, and Barbara Hearn, former deputy chief executive of the National Children's Bureau.

And now some unrelated news...


http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5348/scotland-yard-delays-200-charges-over-claims-of-child-sex-abuse

>Met is worried about ‘media frenzy’ over paedophile network at Westminster, claims MP

Police have delayed seeking to press nearly 200 charges as part of their investigation into a paedophile network linked to politicians...

...the Metropolitan Police Service’s paedophile unit has delayed putting through to the CPS evidence that might lead to up to 180 charges that relate to around 80 alleged victims of child sex abuse.

One MP said: “This looks like it has been done for presentational reasons, with police wanting to show that they are serious, but are holding back charges so as not to fuel the current media frenzy about child sex abuse.”

A second source, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said simply: “I am concerned.” He fears that the police will decide against pressing the further charges altogether.

A third source, a former detective with expertise in child protection, also said that media strategy was driving specific charging decisions by the Met in the highly-sensitive investigation.

The huge number of likely charges also shows how stretched the small number of detectives in the Met’s paedophile unit are as they investigate a wide range of historical allegations.
>> No. 3330 Anonymous
7th September 2014
Sunday 8:30 pm
3330 spacer

GCHQ-Protocol-Shit-Post-Fury.jpg
333033303330
>>3329

Fuck me, this post seems to have set off one of the biggest slides I've ever seen on Britfa.gs. Sorry about that. Now if GCHQlad would ease off the shit posting, I'll happily agree to wait till after the Scottish referendum before commencing my tinfoilery.
>> No. 3331 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 6:11 am
3331 spacer
>>3329
>One MP said: “This looks like it has been done for presentational reasons, with police wanting to show that they are serious, but are holding back charges so as not to fuel the current media frenzy about child sex abuse.”

>A second source, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said simply: “I am concerned.” He fears that the police will decide against pressing the further charges altogether.

>A third source, a former detective with expertise in child protection, also said that media strategy was driving specific charging decisions by the Met in the highly-sensitive investigation.

That is entirely fucked up. So they don't actually give a shit about the alleged abuse of children by the people meant to serve us. What a bunch of infected weeping pus filled wounds. The fact that the "media frenzy" is effecting charging decisions is absolutely fucked. These people honestly don't give a shit do they. Basically "fuck you proles we are too big and too important to be actually charged with crimes".

Cunts cunts cunts.

Also that new appointee sounds about as "Establishment" as it's possible to get.
>> No. 3332 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 8:57 am
3332 spacer
>>3330

I wonder how much new content this thread is generating for the site?

>>3331

It's become fairly clear that the enquiry will be blocked, minimised and contained at every available opportunity. The complicity of the government and police in these crimes is unlikely to be forgotten by the British public regardless of how much it is kept out of the mainstream media.

Fear not, sooner or later at least one major figure will break ranks over the issue in an attempt to save their careers (Gerald Kaufman was a bit of a surprise, I must say). Then things could get really interesting, in the Chinese sense of the word.
>> No. 3333 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 7:22 pm
3333 spacer
>>3331
>The fact that the "media frenzy" is effecting charging decisions is absolutely fucked.
Nice try, GCHQlad. You just want them to be charged now so they can plead "fair trial impossible" and get off, don't you?
>> No. 3334 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 7:34 pm
3334 spacer
>>3333
I just think the fact that there's supposedly a "media frenzy" at the moment is a bullshit justification for not charging people.

Also whatever happened to that tape that the Ed Winchester was on about earlier in the thread?
>> No. 3335 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 7:55 pm
3335 spacer
>>3334
>Also whatever happened to that tape that the Ed Winchester was on about earlier in the thread?

This is a very good question.
>> No. 3336 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 9:23 pm
3336 spacer
If I were a young up and coming politician after the referendum I would surely seize upon this opportunity to become a hero to the people by letting them know the truth. And if it acts to oust some of the dinosaurs from positions of power, well now that would just be too bad wouldn't it?
>> No. 3337 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 10:05 pm
3337 spacer
>>3336

Yeah, well I suppose most young politicians aren't too keen on having GCHQlad send his MI5 mandem round for a chat, before dying in a tragic wanking accident.
>> No. 3338 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 10:07 pm
3338 spacer
>>3337
It's surely how any young politician wants to go.
>> No. 3339 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 11:21 pm
3339 spacer
>>3337

How many wanking accidents can there be though before people start wising up?

Can we expect to see a 'circle jerk suicide pact' in the coming months?
>> No. 3340 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 11:23 pm
3340 spacer

Leslie Nielsen young LN.jpg
334033403340
>>3337

At least some of the GCHQlads must see the turning of the tide and want to capitalize on the situation surely?

Plus the intellilads know how to get information out in the most discreet of ways. It's part of the job.
>> No. 3341 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 11:23 pm
3341 spacer
>>3339
>How many wanking accidents can there be though before people start wising up?
Remember we're talking about a lot of wankers here.
>> No. 3342 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 11:34 pm
3342 spacer
>>3340

An English Snowdon would be really marvelous.

>>3339

>Can we expect to see a 'circle jerk suicide pact' in the coming months?

I didn't know there was a .gs meet up on the cards?
>> No. 3343 Anonymous
14th September 2014
Sunday 3:33 pm
3343 spacer

Morton_1391346c.jpg
334333433343
http://www.theguardian.com/society/video/2014/sep/12/samantha-morton-sexually-abused-child-care-homes-video-interview
>> No. 3344 Anonymous
14th September 2014
Sunday 3:39 pm
3344 spacer
>>3343
>samantha-morton-sexually-abused-child-care-homes

"Point to where she touched you on this doll-house"
>> No. 3345 Anonymous
16th September 2014
Tuesday 11:05 pm
3345 spacer
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2751961/Cliff-Richard-impersonator-axed-musical-police-raid-star-s-home-sex-abuse-allegations.html

How many more of the innocent will have to suffer before this insufferable situation is resolved?
>> No. 3369 Anonymous
23rd September 2014
Tuesday 7:24 am
3369 spacer

1411426275666_Image_galleryImage_MP_S_WIFE_KAREN_D.jpg
336933693369
Any recent developments? I bet Mr Danczuk's wife is keeping him abreast of the situation.
>> No. 3383 Anonymous
23rd September 2014
Tuesday 6:56 pm
3383 spacer
>>3369

Yeah, I'd probably ditch my wife and kids for her too.
>> No. 3412 Anonymous
21st October 2014
Tuesday 2:21 pm
3412 Abuse inquiry head Fiona Woolf defends Lord Brittan links
thequeenoflondon.jpg
341234123412
>Lawyer Fiona Woolf disclosed she had dined with former home secretary Lord Brittan and his family five times.

>In addition, she said she she had a coffee with Lady Brittan on a "small number of occasions" and both women were judges for the Dragon Awards, a City of London Corporation which celebrates community engagement programmes.

>She added: "If I had any doubt about this I would not have accepted this appointment."

>But the BBC's home affairs correspondent Tom Symonds said survivors of child abuse were increasingly concerned about her apparent links to Lord Brittan.

>Labour MP Simon Danczuk, who campaigned for the inquiry, told the BBC he thought Mrs Woolf should resign.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29703282

https://childsexualabuseinquiry.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Letter-to-the-Home-Secretary.pdf
>> No. 3413 Anonymous
21st October 2014
Tuesday 2:41 pm
3413 spacer
>>3412

How do you appoint someone with the necessary credentials who isn't connected to the establishment?
>> No. 3414 Anonymous
21st October 2014
Tuesday 3:00 pm
3414 spacer
>>3413

I'm not sure on the requisite skills needed to oversee such a task but in a country of 64 million people I'm sure there must be someone who hasn't had diner with a person suspected of being complicit in the original cover-up.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 3415 Anonymous
26th October 2014
Sunday 9:51 pm
3415 spacer
>Bizarre bid to gag MoS... by 'Home Office': Newspaper warned it would be reported to new press complaints watchdog for trying to uncover truth about Fiona Woolf's appointment to child abuse inquiry

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2808000/Bizarre-bid-gag-MoS-Home-Office-Newspaper-warned-reported-new-press-complaints-watchdog-trying-uncover-truth-Fiona-Woolf-s-appointment-child-abuse-inquiry.html

>So was this ANOTHER party with Leon Brittan you forgot, Mrs Woolf?: Pressure grows on beleaguered sex abuse inquiry chief to resign... as MoS uncovers new link to ex-minister who 'lost' vital evidence

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2807976/Pressure-grows-beleaguered-sex-abuse-enquiry-chief-Fiona-Woolf-resign.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2808068/THE-MAIL-SUNDAY-COMMENT-Woolf-quit-sake-victims.html

They're good 'uns when they want to be, like with Stephen Lawrence.
>> No. 3416 Anonymous
27th October 2014
Monday 1:59 am
3416 spacer

1472-0-1.jpg
341634163416
>>3415

The DM is a paper with many (many, many...) faults, but being too 'establishment' is certainly not one of them. A marked contrast to a person involved with a tabloid newspaper (I forget which) who appeared on Question Time when this scandal was originally unfolding, who suggested that an inquiry into historical sex abuse in the upper echelons of society would be a pointless 'waste of public time and money' and that the resources would be better spent on [whatever else was in the news at the time]. One thing I do remember about the newspaper in question, was that it was one of the ones that had put a great deal of energy into paedogeddon-style hysteria (Chris Jeffries, paediatricians being attacked, etc.). So to hear them balking at the idea that the spotlight be turned away from the usual working-class targets and onto the moneyed elite was completely outrageous, not to mention a little suspicious. Let's not forget that we've already seen evidence of systemic abuse and coverup at similar institutions such as the Vatican and the BBC.
>> No. 3417 Anonymous
28th October 2014
Tuesday 10:34 am
3417 spacer
On unrelated news:

>Jill Dando
>Kristian Digby
>Natasha Collins
>Mark Speight
>Kevin Greening
>Paula Yates
>Rik Mayall
>Peaches Geldof
>Mike Smith

/boo!
>> No. 3418 Anonymous
28th October 2014
Tuesday 4:24 pm
3418 spacer
>>3417

Care to explain?
>> No. 3419 Anonymous
29th October 2014
Wednesday 9:58 pm
3419 Labour MP links Leon Brittan to 80s child abuse claims
Only_Jim_Hood_could.jpg
341934193419
>A Labour MP has used parliamentary privilege to accuse former Home Secretary Leon Brittan of ‘improper conduct with children’

>The remarks from Jim Hood, who said there were ‘reports about child abuse being linked with’ the Conservative politician, were criticised as ‘disgusting’ by business minister Matthew Hancock.

Tea. Spilt. Everywhere.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2811776/Labour-MP-links-Leon-Brittan-80s-child-abuse-claims-Amid-row-historic-sex-crimes-inquiry-former-Home-Secretary-named-Commons.html
>> No. 3420 Anonymous
29th October 2014
Wednesday 10:00 pm
3420 spacer
>>3418

They're dead m79.
>> No. 3421 Anonymous
29th October 2014
Wednesday 10:46 pm
3421 spacer
>>3419

>MPs comments are protected from slander and contempt of court laws

I really should think about becoming an MP.

Anyway, I'm of the opinion that inaction over the currently unfolding scandal taking place in several Northern cities is not because of some "PC conspiracy", as some believe. Rather a fear of the outrage at just how blissfully ignorant, and indeed entirely complicit, some of the political leadership of the nation have been on this issue. I think they've chosen to do little about these local scandals in order to avoid a revelation, regarding the extent of these nationally endorsed crimes.

I'unno, man, shit's really not dank, yo. I'm not one for conspiracies, but something's majorly up.

EDIT (See "afterthought"): Also it's all symptomatic of the deep rooted misogyny within our society right now.
>> No. 3422 Anonymous
30th October 2014
Thursday 10:26 am
3422 spacer
>>3421
> the currently unfolding scandal taking place in several Northern cities is not because of some "PC conspiracy",
Er, there was all that stuff about people reporting it being ostracised and forced to go on diversity training. Also them being told to drop it, couldn't mention race etc.

Anyway, Leon Brittan is a definite wrong'un. When will the crowd see his blood?
>> No. 3423 Anonymous
30th October 2014
Thursday 1:11 pm
3423 spacer
>>3421
>inaction over the currently unfolding scandal taking place in several Northern cities is not because of some "PC conspiracy"
No more than the Scottish referendum result was a result of some "Mac conspiracy"

Sorry, lads. I couldn't resist.
>> No. 3424 Anonymous
31st October 2014
Friday 5:03 pm
3424 spacer
Fiona Woolf has stepped down.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29855265
>> No. 3425 Anonymous
31st October 2014
Friday 7:13 pm
3425 spacer
>>3424
I think we've found the real conspiracy. A chair is appointed, and the lawyers trawl through their history to find a time when they once looked in a suspect's general direction, and campaign to have them removed, all the while running up ever more fees for themselves. Lather, rinse, repeat. Fucking parasites. All that ends up happening is the process gets delayed, and, as any fule no, justice delayed is justice denied.
>> No. 3426 Anonymous
31st October 2014
Friday 8:50 pm
3426 spacer
>>3425

Oh GCHQ lad, I will never tire of your witty banter.
>> No. 3427 Anonymous
31st October 2014
Friday 10:48 pm
3427 spacer
>>3426
Nice try GCHQlad, but you're not fooling anyone.
>> No. 3428 Anonymous
31st October 2014
Friday 10:53 pm
3428 spacer
>>3425

I'd agree, in part, if the same people calling for her dismissal weren't also the victims in question.
>> No. 3429 Anonymous
31st October 2014
Friday 11:05 pm
3429 spacer
>>3428
How exactly do you think those victims found out?
>> No. 3430 Anonymous
31st October 2014
Friday 11:14 pm
3430 spacer
>>3429

They found out because the integrity of the investigation is of utmost importance so people are shining a light on it. So what you are saying here? Is it the investigation would have been entirely impartial and they needn't have worried their pretty little heads?

Be serious.
>> No. 3431 Anonymous
31st October 2014
Friday 11:18 pm
3431 spacer
>>3430
>Is it the investigation would have been entirely impartial and they needn't have worried their pretty little heads?
Well, yes, obviously. But then I did once live within a mile of a district judge, so I guess that sort of thing might present a conflict of interest if these people's lawyers are to be believed.
>> No. 3432 Anonymous
31st October 2014
Friday 11:42 pm
3432 spacer
>>3431

That's facetious at best, you're grossly and willfully misrepresenting the very real implications a conflict of interest can cause by implying this is a petty grievance. It isn't petty and you know it, this shit has been covered up successfully in the past.

Have a word with yourself.
>> No. 3433 Anonymous
1st November 2014
Saturday 12:07 am
3433 spacer
>>3432
>That's facetious at best, you're grossly and willfully misrepresenting the very real implications a conflict of interest can cause by implying this is a petty grievance
It is a petty grievance. The extent of the so-called "conflict of interest" is that she once lived on the same street as Lord Brittan. I once lived on the same street as two of my teachers, but didn't prevent either of them from giving honest feedback come parents' evening.
>> No. 3434 Anonymous
1st November 2014
Saturday 2:21 am
3434 spacer
>>3433
They had half a dozen dinner parties together. She sat on a committee with his wife, and sponsered her for something or other. Her letter declaring this went through seven drafts with the help of Home Office officials before it was submitted to the, er, Home Secretary.
>> No. 3435 Anonymous
3rd November 2014
Monday 10:53 pm
3435 spacer
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mps-vips-child-abuse-ring-4551934

Plod investigating Dolphin Square. Interesting stuff. The video that journochap was on about earlier in the thread still doesn't seem to have materialised, odd that.
>> No. 3436 Anonymous
3rd November 2014
Monday 11:04 pm
3436 spacer
>>3435

I couldn't even read the article because the stream of nightmares occupying the side bar. It felt I'd dropped acid in the middle of an episode of Southcliffe.

No one remembers Southcliffe do they?
>> No. 3437 Anonymous
3rd November 2014
Monday 11:12 pm
3437 spacer
Also.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/02/theresa-may-child-abuse-report-inquiry-home-office

>Theresa May, the home secretary, has been accused of delaying the release of a completed report about the Home Office’s handling of child abuse allegations during the furore about who should chair the new official inquiry into what happened.



What an absolute shower of cunts our rulers are. Dirty fucking rotters.
>> No. 3438 Anonymous
9th November 2014
Sunday 7:08 pm
3438 spacer
This kinda means it's no longer boo?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2827378/Ex-MI6-chief-Peter-Hayman-named-VIP-sexually-abused-boys-Dolphin-Square-apartment-complex-near-Parliament.html
>> No. 3439 Anonymous
9th November 2014
Sunday 10:10 pm
3439 spacer
>>3438
It will if we get a credible source.
>> No. 3441 Anonymous
9th November 2014
Sunday 10:20 pm
3441 spacer
>>3439
On what basis do you call into question Exaro's credibility? And how do you propose we provide a source more credible than the primary one? Or is the reality that you haven't clicked the link, don't know what it contains, aren't in a position to evaluate its credibility and you just wanted to draw attention to your masturbatory DM boycott? Again.
>> No. 3442 Anonymous
9th November 2014
Sunday 10:30 pm
3442 spacer
>>3441
>And how do you propose we provide a source more credible than the primary one?
Did you drop English and history in primary school or something?
>> No. 3444 Anonymous
9th November 2014
Sunday 10:57 pm
3444 spacer
>>3442
No, this is where you discover that I'm talking about a primary source.

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5396/video-nick-tells-of-how-mps-liked-to-inflict-pain-during-abuse

Although whether the video contains the exact allegation we're now talking about I can't actually say because it appears you have to register for it to play.
>> No. 3445 Anonymous
10th November 2014
Monday 7:32 am
3445 spacer
>>3444
So it would appear that yes, you did drop English and history in primary school. Thanks for clearing that up, lad.
>> No. 3446 Anonymous
10th November 2014
Monday 9:40 am
3446 spacer
>>3444

Found this too:

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5398/ex-mi6-chief-named-as-sexual-abuser-of-boys-at-dolphin-square
>> No. 3447 Anonymous
11th November 2014
Tuesday 12:16 pm
3447 spacer
It's alright lads, there wasn't a cover up after all

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30002908
>> No. 3448 Anonymous
11th November 2014
Tuesday 8:05 pm
3448 spacer
>>3447
Oh right, that's fine then. Nothing to see here.
>> No. 3449 Anonymous
11th November 2014
Tuesday 10:11 pm
3449 spacer
>>3447
>>3448
>But speaking to BBC Radio 4's PM, Peter Wanless said David Cameron was "wrong" to say his report proved there was no cover-up.

"He can only say that into the registered filing system of the Home Office," he said.

"I think it's really important that no-one regards our piece of work as the beginning and end of all this."
>> No. 3450 Anonymous
11th November 2014
Tuesday 10:14 pm
3450 spacer
>>3449
So, basically, paedocrabs again?
>> No. 3451 Anonymous
11th November 2014
Tuesday 10:49 pm
3451 spacer
>>3450
No, just the chap who headed the report saying it's not as definitive as Cameron et al are saying it is.
>> No. 3452 Anonymous
11th November 2014
Tuesday 11:00 pm
3452 spacer
>>3451
>Peter Wanless: "What we can conclude...is there wasn't a cover up which involved taking things out of the registered filing system of the Home Office"
Paedocrabs it is, then.
>> No. 3453 Anonymous
11th November 2014
Tuesday 11:33 pm
3453 spacer
>>3452
He was talking about how limited the ability of his enquiry to get definite answers was due to limited scope, missing records etc.
>> No. 3454 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 12:50 pm
3454 spacer
>>3453

Wanless was allowed to give search terms for a civil servant to type into the computer system to match titles of records in the filing system. One thing that baffled me is that it was mentioned later in the debate that the whole system is entirely on paper. The love of my life, Theresa May (who at one point in the debate mentioned that a former colleague used to refer to her as mother Theresa) admitted that the filing system wasn't well organised.
>> No. 3455 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 1:00 pm
3455 spacer
>>3451
The PM said anyone looking for a cover-up needs to look elsewhere. Presumably that just means they need to look somewhere other than the Home Office filling system.
>> No. 3456 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 1:04 pm
3456 spacer

peace_was_never_an_option.jpg
345634563456
HEADS ON PIKES for fucks sake. Can't we all just march on number 10 and take justice? It's obvious it's not going to be given any other way.

Get rid of all the pedos, get rid of all the banker's cronies, get rid of all the fucking friends of Israel who steer our foreign policy into stupid bloody wars for oil and because they want to blow up eskimos.

HANG EVERY ONE OF THESE FUCKERS AAAAAAAAAARGH.
>> No. 3457 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 3:28 pm
3457 spacer
>>3456

>get rid of all the fucking friends of Israel who steer our foreign policy into stupid bloody wars for oil and because they want to blow up eskimos.

Sounds like someone's been reading The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Good read, was it?
>> No. 3458 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 3:28 pm
3458 spacer
>>3454
Exactly. The report itself doesn't strike me as particularly dishonest, and nor do Wanless and Whittam, but the way it's being spun as definitive proof that nothing dodgy happened is ridiculous.
>> No. 3459 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 3:32 pm
3459 spacer
>>3457
What were the wars for then?

People keep saying that Israel is our "greatest friend in the middle east".

Seems to me that before they existed, we had a lot less enemies there.

I wonder if you're simply blind, or you're actually being paid to post, like these guys.

https://www.youtube.com/v/LofScCiJT4c
>> No. 3460 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 4:35 pm
3460 spacer
>>3459

You are terribly confused. Please learn some history and take it to another thread.
>> No. 3461 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 4:51 pm
3461 spacer
>>3456
>>3457
>>3459
>>3460

Any chance of not derailing this thread? You can just start a new one you know.
>> No. 3462 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 4:56 pm
3462 spacer
>>3460
Excellent rebuttal m8.

It's actually relevant in a convoluted way. There's been plenty of talk that these pedo/secret sexual activities are being ignored by "authorities" because it gives them leverage over the politicians.

There's been talk that Blair really didn't want the Iraq war at all, but he was blackmailed regarding his crossdressing/gay secrets. Might go some way towards explaining that whopper about the WMD's. Could be bollocks...but what is known is the pedo rings were set up with the help of the secret services, to trap politicians so they could blackmail them.

Either way - leaving aside the completely true fact that all those wars in the middle east are definitely in Israel's favour, someone should hang every one of these pedo cunts. They think they are invulnerable, and unless a baying mob turns up at Downing street, they probably will be.
>> No. 3463 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 4:59 pm
3463 spacer
>>3461
To be fair, he was the one who got a chip on his shoulder at the mere mention of wars in the Middle East. It was only a passing mention, funny he picked up on that instead of being rightfully outraged at this cover up.

But yes, there is no point going down that particular avenue.
>> No. 3464 Anonymous
12th November 2014
Wednesday 5:12 pm
3464 spacer
>>3462

The war in Syria has brought trouble to the Golan. That's not in Israel's favour. Nor was the uprising in Egypt - Mubarak had a truce going on with Israel.

I'm sure all the secret services are playing a wonderful game, not just Mossad.
>> No. 3465 Anonymous
13th November 2014
Thursday 3:24 pm
3465 spacer

1379524425_nick-cage-wrecking-ball.png
346534653465
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/scotland-yard-searching-bodleian-library-for-dickens-dossier-on-alleged-child-sex-abuse-9857200.html

I'm picturing a National Treasure/Da Vinci Code style showdown between are Danczuk and the forces of darkness.
>> No. 3466 Anonymous
14th November 2014
Friday 4:39 pm
3466 spacer

dayoftherope.jpg
346634663466
>Police are investigating "possible homicide" linked to what has been described as a paedophile ring involving powerful people in the 1970s and 1980s.

>The group is alleged to have included senior figures in public life, the military, politics and law enforcement.

>In a statement Scotland Yard said inquiries were at an early stage.

>A key witness who has spoken to police has told the BBC that he was abused for nine years as a boy.

>He has appealed for others who may have evidence to come forward.

>The Metropolitan Police said detectives were made aware of allegations regarding possible homicide during the last month.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30052726
>> No. 3467 Anonymous
14th November 2014
Friday 5:47 pm
3467 spacer
>>3466
Has the use of homicide superseded using 'murder'? Or have we always referred to it in the British press as' homicide'?
>> No. 3468 Anonymous
14th November 2014
Friday 5:55 pm
3468 spacer
>>3467

I presume it's because it may or may not be manslaughter.
>> No. 3470 Anonymous
14th November 2014
Friday 6:00 pm
3470 spacer
>>3467
They're not synonymous. Murder is a type of homicide.
>> No. 3471 Anonymous
14th November 2014
Friday 6:06 pm
3471 spacer
>>3467

Homicide describes any form of unlawful killing, be it murder or manslaughter. Lets say some MP sodomises a child to death, has he committed murder or manslaughter? Until a criminal charge is brought against said MP by the police, it is best to hedge your bets and use the term homicide. God forbid you should accidentally accuse the MP of murdering a child with their penis when in fact he had no intent on killing the child but only raping them. Or something. I'm a bit thick so you might want to wait for Ed Winchester or GCHQlad to chip in.
>> No. 3472 Anonymous
16th November 2014
Sunday 10:55 am
3472 spacer

File
removed
I saw someone on another forum decry all this as "bastard pervert tories", at which point someone posted a link to this site.

http://labour25.com/2014/08/27/carrying-the-can/

Granted, it's a website set up specifically to go after Labour MP's, but it at least helped the other commenter realise that this isn't an issue related to one party. They are all at it.
>> No. 3479 Anonymous
16th November 2014
Sunday 7:23 pm
3479 spacer
>>3468
I agree. Could be wrong though.
>> No. 3480 Anonymous
16th November 2014
Sunday 7:32 pm
3480 spacer
>>3472

Where did the image go?
>> No. 3481 Anonymous
16th November 2014
Sunday 7:34 pm
3481 spacer
>>3479
Yeah, it'll be a fancy way of saying a death that wasn't entirely natural.
>> No. 3483 Anonymous
16th November 2014
Sunday 7:56 pm
3483 spacer
>>3480
GCHQ asked that it was deleted.
>> No. 3488 Anonymous
16th November 2014
Sunday 9:51 pm
3488 spacer
>>3480
Some crap about the BBC and a jewish conspiracy, idk. Probably deleted for being shite.
>> No. 3499 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 5:11 am
3499 spacer
When a wise man points at the moon, an imbecile looks at the finger.
>> No. 3500 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 5:41 am
3500 spacer
>>3499

When a quote sounds snappy enough, it's validity is often overlooked in favour of sounding vaguely profound.

Case in point, no one will ever repeat that sentence.
>> No. 3501 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 7:03 am
3501 spacer
>>3500
Not him, but it's a quote by Confucius, so it's been repeated a fair few times.
>> No. 3502 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 7:14 am
3502 spacer
>>3501

Perhaps I should I have said "contextual validity". See, unlike Confucius I'm open to change.
>> No. 3504 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 11:34 am
3504 spacer
>>3499
... and vice versa.
>> No. 3505 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 11:49 am
3505 spacer

opinions.png
350535053505
>>3500
>>3501
I don't often go in for the vernacular of the "yoof" demographic these days, but I believe the phrase "blown the fuck out" is applicable here.
>> No. 3506 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 12:47 pm
3506 spacer
>>3505
Not on this site, it isn't. Ever.
>> No. 3514 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 7:26 pm
3514 spacer
>>3505
I don't understand the comic. It's probably too complicated for me.
>> No. 3515 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 7:45 pm
3515 spacer
>>3514
The interviewee establishes that he thinks other people's opinions are shit whilst his own are facts, and he is hired to work at 4chan.
>> No. 3521 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 12:58 am
3521 spacer
>>3515
Ah, I was reading it in the wrong order.

-My opinions?
=Shit. Facts.
-Your opinions? WELCOME ABOARD!

I told you it was all too complicated for a simpleton like myself.
>> No. 3522 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 2:01 am
3522 spacer

debate.png
352235223522
>>3514
>>3515
That's exactly it. Similar to a notice on a another forum I occasionally frequent, pic related.
>> No. 3523 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 11:03 am
3523 spacer
>>3505
I fucking love those macros for some reason.
>> No. 3543 Anonymous
23rd November 2014
Sunday 10:43 pm
3543 spacer

mr_spanky.jpg
354335433543
>Two retired detectives have reportedly backed claims that young boys were murdered by politicians at paedophile orgies.

>The two retired officers provided their information today to the Sunday People.

>According to the newspaper, the officers were part of the team which originally investigated the claims in the 1980s but it is thought they were told not to probe further.

>The revelation came as the Home Secretary Theresa May admitted the recent spate of child abuse allegations were only the 'tip of the iceberg'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2845969/Former-Scotland-Yard-detectives-say-young-boys-murdered-Westminster-paedophile-ring.html
>> No. 3544 Anonymous
24th November 2014
Monday 12:33 am
3544 spacer
>>3543
Lads, surely if we all chip in together we can get a wholesale discount for ordering our pitchforks together.
>> No. 3546 Anonymous
28th November 2014
Friday 2:20 pm
3546 spacer

sauce.jpg
354635463546
>>2890

Sir Edward Garnier

>One of David Cameron’s former legal advisers was accused yesterday of trying to discourage a Labour MP from naming Lord Brittan over child abuse allegations.

>Simon Danczuk, the campaigning Rochdale MP, claimed Sir Edward Garnier spoke to him before he was due to give evidence to a committee of MPs this summer.

>Mr Danczuk said Sir Edward – who was Solicitor General from 2010 to 2012 – said that ‘challenging Lord Brittan on child abuse would not be a wise move’.

>Mr Danczuk said earlier: ‘We now know that from at least the 1970s up to the present day there have been people in positions of power who have sexually abused children. Not only this, there have been powerful people willing to cover up this abuse and obstruct justice.’

>Mr Goldsmith added: ‘There can no longer be any doubt at all that powerful people have done terrible things and that they have been protected by the establishment.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2852444/Did-PM-s-adviser-try-stop-MP-linking-Brittan-claims-child-sex-abuse-Former-solictor-general-said-naming-not-wise-move.html
>> No. 3547 Anonymous
28th November 2014
Friday 8:48 pm
3547 spacer
>>3546
At least he knows how to eat a sandwich.
>> No. 3548 Anonymous
28th November 2014
Friday 8:48 pm
3548 spacer
>>3547

I will find you, and I will kill you.

Sage for pet peeve.
>> No. 3549 Anonymous
28th November 2014
Friday 9:06 pm
3549 spacer
>>3547
This was my first thoughts, too.
>> No. 3550 Anonymous
28th November 2014
Friday 9:17 pm
3550 spacer
>>3546
The union flag, bacon sarnies, and aristocratic paedos. It doesn't get much more British.

God save our gracious queen.
>> No. 3551 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 11:42 pm
3551 spacer

oops.jpg
355135513551
Scotland Yard 'hid top MP's name' in sex abuse inquiry

>Police were accused last night of covering up allegations that a senior politician abused a boy at a notorious gay brothel.

>Retired detectives believe the boys 1982 testimony may have been ‘sanitised’ at the request of Special Branch and the security services, which feared Soviet spies would exploit the hugely embarrassing claims.

>Last week, Mrs May suggested that the allegations aired so far — including a claim of three child murders by Westminster-linked paedophiles who frequented exclusive flats in the Thames-side Dolphin Square — amounted to the ‘tip of the iceberg’.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2862849/Scotland-Yard-hid-MP-s-sex-abuse-inquiry-Police-buried-young-boy-s-testimony-Establishment-cover-says-author-book-Cyril-Smith-scandal.html
>> No. 3552 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 12:43 am
3552 spacer
>>3551
Yet despite apparently knowing who these people are the press still won't name them.
>> No. 3553 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 1:00 am
3553 spacer

mcalpine-wato_2399313b.jpg
355335533553
>>3552
And after it turned out so well last time.
>> No. 3554 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 10:40 am
3554 spacer
>>3552

It is still slanderous even if it's true, before a court of law has proven it. Afterwards, it is fine.

Sticky legal area. If anyone was going to print names I imagine it would be Hislop, but he'd do it in a way that wasn't slanderous. Like a two page centrefold of MPs names with no apparent explanation of why they were there other than "MPs I think look shifty".
>> No. 3555 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 12:37 pm
3555 spacer
>>3552
People get named, and then there's a massive cover up and legal and other threats.

Like Macalpine, who is beyond a shadow of a doubt a paedophile, a rapist and a murderer. People get a visit and then shut up.
>> No. 3556 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 12:54 pm
3556 spacer
>>3555
>Like Macalpine, who is beyond a shadow of a doubt a paedophile, a rapist and a murderer.
Nah m8, use a paedophile, a rapist and a murderer, innit.
>> No. 3557 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 1:10 pm
3557 spacer
>>3556

This would be shitposting even on /iq/. Have a word with yourself.
>> No. 3558 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 8:27 pm
3558 spacer
>Two members of Theresa May’s panel inquiring into child sex abuse are facing calls to resign after being accused of sending threatening or insulting emails to victims who had criticised the inquiry.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/dec/06/theresa-may-child-sexual-abuse-inquiry-panel-accused-victims-letters
>> No. 3559 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 9:27 pm
3559 spacer
>> a rapist and a murderer, innit.

Bongo Bob Marleyists.

Vote UKIP.
>> No. 3560 Anonymous
18th December 2014
Thursday 2:51 pm
3560 spacer
>Westminster paedophile ring linked to murders of THREE young boys by detectives

>Met investigating alleged murders by MPs at flats in Pimlico, London
>Boy called Nick says rich and powerful strangled boy, 12, at 'abuse party'
>Also claims that he saw boy run over and another killed in sex attack
>Met Police appeal for witnesses who may corroborate his claims
>Scotland Yard also believe abuse took place in London and Home Counties, including at military bases

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/dec/18/police-claims-vip-sex-ring-murder-three-boys
>> No. 3561 Anonymous
18th December 2014
Thursday 6:22 pm
3561 spacer
>>3560
Radio 4's been heavy on the story today as well.
>> No. 3562 Anonymous
21st December 2014
Sunday 5:33 pm
3562 spacer
They think it's all over.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30568645
>> No. 3563 Anonymous
21st December 2014
Sunday 6:09 pm
3563 spacer
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1cm0t3/original_research_the_mountain_of_evidence_for_a/

There are a lot of things I wish I had never read.
>> No. 3564 Anonymous
21st December 2014
Sunday 8:29 pm
3564 spacer
>>3563
That's all a bit Emily Gyde.
>> No. 3565 Anonymous
22nd December 2014
Monday 3:32 am
3565 spacer
>>3563
>>3564
Seems more True Detective to me. Somewhat worrying that was posted a year ago and now we have this, too.
>> No. 3566 Anonymous
22nd December 2014
Monday 2:39 pm
3566 spacer
So survivors of child abuse have asked Theresa May to disband the panel. Why?
>> No. 3567 Anonymous
22nd December 2014
Monday 2:48 pm
3567 spacer
>>3566

Source?
>> No. 3568 Anonymous
22nd December 2014
Monday 2:56 pm
3568 spacer
>>3566
>Why?
So it can be replaced with a more powerful body (a royal comission or statuary inquiry) and also because survivors had called for some members to be replaced anyway. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/dec/22/child-abuse-victims-group-panel-replaced
>> No. 3569 Anonymous
22nd December 2014
Monday 3:04 pm
3569 spacer
>>3568
You should know the rules by now, /boo/lads. Follow the money. Who stands to benefit from this?

>May announced an inquiry panel, based on the body that investigated the Hillsborough disaster, rather than a full statutory inquiry because she believed that giving the inquiry statutory powers would lead to lawyers unduly prolonging its proceedings.
>> No. 3570 Anonymous
22nd December 2014
Monday 9:28 pm
3570 spacer
I really can't keep up with this any more.
>> No. 3571 Anonymous
23rd December 2014
Tuesday 5:00 am
3571 spacer
>>3570
I'd imagine that's the desired outcome. Just keep stalling, obfuscating and throwing spanners in the works until no one gives a fuck. Most people don't anyway.
>> No. 3572 Anonymous
30th December 2014
Tuesday 4:55 am
3572 spacer
http://rt.com/uk/217051-child-abuse-whistleblowers-deaths/

https://davidhencke.wordpress.com/2014/12/22/bad-mad-and-sad-the-politics-of-scrapping-the-child-sex-abuse-inquiry/
>> No. 3573 Anonymous
30th December 2014
Tuesday 6:56 pm
3573 spacer

this_should_happen.jpg
357335733573
>>3572
I'm incredibly mad.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 3574 Anonymous
2nd January 2015
Friday 3:55 pm
3574 spacer

bestfriendsforever.jpg
357435743574
>Prince Andrew strongly denies 'underage sex slave' allegations after being named in lawsuit filed in U.S. court papers

>Court motion in U.S. brought in relation to millionaire Jeffrey Epstein
>Epstein, a former friend of the Prince, was convicted of sex crime in 2008
>Court papers in motion claim woman had sex with Andrew three times
>They claim meetings took place in London, New York and US Virgin Islands
>One meeting was 'an orgy with numerous under-aged girls' it is claimed
>It is said the woman was approached by the daughter of Robert Maxwell
>The royal has issued a strong denial of the 'categorically untrue' claims
>> No. 3575 Anonymous
2nd January 2015
Friday 3:56 pm
3575 spacer
>>3574

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/02/prince-andrew-named-us-lawsuit-underage-sex-allegations
>> No. 3577 Anonymous
2nd January 2015
Friday 4:43 pm
3577 spacer
>>3575

I understand the world's "elite" have to absolute bastards, but could they at least keep a base regard for semblance of a thimble of a fucking atom of human decency?

>>3576

>What the fuck are you greentexting?

>Why are you going down two lines each time?

>Are you an insufferable retard?

>That last thing was rhetorical.
>> No. 3578 Anonymous
2nd January 2015
Friday 4:57 pm
3578 spacer
>>3577

Sorry about that chap. And yes I am an insufferable retard. And I'm pretty sure my penis is smaller than yours. You big brave internet tough guy.

>In Florida, court documents report:

>"Epstein forced (the underage girl sex slave) to have sexual relations with ... Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York)."
>The accusations against the Duke of York include claims that he took part in an orgy with other underage girls.
>The Duke, according to the court documents, made "efforts on his behalf" to lobby prosecutors for a favourable plea arrangement.
>The girl claims she was forced to have "sexual relations" with the Duke at a flat in London, at a Caribbean island and a location in New York.
>'Jane Doe 3' claims that in 1999 she was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, who "procured" under-age girls for sex with Epstein.
>Ghislaine Maxwell is the daughter of the late Sir Robert Maxwell, who is said to have been a top agent of Mossad.
>'Jane Doe 3', who was 15 at the time, claims she was "converted into a sex slave".
>The court document states:
>"Epstein trafficked Jane Doe #3 for sexual purposes to many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known Prime Minister, and other world leaders.
>"Epstein required Jane Doe 3 to describe the events that she had with these men so that he could potentially blackmail them."
>On 13th March 2011, the Mail on Sunday reported on Jeffrey Epstein's private Caribbean island, Little St James, and on his 'little black book' listing phone contacts.
>Among those whose names have been linked to Epstein are:
> -Ehud Barak
> -Bill Clinton
> -Sir Evelyn de Rothschild and his daughter Hannah
> -Lord Mandelson and Lord Mandelson's boyfriend Reinaldo.
> -Ghislaine Maxwell
> -Naomi Campbell
> -Sir Richard Branson
> -Lord Palumbo, the UK's former Arts Council chairman and godfather to the Duke of York’s eldest daughter Beatrice
> -The journalist Toby Young
> -Dame Gail Ronson, wife of the multi-millionaire British developer Gerald Ronson
> -The JCB tycoon Sir Anthony Bamford
> -Philippe Amon, a Swiss industrialist
> -Caroline Stanbury, a former girlfriend of Prince Andrew.
>The island of Little St James was managed by Cathy and Miles Alexander.
>Speaking at their home in South Africa, "the Alexanders reveal they had watched with increasing concern the beautiful girls who paraded about the house topless or naked whenever their boss was in residence."
>Cathy says: "I saw some girls who I thought were very young-looking..."
>"They looked like they had stepped out of an underwear catalogue."
>"They walked around with very few clothes on or lounged around by the pool with nothing on..."
>Ghislaine Maxwell helped recruit the Alexanders in 1998.
>Among those who visited Little St James were Prince Andrew, Naomi Campbell, Lord Mandelson and Lord Mandelson's boyfriend Reinaldo.
>Numerous academics, architects and some of the most prominent scientific and business minds also enjoyed Epstein’s generous hospitality.

http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/mossad-blackmail-ring-linked-to-prince.html
>> No. 3579 Anonymous
2nd January 2015
Friday 5:05 pm
3579 spacer
>>3578

I wasn't being tough, just smarter than you.
>> No. 3580 Anonymous
2nd January 2015
Friday 5:07 pm
3580 spacer
>>3579

Hush now, you're embarrassing yourself.
>> No. 3581 Anonymous
2nd January 2015
Friday 5:15 pm
3581 spacer
>>3580

Why do you keep posting your dumb fucking "Mossad did it!" shit ITT, and being a cunt while you do it?

You have a muddy soul and a thick head and I wish you all the worst.
>> No. 3582 Anonymous
2nd January 2015
Friday 5:30 pm
3582 spacer
>>3581

see

>>3580
>> No. 3583 Anonymous
2nd January 2015
Friday 8:07 pm
3583 spacer
>>3581
But you're missing out on THE TRUTH, lad. If you're just going to ignore THE TRUTH there's no point in even living.

Never forget that the Civil War was an inside job.
>> No. 3584 Anonymous
3rd January 2015
Saturday 8:51 am
3584 spacer

topbabysitters2015.jpg
358435843584
>In an extraordinary legal allegation, a woman said she was 'forced' to have sex with Prince Andrew at parties in London, New York and the Caribbean.

>The woman - named only as Jane Doe #3 but said to be 30-year-old Virginia Roberts - says in court documents she was told to 'give the prince whatever he demanded' by his friend Jeffrey Epstein, the US billionaire paedophile who hosted the sordid parties.

>She claimed she and other underage girls were 'procured for sexual activities' by Ghislaine Maxwell, the socialite daughter of crooked tycoon Robert Maxwell. Miss Maxwell is alleged to have facilitated the prince's 'abuse' of the girl, after helping Epstein to convert her 'into what is commonly referred to as a sex slave'.

>Legal documents lodged with a court in Florida name Andrew, 54, as one of three men allegedly involved in abusing the woman 13 years ago when she was 17 - which is underage in Florida state law.

>Buckingham Palace said 'any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue'.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2894911/Andrew-age-sex-slave-Duke-denies-claim-court-papers-teen-picked-sleep-Robert-Maxwell-s-daughter.html

It's alright lads, she woz 17 at the time and a blonde bint so woz obviously gagging for it. Plus ARE Queen says it isn't true anyway.
>> No. 3585 Anonymous
3rd January 2015
Saturday 12:17 pm
3585 spacer
>>3584
>17
Oh who gives a fuck. This will all blow over.

Which is exactly the response they want. God forbid any of the really naughty stuff gets out.
>> No. 3586 Anonymous
3rd January 2015
Saturday 1:30 pm
3586 spacer
>>3585

This sits unwell with me, perhaps they're testing the waters with a slightly grey area with the fact that 17 is legal here but illegal in the US so that next time something like this comes up we will be more biased to them being innocent.
>> No. 3621 Anonymous
21st January 2015
Wednesday 6:27 pm
3621 spacer
>>3584

>Flight records show Duke of York and his accuser Virginia Roberts were in the same places at the same times she claims to have had sex with him

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/11359788/Prince-Andrew-under-renewed-pressure-to-speak-about-sex-abuse-claims-after-flight-logs-emerge.html
>> No. 3622 Anonymous
21st January 2015
Wednesday 7:29 pm
3622 spacer
>An academic discovers document from the Prime Minister's files which contain allegations of 'unnatural sexual proclivities' between 1980 and 1981.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11359459/Secret-government-file-on-unnatural-sexual-behaviour-at-Westminster-unearthed.html
>> No. 3623 Anonymous
21st January 2015
Wednesday 8:37 pm
3623 spacer
>>3622
Utterly shocking. I'm amazed anyone would use wording like "unnatural sexual proclivities" any time after about 1963.
>> No. 3624 Anonymous
21st January 2015
Wednesday 10:49 pm
3624 spacer
Why has that slimy cunt in the OP picture not been arrested yet?

I somehow doubt he ever will be.
>> No. 3625 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 12:11 am
3625 spacer
Lawyers ask Prince Andrew to respond under oath about claims of sex with 17-year-old girl

>"I had sex with him three times, including one orgy,” Roberts claims in her affidavit. “I knew he was a member of the British royal family, but I just called him Andy.”
>Roberts also claimed that Epstein required her to recount personal details about her alleged sexual encounter with Andrew, adding: “Epstein appeared to be collecting private information about Andy.”
>Roberts alleged in her affidavit that Epstein obtained girls for his influential friends “so that they would owe him, they would be in his pocket, and he would have something on them." She claimed: "Epstein thought he could get leniency if he was ever caught doing anything illegal, or more so that he could escape trouble altogether.”
>“Her allegations against Prince Andrew are strongly corroborated,” Roberts’ lawyers claim in their motion, adding that despite Buckingham Palace’s denials, the royal household “has not attempted to explain what led to the Prince having his picture taken with his arm around a 17- year-old American girl at night in London in an intimate setting in a private residence”.

If Andy Pandy gets caught lying under oath in the USA, would the yanks seek to press criminal charges?

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/21/woman-affidavit-prince-andrew
>> No. 3627 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 1:16 am
3627 spacer
>>3621
I'm confused. Surely those logs only demonstrate where ARE ANDY is supposed to be, on the assumption that he's on the plane.
>> No. 3628 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 3:29 am
3628 spacer
>>3625

I'm not sure how it works, but I think he could have a warrant put out for his arrest, except if he's ever there as a diplomat (probably the only reason he'd go nowadays) he cannot be arrested. But then maybe some third country he goes to could arrest him and extradite him?
>> No. 3629 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 2:56 pm
3629 spacer

Leon-Brittan.jpg
362936293629
>>3624

>Leon Brittan, former home secretary, dies, aged 75

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jan/22/leon-brittan-former-home-secretary-dies

No conspiracy here lads. Move along now...
>> No. 3630 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 3:03 pm
3630 spacer
>>3624
>I somehow doubt he ever will be.
Come on, lad. What did you know that the rest of us didn't?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30938755
>> No. 3632 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 3:35 pm
3632 spacer
>>3629
>>3630
Well, >>3624 here. This is great news! They probably killed him off because they know by now that it will all come out. Or maybe they killed him off so that it can come out. The only time we hear any news is of the dead.

Still not ideal circumstances (I'd rather he had faced trial) but all things considered the fact that an evil child killing pedo rapist cunt is dead can only be good news.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 3633 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 3:46 pm
3633 spacer
>>3632
An alleged evil child killing pedo rapist cunt. Remember what happened with McAlpine.

Also, it's 'paedo', you paedo.
>> No. 3634 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 4:20 pm
3634 spacer
>>3633
I of course meant alleged. And paedo.

I am deeply sorry.
>> No. 3635 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 4:24 pm
3635 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/v/8vXR5gjRMPk
>> No. 3636 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 4:30 pm
3636 spacer
>>3635
Now we get to hear about the real filth.
>> No. 3637 Anonymous
22nd January 2015
Thursday 5:07 pm
3637 spacer
>>3633

You can't libel the dead, that's why so much came out after Savile died.

Leon Brittan fucked donkeys while dressed as Hitler and reciting the racier parts of the Quran. Leon Brittan stole pick and mix to fund his heroin habit. Leon Brittan parked sideways in disabled spaces while bellowing "FUCK THE SPASTICS!" through a loudhailer made from human skin.
>> No. 3644 Anonymous
25th January 2015
Sunday 1:36 pm
3644 spacer
>>3637

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/leon-brittan-abused-children-westminster-5038101

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2925149/Labour-MP-sensationally-accuses-Leon-Brittan-multiple-child-rape-compares-tributes-former-Home-Secretary-heaped-Jimmy-Savile.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11367242/Leon-Brittan-A-fine-man-and-an-important-ally-of-Thatcher-who-left-under-a-cloud.html

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/554092/Tories-to-ignore-sex-abuse-claims-surrounding-Leon-Brittan-protect-memorial
>> No. 3645 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 5:23 pm
3645 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/v/BAY46NW7EDo
Parklife.
>> No. 3646 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 5:25 pm
3646 spacer
>>3645
Does it really take nine minutes and four seconds to say "yes"?
>> No. 3647 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 6:13 pm
3647 spacer
>>3645
Well, at least he'll make more people aware that this is going on.
>> No. 3648 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 6:18 pm
3648 spacer
>>3647

There are loads of No voters linking this on my FB foaming at the mouth insisting if they'd known in September they would have voted Yes in the referendum.

So yeah, he is getting the word out about it. To be honest, I learned more about it from .gs than I did from the news or the papers.
>> No. 3649 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 6:30 pm
3649 spacer
>>3648
>There are loads of No voters linking this on my FB foaming at the mouth insisting if they'd known in September they would have voted Yes in the referendum.
Because obviously whether people were diddling kiddies back in the 70s is totally relevant to the question of whether or not Scotland should be independent.
>> No. 3651 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 6:34 pm
3651 spacer
>>3649

Calm down Maplad.
>> No. 3652 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 6:44 pm
3652 spacer
>>3648
That makes it seem like they don't actually keep up with things or read much news, since then they would have been aware of it.
>> No. 3653 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 6:45 pm
3653 spacer
>>3649

It is if the establishment they voted to remain a member of were complicit in the abuse, which it turns out they were.

You can't really blame them for being annoyed.
>> No. 3655 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 6:55 pm
3655 spacer
>>3653
Christ, lad. That's silly thinking even by /boo/ standaards.
>> No. 3656 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 6:55 pm
3656 spacer
>>3652

Which was my point.
>> No. 3657 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 7:08 pm
3657 spacer
>>3655

Not really. Why would anyone want to be associated with an organisation complicit in child abuse?

Are you so bitter about Scottish nationalists that you'd argue that they are mental for being angry about the people that run the country covering up paedophilia? It shines a very unflattering light on Westminster, because if they would lie about something like endemic child abuse in the establishment then they can't be trusted.

In case you you've had your head in the sand for months, the Scots are going crazy because they think they were lied to about new powers and are defecting en masse to the SNP. Trust is something they need in Westminster right now, but they simply don't have it and, frankly, I don't fucking blame them. This is one of the most disgusting stories to come out relating to state-sponsored abuse and corruption in my lifetime and I think we'll still be talking about it in 30 years.
>> No. 3658 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 7:17 pm
3658 spacer
>>3657
I'm going to sound like a Russian now but there's no evidence for said goings on. It's not far off egging your neighbour because someone said he was a paedo.
>> No. 3659 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 7:22 pm
3659 spacer
>>3658

>no evidence

Mirth.
>> No. 3660 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 7:23 pm
3660 spacer
>>3657
>Why would anyone want to be associated with an organisation complicit in child abuse?
It's not like we determine who's in that organisation or anything.
>> No. 3661 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 7:29 pm
3661 spacer
>>3660

If you'll allow me to be pedantic for a second, that isn't really true for them. We get what we vote for every time, but they don't. I can understand why they wanted a more democratic solution. Cornwall in/out referendum 2016!
>> No. 3662 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 7:54 pm
3662 spacer
>>3661
>We get what we vote for every time, but they don't.
u wot m7?
>> No. 3677 Anonymous
1st February 2015
Sunday 1:05 pm
3677 spacer

ok.jpg
367736773677
>Both Russian and US intelligence knew about a group of powerful paedophiles operating in Britain and the KGB hoped to blackmail them in exchange for information

>One source close to the KGB said: “These were troubled times and my task was to identify people who could perhaps help us with information."

>“We knew of some MPs who loved rent boys, and others who were active paedophiles."

>“In those days, MPs were protected by Special Branch and anyone with a chequered history, or an unhealthy appetite for young children, was soon flagged up by them."

>“They had a difficult job but were fully aware that we knew what they knew, and they tried hard to suppress any possible leaks.”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/westminster-child-abuse-scandal-kgb-5080120
>> No. 3678 Anonymous
1st February 2015
Sunday 2:13 pm
3678 spacer
>>3661
I feel the Scots' pain, don't you worry. Brighton also got a government it didn't vote for.
>> No. 3679 Anonymous
2nd February 2015
Monday 10:59 pm
3679 spacer
>>3677

Even the Russians are at it

>Litvinenko had long-standing bitter feud with Putin, inquiry told
>Murdered man had alleged Russian president was paedophile in blogpost while his books made claims about mafia links

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/02/litvinenko-long-standing-bitter-feud-putin-inquiry-told
>> No. 3680 Anonymous
2nd February 2015
Monday 11:03 pm
3680 spacer
>>3679
He's not the first to make claims of Putin's links to organised crime though, and it's something I could definitely see being true.
>> No. 3681 Anonymous
2nd February 2015
Monday 11:19 pm
3681 spacer
>>3661
Democracy isn't about 'getting what you vote for', it's about getting what the people as a whole vote for.
>> No. 3682 Anonymous
2nd February 2015
Monday 11:40 pm
3682 spacer
>>3680

It's not a speculation, it's essentially fact;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAAMPiF_BSg

Very good documentary.

Litvinenko claimed that Putin used these apartment bombings to accelerate his political career. I don't doubt that for a second.
>> No. 3683 Anonymous
2nd February 2015
Monday 11:47 pm
3683 spacer
>Thatcher stopped Peter Hayman being named as paedophile-link civil servant
>Papers released to National Archives about senior diplomat will be of interest to campaigners for victims of historical sex abuse

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives
>> No. 3684 Anonymous
4th February 2015
Wednesday 12:17 am
3684 spacer
Whats the latest dirt on Cliff 'uses boys like sex toys' Richards?
>> No. 3685 Anonymous
5th February 2015
Thursday 4:18 pm
3685 spacer
SHOCK NEWS LADS

GARY GLITTER FOUND GUILTY

TURNS OUT HE WAS A PAEDOPHILE
>> No. 3686 Anonymous
5th February 2015
Thursday 4:26 pm
3686 spacer

GG.jpg
368636863686
>>3685

IT'S A STITCH UP M8, HE WOULDN'T HURT A FLY! DOES HE LOOK LIKE A PAEDO TO YOU?
>> No. 3687 Anonymous
5th February 2015
Thursday 6:46 pm
3687 spacer
They are taking their time. In the mean time, I feel that the general public doesn't give a shit. In fact, I feel that the general public doesn't give a shit about anything, unless the media gives it enough airtime, and nudge people to care about it. This is all too frustrating.
>> No. 3690 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:01 pm
3690 spacer
>>3689
All that needs to be said on the matter is this:
What they're describing is Satanic ritual abuse. If what they're saying is correct, despite decades or even centuries of such reports being made, it would be the first to be true, ever.
>> No. 3691 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:02 pm
3691 spacer
>>3689
Stop doing that to the semicolons.
>> No. 3693 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:07 pm
3693 spacer
>>3692
>Regardless if it's true or not, why are those children describing such vile acts ?
The two halves of that sentence appear to be incompatible.
>> No. 3694 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 9:06 pm
3694 spacer

oh lord.jpg
369436943694
>>3686

They're everywhere
>> No. 3695 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 9:12 pm
3695 spacer

SchoolCrossing[1].jpg
369536953695
>>3694
I just looked up the Wikipedia article on lollipop men and saw this picture illustrating the American version, and pissed myself for about five minutes.
>> No. 3696 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 9:21 pm
3696 spacer
>>3695

That is beautiful.
>> No. 3697 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 9:32 pm
3697 spacer

partridge.jpg
369736973697
>>3695

And here's a video of an American trying to stop a crack addled monster truck driver. Crash bang what a wallop.
>> No. 3698 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 9:32 pm
3698 spacer

Wrex.gif
369836983698
>>3695

"POL..." *several yards later* "...ICE".
>> No. 3700 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 9:04 am
3700 spacer
>>3699

I clicked it, and now I wish I hadn't.
>> No. 3701 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 9:06 am
3701 spacer
>>3700
What is it?
>> No. 3702 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 9:33 am
3702 spacer

pure_coincidence.jpg
370237023702
Lots of one day old accounts on reddit telling us all "nothing to see here folks".
>> No. 3703 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 9:43 am
3703 spacer

File
removed
>>3702
Here's another. An account purely created to say "nothing to see here" (he actually ends his first ever comment with those lines).
http://www.reddit.com/user/forgotthatusername
>> No. 3704 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 10:00 am
3704 spacer
>>3702
Because there isn't, it's obviously faked.
>> No. 3705 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 10:29 am
3705 spacer
>>3704
Well, one of the children who claims to have been abused says she can identify a tattoo one of the abusers has near her vagina (the headteacher). Sure we'll soon find out if that checks out.
>> No. 3706 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 10:50 am
3706 spacer
>>3705
Sounds like one of the many failed challenges from You Bet.
>> No. 3707 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 10:57 am
3707 spacer
>>3705

I posted this stuff yesterday and promptly deleted it since it looks dubious.

But still raises questions about why these kids were made to say these things, and then film them? Seems absurd.
>> No. 3708 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 11:05 am
3708 spacer
>>3707
If the guy who posted the video actually is the guy who apparently posted it, Henry Curteis or whatever, then a few googles indicates that he's a tinfoillad.
>> No. 3711 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 12:03 pm
3711 spacer
>>3707
Falsely accusing them of sexual misdeeds is a tried and tested means of discrediting someone. If the everyone and their cat is embroiled in a child abuse scandal, nobody's going to notice if you slip one more name into the pile.
>> No. 3712 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 12:47 pm
3712 spacer
>>3699
At least one of these videos explicitly names victims of sexual abuse, and the children's faces being shown unobscured and their voices being heard undisguised almost certainly means that posting a link to it is an act likely to lead to the identification of the victims, which would be illegal.
>> No. 3713 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 8:27 pm
3713 spacer
>>3699
Very odd.
>> No. 3714 Anonymous
8th February 2015
Sunday 8:40 pm
3714 spacer
>>3705
According to >>3699 they all have tattoos.
>> No. 3715 Anonymous
16th February 2015
Monday 8:54 am
3715 spacer
>MI5 accused of covering up sexual abuse at boys’ home

They used children as bate. Little boys and little girls were raped, tortured and murdered so 'Britain' could sustain itz little empire.

GCHQlad better fucking explain himself. Do you really believe sacrificing children in the name of profit and 'power' is in our national interest?

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/feb/15/mi5-kincora-childrens-home-northwen-ireland-sexual-abuse

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 3716 Anonymous
16th February 2015
Monday 12:42 pm
3716 spacer
>>3707
My theory: The mother and her new boyfriend have cannabis psychosis from oversampling their own stock. The children are clearly malnourished and neglected and have had a fucked up vegan diet inflicted on them. When the worst parents in the world found them doing innocent sex play stuff together, their dope addled brains went into tinfoil land and the headmistress of the school began to fly to the moon every night on a broomstick made of dead babies. The kids somehow knew what to say.

Heartbreakingly, the children may have somehow known that saying this stuff on camera increased their chances of being taken into care and their survival. I can't imagine being around Mum and the cameraman was any fun at all and Papa seemed pretty useless too.

It is an old and well used smear to claim someone has hidden marks or tattoos, and places the 'suspect' immediately on the defensive.

Well done .gs mods for deleting this stuff - can't believe the circulation it has received including some idiot on my fb feed - half the people sharing it all from 'concern' are getting off on it anyway.
>> No. 3717 Anonymous
17th February 2015
Tuesday 7:40 am
3717 spacer
>>3702
>>3703
One has to wonder, if all this is nothing to worry about and patently false - then why are people making throwaway accounts to post "nothing to see here"?

Why make an account specifically to address this issue?

Cui bono?
>> No. 3718 Anonymous
17th February 2015
Tuesday 9:04 am
3718 spacer
>>3717
The person making the account benefits through not having to deal with crazy people.following them around.
>> No. 3719 Anonymous
17th February 2015
Tuesday 9:53 am
3719 spacer
>>3718
This makes no sense.
>> No. 3720 Anonymous
17th February 2015
Tuesday 11:28 am
3720 spacer
>>3719
Not him, but are you saying not being stalked by crazies is not beneficial?
>> No. 3721 Anonymous
17th February 2015
Tuesday 12:56 pm
3721 spacer
>>3716
That is quite a lot of dismissive assumptions you seem to have made there.
>> No. 3722 Anonymous
17th February 2015
Tuesday 1:07 pm
3722 spacer
>>3721
Welcome to /boo/, lad.
>> No. 3781 Anonymous
20th February 2015
Friday 4:48 pm
3781 spacer
>>3721
The follow-up release of the police interviews and retractions seems to bear it all out though. It's a weird case and I really wish I hadn't started reading up on it - feels like I've been experimented on, and the videos made you feel bad to watch straight away.
>> No. 3783 Anonymous
20th February 2015
Friday 5:43 pm
3783 spacer
Fucking hell, lads. Why did none of you tell me that it was nonce enablers who killed Jill Dando?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2698820/Murdered-Crimewatch-presenter-Jill-Dando-tried-bosses-investigate-alleged-paeodphile-ring-inside-BBC-no-one-wanted-know.html
>> No. 3785 Anonymous
20th February 2015
Friday 7:28 pm
3785 spacer
>>3783
I thought all /boo/ lads already knew, it's pretty much common knowledge in "conspiracy" circles.
>> No. 3786 Anonymous
23rd February 2015
Monday 12:33 pm
3786 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/v/Nml5a7vqa3U

Also related, if you google "anonymous leaks satanic cult member names" you'll find a very long, very detailed article. I expect someone somewhere is going to get either sued or killed over this, it will be interesting to see which.
>> No. 3787 Anonymous
23rd February 2015
Monday 1:04 pm
3787 spacer
>>3786
It reads like the product of a seriously unhinged mind. A secret kitchen in a McDonalds for cooking babies? One guy killing "at least one baby a day"? I mean, come on.

I suspect there'll be neither death nor legal action, rather it'll be ignored as another example of fantasist "satanic death cult" nonsense.
>> No. 3788 Anonymous
23rd February 2015
Monday 1:19 pm
3788 spacer
>>3787
This. Yet again, if it proves true it'll be the first confirmed case ever. This shit isn't new. For centuries people used to say that Jews engaged in ritual child sacrifice. Long before that the Romans invented similar stories to justify war against Carthage which stood for millennia until we figured them out.
>> No. 3789 Anonymous
23rd February 2015
Monday 3:08 pm
3789 spacer
>"The strange reaction of the staff accused by the children (Alisa and Gabriel) was weird.

>"If I were the headmistress or a staffmember at that school, I would have immediately issued a statement with my lawyer, vigorously denying the children's videos, and I would have immediately had my privates photographed by a trusted gynecologist who would then issue an exonerating statement on my behalf - and within 24 hours all fears and internet questions could have been resolved.

>"I would have opened up the school to all parents and any interested parties to show that hidden rooms described by the children did not exist.

>"Instead, however, the reaction was to delete the school's website and to delete facebook accounts and videos..."
>> No. 3790 Anonymous
23rd February 2015
Monday 3:18 pm
3790 spacer
>>3789
Thank goodness they're not staff at that school. Those would be tremendously silly things to do.

Also, are we doing the whole 'naming victims of alleged sexual abuse' thing again?
>> No. 3791 Anonymous
23rd February 2015
Monday 3:34 pm
3791 spacer
That kids vids been floating round since last sept.

At first its shocking and therefore MUST BE TRUE BECAUSE KIDS DONT LIE!!!11
But upon closer inspection its probably complete bullshit.

The parents have split up, theres some kind of international custody battle occurring and sounds like the mother & her bf are using these kids as pawns. (or porns lol)
However what is clear that satanic or not, these kids ARE being abused - no child should have that kind of graphic sexual knowledge.

Supposedly the police / social services have been involved now and i should fucking hope so too.

The reason no one's heard anything from those involved is that if its an open police investigation they have been told not to comment incase it compromises anything. I expect the sites been closed due to a bombardment of emails or to stop communications (remember it'll probably come back on the local school authority etc and all that legal guff)

I'm interested to watch this case develop but i'd rather people stfu about it - last hing OpDeathEaters needs is discreditation from a new "Satanic Panic"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria
>> No. 3792 Anonymous
23rd February 2015
Monday 3:36 pm
3792 spacer
>>3791
>However what is clear that satanic or not, these kids ARE being abused - no child should have that kind of graphic sexual knowledge.
There is a medical report that states both children have anal scarring.
>> No. 3793 Anonymous
23rd February 2015
Monday 4:43 pm
3793 spacer
>>3792
Do you mean 'there is a report' or the subtly but importantly distinct 'I have read and/or been told there is a report'?
>> No. 3794 Anonymous
23rd February 2015
Monday 5:18 pm
3794 spacer
>>3789
>and within 24 hours all fears and internet questions could have been resolved.
Heh.
>> No. 3795 Anonymous
24th February 2015
Tuesday 5:28 pm
3795 spacer
I've been reading up on this in the last 24 hours and its veering to the conclusion of hoaxery(technical term).

I have so far heard (corrections welcome) that the mother was done for child neglect because she locked the kids out on a balcony for hours. She also claimed her other ex-bf was part of a satanic cult. Her current bf has been done for beating his own kids. They're both into vegan and hemp shit which probably gone some way to warping their minds.

Some other 'supporters' have turned up on the scene while the mother has fled the country. One being some woman called Sabine who has been fighting this 'forced adoption' cause for years. Police reports and such were leaked supporting the child abuse claims, e.g. anal scarring report.

A huge list of names were dox'd - supposedly by Anonymous.
Anonymous denys it, stating such illegal behaviour would seriously compromise their credibility to establish inquiries into child abuse a la OpDeathEaters.

People finally twig and say 'hang on, someone's leaking all these police reports aren't they compromising justice for the children?' Leaked reports are traced to Sabines Google Drive.

Sabine says it was 'accidental' and that someone must have hacked the info. Convenient, non? now that Anon is in the frame...

Personally i anticipate a huge shitstorm when this turns out to be bogus and all the personal info of virtually an entire school (including children) is doing the rounds on the internet, and there will be a further crackdown on censorship which will stop genuine whistleblowers from coming forward, i.e. Westminster Ring.

I'll be happy if this story politely fades the fuck away asap
>> No. 3796 Anonymous
24th February 2015
Tuesday 6:55 pm
3796 spacer
Bullshit confirmed. http://zeeklytv.com/video/19738/Gabriel-17-Sep-24-min
>> No. 3797 Anonymous
24th February 2015
Tuesday 6:55 pm
3797 spacer
>>3795
> They're both into vegan and hemp shit which probably gone some way to warping their minds.
For fuck's sake give it a rest.

As for the rest of your post, so this means the leaked medical report is false or not? That's really what matters. Because if it's true, then something is definitely wrong. If not, then yes, I guess it should be dropped.
>> No. 3798 Anonymous
24th February 2015
Tuesday 7:39 pm
3798 spacer
>>3797 The kids have been abused. The fact they are talking so graphically is abuse in itself.
But sexual abuse does not automatically mean 'SATANIC RITUALISTIC BABY KILLING'!!! which is what a load of nutters are going round the internet saying, discrediting the pursuit of child sex allegations generally.
>> No. 3799 Anonymous
24th February 2015
Tuesday 8:06 pm
3799 spacer
>>3796
While it's nice to know that the videos were staged, unless the police have approved the release of that interview video then linking to it here is likely just as illegal as linking to the previous videos.
>> No. 3800 Anonymous
24th February 2015
Tuesday 8:40 pm
3800 spacer
>>3796
Can you give a summary? The site's only half-working and anyway I'm not sure I want to sit through 24 minutes of this stuff.
>> No. 3801 Anonymous
24th February 2015
Tuesday 9:00 pm
3801 spacer
>>3800
I don't know why he said "Bullshit confirmed" because it's just another interview with one of the kids, but instead this time instead of them saying "I was abused" what they say is "I was abused - no wait, I wasn't, at least not very much, wait, no I wasn't at all. And any secret rooms aren't really secret so it's no big deal".

If he'd actually watched the video he would not have said "bullshit confirmed". Because that video neither confirms or denies anything. All it shows is that now they want the child to deny everything, they seem to be unable to give a straightforward testimony, unlike before.
>> No. 3802 Anonymous
24th February 2015
Tuesday 9:02 pm
3802 spacer
>>3800
I'm about halfway through, and so far:
- someone made him say there were babies killed
- someone made him say there were secret rooms
- "none of it was real"
- there wasn't any touching
- copper notes there was bruising on the boy's bottom, but does not use the word scarring
- nobody has penetrated his anus, neither with an object nor with an appendage

The kids have been used for revenge, though it's not entirely clear to what end. They have at the very least been psychologically abused by forcing them through this.

Quote of the day:
>So, no-one's put any plastic or real willies in your bum?
>> No. 3803 Anonymous
25th February 2015
Wednesday 9:08 pm
3803 spacer

4649285_l1.jpg
380338033803
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11435266/Sir-Cliff-Richard-sex-abuse-investigation-involves-more-than-one-allegation.html

Just in lads, Cliff Richards is more innocent than previously reported.
>> No. 3804 Anonymous
26th February 2015
Thursday 4:58 am
3804 spacer
>>3801
The longest police interview with the girl explains much more. The boyfriend is a psycho and I hope he goes to prison.

I do not recommend anyone watch this material and would like to see it removed from the internet as much as possible for the sake of the childrens' future. There is no conspiracy, no satanic cult - it is however a tragedy in the making.
>> No. 3805 Anonymous
1st March 2015
Sunday 10:39 pm
3805 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/v/NQTBepU7D0U
>> No. 3806 Anonymous
2nd March 2015
Monday 1:34 am
3806 spacer
>>3805
Is this real?


I'm afraid.
>> No. 3807 Anonymous
2nd March 2015
Monday 1:40 am
3807 spacer
>>3806
>Is this real?
Pretty obviously not.
>> No. 3808 Anonymous
2nd March 2015
Monday 3:02 am
3808 spacer
>>3807
I don't know what to believe. GCHQlad, is this you?
>> No. 3809 Anonymous
2nd March 2015
Monday 8:30 am
3809 spacer
>>3808
Lad, that video is quite blatantly comped.
>> No. 3810 Anonymous
2nd March 2015
Monday 9:57 am
3810 spacer
>>3808
Hey, the telegraph has a totally convincing article about how it's fake. Listen and believe, friend.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/viral-video/11442766/Naked-man-caught-jumping-out-of-Buckingham-Palace-window-in-internet-hoax.html
>> No. 3811 Anonymous
2nd March 2015
Monday 2:32 pm
3811 spacer
>>3806

>Man falls to his death
>Heheh *Eurospeak*

If it is real which it isn't the most frightening thing about it is those women.
>> No. 3812 Anonymous
2nd March 2015
Monday 10:07 pm
3812 spacer
>>3811
They are from Europe. It is expected of them to be like that.
>> No. 3813 Anonymous
3rd March 2015
Tuesday 3:09 pm
3813 spacer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial
>> No. 3817 Anonymous
5th March 2015
Thursday 8:24 am
3817 spacer
Is there anyone here who thinks Leon Brittan was an innocent man?
>> No. 3818 Anonymous
5th March 2015
Thursday 12:36 pm
3818 spacer
>>3817

No
>> No. 3819 Anonymous
5th March 2015
Thursday 3:31 pm
3819 spacer
>>3817

No, but I do wonder why Clegg bought him a DeLorean as a gift. It seems to be a weird present.

Latest news in the nonce MP chronicles:

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5510/police-raid-harvey-proctor-s-home-under-operation-midland

Why are they searching these houses 30 years after the fact? Are they expecting to find DNA evidence or some kind of sex dungeon or something?

https://www.youtube.com/v/M8H0W9LVlkw
>> No. 3820 Anonymous
14th March 2015
Saturday 6:54 pm
3820 spacer

May-vs-Fiddler-Gove.jpg
382038203820
>Child sex abuse is "woven, covertly, into the fabric" of British society, Theresa May has warned.

>Mrs May said the inquiry marked a "new beginning", but warned allegations made so far were only the "tip of the iceberg".

>Mrs May said: "We already know the trail will lead into our schools and hospitals, our churches, our youth clubs and many other institutions that should have been places of safety but instead became the setting for the most appalling abuse.

>"However, what the country doesn't yet appreciate is the true scale of that abuse."

They're everywhere lads. And there's LOTZ of them!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31885906
>> No. 3821 Anonymous
14th March 2015
Saturday 7:05 pm
3821 spacer
>>3820
All the better to 'bulk collect', and if you use a VPN or other privacy protection technology then clearly you are a naughty little paedo.

Waiting for it.
>> No. 3822 Anonymous
14th March 2015
Saturday 7:07 pm
3822 spacer
>>3821
That's a step forward, I suppose. It's nice to have an alternative to being a terrorist.
>> No. 3823 Anonymous
16th March 2015
Monday 3:27 pm
3823 spacer
>Metropolitan Police probed over child abuse 'cover-up' claims

>The police watchdog is investigating alleged corruption in the Metropolitan Police, including claims it covered up child sex offences because of the involvement of police officers and MPs.

>Allegations being investigated as set out by the IPCC include:

> -A claim that an investigation into young men being targeted at the Dolphin Square flats in Pimlico, south-west London, was halted because "officers were too near prominent people"

> -An allegation that a document from the Houses of Parliament was found at a paedophile's address linking "highly-prominent individuals", including MPs and senior police officers, to a paedophile ring but no further action was taken

> -Alleged alteration of a child sex abuse victim's account to remove the name of a senior politician

> -Alleged child sex abuse by a senior politician and a subsequent cover-up of the alleged crimes

> -Claims that a surveillance operation of a child abuse ring was shut down due to "high-profile people being involved"

> -An allegation that police officers sexually abused a boy and carried out surveillance on him

>The force said in a statement: "The allegations emerged whilst officers were working on Operation Fairbank and relate to the period between 1970 and 2005

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31907201
>> No. 3824 Anonymous
16th March 2015
Monday 11:34 pm
3824 spacer
>>3823
Do you think you could post things like this without quote marks? I find reading a whole paragraph of green on grey quite difficult on the eyes. Ta.
>> No. 3825 Anonymous
17th March 2015
Tuesday 12:39 am
3825 spacer

muslim fem.jpg
382538253825
>>3824

Last time I quoted a source without green-texting it, I was quietly pulled to one side and called a cunt.

Unless itz your own words, I had assumed it needed the > treatment. Either way, I apologise for putting sand in your vag. It woz'nt intentional.

If Purple could provide editorial guidance on this matter, it would be much appreciated.
>> No. 3826 Anonymous
17th March 2015
Tuesday 1:07 am
3826 spacer
>>3825
I think that guy's a minority, the entire point of green text is to denote quotations, and be easier on the eye than a glaring white/dark contrast.
>> No. 3827 Anonymous
17th March 2015
Tuesday 2:38 pm
3827 spacer
>>3825
>>3826
Not him but if I'm quoting a lot from a link I sometimes stick it in italics rather than green.
>> No. 3828 Anonymous
17th March 2015
Tuesday 2:49 pm
3828 spacer
>>3826
It was probably to do with Flux making my screen colours fucky. If the majority prefer green/grey then stick to that. I really doesn't matter.
>> No. 3829 Anonymous
17th March 2015
Tuesday 2:58 pm
3829 spacer
>>3828
REFERENDUM NOW!
>> No. 3830 Anonymous
17th March 2015
Tuesday 3:40 pm
3830 spacer
>>3829
Tough call. On the one hand I don't want to vote Green, but on the other it feels a bit racist to vote White.
>> No. 3831 Anonymous
17th March 2015
Tuesday 7:28 pm
3831 spacer
>>3830

Vote Purple!
>> No. 3868 Anonymous
23rd March 2015
Monday 10:10 pm
3868 spacer

U-WOT-M8.jpg
386838683868
http://i.imgur.com/2i3xBLa.jpg

MPs vote against allowing whistleblowers giving evidence in these cases to be protected from violations of the Official Secrets act.

Not in the least bit suspicious.
>> No. 3869 Anonymous
23rd March 2015
Monday 10:21 pm
3869 spacer
>>3868
Thanks for reminding me to subscribe to Exaro. I keep forgetting.
>> No. 3870 Anonymous
23rd March 2015
Monday 10:38 pm
3870 spacer
>>3868
How do they honestly think that's going to look?
>> No. 3871 Anonymous
29th March 2015
Sunday 11:07 pm
3871 Loose lips sink ships
Aristocrats 'feel entitled to abuse people' says son of the 10th Earl of Sandwich who was raped by his father as a child

>Mr Montagu said that, during his years at Eton, rape was common, adding that people with 'entitled backgrounds' were given 'more opportunities' to be abusive towards children.
>Mr Montagu has talked in the past about how a loving relationship with his father turned to abuse when he was aged seven.
>It began after his mother, Rosemary Peto, goddaughter of Queen Maud of Norway, left the family home, and he believes his father used it as a way to cope with the loss.
>He wrote about being groomed by his father, as hugs and tickles gave way to kisses, which in turn gave way to serial and serious abuse.
>Mr Montagu says there were other victims, beside himself, and that he has personally spoken to ten of them - though believes there could be another ten he has yet to identify.
>Asked why there was such a reluctance for her father's story to be told, his daughter Fiamma said: 'In our case it has been because of the Establishment. Everybody has a vested interest in getting him to shut up.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3016137/Aristocrats-feel-entitled-abuse-people-says-son-10th-Earl-Sandwich-raped-father-child.html
>> No. 3872 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 10:24 pm
3872 spacer
>>3868

If any of you are voting this year, keep this in mind lads.

http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2015-02-23&number=158&display=allvotes
>> No. 3873 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 10:28 pm
3873 spacer
>>3872

Christ.
>> No. 3874 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 10:30 pm
3874 spacer
>>3872
That's a tough one. See, the next Snowden could simply turn around and claim that somewhere in his bundles he has information on "historic child abuse" and he's got an instant loophole. The Young Men can't have that, can they?
>> No. 3875 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 10:51 pm
3875 spacer
>>3872
Isn't Labour part of the establishment? Why are they voting aye?

LibDems are noncers-lite.
>> No. 3876 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:01 pm
3876 spacer
>>3875

They probably know there are more active Conservative nonces than Labour ones. See >>3871 - Anyone who went to Eton is probably a nonce or was diddled into being a nonce apologist. That said, Theresa May reckons everyone is a nonce.
>> No. 3879 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:05 pm
3879 spacer
>>3875
>Isn't Labour part of the establishment? Why are they voting aye?
Because they knew they'd lose the vote anyway but relished the opportunity to be seen doing the right thing. Basic opposition politics, this.
>> No. 3880 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:19 pm
3880 spacer

poster.php.jpg
388038803880
>>3879
Never mind that it's consistently been Labour MPs who've raised child abuse in the house. Never mind that it's consistently been Tories and Lib Dems who've fouled up inquiries, or ensured the OSA remains to threaten witness away from giving testimony. Just think of the damage those evil Labour MPs might do to your house price! You might even pay £200 more a year in VAT!
>> No. 3881 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:22 pm
3881 spacer
>>3880
The Lib Dems? Before they entered into government? Really? Or are you just pretending to disagree with me?
>> No. 3882 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:23 pm
3882 spacer
>>3881
http://www.private-eye.co.uk/smith-archive
>> No. 3883 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:24 pm
3883 spacer
>>3882
Organisation defends its own shocker. Anything else?
>> No. 3884 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:26 pm
3884 spacer

ym26_humphreydesmond3[1].jpg
388438843884
>>3883
It's not a shocker if you're a Tory or a Lib Dem, clearly. Who cares about molested kids when your chums are on the line? Good to see you're a sound chap, lad.
>> No. 3887 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:44 pm
3887 spacer
>>3886
Right, but it's Labour MPs who are advocating the lifting of the OSA concerning child abuse, and it is Labour MPs like Tom Watson who brought this stuff to the house in the first place.

What's it like, to sell your soul to a gang of child-abusing toff pieces of shit? What are you getting in return?
>> No. 3888 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:51 pm
3888 spacer
>>3884
Before you choke on your non-sequiturs, let me remind you that you're trying to prove the assertion that the Lib Dems are noncier than Labour, one of the two parties to have overseen this country for nearly a century. The Lib Dems weren't in power while boys and girls were getting raped in children's homes up and down the country. Labour were. The Conservatives were.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=labour+paedophile

I read your link. Oh dear, mate. Oh dear, oh dear.

>Smith was [at the time of the abuse] a prominent member of the Labour Party (he got the MBE on the recommendation of [Rochdale's] Labour MP in 1966).

>>3887
In opposition, yes. It doesn't count for shit and that was my only point. Why didn't they do that five years ago?

The person who vandalised paediatrician Yvette Cloete's home was not a good troll and you're not either.
>> No. 3889 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 11:55 pm
3889 spacer
>>3888
> It doesn't count for shit

Is that actually how you think?

Oh libdemlad.
>> No. 3891 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:18 am
3891 spacer
>>3888
>Why didn't they do that five years ago?
Why didn't you bring it up five years ago?
>> No. 3892 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:22 am
3892 spacer
>>3891
Weren't you paying attention? 'It doesn't count' when you're in opposition!
>> No. 3893 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:30 am
3893 spacer
>>3891
Because Labour and the Conservatives covered it up and I didn't know about it. It's been fun playing.

>>3892
>The majority of MPs voted against
The OSA remains unchanged. Nothing has happened. The situation remains as it was 50 years ago. It really doesn't count. I'll be back in another five to say I told you so.
>> No. 3894 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:35 am
3894 spacer
>>3893
OK lad - be sure to write a letter to your party's leadership applauding them for standing by with Call me Dave and protecting the child molesters from the courts. Sterling effort.
>> No. 3896 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:42 am
3896 spacer
>>3893
>Because Labour and the Conservatives covered it up and I didn't know about it
That's no excuse.
>> No. 3897 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:45 am
3897 spacer
>>3894
I would, but I don't imagine anyone in Natalie Bennett's office would get back to me. They'd dismiss such a letter as the ramblings of someone mentally ill.

Oh, you mistook me for the kind of moron who participates in party-political pantomimes? Oops.
>> No. 3898 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:46 am
3898 spacer
>>3897
>They'd dismiss such a letter as the ramblings of someone mentally ill.

They probably wouldn't be wrong.
>> No. 3899 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:46 am
3899 spacer
>>3897
The Greens stood by and let it happen. They're as guilty as the next man.
>> No. 3900 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:51 am
3900 spacer
>>3899
Do you think there's a corollary here to the rule that suggests the most homophobic are in actuality the most closeted?
>> No. 3901 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 12:56 am
3901 spacer
>>3900
I don't think I could answer while staying within the limits of the libel laws.
>> No. 3906 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 2:51 am
3906 spacer
Why does whoever being in power make any difference to kid noncing?
>> No. 3907 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 3:14 am
3907 spacer
I sometimes wonder why I think Britain is any different than any other corrupt hellhole on earth. I have this naive belief that we are different; that we are civilised, and that the weak won't be stomp on by the strong. I slap myself back into my senses. £10 says everyone who was involved with the noncing gets away with it, and nothing will change.
>> No. 3908 Anonymous
31st March 2015
Tuesday 3:39 am
3908 spacer
>>3907

I have a theory that all societies are equally corrupt, they just have different levels of pretence hiding their innate corruption. In India, if you want to build a dodgy pollution-spewing factory, you give a big envelope full of cash to the local governor. In America, you make 'campaign contributions' to a mayor or congressman. In Britain, it's all funny handshakes and the old school tie. Every culture has it's own peculiar way of lying, cheating and swindling.
>> No. 3909 Anonymous
1st April 2015
Wednesday 4:21 pm
3909 spacer

bbc-logo-design.gif
390939093909
http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5527/bbc-at-war-over-panorama-on-claims-of-vip-paedophile-network#.VRvbhOaajqs.twitter

Now the BBC is going to make a Panorama special suggesting there was no VIP ring?

I'm starting to suspect we're living in a Nonceocracy lads.
>> No. 3910 Anonymous
1st April 2015
Wednesday 5:49 pm
3910 spacer
>>3907

>I have this naive belief that we are different; that we are civilised, and that the weak won't be stomp on by the strong.

There's a kind of inherent belief in Britain of the incorruptibility of British institutions. It stems from - where else - the Empire. Before the Second World War the BBFC actively censored movies that were perceived to criticise British culture, society or government. As Lord Tyrrell said in 1937, "We may take pride in the fact that there is not a single film showing in London which deals with any of the burning issues of the day."
>> No. 3911 Anonymous
1st April 2015
Wednesday 7:00 pm
3911 spacer
>>3909
The key thing with the VIP ring is not that high-ranking people were doing it but that it was co-ordinated (hence a "ring"). That may be the part that doesn't stand up.
>> No. 3912 Anonymous
1st April 2015
Wednesday 7:37 pm
3912 spacer
>>3911
Easy there lad, that sounds supiciously like common sense to me, and we don't seem to take kindly to that in this thread...
>> No. 3913 Anonymous
1st April 2015
Wednesday 7:54 pm
3913 spacer
On the subject of the BBC, does anyone know that website where you can view old UK tv shows? All I know of it is that you can search according to word, ie. it'll come up with shows actually using that word in the script, and that you use can use university login details.
>> No. 3914 Anonymous
1st April 2015
Wednesday 8:54 pm
3914 spacer
>>3913
http://bobnational.net/

I assume?
>> No. 3915 Anonymous
3rd April 2015
Friday 11:40 pm
3915 spacer
>>3912

I think you need to head back to /pol/ or maybe /news/ for this type of commentary. In the meantime:

http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/child-abuse-networks.html

http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/child-abuse-networks-part-two.html

/boo/!
>> No. 3916 Anonymous
4th April 2015
Saturday 4:41 pm
3916 spacer
>Liberals offered hush money to hide Cyril Smith's abuse

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3025076/EXPOSED-Liberals-offered-hush-money-hide-Cyril-Smith-s-abuse-MP-SIMON-DANCZUK-reveals-devastating-new-evidence-raises-deeply-troubling-questions-David-Steel-Nick-Clegg.html
>> No. 3918 Anonymous
5th April 2015
Sunday 12:18 pm
3918 spacer
>63 police inquiries, 2,100 victims

>Lady Butler-Sloss said she felt ‘very sorry’ for her successor.
>‘She is going to have a really difficult job. The Government appears to be asking her to tackle too many issues at once.
>‘She has got a vast task and I fear unless she is selective, which is of course entirely a matter for her, she may just find it too much.’

Yup, I'm 100% sure she will be very selective! They reckon the inquiry will take at least 5 years and cost £200 million. Nice touch for the lawyers. Shame the security services won't be investigated for their part in this greasy horror show.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3025991/63-police-inquiries-2-100-victims-child-abuse-dossier-shames-Britain.html
>> No. 3919 Anonymous
7th April 2015
Tuesday 11:09 pm
3919 spacer
>Claims that a woman was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew when she was 17 are to be struck from the record of a civil case in the US, a judge has said.

>Judge Marra had expressed no opinion as to the "validity or veracity" of the allegations against Prince Andrew.

Nicely played. The slimy cunt.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/32210056
>> No. 3920 Anonymous
8th April 2015
Wednesday 10:59 pm
3920 spacer
>>3919
>Nicely played. The slimy cunt.
It was thrown out because it was deemed not relevant to the case.

Sorry m8.
>> No. 3921 Anonymous
9th April 2015
Thursday 9:12 pm
3921 spacer
>>3920

No need to be sorry ladm8. I failed to explain why the judge's decision to dismiss Andy Pandy's use of teenage prostitutes was relevant to this /boo/ thread. I apologise wholeheartedly. I'll try harder next time. My piss is currently tepid
>> No. 3922 Anonymous
11th April 2015
Saturday 12:37 am
3922 spacer
Looks like another apology is in order lads. Every time I bump this thread with related news, the quality of subsequent posts elsewhere on the boards takes a nosedive. In future I'll ration my paranoid postings so as to not shit up the rest of this site. Sorry.
>> No. 3923 Anonymous
11th April 2015
Saturday 12:43 am
3923 spacer
>>3922
Shiteating cuntspitter.
>> No. 3924 Anonymous
16th April 2015
Thursday 3:26 pm
3924 spacer
Lord Janner will not be charged despite evidence of child abuse

>Leicestershire police condemn CPS decision that it is not in public interest to charge peer because he has Alzheimer’s disease

>The peer was first accused of abuse offences in 1991 by a witness at the trial of Frank Beck, a serial abuser who ran children’s homes in Leicestershire.

>Mick Creedon, now chief constable of Derbyshire police but then an investigating officer, told the Times last year there was credible evidence against Janner and that he and colleagues wanted to make an arrest but were prevented from doing so by “more senior people”.

>Janner was interviewed at a police station in Leicester. He attended with his solicitor and gave “no comment” answers. The CPS decided at the time that there was no evidence to warrant charging him.

>Janner returned to the Commons after the controversy to a rousing reception from all sides. He told parliament that the claims against him consisted of “disgraceful, contemptible and totally untrue allegations”.

>Janner, a prominent advocate for Jewish rights and against the far right, who was president of the Board of British Jews, has led efforts to see Holocaust victims receive compensation.

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2015/apr/16/lord-janner-will-not-be-charged-despite-evidence-of-child-abuse
>> No. 3925 Anonymous
16th April 2015
Thursday 6:55 pm
3925 spacer
>>3924

So he is unable to stand trial for crimes evidence suggests he has commited, but he is still compus mentus enough to have a say in how we run the fucking country? Bullshit


>Janner, a prominent advocate for Jewish rights and against the far right, who was president of the Board of British Jews, has led efforts to see Holocaust victims receive compensation.

What does this have to do with anything? Is the guardian trying to conflate child abuse with Judaism?
>> No. 3926 Anonymous
16th April 2015
Thursday 7:16 pm
3926 spacer
>>3925

Why would they do that? It's well known that Jews are scum.
>> No. 3927 Anonymous
16th April 2015
Thursday 7:33 pm
3927 spacer

st-simon-of-trent-jewish-ritual-murder-catholic.jpg
392739273927
>>3926
Now now, I'm sure it's just a coincidence that there are so many Jewish people involved in all these pedo scandals.

PURE COINCIDENCE.

We're both going to be banned.
>> No. 3928 Anonymous
16th April 2015
Thursday 7:40 pm
3928 spacer

je1.jpg
392839283928
>>3926
>>3927

yew guize.
>> No. 3929 Anonymous
16th April 2015
Thursday 7:40 pm
3929 spacer
>>3927
Of course you are, purple is a Jew. It's well known he's a Zionist.
>> No. 3930 Anonymous
16th April 2015
Thursday 7:49 pm
3930 spacer
>>3929

Purple, stop sillyposting. The dullards don't know what's legit what isn't, it's not right to confuse them like that.
>> No. 3931 Anonymous
16th April 2015
Thursday 8:49 pm
3931 spacer
>>3925
>What does this have to do with anything? Is the guardian trying to conflate child abuse with Judaism?
It is refreshing to see that the mainstream media does to the Jews what it does to eskimos. At least they aren't selective in their bigotry like some people.
>> No. 3932 Anonymous
17th April 2015
Friday 4:22 am
3932 spacer
>>3930

It's all propaganda and lies, m8.
>> No. 3933 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 1:48 am
3933 spacer
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/apr/19/establishment-stopped-me-exposing-greville-janner-25-years-ago
>> No. 3934 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 2:17 am
3934 spacer
While all that is going on, why is nobody talking about how powerful figures suppressed any exposure of Noel Edmonds?

That ought to do it, lads.
>> No. 3935 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 5:48 am
3935 spacer
>>3934
Kunt of Kunt And The Gang fame did a brilliant short story about that, you can download it for free from his website.
>> No. 3936 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 10:28 am
3936 spacer
>>3934

Nice try FBI GCHQlad

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/11234069/Royals-and-Thatcher-to-blame-for-Jimmy-Savile-scandal-says-Noel-Edmonds.html
>> No. 3937 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 12:19 pm
3937 spacer
>>3936
The Noel doth protest too much, methinks.
>> No. 3938 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 1:55 pm
3938 spacer
>>3937

Link or fuck off back to Cheltenham

I'll even settle for an Aanirfan loon-post. Although I'll draw the line at David Icke forum threads!
>> No. 3939 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 2:13 pm
3939 spacer
>>3938
Remember the guy who had that fatal "accident" doing the bungee jump on his show?
>> No. 3940 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 2:20 pm
3940 spacer
>>3939
Michael Lush.
>> No. 3941 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 3:06 pm
3941 spacer

hmmm.jpg
394139413941
>>3939

OK, I'll bite.

After a quick google "Michael Lush Noel Edmonds", nothing of interest except:

>Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe

I tried Tor / google.com and Tor / duckduckgo.com and still nothing.

What I did find that raised an eyebrow or three was this statement regarding Lush's death:

>A member of the Health and Safety Executive showed the jury that the malfunctioning carabiner clip used for the stunt wasn't strong enough to hold the weight of a bag of sugar

Not sure how this connects Noel to noncing. I know he's an insufferable cunt, but unless you have something a little more substantial, I'll have to decline your bait in this instance.
>> No. 3942 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 3:27 pm
3942 spacer
>>3941
>Not sure how this connects Noel to noncing.
Why else would he want him killed in an "accident"?

>unless you have something a little more substantial
This is /boo/, m8. Now back to Thames House with you.
>> No. 3944 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 4:01 pm
3944 spacer

no.jpg
394439443944
>>3934 >>3291
Well played. I'm guessing you're that lad from the other thread.

>>3942
/boo/ or no /boo/, we at least try to back up our paranoid brain thinkings suspicions with dailymail copypasta.
>> No. 3947 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 7:38 pm
3947 spacer
>>3944

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-990129/Noel-Edmonds-Crinkley-Bottom-Grooming-Shocker
>Edmonds is the latest TV personality to be implicated in the ongoing Operation Yewtree investigation. Several complaints have been lodged against him, which are currently being investigated by police. Edmonds has not been arrested or charged as of yet.

>One witness who was employed at the infamous Crinkley Bottom theme park in the early nineties, which featured children’s attractions with names such as ‘Throttled Cock’ and ‘the Gunge Mines’, told us of how the facility was used by Edmonds and other famous guests to groom children. She said he would skulk about Dunblobbin Manor in a specially made Mr. Blobby suit which had the crotch region cut away for ease of access.

>Another witness tells of how he overheard Edmonds threatening to ‘Gunge’ some guests if they didn’t allow him to have his way with them.

>Other allegations being investigated include that Edmonds had Michael Lush assassinated on his television show due to fears that the 25-year old self-employed hod carrier from Cheltenham was going to blow the lid on Noel’s backstage goings on during Swap Shop years earlier.

Well, I'm convinced.
>> No. 3948 Anonymous
19th April 2015
Sunday 11:04 pm
3948 spacer
>>3947

Fuck me lad, how long did you waste on that? I'm guessing rhetorical banter isn't your strong point. No wonder Noel ignored your dad that one time.
>> No. 3950 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 12:06 am
3950 spacer
>>3948

Why would Noel ignore some lad's dad because the lad had weak rhetorical banter skills? Your put-down seems to lack a certain internal logical coherence.

Also, including research?It took 15 minutes tops. All I did was link the relevant DM article.
>> No. 3951 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 12:08 am
3951 spacer
>>3950
>Your put-down seems to lack a certain internal logical coherence.
His programming kicked in m8.
>> No. 3952 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 1:03 am
3952 spacer
>>3950
>Your put-down seems to lack a certain internal logical coherence
Welcome to /boo/.
>> No. 3953 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 2:15 am
3953 spacer
>>3950

Some bad lad's dad hadn't had a bad nad pat?
>> No. 3954 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 10:00 am
3954 spacer
>>3950

Oh dear, I should know by now to avoid shitposting when pissed on fortified wine. I had some oh so witty comment about the lad inheriting bantz from his old man. I deleted it for the sake of brevity and the fact it wasn't very funny. I then hit send without re-reading what was left of my pathetic attempt at a put down. And to think I wasted Sunday evening failing to defend Noel Edmond's honour. FFS. Purpz, a one week ban please.
>> No. 3955 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 12:16 pm
3955 spacer
>>3954

Don't worry about it Cliff. I'm sure all the important witnesses will die in car crashes, of natural causes, or in tragic masturbation accidents before you ever see the inside of a court room.
>> No. 3956 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 1:13 pm
3956 spacer
Satanic ritual abuse fabricated shocker.
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-32357195
>> No. 3957 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 1:48 pm
3957 spacer
>>3956
Thanks for posting this. The people who spread the videos thinking they were fighting the good fight perhaps need to spend some time examining their actions.
>> No. 3958 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 4:21 pm
3958 spacer
>>3956
>Ricky says there are court orders regarding the publishing of online material. "But they are for UK, which is why online it's like the wild, wild West," he said.
Wicky wicky.
>> No. 3959 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 5:11 pm
3959 spacer
>>3956
Why do we have such paedo hysteria in this country?
>> No. 3960 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 7:33 pm
3960 spacer
>>3958
Don't make me tell you about my times in West Philadelphia.
>> No. 3961 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 8:45 pm
3961 spacer
>>3959

That sort of Satanic nonsense isn't unique to the UK at all, indeed it's the completely cliché nature of the story that made it so unbelievable.
>> No. 3962 Anonymous
20th April 2015
Monday 9:51 pm
3962 spacer
>>3961
I recently discovered that in parts of the world where sex with children is more common, they have myths about evil witches and warlocks who drive around in vans offering kiddies sweeties to get in the back, where they murder them for their organs or something. I thought it was quite funny how generic our bogeymen are.
>> No. 3963 Anonymous
21st April 2015
Tuesday 4:44 am
3963 spacer
>>3962

There are parts of the world where that really happens. I know one of the Mexican drug cartels recently started harvesting children's organs for sale on the international black market.
>> No. 3964 Anonymous
21st April 2015
Tuesday 6:42 am
3964 spacer
>>3959
I wouldn't have said that's paedo hysteria, more batshit insane ex-wife trying to destroy her ex-husband whilst being oblivious to the fact she's royally fucking her kids up.
>> No. 3965 Anonymous
21st April 2015
Tuesday 9:14 am
3965 spacer
>>3964

Will she face charges about this? What she has done is undoubtedly a form of abuse.

And that poor man. Even though he's been found innocent these accusations will follow him around like a bad smell.
>> No. 3966 Anonymous
21st April 2015
Tuesday 11:03 am
3966 spacer
>>3964
I think by "paedo hysteria" that poster was referring to the public's response to the videos (millions of views and a lot of pitchfork rattling), rather than the individuals involved.

>Will she face charges about this?
I'd be surprised if she didn't.
>> No. 3967 Anonymous
23rd April 2015
Thursday 1:43 am
3967 spacer
>UK's top prosecutor 'ignored advice of two QCs who told her to charge Janner because of overwhelming evidence and accounts of victims'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3051419/UK-s-prosecutor-ignored-advice-two-QCs-told-charge-Janner-overwhelming-evidence-accounts-victims.html

>Janner gave his children deeds to his £2m home at height of abuse probe in echo of Stuart Hall case, move could slash potential payouts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3051384/Janner-gave-children-deeds-2m-home-height-abuse-probe-echo-Stuart-Hall-case-slash-potential-payouts.html
>> No. 3968 Anonymous
23rd April 2015
Thursday 1:53 am
3968 spacer
>>3967
>UK's top prosecutor 'ignored advice of two QCs who told her to charge Janner because of overwhelming evidence and accounts of victims'
Presumaby to make clear that she's the boss and won't be told what to do by a man. Which is also probably the same reason why I wouldn't be surprised if crazysatanicabusebint isn't charged.

>Janner gave his children deeds to his £2m home at height of abuse probe in echo of Stuart Hall case, move could slash potential payouts
I smell money-grabbing lawyers again. I fail to see why anyone else would be more entitled to it. He's also known to be suffering from dementia, and I can say from personal experience that in that situation you certainly want issues like the family home dealt with sooner rather than later.
>> No. 3969 Anonymous
23rd April 2015
Thursday 7:37 am
3969 spacer
>>3968
>Presumaby to make clear that she's the boss and won't be told what to do by a man.
What?
>> No. 3970 Anonymous
23rd April 2015
Thursday 9:07 am
3970 spacer
>>3968
Both the QCs were women, you big bellend.
>> No. 3971 Anonymous
25th April 2015
Saturday 9:18 pm
3971 spacer

thatface.jpg
397139713971
>>3967

>Law chief who decided not to prosecute Labour peer Lord Janner over alleged child sex abuse was at the same legal chambers as him

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3055063/Law-chief-decided-not-prosecute-Labour-peer-Lord-Janner-alleged-child-sex-abuse-legal-chambers-him.html
>> No. 3972 Anonymous
25th April 2015
Saturday 9:43 pm
3972 spacer
>>3971
It's almost as if there were only a small-ish number of chambers for barristers to work in.
>> No. 3973 Anonymous
25th April 2015
Saturday 11:14 pm
3973 spacer
>Both the QCs were women, you big bellend.

My bellend is more like a mushroomend
>> No. 3974 Anonymous
3rd May 2015
Sunday 2:39 pm
3974 spacer

guardianboo.jpg
397439743974
>Ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor hits out at child sex abuse investigation

>Proctor’s home within the grounds of Belvoir Castle in Leicestershire was searched by officers from Operation Midland in March.

>Just weeks later he announced he was retiring as private secretary to the Duke of Rutland.

>Operation Midland was launched by the Met last November following allegations that boys were sexually abused by a VIP paedophile ring alleged to have existed at Westminster during the 1970s and 1980s.

>There were claims that sex parties involving boys below the age of consent were held at the exclusive Dolphin Square apartment block near the Houses of Parliament.

>Proctor, who left parliament in 1987 after pleading guilty to acts of gross indecency, has previously said he knew nothing about the paedophile ring or allegations that three boys linked to the abuse were murdered.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/may/03/ex-tory-mp-harvey-proctor-hits-out-at-child-sex-abuse-investigation
>> No. 3987 Anonymous
10th May 2015
Sunday 10:16 pm
3987 spacer
>>3940

>Mike Smith, former Radio 1 DJ, dies aged 59

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-28623367
>> No. 3991 Anonymous
2nd June 2015
Tuesday 8:39 pm
3991 spacer

her-royal-wee.jpg
399139913991
Any significant updates lads?
>> No. 3992 Anonymous
3rd June 2015
Wednesday 7:47 pm
3992 spacer
Seppos are releasing a documentary about child molestation in Hollywood.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JpHUaMBARU

Embed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JpHUaMBARU
>> No. 4060 Anonymous
27th June 2015
Saturday 10:44 am
4060 spacer

cake.jpg
406040604060
>>3924

CPS decision not to prosecute Lord Janner 'to be overturned'

>The decision not to prosecute Greville Janner for historical child sex offences is to be overturned, according to reports.

>A barrister who has spent several weeks examining the evidence as part of an independent review has concluded there should be a hearing of the allegations, the Daily Mail has claimed.

>The decision is expected to be released next week and would overturn the Crown Prosecution Service’s decision in April not to pursue Lord Janner.

>Such a move would pave the way for evidence to be tested in a criminal court in a “trial of facts”, and will put Alison Saunders, the director of public prosecutions, under pressure to resign.

>Simon Danczuk, the MP for Rochdale who has campaigned for a trial of facts, told the Guardian that if the report is accurate, Saunders will now have to consider her position

Will they, won't they?
>> No. 4061 Anonymous
28th June 2015
Sunday 8:29 am
4061 spacer
Police files on child sex abuse at Gordonstoun school have vanished

>Official files on police investigations of child abuse at Gordonstoun, the school in the Scottish Highlands that educated the Queen’s sons and Prince Philip, appear to have gone missing or been destroyed.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jun/28/gordonstoun-child-sex-abuse-search-for-victims
>> No. 4062 Anonymous
29th June 2015
Monday 1:24 pm
4062 spacer
>>4060
It's on, lads

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33310095

>Lord Janner will be prosecuted over claims of historical child sexual abuse after a review overturned a decision by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

>He will face criminal proceedings relating to 22 allegations of historical sexual abuse against nine children during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.

>A judge will now decide if Lord Janner is fit to stand trial. If not, he will face what is known as a "trial of the facts", where a court hears evidence from alleged victims and decides only if Lord Janner committed the physical acts of abuse. There will be no finding of guilt or conviction.
>> No. 4063 Anonymous
29th June 2015
Monday 3:34 pm
4063 spacer
>>4062

I guess a trial of the facts is better than nothing. Any word on the other politicians and senior figures accused of noncing? I'm guessing there will be a spate of untimely natural deaths clogging up the front pages in the coming months
>> No. 4064 Anonymous
30th June 2015
Tuesday 12:54 am
4064 spacer
2015 is turning out to be a really fucking confusing year.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/10045699/Allow-legal-sex-at-13-to-stop-old-men-abuse-persecutions-says-barrister.html
>> No. 4065 Anonymous
30th June 2015
Tuesday 8:57 am
4065 spacer
>>4064
That article is from 2013.
>> No. 4066 Anonymous
30th June 2015
Tuesday 9:23 am
4066 spacer
>>4065
It's still a crazy year. Poor Simon's wife has upped and left him. Notably he's yet to say anything about Janner outside Parliament, which is concerning given the law was changed to make truth an absolute defence to libel.
>> No. 4067 Anonymous
30th June 2015
Tuesday 10:29 am
4067 spacer
>>4066

I'm not sure either of those things constitute "crazy".
>> No. 4068 Anonymous
30th June 2015
Tuesday 1:07 pm
4068 spacer
>>4067
Does that make it not a crazy year?
>> No. 4069 Anonymous
30th June 2015
Tuesday 7:31 pm
4069 spacer
Officers swooped on home in 1991 to seize evidence of Labour MP’s child sex abuse

>Police face accusations that they staged a raid to seize evidence of paedophilia by then Labour MP Greville Janner as part of a massive cover-up.

>Exaro has obtained a sensational statement by a former police officer who gave a detailed account of how he was arrested and his home raided in 1991 in an attempt to collect personal letters between Janner and a boy whom the influential politician is alleged to have sexually abused.

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5596/police-raided-this-former-officer-in-cover-up-for-lord-janner

The rabbit hole keeps getting deeper.
>> No. 4070 Anonymous
30th June 2015
Tuesday 7:43 pm
4070 spacer
Elite nonces discussed on LBC


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f3gj5J0tJ4
>> No. 4071 Anonymous
8th July 2015
Wednesday 1:05 am
4071 spacer
>BBC fears inquiry indictment over abuse failure

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5610/jimmy-savile-bbc-fears-inquiry-indictment-over-abuse-failure

I wonder how many 'proper' journalists from the BBC failed to dig deeper into this shithole. Was it ineptness? Laziness? Other?
>> No. 4072 Anonymous
8th July 2015
Wednesday 1:29 am
4072 spacer
Can't remember if I've shared this before here or have just run off at the mouth about it elsewhere.

From the trustworthy testimony of an elderly relative who was involved in the entertainment trade during the 1960s:

Bob Hope would chance his arm and ask for a mid-teens girl to be sent to his hotel room as part of his fee from anyone wanting to hire him for anything whatsoever.

Mike and Bernie Winters (long-forgotten terrible comedians) were known for parking their cars near girls' schools and sitting masturbating to the skirt that came out.

Fairly obscure characters I heard this about, but an illustration of how this was semi-expected during showbusiness and its offshoot politics 50 or so years ago.
>> No. 4073 Anonymous
8th July 2015
Wednesday 7:41 pm
4073 spacer
>>4072

It was a different world back then. In the 70s, high street newsagents were selling child porn magazines.
>> No. 4074 Anonymous
8th July 2015
Wednesday 7:48 pm
4074 spacer
>>4073
Hah, I'm stealing that observation.
>> No. 4075 Anonymous
8th July 2015
Wednesday 8:51 pm
4075 spacer
>>4074
It's not an observation, it's true. Not all of them like, just the ones which had a top shelf of porn and a bit of under the counter imported Euro material.

A now dead much older friend distinctly remembered the shop where you could buy the child pornography in the town we both grew up in. Manufactured under at the time legal conditions in Denmark and Holland, printed by still extant porno corporations such as Rodox and Color Climax. Sage for eww.
>> No. 4076 Anonymous
8th July 2015
Wednesday 8:55 pm
4076 spacer
>>4075
>It's not an observation, it's true.
Are we speaking the same language? Is this real life? What is happening to me right now?
>> No. 4077 Anonymous
9th July 2015
Thursday 12:53 am
4077 spacer
>>4076
I'm fairly sure he's right - I didn't know anyone who knew which newsagents had the dodgy stuff, but I remember there being a general understanding (to the extent it was joked about in pop culture) that there were certain shops where you could ask if they had anything a bit stronger and be shown most kinds of filth, generally (as he says) imported from Amsterdam. Sage because likewise ewww.
>> No. 4078 Anonymous
9th July 2015
Thursday 1:48 am
4078 spacer
>>4077
Right about what? I like to think most observations are true, so was puzzled by his phrasing there. I didn't intentionally express any doubt over his story.
>> No. 4079 Anonymous
9th July 2015
Thursday 2:42 am
4079 spacer
>>4077
>>4078

>>4075 doesn't seem to speak English as his native language which probably led to the confusion. Let's all just carry on now lads.
>> No. 4080 Anonymous
18th July 2015
Saturday 11:32 am
4080 spacer

absolutelydisgusting.jpg
408040804080
Roger Cook to testify in trial of Ben Fellows over Kenneth Clarke

>Television investigator Roger Cook is to be a witness in the trial of a man accused of falsely alleging sexual assault by ex-minister Kenneth Clarke.

>Benjamin Matthew Fellows, 40, an actor, is set to go on trial next week at the Old Bailey over the accusations that he made to police. Cook, who used to front The Cook Report, and Exaro’s David Hencke are due to be witnesses in the case.

>Ben Fellows alleged that Clarke sexually assaulted him during undercover filming for The Cook Report in 1994. Fellows was allegedly posing at the time as a 15-year-old boy during an investigation into political lobbying.

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5612/roger-cook-to-testify-in-trial-of-ben-fellows-over-kenneth-clarke
>> No. 4081 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 4:58 pm
4081 spacer
>A senior Labour MP has been reported to police by two fellow MPs over claims of child sex abuse, The Mail on Sunday has learned.

>One of the informants, Labour MP John Mann, passed details about the prominent individual to officers earlier this year.

>Then, a fortnight ago, a Conservative MP went to the same police force armed with information about the same individual, some of which had been provided to him by a former Government Minister.

>It is believed to be the first time that a sitting MP has been scrutinised by any of the ongoing police investigations into child abuse, representing a further extension of the ever-widening sphere of historic sex allegations.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3166708/Senior-MP-accused-child-sex-abuse-Two-MPs-report-serving-Labour-politician-police-sex-attacks-corruption-claims.html
>> No. 4082 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 5:02 pm
4082 spacer
>>4081
>But even though we're well prepared to handle the consequences, we're not going to tell you who it is. After all, we'll need something to sell tomorrow's paper.
>> No. 4083 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 5:08 pm
4083 spacer
>Among those who were part of the cover-up of a paedophile network linked to Kincora boys’ home in Belfast, Northern Ireland, according to Kerr, were:

>-Lord Mountbatten, a cousin of the Queen, great-uncle to Prince Charles, chief of the defence staff from 1959 to 1965, murdered by the IRA in 1979;
>-Sir Maurice Oldfield, director of the Secret Intelligence Service, better known as MI6;
>-Sir Anthony Blunt, master of the Queen’s pictures, former officer in the Security Service, or MI5, who became a Russian spy;
>-Sir Knox Cunningham, Unionist/Ulster Unionist MP, parliamentary private secretary to Harold Macmillan as prime minister, and member of the Conservative party’s national executive committee 1959-66.

>Kerr also picks out other powerful people as members of the paedophile network who sexually abused him while he was a Kincora boy:

>-Sir Peter Hayman, deputy director of MI6, previously the UK’s high commissioner to Canada;
>-Sir Nicholas Fairbairn, Conservative MP, solicitor general in Scotland;
>-Sir Cyril Smith, Liberal MP, who, says Kerr, assaulted him in Manchester.

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5601/video-kincora-was-used-for-political-leverage-richard-kerr

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5608/richard-kerr-names-powerful-men-who-covered-up-kincora
>> No. 4084 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 6:36 pm
4084 spacer
Leon Brittan (in the OP) looks a lot like James Gandolfini.
>> No. 4085 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 6:40 pm
4085 spacer
>>4082

Have you heard of Contempt of Court, lad?
>> No. 4086 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 6:47 pm
4086 spacer
>>4085
Yes I have, but it's of no relevance here. It is not and has never been illegal to announce that someone has been reported to the police or, when the time comes, that a decision has been made to prosecute them (or not, as the case may be). I'm going to be bold and assume that there are no considerations involving financial fraud or encryption keys in this case, but then if you even halfway know what you're talking about you'll be well aware that tipping off and contempt of court are two very different things.
>> No. 4088 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 7:21 pm
4088 spacer
>>4086
Minor point of fact: between the sixties and the eighties it was illegal to identify the defendant in sexual offences cases. But otherwise correct. There's no issue of contempt unless it's been to court already, and you don't get an injunction of that nature without someone finding out.
>> No. 4089 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 8:06 pm
4089 spacer
>>4085 here.

Sorry lads, you two are completely correct. Long day in the pub, and all...

Apologies for sounding like a cunt.

Thinking about it though, I would assume it was libel. If I am remembering correctly the MoS got nailed in court over the McAlpine thing. Maybe they are playing it safe. Fuck knows.

Anyway, sorry 'bout that.
>> No. 4090 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 8:08 pm
4090 spacer
OK, so maybe it's not contempt of court, but there's got to be some legal reason they aren't naming the MP. 'Just so we can report it tomorrow' is too cynical.
>> No. 4091 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 8:35 pm
4091 spacer

daily_mail_murderers.jpg
409140914091
>>4089
>Thinking about it though, I would assume it was libel.
It's well-known among media circles that the Mail not only aren't afraid of libel suits, but have on more than one occasion openly invited them (pic related).

>>4090
>'Just so we can report it tomorrow' is too cynical.
You're aware we're talking about the Mail here, right? They have form for this. Just a few months ago they took what could have been a substantial feature on the state of the NHS in Wales and instead decided to drip-feed it over the course of a week to score political points.
>> No. 4093 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 8:45 pm
4093 spacer
>>4091

Sorry mate, I am going to jump in on this one. In regards to your points/responses:

1) Yup. But that was due to Paul Dacre having met Stephen Lawrence when he was a kid. He took it personally and effectively gave staff carte blache to go for the fuckers.

2) The Mail and the MoS are completely separate entities - hence having two different editors. I believe it was the MoS who got done by McAlpine for libel. They didn't even mention his name.

I am not trying to defend such an obnoxiously shite rag, but I do think the risk of libel is what is staving off the hounds. This is a slightly different situation to the run up to an election, no?

Anyway, we shall see. If they publish the name at any point this week I stand corrected. I do doubt it though.

I really should put down my copy of Private Eye and get out a bit more...
>> No. 4094 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 8:56 pm
4094 spacer
>>2890
Wonder who the "Senior Labour MP" referred to in this weekends press is?
>> No. 4095 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 9:13 pm
4095 spacer

_84358973_sun[1].jpg
409540954095
>>4091
Funny you keep going on about the Mail because it wasn't actually on the front page of today's (instead they went with some internal Tory Party catfight). It was, however, on that of The Sun.

Two newspapers, the same story, the same holding back on names - if there isn't a legal reason and it's really about trying to sell more newspapers, why wouldn't one want to scoop the other?
>> No. 4096 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 9:16 pm
4096 spacer
>>4094
What's all this? A story about a Labour MP? Tell us more!
>> No. 4097 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 10:10 pm
4097 spacer
>>4095
Is The Sun really £1? I thought it was 30p or summat.
>> No. 4098 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 10:12 pm
4098 spacer
>>4097

I think the Sunday edition is more expensive to account for the several glossy insert rags and free CD full of 70s/80s hits you usually get, presumably to make up for the fact that there isn't any news on a Sunday.
>> No. 4099 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 10:13 pm
4099 spacer
>>4093
>But that was due to Paul Dacre having met Stephen Lawrence when he was a kid.
Doesn't matter. It was neither the first nor last time they've done such a thing.

>The Mail and the MoS are completely separate entities
They're not that separate. They're both owned by DMGT, and share an online presence. Legally they're no more separate entities than your testicles. The DM's solicitors are the MoS's solicitors, and vice versa. Unless there's been a change in policy at the top they're not afraid of pesky little things like libel suits.

>I believe it was the MoS who got done by McAlpine for libel.
I can't find any evidence of this. I know the BBC, ITV and (amongst others) Sally Bercow were on the receiving end, but I'm not aware of a claim made against DMGT. Not that it's relevant, because there simply isn't a libel case in there. They'd be reporting factually that a report had been made and that Joe Bloggs was the subject of that report. Since both of those facts would be true, and the recent recast of defamation law made truth an absolute defence, there's no problem.

If there were genuine legal impediments, the usual formula "who cannot be named for legal reasons" would be trotted out. Either they're sitting on it for more impact or they genuinely don't know. It's possible that John Mann has only confirmed that he's made a report, and the police don't usually name names (their statements commonly say things like "a 64 year old man was arrested"). It's also possible that it's a Tory MP that they rather like, so don't want to be the ones to ruin his career.
>> No. 4100 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 10:34 pm
4100 spacer
>>4095
Because the stories are very frequently made up and cynical editors and news agency people from Murdoch through to Exaro understand that paedo shit sells papers and clicks.
>> No. 4101 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 11:37 pm
4101 spacer
>>4100

Less so Exaro, I think they're pretty much bankrolled by New Sparta. See http://jeromebooth.co.uk/

They genuinely hate nonces. And they love trolling the establishment.
>> No. 4102 Anonymous
19th July 2015
Sunday 11:40 pm
4102 spacer
>>4101

Also:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDVbAD5QCrk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flNywB5uMt4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLoYyLkPu8A
>> No. 4103 Anonymous
20th July 2015
Monday 2:22 am
4103 spacer
>>4101
Funny shit going on with Exaro and their founder being the son of the Mancunian eminence grise who was best mates with Owen Oyston, Stuart Hall, Bill Roache and no doubt many other questionable individuals though huh?
>> No. 4104 Anonymous
20th July 2015
Monday 4:31 am
4104 spacer
>>4102
>12:32
>7:44
>10:45
I don't think we can trust them. That is at best 31 minutes.
>> No. 4105 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 2:42 pm
4105 spacer
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150723/1024946021.html

Britain’s MI5 security service covered up for pedophile members of the UK government under then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher to avoid political embarrassment, local media reported Thursday, citing a recently unsealed trove of Cabinet files.
>> No. 4106 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 4:19 pm
4106 spacer
>>4105
Except that's not what the papers appear to say.
>> No. 4107 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 4:42 pm
4107 spacer
>>4106

Not him, but I'd like to hear what you think the unreleased papers say. The tabloids seem to think they say as much.

>Newly released papers reveal that in 1986 the then director general of MI5, Sir Antony Duff, looked at claims that the MP ‘has a penchant for small boys’.

>But the inquiry was dropped when the security services simply accepted the MP’s claims that the allegations were false.

>Shockingly, Sir Antony concluded: ‘The risks of political embarrassment to the Government is rather greater than the security danger.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3171095/Senior-Westminster-figures-1970s-1980s-named-government-child-abuse-files.html
>> No. 4108 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 4:59 pm
4108 spacer
>>4107
You say they "covered up" butt that second statement you quoted clearly contradicts this.
>> No. 4109 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 5:32 pm
4109 spacer
>>4108

Accepting someone's word for something like whether or not the nonced a kid and then taking it no further after that is a cover-up in all but name.

On the surface of things it seems like sheer incompetence, however this is to deflect heat as documentation which points at incompetence rather than a constructive cover-up is far less damaging to the agency and the govt as a whole.
>> No. 4110 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 5:38 pm
4110 spacer
>>4109
>Accepting someone's word for something like whether or not the nonced a kid and then taking it no further after that is a cover-up in all but name.
If you say so, lad.
>> No. 4111 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 5:39 pm
4111 spacer
>>4108

I didn't say covered up, that was the other lads quote.

Regarding my DM green text, the fact MI5 failed to properly investigate claims an MP was noncing children, other than accepting his word at face value, suggests something foul. I mean, it's not like he was being accused of pinching office supplies.

Why do you think MI5 seemed so disinterested in investigating MP's who were suspected of noncing children?

Are you the lad who reckons itz all a Ruskie plot to destabilise the British establishment?
>> No. 4112 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 5:51 pm
4112 spacer
>>4111
>Why do you think MI5 seemed so disinterested in investigating MP's who were suspected of noncing children?
Probably the same reason I'd be so disinterested. Investigating such things isn't my job, nor is it theirs. Their job was to investigate security risks, and in their considered opinion there wasn't one. I'm in no position to judge whether their assessment was correct, and I daresay neither are you. Basically you're asking the equivalent of why the police didn't investigate the fire hazard at Kings Cross tube earlier.
>> No. 4113 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 6:00 pm
4113 spacer
>>4112

Are you that lad who molested his infant daughter with his mobile phone 'for a laugh' ?
>> No. 4114 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 6:03 pm
4114 spacer
>>4113
Are you that lad who asks everyone if they are "that lad" who did something or other?
>> No. 4115 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 6:04 pm
4115 spacer
Is this still going on? If someone gets molested, they should go ahead and murder the molester whenever they get a chance, even a couple of decades later. There is no recourse. No justice, sadly.

I thought I would never say this, but an eye for an eye makes sense now. Even those muslamic "honour killings" make sense. Shame.
>> No. 4116 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 6:11 pm
4116 spacer
>>4114

You are correct Although I think there are three or four of us who push that meme.
>> No. 4117 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 6:14 pm
4117 spacer
>>4116
Are you that lad who insists there are more than three of us here?
>> No. 4118 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 7:15 pm
4118 spacer
>>4117

He's a mad'un, that one.
>> No. 4119 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 7:36 pm
4119 spacer
>>4112

They investigated it, the evidence was enough to warrant police investigation and that evidence wasn't passed along. That is a cover up.
>> No. 4120 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 7:58 pm
4120 spacer
>>4119
>They investigated it, the evidence was enough to warrant police investigation and that evidence wasn't passed along.
Not him, but I don't see that anywhere in the article. Two people saying they think someone has a thing for kids isn't really evidence of anything.
>> No. 4121 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 8:01 pm
4121 spacer
>>4119

No point trying to explain to him lad. Someone being that pedantic in a /boo thread is either a nonce or GCHQlad Bollocks, I did it again. Sorry
>> No. 4122 Anonymous
23rd July 2015
Thursday 8:13 pm
4122 spacer
May dodges questions about MI5 failure to act on MP paedophile fears

>Home secretary refuses to say whether she asked security service about why it did not follow up suspicions that MP had ‘penchant for small boys’

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jul/23/theresa-may-mi5-failure-mp-paedophile-fears
>> No. 4123 Anonymous
31st July 2015
Friday 8:30 pm
4123 spacer
So what do you /boo/ lads reckon to the Ben Fellows verdict and outcome?
>> No. 4124 Anonymous
1st August 2015
Saturday 8:16 am
4124 spacer
>>4121

Or both.
>> No. 4125 Anonymous
1st August 2015
Saturday 6:22 pm
4125 spacer
>So what do you /boo/ lads reckon

JEWS
>> No. 4126 Anonymous
1st August 2015
Saturday 9:15 pm
4126 spacer
>>4123
I think the verdict acknowledges that Mr Fellows is genuinely crazy and believed what he claimed, and that he didn't say all that just for internet traffic.

I don't believe Ken Clarke is a nonce at all. I do have reason to believe that noncing among politicians was and is commonplace. I think Ben Fellows got some wires crossed and some false memories created somewhere.

Now where is Ke*th V*z in this thread? Funny to see orderorder Guido doing a nudge nudge entry on him the other week just before the 'unnamed Labour MP' hit the headlines. It went right over the heads of most of his idiotic commenters.

>>4125
Stay away from /boo/ if you don't want to actually engage, dickhead.
>> No. 4127 Anonymous
2nd August 2015
Sunday 11:00 pm
4127 spacer
>>4123
>Ken Clarke: police investigate second claim of indecent assault
>Exaro wins battle to lift order for reporting ban on separate probe into former minister

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5624/ken-clarke-police-investigate-second-claim-of-indecent-assault
>> No. 4128 Anonymous
2nd August 2015
Sunday 11:11 pm
4128 spacer
So who spotted this line in that Sewel video?
>I think there's all sorts of things going on. Not in a great way - not with women. I think the real problem is with you know, erm ... boys.
>> No. 4129 Anonymous
3rd August 2015
Monday 4:14 am
4129 spacer
>>4127
>The Fellows case could not be adjourned indefinitely, he ruled, because there was no timeframe on when the police investigation into the other case would be completed. “It could be years,” he said.
I'm guessing it will all conveniently come out roughly five minutes after he dies.
>> No. 4130 Anonymous
3rd August 2015
Monday 6:33 pm
4130 spacer

ted.jpg
413041304130
Police watchdog to investigate Wiltshire force after claims it failed to act on allegations of child sex abuse made about former Prime Minister Sir Edward Heath

>Wiltshire Police accused of ignoring sex abuse claim in the 1990s
>Man may have been let off prosecution after threat to expose Sir Edward
>Sir Edward Heath served as Tory prime minister between 1970 and 1974

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/03/ted-heath-child-abuse-investigation-police-watchdog-ipcc
>> No. 4131 Anonymous
3rd August 2015
Monday 7:56 pm
4131 spacer

bait.jpg
413141314131
It's on lads.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11780308/Sir-Edward-Heath-child-sex-abuse-claim-Wiltshire-Police-faces-investigation.html
>> No. 4132 Anonymous
3rd August 2015
Monday 7:56 pm
4132 spacer
>>4130
Aw bugger, you beat me to it.
>> No. 4133 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 11:19 am
4133 spacer
>>4130

>Former Prime Minister

Wasn't Margret Thatcher's husband a suspected nonce? Also her father? And I'm sure I read some /boo related stuff about Blair getting caught hawking for blowjobs in a public toilet. I wonder if you're only allowed into power if they have salacious dirt on you. I wonder what they had on Brown and Major. And wot about ARE DAVE?
>> No. 4134 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 11:27 am
4134 spacer

article-0-0DB3491600000578-998_468x286.jpg
413441344134
>>4133
This is why I'm going to bet against George becoming the next conservative leader, someone with such an obvious interest in women would never be allowed to lead.
>> No. 4135 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 6:38 pm
4135 spacer
>>4134
He looks good you know. I bet he wanks off to ebony BDSM porn.
>> No. 4136 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 7:45 pm
4136 spacer
>>4135

I like him slightly more now. However, I still hope he gets cancer of the everything.
>> No. 4137 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 8:14 pm
4137 spacer
>>4134

I would definitely have gone out on the razz with young George Osbourne.
>> No. 4138 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 9:29 pm
4138 spacer
>>4137

You could have walked him back along the canals and everything...
>> No. 4139 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 9:38 pm
4139 spacer
>>4103
An interesting read for any Exaro News enthusiasts - http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sn4bii - cannot gauge the levels of tinfoil here exactly.
>> No. 4140 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 10:17 pm
4140 spacer
>>4139

Oh GCHQlad, please try harder. We may be plebs, but we're not complete fucking dullards. 1/10 - Please see me after school.
>> No. 4141 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 10:48 pm
4141 spacer
>>4140
Are you familiar with the term 'limited hangout' and what it implies?
>> No. 4142 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 11:02 pm
4142 spacer
>>4141

That's when you just air out the one testicle, right?
>> No. 4143 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 11:17 pm
4143 spacer
>>4141

I'm familiar with the term. However, your shitty link is obviously penned by someone trying, in vain, to sound like aangirfan aanirfan.

This thread has almost 800 posts. It's not difficult to skim through it and gauge the tone / nuances of proper /boo nutters in order to sound authentic. You failed. And once again, hard working tax payer's money is squandered on shitty Yankee-tier PSYOPs.

A good day to you, sir!
>> No. 4144 Anonymous
4th August 2015
Tuesday 11:41 pm
4144 spacer
>>4143
k
>> No. 4145 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 12:03 am
4145 spacer

CKip-tfWoAALQ98.jpg
414541454145
>>4143
As I said, I don't know what to make of that link and the information or disinformation in it - a huge number of the posts in the 2012 Savile thread here were mine and some of them ended up quoted on Icke - as far as I know barring any deep cover MK Ultra shenanigans going on in my subconscious I am not a paid disinformation agent.

I'm interested in the tipping point aspect of these scandals with regards to the rule of law and the stability of the UK, and I'm interested in how different victim jockeys attempt to manipulate the material for their own agendas and incomes, and I'm interested in the nature of evil and just how filthy humanity can be revealed to be.

One of Leon Brittan's boys who has presumably given material to both Exaro and the Met has a blog at https://carlchass.wordpress.com/
>> No. 4146 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 12:09 am
4146 spacer
>>4145
>as far as I know barring any deep cover MK Ultra shenanigans going on in my subconscious I am not a paid disinformation agent.
You would say that, wouldn't you?
>> No. 4147 Anonymous
6th August 2015
Thursday 11:35 pm
4147 spacer

Nowthen.png
414741474147
>A police source confirmed the IPCC inquiry would centre on evidence that witnesses were tampered with to stop abuse claims against Heath from coming into the public domain.

>Inquiries will look at whether witnesses in the court case were interfered with in some way. This follows information from the retired officer that are at the heart of the inquiry.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/06/ted-heath-inquiry-into-alleged-witness-tampering-to-stop-child-abuse-claims

There must be so many retired coppers and Intel-lads out there who could collectively bring this whole shitshow to it's knees. Interesting days.
>> No. 4149 Anonymous
9th August 2015
Sunday 2:22 pm
4149 spacer
>>4147

From the outer limits of /boo

>So, let me get this straight.
>Matthew Scott, AKA Barrister Blogger, arch CSA-sceptic was ‘straw man’ Madam Ling Ling’s barrister ?
>Well, that doesn’t sound dodgy in any way, does it ?

https://theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/07/curiouser-and-curiouser/
>> No. 4150 Anonymous
10th August 2015
Monday 10:20 am
4150 spacer
David Icke knew that Heath was a nonce. Apparently he was also seen transforming into his true reptilian form in the woods where I grew up. Heath, that is. Makes you think.
>> No. 4151 Anonymous
10th August 2015
Monday 11:04 am
4151 spacer
>>4147
Apparently someone found an old cartoon depicting Heath talking about getting on well with the boys, though as was pointed out during the Sewel affair "boys" and "lads" were slang at the time for the second M in MSM, whether they were rentboys or companions, and there was a lot of talk at the time about the 55 year old bachelor PM being a possible bumder.
>> No. 4152 Anonymous
13th August 2015
Thursday 1:07 pm
4152 spacer
>>4126
>>4139

http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/regina-v-ben-fellows-abuse-power-and-deeply-flawed-trial
>> No. 4153 Anonymous
16th August 2015
Sunday 3:57 am
4153 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33787201

Oi oi!
>> No. 4154 Anonymous
16th August 2015
Sunday 10:23 am
4154 spacer
>>4153

Oi oi... saveloy! Any reason you posted that BBC story?

Also:

>Butler-Sloss testifies in child abuse case

>A retired High Court Judge has given evidence on behalf of a man who is on trial for raping a 13-year-old girl.
>Baroness Butler-Sloss told Exeter Crown Court she had 34 years experience of dealing with child abuse cases.
>She gave character evidence on behalf of Philip Chard, 44, on trial for rape and sexual abuse of the girl.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-33914740
>> No. 4155 Anonymous
16th August 2015
Sunday 11:56 pm
4155 spacer
Despite defending Exaro several times in this thread, anyone fancy explaining why I might be misguided in my efforts? Something more coherint than my usual /boo rants would be appreciated!

The more I think about the stories and people they choose to cover, I can't help but question their integrity / motives.

It doesn't help that GCHQlad keeps muddying the waters. Have I fallen afoul of GCHQlad's campaign of disinformation?
>> No. 4156 Anonymous
17th August 2015
Monday 12:19 am
4156 spacer
>>4155
I am not GCHQlad, but I think Exaro is a disinformation unit - the murky connections of those involved in creating it and the overwhelming focus on the dead and long-retired rather than say the MP for Leicester East are decidedly fishy.

Again and again the trail of wrongness, blackmail, cover-ups goes dead and disappears into a mess of paedo hysteria, ridiculous tales, Satanic panic nonsense etc.

I don't trust the very wealthy and powerful of the UK or the police and intelligence agencies which protect them to allow evil deeds to be exposed in any way that doesn't provide income from vicarious and morbid public obsession via clickbait garbage. Paedogeddon is a great panem et circenses tactic for the status quo, not something which will bring the house of cards tumbling.
>> No. 4157 Anonymous
17th August 2015
Monday 12:40 am
4157 spacer
>>4155

Something smells rotten to me too, but I'm damned if I can find a shred of evidence suggesting impropriety. The credentials of the core journalistic team are extremely good. Fielding broke the Shayler story, Pallister testified against Jonathan Aitken, Hencke wrote the story that caused Peter Mandelson to resign, Watts wrote the definitive exposé on the dark arts of journalism. The only blemish I can find is the fact that Watts once worked for Press TV, but that's not exactly damning.

Exaro isn't some left-field blog by a bunch of nobodies with nothing to lose, but a dream team of investigative journalists with outstanding professional reputations. If the owner has an ulterior motive, then he is keeping it very well hidden, and he has hoodwinked a group of extremely skilled and conscientious journalists. They're making some bizarre allegations, but the idea that they have fabricated the story or have been blinded by hysteria is equally bizarre. I don't know what to believe.
>> No. 4158 Anonymous
17th August 2015
Monday 1:01 am
4158 spacer
>>4156
>>4157

I'm glad I'm not alone in my suspisions. Itz almost as if they want you to believe nonces stopped fiddling in the late 80's.

There are definitely games afoot that most of the mainstream media, and even the /boo correspondents, seem to purposely miss.

Are they resurrecting these accusation so they can control, through fear of retribution, current members of the political elite who like to abuse children?

What I find most troubling at the moment is the lack of attention being paid to people like Jeremy Corbyn amongst many others on both sides of the house who actively turned a blind eye to such debauchery. Having compromised cunts in opposition and the cabinet would definitely play to their favour.

Normally I love a good conspiracy, but not when it involves children being raped or people being falsely accused of doing so.
>> No. 4159 Anonymous
17th August 2015
Monday 1:28 am
4159 spacer
>>4158

>Normally I love a good conspiracy, but not when it involves children being raped or people being falsely accused of doing so.

I prefer my conspiracies nice and fantastical, but with recent events in mind and the depth and breadth of the apparent cover up I'm left thinking plausible thoughts. Thoughts like coercion, corruption and "How many have died to keep this secret?"

It's a grim tale to have to write and if, as you say, these journalists are the best and have chops from previous scandals it seems unlikely they have succumbed to "paedo-panic" all at the same time.
>> No. 4160 Anonymous
17th August 2015
Monday 1:30 am
4160 spacer
>>4158
>Itz almost as if they want you to believe nonces stopped fiddling in the late 80's.

[spoiler]Maybe that's the case.
>> No. 4161 Anonymous
18th August 2015
Tuesday 7:12 pm
4161 spacer
>>4154

>Man convicted of raping 13-year-old despite testimony by Lady Butler-Sloss

>Retired high court judge was character witness for Philip Chard, whose mother was her cleaner, and said she was ‘astonished’ by claims made against him

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/18/man-convicted-raping-13-year-old-despite-testimony-lady-butler-sloss

Oh dear.
>> No. 4162 Anonymous
19th August 2015
Wednesday 3:10 pm
4162 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAzxNdw3RV0
>> No. 4163 Anonymous
26th August 2015
Wednesday 9:59 am
4163 spacer
A former Conservative MP has accused police of a witch-hunt after disclosing that he has been questioned over the alleged murder of three boys supposedly linked to an “elite Westminster sex ring”.

Harvey Proctor said the Metropolitan police’s Operation Midland inquiry team, set up to examine claims that boys were systematically abused by an establishment paedophile ring, should be wound up and its head be put in charge of parking offences.

At a press conference on Tuesday, Proctor added that he had been accused of being part of a child sexual abuse ring along with the late prime minister Edward Heath, ex-home secretary Leon Brittan and former heads of MI5 and MI6. The allegations were based on the testimony of an anonymous witness that Scotland Yard had previously described as being “credible and true”.

Proctor said he was “completely innocent” of accusations of murder, rape and torture of children as he unveiled the allegations being investigated by Operation Midland detectives.

He said he should either be charged with murder or his accuser should be stripped of his anonymity and charged with perverting the course of justice.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/25/westminster-paedophile-claims-harvey-proctor-accuses-police-of-witch-hunt?CMP=share_btn_tw
>> No. 4166 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 10:53 am
4166 spacer

bbf.jpg
416641664166
Peter Ball victims accuse C of E, police and CPS of sexual abuse cover-up

>Details of how the former bishop of Lewes and Gloucester escaped justice 22 years ago can now be reported

>Ball was not charged when the allegations of abuse against him first emerged in 1993. Instead the police and senior figures in the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), then led by the late Barbara Mills, agreed to issue Ball with a caution.

>This was done with the knowledge of the then archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey. Ball proceeded to resign as bishop and went to live in a property lent to him by his friend the Prince of Wales.
>> No. 4167 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 10:53 am
4167 spacer
>>4166

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/08/bishop-peter-ball-victims-accuse-c-of-e-police-and-cps-of-sexual-abuse-cover-up
>> No. 4168 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 12:12 pm
4168 spacer
>>4166

>The Home Office has again been forced to defend the appointment of Lady Butler-Sloss to run the inquiry into allegations of historical child abuse amid claims she refused to go public about a bishop implicated in a scandal.

>The retired high court judge is reported to have told a victim of alleged abuse that she did not want to include some of his allegations in a review of how the Church of England dealt with two paedophile priests because she "cared about the Church" and "the press would love a bishop".

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/12/home-office-defends-butler-sloss-bishop-cover-up

THEY are pretty shit at this cover-up game. GCHQlad, get your shit together.
>> No. 4169 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 12:27 pm
4169 spacer
>>4168
>Saturday 12 July 2014
Didn't you get the memo? She stepped down lasts year.
>> No. 4170 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 1:11 pm
4170 spacer
>>4169

She stepped down because of ties between her brother and Brittan. It now looks like she was personally compromised from the beginning. And they knew it. So much for a fair and open inquiry. I wonder what grubby shit they have on the current inquiry head, Dame Lowell Goddard?
>> No. 4172 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 1:48 pm
4172 spacer
>>4170

ffs

http://www.kiwisfirst.com/judge-goddard-lie-parliament/

http://www.kiwisfirst.com/judge-file-index/high-court-justice-lowell-goddard/
>> No. 4173 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 2:40 pm
4173 spacer
>>4172
>SPARTAN NEWS LIMITED
Why does that sound familiar?
>> No. 4174 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 6:46 pm
4174 spacer
>>4173

Exaro = A New Sparta Group Company

Kiwifirst = Spartan News Ltd


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparta

>Adolf Hitler praised the Spartans, recommending in 1928 that Germany should imitate them by limiting "the number allowed to live". He added that "The Spartans were once capable of such a wise measure... The subjugation of 350,000 Helots by 6,000 Spartans was only possible because of the racial superiority of the Spartans." The Spartans had created "the first racialist state".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_Siemer

>Vincent Siemer (born 21 August 1956) is a critic of the New Zealand judiciary and publisher of the website www.kiwisfirst.com...

>On 23 December 2008, Justice Cooper’s reserved judgment in the undefended defamation claim declared it was not possible for him to consider what Mr Siemer’s defence might be. However, he was still able to conclude “there is no substance to the allegations Mr Siemer makes”.

>He took the words "Gestapo", "Hitler" and "Jewish" from unrelated publications by Siemer on his website ordered "unconditionally shut down", as well as Siemer’s comment that Stiassny claimed "what a good Jew he is (no joke)" in response to Stiassny’s New Zealand Herald interview that he supported Israel because he was Jewish, to support his ruling that Mr Siemer engaged in “vile, racist abuse” against Jews.

>In an affidavit to the Court, Siemer claimed the "good Jew" comment in proper context was a scoff parallel to the two Israeli Mossad agents released by New Zealand the previous year after conviction for New Zealand passport fraud. The Judge awarded Stiassny $920,000 in damages for what he concluded was clear defamation by Mr Siemer, as well as a permanent injunction against Siemer publishing further material

Exaro news has a thing for outing jewish fiddlers so, er, not sure where I'm going with this. Anyhow, couldn't find any business links between the two companies. Fucking hell, I need to stop reading Aangirfan Aanirfan. Apologies to Hebrewlad for any triggering text
>> No. 4175 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 7:01 pm
4175 spacer
>>4173

You're an ancient Greek?

>>>/zoo/
>> No. 4176 Anonymous
9th September 2015
Wednesday 7:06 pm
4176 spacer
>>4175

Nah, just your average /BOO! shitposter. Although I am partial to a Moussaka...
>> No. 4177 Anonymous
17th September 2015
Thursday 5:05 pm
4177 spacer
Thirteen further investigations have been launched into police corruption relating to historical child sex abuse claims, the police watchdog says.

>The investigations involve allegations that:

>-Evidence relating to abuse at a youth club in the 1980s and 1990s, allegedly involving politicians and council officers, went missing from a London police station.
>-An MP was charged with specimen child sex offences and not "more numerous or serious offences".
>-Paperwork and evidence relating to child sex offences involving an MP disappeared and the MP was released without charge.
>-Special Branch in the 1970s interfered in an investigation that would have revealed an MP to be involved in child sex offences.
>-An investigation into child sex abuse in central London in the 1980s was halted when it became apparent an MP was involved.
>-An officer serving with the Met Police was involved in a paedophile ring in north London and that evidence was covered up by Special Branch.

>Three of the cases involve the Met's former Special Branch - the team that had responsibility for, among other things, personal protection for VIPs, including many politicians.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34279984
>> No. 4178 Anonymous
17th September 2015
Thursday 5:27 pm
4178 spacer
This won't be sorted out until every fucker at the top has been deposed.

Unfortunately that will never happen.

I know this, any offspring of mine will be steered well clear of any interactions with the BBC or politicians.
>> No. 4179 Anonymous
17th September 2015
Thursday 8:25 pm
4179 spacer
>>4178
> any offspring of mine will be steered well clear of any interactions with the BBC or politicians.

It seems to me that there's a more sinister (if bleeding obvious) truth emerging at this point in the trawl for historical sex offences: yes, the Establishment (Beeb, Westmister, wherever) had its share of nonces back in the day, but the Police were systemically corrupt in the way in which they ignored evidence and covered things up then, are still corrupt enough to be happy flinging accusations all over the place now in an attempt to distract us from their failings.
>> No. 4180 Anonymous
17th September 2015
Thursday 8:33 pm
4180 spacer
>>4179
>the Police were systemically corrupt
Were?
>> No. 4181 Anonymous
17th September 2015
Thursday 9:31 pm
4181 spacer
>>4179
What is it about the BBC and the government that attracts so many peodos?

Surely there can't be that many in the general population.
>> No. 4182 Anonymous
17th September 2015
Thursday 9:36 pm
4182 spacer
>>4181
Public institutions have a strong immune system and armies of lawyers you don't have to pay for.
>> No. 4183 Anonymous
17th September 2015
Thursday 10:55 pm
4183 spacer
>>4180
Hence the "(bleeding obvious)" comment.
>> No. 4184 Anonymous
18th September 2015
Friday 2:53 am
4184 spacer
>>4181
I'm actually not sure they do attract a disproportionate amount though - there's only been a couple of prosecutions from each institution, and despite the police's recent willingness to believe victims there hasn't been much noise lately about any more suspects; in fact there's been more noise from suspects themselves criticisng the police for their handling of things (Paul Gambaccini and Harvey Proctor leap to mind).
>> No. 4185 Anonymous
18th September 2015
Friday 6:34 am
4185 spacer
>>4184
>there's only been a couple of prosecutions from each institution
What an absolute shocker.
>> No. 4186 Anonymous
18th September 2015
Friday 10:31 am
4186 spacer
>>4177

The full list from Exaro:

1) Allegation that a prosecution against a government official who was in possession of indecent images of children was not pursued following instruction from senior officers and lawyers.

2) Allegation that an investigation into a paedophile ring in south-west London in the 1970’s was shut down prematurely on instruction of senior or high-ranking officers.

3) Allegation that evidence, relating to child abuse at a youth club in 1980’s and 1990’s that involved politicians and council officers, went missing from a London police station.

4) Allegation that an MP was only charged with specimen charges for child sex offences and not more numerous or serious offences.

5) Allegation that paperwork and evidence relating to child sex offences involving an MP disappeared and the MP was released without charge.

6) Allegation of a failure to investigate child sex offences involving an MP due to instructions from senior or high-ranking officers.

7) Allegations about attempts by Special Branch in the 1970’s to interfere in an investigation that would have revealed an MP to be involved in child sex offences.

8) Allegations an investigation into a west London paedophile ring in the 1980’s had evidence removed and was threatened with closure by senior officer if it uncovered evidence against VIPs.

9) Allegation that an MP was arrested and then released without charge on the instruction of senior officers following an investigation into a south London paedophile ring in the 1980’s. Also alleges officers were threatened with breaking the Official Secrets Act if they spoke of the events.

10) Allegation that an investigation into child sex abuse in central London in the 1980’s was halted when it became apparent that an MP was involved.

11) Allegation that an investigation into child sex offences committed by an MP was taken over by officers from Special Branch and then not progressed.

12) Allegation that an officer serving with the Met was involved in a paedophile ring in north London and that evidence was covered up by Special Branch.

13) Allegation that intelligence was provided by a witness, during a separate investigation, indicating an MP was involved in child sex abuse and that this was not investigated.
>> No. 4187 Anonymous
18th September 2015
Friday 10:38 am
4187 spacer
>>4186
Yet again no names. Do they not believe what they're writing is true?
>> No. 4188 Anonymous
18th September 2015
Friday 5:03 pm
4188 spacer
>>4187
Libel?
>> No. 4189 Anonymous
18th September 2015
Friday 5:28 pm
4189 spacer
>>4188
Not since the law changed a year or so ago.
>> No. 4190 Anonymous
19th September 2015
Saturday 3:01 pm
4190 spacer
DM throwing sand around again.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3240661/Nick-Victim-fantasist-Rape-Torture-Murders-extraordinary-claims-one-man-against-leading-Establishment-figures-Police-called-story-credible-true-s-not-shred-evidence-allegations.html
>> No. 4191 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 12:13 am
4191 spacer

p01lyn5j.jpg
419141914191
Pretty thorough analysis there. At least one of the alleged murders now known not to have happened, and what appears to be one victim claiming that his story has been misrepresented and another claiming that he was economical with the truth. Exaro made to look like idiots, and Chris Fay quite frankly making himself to look like a conspiracy nut. Questions need to be asked when not even Private Eye will take your side. Naturally the I WANT TO BELIEVE crowd on t'internet are in full ostrich mode.

Highly suspicious that the worst Exaro have to say is "they used our footage, breaching our copyright". Which would be a valid point were it not for the exemption for "reporting current events".
>> No. 4192 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 2:52 am
4192 spacer
I've noticed a ramping up of damage control, especially from the beeb. It wouldn't surprise me if they posted anywhere that talked about it trying to push their own narrative.

Check out this unbelievable shit.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34442292

Here's particularly obnoxious quote, about the poor coppers who, because of this pedo scandal...

>In effect, they're charged with giving up on even-handed, evidence-based policing at enormous cost to the reputations of people who've been accused - people like Harvey Proctor, Leon Brittan, Sir Edward Heath. How much responsibility do the police bear for smoke-damage when they light the most enormous fire?

Oh I am laughing.
>> No. 4193 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 8:26 am
4193 spacer
>>4192
>unbelievable shit
Go on.
>> No. 4194 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 9:03 am
4194 spacer
>>4192
Oh, hi Mark.
>> No. 4195 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 1:58 pm
4195 spacer

c480x270_11[1].jpg
419541954195
>>4194
>> No. 4196 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 7:43 pm
4196 spacer
>>4193
The entire article.

Everyone I've linked to it has been in a state of disbelief over the gall of them publishing "Nothing to see here guys! - The article".

Keep an eye on the beeb. They are running a lot of of damage control stories at the minute.

>>4194
>>4195
I don't know what this is in reference to, but try and keep the memeposting to other threads. You're adding nothing to the discussion.
>> No. 4197 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 8:02 pm
4197 spacer
>>4196
Have you considered sharing it with someone outside your bubble of crazy?

You're going to have to do a lot better than that. What, specifically, do you take exception to?
>> No. 4198 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 8:18 pm
4198 spacer
>>4197
Nice ad-homs mate.

what do I take exception to? How much are they paying you to post this? Have you even read the bloody thing?

In the words of the immortal 2pac, you can tell your homies whatever you want, but you and I know what's going on.
>> No. 4199 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 8:25 pm
4199 spacer
>>4198
0/10. This is poor even by /boo/ standards.
>> No. 4200 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 8:35 pm
4200 spacer
>>4196
I'm assuming they're referring to Mark Watts, shit-stirrer-in-chief, who appears to have fallen hook, line and sinker for the claims of not one but two convicted fraudsters.

This whole thing is starting to look like al-Qa`ida, which you'll recall was the invention of a convicted fraudster looking to the FBI for a discount, later defictionalised by charming fellows like Ayman al-Zawahiri. If this is the case, hopefully nobody behind the scenes says "well, if they want a satanic abuse and murder gang, then we'll give them one".

A timely reminder that the sort of abuse that "Nick" describes is not a new phenomenon. There have been many hundreds of similar stories, going back millennia. But if it turns out to be true, it would be the first confirmed case of its kind in recorded history. Remember that one of the key allegations is that one of the bad guys just swerved in front of him and deliberately ran down a child, on a busy public road in broad daylight, then bundled him in the car and drove off leaving the corpse behind, but somehow no ambulance turned up to take the child to hospital, no other drivers thought to say anything, and even the lad's parents somehow failed to notice that one day their son was no longer there.

Do yourself a favour and engage your brain for a moment.
>> No. 4201 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 8:39 pm
4201 spacer
>>4199
Poor is insinuating I live in a "bubble of crazy".

You've lost all credibility at that point. It's just lazy smear tactics.
>> No. 4202 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 8:48 pm
4202 spacer
>>4201
Funny how you still can't seem to point to anything specific in the article that is objectionable, or put into words what you think is wrong with it beyond empty cliches.
>> No. 4203 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 8:53 pm
4203 spacer
>>4202
Funyn how you missed that in the post where I linked the article I quoted a particularly gresy quote about people besmirching the good names of Ted Heath and Leon Brittan, as an example.

I ask again, have you even read this? It's chock full of stuff like that.
>> No. 4204 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 8:56 pm
4204 spacer
>>4203
Also, google the author of that piece.

There seems to be a fair few skeletons in his closet, regarding cover ups. No wonder he's taking the position he is.
>> No. 4205 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 9:09 pm
4205 spacer
>>4203
>Funyn how you missed that in the post where I linked the article I quoted a particularly gresy quote
and said precisely fuck all about what you think is wrong with it, or what makes it "gresy" [sic].

>>4204
What was that you were saying about ad homs, lad?
>> No. 4206 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 9:25 pm
4206 spacer
My god there are none so blind as those that can't see.
>> No. 4207 Anonymous
7th October 2015
Wednesday 9:44 pm
4207 spacer

7ec9d452c9780ae1bfc1648bf857474c.850x646x1.jpg
420742074207
>>4206
Erm, yes. That's how blindness works.
>> No. 4208 Anonymous
16th October 2015
Friday 10:04 am
4208 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34546338

Whoops!
>> No. 4209 Anonymous
25th October 2015
Sunday 7:39 am
4209 spacer
>>2890

https://www.literotica.com/s/dishonourable-member

This is quite good.
>> No. 4210 Anonymous
25th October 2015
Sunday 9:03 am
4210 spacer
>>4209

I fired up Tor to check that link. Needn't have bothered. I'm guessing the sentiment of the story, and your linking to it, is that naughty MPs who get caught out are turned into the bitches of alpha-homosexuals within government. BROKEN BRITAIN. BAN THE BUMDERS. UP THE RA. etc etc.
>> No. 4236 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 5:08 pm
4236 Lord Janner unfit to stand trial
nonce.png
423642364236
Who'd have guessed?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35027705
>> No. 4237 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 5:17 pm
4237 spacer
>>4236

Too senile to stand trial, but fit enough to vote pretty much sums it up. It's a cover-up, plain and simple. There is obviously something pertaining to the case which, if it came to light, would endanger either The Crown or national security.
>> No. 4238 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 5:19 pm
4238 spacer

i-am-the-law-now-let-me-eat-yo.jpg
423842384238
>>4236
>We live in a country where a man can be fit enough to make the law but not fit enough to stand before the law!
>> No. 4239 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 5:36 pm
4239 spacer
>>4237
But he's not fit enough to vote in the Lords, which is why he's been placed on leave for the past year.
>> No. 4240 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 5:41 pm
4240 spacer
>>4239

"Suspended from the Labour Party but will remain a member of the House of Lords until his death or until he retires", according to that BBC report. I honestly don't know if that means that he can vote or not as the wording is somewhat ambiguous. In any case, taking up a seat someone with a working bonce could be using is somewhat typical of these oafs.
>> No. 4241 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 6:02 pm
4241 spacer
>>4240
No, he can't vote. Because, as you'd know if you'd fucking bothered to read the post, he's been placed on leave. Not that it makes much difference, mind. He may have been ineligible for the last 12 months, but he had neither spoken nor voted for another 18 months before that.
>> No. 4242 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 6:03 pm
4242 spacer
>>4236
>>4237
He won't ever turn up to vote again, and I imagine if he ever does there will be outrage. There are plenty of peers who, I think, have the right to sit in the House but don't. I can't remember if hereditary peers still exist but I think many of them don't/didn't take their seats in recent years.
>> No. 4243 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 6:04 pm
4243 spacer
>>4240
>taking up a seat someone with a working bonce could be using
This betrays a certain ignorance about the workings of the upper house - there is no finite number of seats.
>> No. 4244 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 6:42 pm
4244 spacer
>>4242
The old boys are still there. There are around 90 of them, originally elected from among their own number, but those who did not get elected cannot vote in the by-elections when one of them dies or resigns.
>> No. 4245 Anonymous
8th December 2015
Tuesday 7:01 pm
4245 spacer

house-of-lords.jpg
424542454245
>>4243

>there is no finite number of seats.

I'm pretty sure that >>4240 is talking about the actual physical seats* that people sit in, not in the sense of being to contribute and vote in the lords.

*Benches
>> No. 4247 Anonymous
9th December 2015
Wednesday 12:14 am
4247 spacer
Suspended from the Labour party, lad. Whilst he can't influence current Labour party politics (via voting), that doesn't stop him voting in the House. Not that he would under the current circumstances.
>> No. 4248 Anonymous
9th December 2015
Wednesday 12:43 am
4248 spacer
>>4247
Oh dear, lad. Do you want to delete that and try again?
>> No. 4249 Anonymous
9th December 2015
Wednesday 1:03 am
4249 spacer
>>4247
You're right, that doesn't stop him voting in the House. What stops him voting in the House is that he is not, in fact, entitled to vote in the House.
>> No. 4250 Anonymous
9th December 2015
Wednesday 1:45 am
4250 spacer
>>4248 >>4249

I stand corrected (probably):

>>What is Leave of Absence?

>>A Member of the House of Lords is expected to attend regularly but may obtain leave of absence.

>>Once granted, the Member is expected not to attend sittings of the House. If the Member wishes to attend before the leave period ends, he or she should give three month's notice.

http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/lords/-ineligible-lords/

http://www.parliament.uk/biographies/lords/lord-janner-of-braunstone/880
>> No. 4251 Anonymous
9th December 2015
Wednesday 1:49 am
4251 spacer
>>4250

And before I forget:

>Janner was diagnosed with dementia in 2009, after which he gave power of attorney to his three children.

>However, it has emerged that he has voted in the House of Lords 203 times since then.

>Also since his diagnosis, he has claimed more than £100,000 in allowances, was appointed to a parliamentary committee last year, and served as a company director until six days before the DPP's ruling.
>> No. 4252 Anonymous
9th December 2015
Wednesday 9:40 am
4252 spacer
>>4251
Dementia is progressive. It can also accelerate such that someone may seem to be on the verge of losing it for years before declining very suddenly. It's been almost three years since he did anything of consequence in the House. A company directorship isn't that big a deal either, given many current and former politicians are on boards (most of them simply for the money). He (or his attorneys) may have appointed a proxy to occasionally turn up to a board meeting, or he may simply have not turned up.
>> No. 4253 Anonymous
9th December 2015
Wednesday 11:19 am
4253 spacer
>>4252

> It can also accelerate such that someone may seem to be on the verge of losing it for years before declining very suddenly.

Funny how being accused of noncing brought about a sudden decline in his condition. I'm sure it was pure coincidence. Nonces are well known for their honesty and I'm sure he isn't faking or exaggerating his condition.
>> No. 4254 Anonymous
9th December 2015
Wednesday 11:58 am
4254 spacer
>>4251
I was going to mention Terry Pratchett, but looking him up it seems he didn't really contract dementia at any stage.

>>4253
tell 'em, Steve-Dave.
>> No. 4255 Anonymous
19th December 2015
Saturday 5:51 pm
4255 spacer

tmp_21176-Screenshot_2015-12-19-17-49-561442509428.png
425542554255
What do you reckon chapmates? Did they do a Dr Kelly on him?
>> No. 4256 Anonymous
19th December 2015
Saturday 6:05 pm
4256 spacer
>>4255
I don't know if you've ever been close to someone with severe dementia, but they are always extremely frail.
>> No. 4257 Anonymous
19th December 2015
Saturday 6:11 pm
4257 spacer
The irony of him being declared unfit to stand trial is that ATOS would have probably declared him fit for work.
>> No. 4258 Anonymous
20th December 2015
Sunday 2:13 pm
4258 spacer
>>4255
Faked death, just like Leon Brittan.
>> No. 4259 Anonymous
20th December 2015
Sunday 3:13 pm
4259 spacer
>>4257
I remember this joke from when ATOS was in charge of work capability assessments. Good times.
>> No. 4260 Anonymous
20th December 2015
Sunday 5:41 pm
4260 spacer
>>4259
Calm down, grandad.
>> No. 4261 Anonymous
20th December 2015
Sunday 5:49 pm
4261 spacer
>>4260

>Calm down

Stop looking for it, m8. It's projection, at best. I'll knock ur fookin heads together if you start summit, swer on me Mam.
>> No. 4262 Anonymous
20th December 2015
Sunday 5:57 pm
4262 spacer
>>4261
For someone who isn't upset you sound awfully upset.
>> No. 4263 Anonymous
20th December 2015
Sunday 6:04 pm
4263 spacer
>>4262

Reading comprehension, lad.

Something something sentry something something labouring something something anonymous imageboards.
>> No. 4264 Anonymous
20th December 2015
Sunday 6:07 pm
4264 spacer
>>4263
I refer the honourable member to the answer I gave some moments ago.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 4265 Anonymous
20th December 2015
Sunday 6:20 pm
4265 spacer
>>4264

I tried to be subtle.
>> No. 4266 Anonymous
20th December 2015
Sunday 6:54 pm
4266 spacer
>>4265
See? You've gone and got yourself upset over nothing.
>> No. 4267 Anonymous
21st December 2015
Monday 11:32 pm
4267 spacer
Wasn't there some scandal about a convicted nonce opening a toy shop recently, which a,so employed all edged nonces? On the coast in some bedsit shithole.
>> No. 4268 Anonymous
22nd December 2015
Tuesday 12:57 am
4268 spacer
What is the point of this? They want to go ahead with the trial of the dead nonce because "people have to be heard." I don't understand this.

I know I might be retarded, but why don't these people who get nonced murder their tormentors?
>> No. 4269 Anonymous
22nd December 2015
Tuesday 1:44 am
4269 spacer
>>4268
>What is the point of this? They want to go ahead with the trial of the dead nonce because "people have to be heard." I don't understand this.

The point is that these people have been ignored, caleed liars, or whatever else for the umpty decades since the alleged abuse happened, and they want the emotional closure that would come with their claims being taken seriously enough to be heard in a court of law and believed by a jury and/or judge (not sure of the mechanism in a trial of the facts). The point is symbolic and therapeutic rather than practical, essentially.

>I know I might be retarded, but why don't these people who get nonced murder their tormentors?

A tiny fraction do (Ricky Rodriguez leaps to mind as a famous example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricky_Rodriguez) but even when you add the trauma of child abuse, most people fundamentally aren't murderers. Simple as that, really.
>> No. 4279 Anonymous
4th January 2016
Monday 8:26 pm
4279 spacer
Now then, now then, has this been discussed in this thread before?

Probably, it's mahoosive.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10666875/Patricia-Hewitt-called-for-age-of-consent-to-be-lowered-to-ten.html

Found it interesting regardless, as it implies all sorts of shady shit.
>> No. 4348 Anonymous
10th March 2016
Thursday 12:39 am
4348 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35765395

>Janner sexually abused children for 33 years, public inquiry hears
>> No. 4351 Anonymous
27th July 2016
Wednesday 1:43 am
4351 spacer
Itz been a while lads, /BOO!

>In a courageous and explosive audio interview with UK Column "Despatches from the Front", a Metropolitan Police Detective Constable child protection specialist, takes the lid off the scale of child abuse, trafficking and prostitution in London and UK.

>He exposes the lies, threats and intimidation used by the police, Local Authorities, Social Services, Politicians, Charities and others to protect Establishment figures and Westminster.

>This criminal conspiracy seeks to deceive the public and stop the truth emerging in every possible way.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_sDeTCLVDQ
>> No. 4365 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 9:30 pm
4365 spacer
>The former head of the child sexual abuse inquiry has strenuously denied a newspaper report of allegations of misconduct and racism made against her.

>Dame Lowell Goddard is alleged to have said Britain had so many paedophiles "because it has so many Asian men", according to a report in the Times.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37653003

Apparently simply stating a fact is racist now.
>> No. 4366 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 9:59 pm
4366 spacer

Danczuk_Face2.png
436643664366
>>2890
> Danczuk
>> No. 4367 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 10:10 pm
4367 spacer
>>4365
>Apparently simply stating a fact is racist now.
You massive racist.
>> No. 4393 Anonymous
10th November 2016
Thursday 3:09 pm
4393 spacer

Capture.png
439343934393
Sorry for necrobumping but I just found this and don't think it warrants its own thread.
>> No. 4701 Anonymous
31st October 2018
Wednesday 2:30 am
4701 spacer
I wonder if there is anyone in power who is not being blackmailed?
>> No. 4702 Anonymous
31st October 2018
Wednesday 3:11 am
4702 spacer
>>4701

Tony Blair.

Or at least his 5th dimension reptilian incarnation.
>> No. 4703 Anonymous
31st October 2018
Wednesday 4:56 pm
4703 spacer
>>4701

You know, there was a poster who bumped this thread after it had been dead for three weeks who thought he was being inconsiderate just above yourself there. That was two fucking years ago!
>> No. 4704 Anonymous
7th November 2018
Wednesday 12:28 pm
4704 spacer
>>4703
Sorry GCHQ, next time I'll make sure not to remind anyone of anything you don't like.
>> No. 4710 Anonymous
7th November 2018
Wednesday 6:56 pm
4710 spacer
>>4704

Some people just get cross about necrobumping although I've never minded it myself.
>> No. 4711 Anonymous
2nd December 2018
Sunday 1:52 am
4711 spacer

diddl.png
471147114711
What a great name.
>> No. 4712 Anonymous
2nd December 2018
Sunday 2:04 am
4712 spacer
>>4711
Diddl Maus is basically the German Mickey. I used to shag a German bird who had an obscene amount of Diddl tack.
>> No. 4713 Anonymous
2nd December 2018
Sunday 2:10 am
4713 spacer
>>4712

Even in context this sounds like some sort of confession.
>> No. 4715 Anonymous
2nd December 2018
Sunday 10:20 am
4715 spacer
>>4712
>>4713
> Diddl tack
It sounds like some kind of coefficient of diddling. Perhaps measuring how good she is at being diddled, or how much she was diddled as a child, or predilection to diddling herself.
>> No. 4716 Anonymous
3rd December 2018
Monday 7:20 am
4716 spacer

Untitled.png
471647164716
>>4711
WHAT WOULD DIANA SAY?!
>> No. 4717 Anonymous
3rd December 2018
Monday 8:20 am
4717 spacer

154382160229.png
471747174717
>>4716

I see viscous white liquid spurting out of a bellend.
>> No. 4718 Anonymous
3rd December 2018
Monday 7:17 pm
4718 spacer

6951226-6455401-image-m-94_1543854530191.jpg
471847184718
It was Peter Griffin all along.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46431818
>> No. 4719 Anonymous
3rd December 2018
Monday 7:58 pm
4719 spacer
>>4718
hahaha - I thought the exact same thing when I saw the picture.
>> No. 4723 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 8:10 am
4723 spacer
>>4711

Really? Someone thought this was a good name for a boarding school?

http://www.sexeys.somerset.sch.uk/

>Sexey's School is named after Hugh Sexey who, in 1599, was appointed as a Royal auditor to Elizabeth I and later as a Royal auditor to James I. Sexey's Hospital was established in 1619 from the proceeds of his will, and the school was founded in 1889.

Oh, well as long as it was named after Mr Sexey.
>> No. 4724 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 8:20 am
4724 spacer

fb3.png
472447244724
Their Facebook cover image is also a little odd.
>> No. 4725 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 8:28 am
4725 spacer
>>4724

Boarding school kids are exceptionally odd, so at least they're being honest.
>> No. 4726 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 10:31 am
4726 spacer
>>4718
They are going to railroad this poor man for having the courage to try and stop them.
>> No. 4727 Anonymous
24th February 2019
Sunday 3:04 am
4727 spacer
One of Britain’s top spy chiefs quit after it emerged that he helped a paedophile Catholic priest avoid jail, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Prime Minister Theresa May was last night accused of a cover-up over the scandal as she knew of GCHQ director Robert Hannigan’s connection to the child sex offender when he stood down in 2017. At the time, Mr Hannigan had cited ‘family reasons’, with this crucial link kept secret.

The high-flying civil servant, who was lauded for his role in striking peace in Northern Ireland, stunned Whitehall with his exit after just two years in charge of GCHQ.

This newspaper has learned he stepped down after the National Crime Agency discovered that he helped a close family friend avoid a custodial sentence for possessing 174 child pornography images After Mr Hannigan provided a character reference for Father Edmund Higgins at his 2013 trial, the priest’s eight-month sentence was suspended. The judge said Higgins had ‘struggled with his sexuality’. But Higgins went on to reoffend, and during an NCA probe his links to Mr Hannigan were discovered and No 10 was alerted.

The powerful mandarin gave the reference ‘in good faith’ a year before his appointment as director of the 5,000-strong Government Communications Headquarters, the notoriously secretive eavesdropping agency. After his conviction, Edmund Higgins, who had served at St Elizabeth’s Church in Richmond, South-West London, was defrocked and changed his name to Edmund Black.

With the Prime Minister’s blessing, he was allowed to resign on January 23, 2017, citing family commitments. Anonymous briefings were given to the media that he would be caring for sick relatives. That same year, Mrs May said: ‘The sunlight of transparency acts… as an important check and balance, and helps ensure the highest standards of public life among senior Government representatives.’

Last night Mr Hannigan, who began to train as a priest before joining the civil service, confirmed that Higgins had been a family friend for two decades. But he admitted his ‘judgment was completely wrong’ in providing the character reference. After his conviction, Higgins, who had served at St Elizabeth’s Church in Richmond, South-West London, was defrocked and changed his name to Edmund Black, but continued to offend.

The Mail on Sunday has learned that No 10 was alerted in early 2017 that the NCA was investigating Higgins as part of a major probe into online chatrooms that hosted abuse of babies. His connection to Mr Hannigan was highlighted to figures at the very top of Government, including the Prime Minister.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6738081/GCHQ-spy-chief-quit-helped-paedophile-Catholic-priest-avoid-jail.html
>> No. 4728 Anonymous
24th February 2019
Sunday 10:07 am
4728 spacer
>>4727
This was the first thing I read after waking up and I consistently misread it as "spy chef" which was confusing.
>online chatrooms that hosted abuse of babies
christ
>> No. 4729 Anonymous
24th February 2019
Sunday 6:05 pm
4729 spacer
>>4727
It's an incredible story, proper /boo/ shit. WTF would anyone take the risk of appearing / writing a character reference for someone accused of kiddie-fiddling.

Exceptionally poor judgement - which is not what you want in the head of GCHQ, so entirely right that he had to go.
>> No. 4730 Anonymous
24th February 2019
Sunday 7:56 pm
4730 spacer

>> No. 4825 Anonymous
23rd July 2019
Tuesday 6:57 am
4825 spacer

16361394-7274151-image-a-29_1563826951966.jpg
482548254825
I don't remember watching this episode of Family Guy.
>> No. 4978 Anonymous
26th August 2020
Wednesday 3:59 pm
4978 spacer
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000m22r/the-unbelievable-story-of-carl-beech
>> No. 4979 Anonymous
26th August 2020
Wednesday 5:22 pm
4979 spacer
>>4729
> It's an incredible story, proper /boo/ shit.

Everything sounds like '/boo/ shit' until the truth outs and we realise it was under our noses all along.

I was going through this place's archives a while back and found a post from 2012 that basically said "Get back to /boo/, lad" in response to someone naming Prince Andrew as a Paedophile.

I have a book published in 2009 that calls out, explicitly as it can without actually committing libel, Jimmy Savile for having "a specially equipped ambulance that he uses to abuse the disabled".

Basically what I'm trying to say is that David Icke is right and the government is all lizards. Now I'm going to put my tinfoil back over my head before the mind rays get me.
>> No. 4980 Anonymous
26th August 2020
Wednesday 5:41 pm
4980 spacer
>>4979
>David Icke is right

God help us all if/when this comes true. We'll all have to move to the Isle of Wight to worship him. I've been there many times, it's hell.
>> No. 4981 Anonymous
26th August 2020
Wednesday 6:16 pm
4981 spacer
>>4980

The Isle of Wight would be more like Mecca for ARE ICKE. We'd all have to make the pilgrimage once a year to pray at Arum Bay and do six laps around the island counter-clockwise in a pedalo or something.
>> No. 4982 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 10:25 pm
4982 spacer
Just watched a bitchute video about pedogate - it was a mistake. Next up is an hour long documentary entitled "300,000 Children a year blood Sacrificed and put in McDonalds meat!". I'm in for a bad couple of weeks it seems.
>> No. 4983 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 11:11 pm
4983 spacer
>>4979
>under our noses all along
>I have a book published in 2009 that calls out

Insiders at the BBC were openly talking about it in the early 90s. Back then I had a friend who had worked there for almost twenty years, which is how/when I first heard about his antics.
>> No. 5362 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 10:36 am
5362 spacer

Screenshot 2021-12-30 10.35.19.png
536253625362
Ghislaine found guilty on 5 of 6 charges.

VIP Sex Trafficking is officially over! We did it Boo lads!
>> No. 5363 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 2:29 pm
5363 spacer
>>5362
I play a celebrity death list game with friends on Facebook, and lots of people are apparently adding Ghislaine Maxwell to their 2022 list, because they got Are Brave Jeff and now they're going to get her too.
>> No. 5364 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 2:36 pm
5364 spacer

td3bys2f9y481.jpg
536453645364
>>5362
I'd give her a conjugal visit.
>> No. 5365 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 2:45 pm
5365 spacer
>>5364
That other woman appears to have lactated all down that cushion. Perhaps this is how Jeffrey Epstein got rich? Selling sex cushions?
>> No. 5366 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 3:21 pm
5366 spacer
>>5364
IKWYM.
>> No. 5367 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 4:26 pm
5367 spacer
>>5365
There's a minor scandal at the moment as she owns the Atlantic magazine which recently came out with an article on why sex trafficking is overblown.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/01/children-sex-trafficking-conspiracy-epidemic/620845/

Also she's Steve Job's widow but that's the lifestyles of the rich and famous for you.
>> No. 5368 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 4:35 pm
5368 spacer
>>5367

This site doesn't visually inspire a lot of confidence in its ability to relate unbiased facts (which could be seen as a positive) but the article is interesting.
https://www.thesteepletimes.com/the-fog/met-police-maxwell-dick/
tl;dr: Dick became a Chief Inspector of the Met after Maxwell's London home was put under police surveillance for being a brothel, then that was never taken any further. That would seem more damning if it wasn't for the fact that Dick was transferred to Thames Valley police in 1995. But both women went to Oxford High School at the same time and Balliol College (possibly or possibly not not quite at the same time).

I'm not convinced this means anything.
>> No. 5369 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 4:45 pm
5369 spacer
It's indicative of the state of Oxbridge students, anyway.
>> No. 5370 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 4:59 pm
5370 spacer

dbo773k0ho881.jpg
537053705370
BBC had Dershowitz on during their coverage Nd he used the opportunity to slander one of the accusers. He also recently put in a news appearance following Desmond Tutu's death to accuse him of antisemitism with a painting of Tsar Nikolas II prominently displayed in the background.

Lad is on one this week.
>> No. 5371 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 5:38 pm
5371 spacer
>>5370

Who's he and why are those things wot he done bad? I haven't been following all this particularly closely.

I thought getting away with shit like that was the whole point of being jewish anyway, have they failed to pay their TV license this year or what?
>> No. 5372 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 5:49 pm
5372 spacer

FH32gjGX0AEqO4S.jpg
537253725372
>>5371

According to the internet he was Epstein's defence attorney who helped get Epstein the 2008 deal where co-conspirators, known and unknown were granted immunity as well as having been accused of diddling the women himself. I think the one (Gifford?) he was talking shit about in the interview is suing him over that. People seem to be upset because none of this background was mentioned before the interview, he was presented as a neutral legal observer.
>> No. 5373 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 6:11 pm
5373 spacer
First Robert Maxwell, now Ghislaine Maxwell. The Maxwell family must be proper wrong 'uns. They're almost as bad as the Chauvin family, who killed George Floyd and presumably also invented chauvinism.
>> No. 5374 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 6:30 pm
5374 spacer
>>5371
>>5372
He was also part of the team that got the murderer OJ Simpson off.
>> No. 5375 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 6:46 pm
5375 spacer
>>5374

I thought he was a john, not a sex worker?
>> No. 5376 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 11:32 pm
5376 spacer
>>5373
I never liked their coffee.
>> No. 5377 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 11:59 pm
5377 spacer
>>5370
>with a painting of Tsar Nikolas II prominently displayed in the background.
Because he approves of the tsar or to imply he and Tutu were on the same wavelength? That is very, very confusing. Nicholas II makes Oswald Mosely look like a member of Labour Friends of Israel ffs. Dershowitz is such a freak and it's concerning he can just rock up for an interview no questions asked on the BBC. Someone at the Big British Castle is very out of touch these days and given my fondness and respect for the institution that's concerning.
>> No. 5378 Anonymous
1st January 2022
Saturday 6:46 pm
5378 spacer
>>5374
And thanks to the OJ case, we also ended up with the Kardashian clan.
>> No. 5379 Anonymous
1st January 2022
Saturday 7:24 pm
5379 spacer
>>5378

I'm usually very sceptical of the "Great Man" theory of history. But there are some cases where it's striking just how much evil really does come back to one person in the end.
>> No. 5380 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 8:21 pm
5380 spacer

Screenshot_20220113-201910_Instagram.jpg
538053805380
Any of you lads seen 'the Scary of Sixty-first' (2021) yet?
>> No. 5381 Anonymous
15th January 2022
Saturday 9:53 pm
5381 spacer
>>5380
>After two mismatched roommates discover that their new Upper East Side apartment once belonged to the late pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, the pair find themselves compelled to uncover—and relive—the murky secrets of their domicile
What the fuuuuck
>> No. 5416 Anonymous
24th January 2022
Monday 4:23 am
5416 spacer
>>5381


>> No. 5455 Anonymous
3rd October 2022
Monday 10:09 pm
5455 spacer
https://www.thenational.scot/news/23016140.man-exposed-jimmy-savile-itv-says-another-untouchable-paedophile-uk/

Who is it lads?
>> No. 5456 Anonymous
3rd October 2022
Monday 10:12 pm
5456 spacer
>>5455

Noel Edmonds, without a shadow of a doubt.
>> No. 5457 Anonymous
3rd October 2022
Monday 11:22 pm
5457 spacer
>>5456
That's too obvious. He's top of everyone's list. Failing to investigate Noel Edmonds for being a closet wrong 'un would be like failing to investigate Usain Bolt for performance-enhancing drugs. He's such an obvious target that he must be clean or one of the thousands of suspicious people would have caught him by now.

Therefore, it is Graham Norton. Although I really hope it's Scott Mills; I never liked him.
>> No. 5458 Anonymous
3rd October 2022
Monday 11:36 pm
5458 spacer
>>5457
>That's too obvious. He's top of everyone's list. Failing to investigate Noel Edmonds for being a closet wrong 'un would be like failing to investigate Usain Bolt for performance-enhancing drugs. He's such an obvious target that he must be clean or one of the thousands of suspicious people would have caught him by now.
You would have said the exact same thing about Savile
>> No. 5459 Anonymous
4th October 2022
Tuesday 4:55 pm
5459 spacer
>>5455


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63rcdLeXiU8
>> No. 5460 Anonymous
4th October 2022
Tuesday 7:37 pm
5460 spacer
>>5457
>Graham Norton

I've suspected him since he got trapped in those caves with a bunch of lads on that church trip...

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password