[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
art

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 5148)
Message
File  []
close
$_3.jpg
514851485148
>> No. 5148 Anonymous
27th January 2015
Tuesday 10:24 pm
5148 spacer
Do you own any artwork?

There's an original Rolf Harris painting on eBay for £2.20, which I'm considering bidding on while everyone else is put off BT him being a filthy noncecase.

Look at this on eBay:

http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=111583864967
Expand all images.
>> No. 5149 Anonymous
27th January 2015
Tuesday 10:56 pm
5149 spacer
I don't. He should have done a more glamourous crime. I bet John Wayne Gacy's "art" would sell for a lot more.
>> No. 5150 Anonymous
27th January 2015
Tuesday 11:06 pm
5150 spacer
>>5148
Buy it. A decade from now, some paedo-art enthusiast will shell out thousands for it.
>> No. 5151 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 11:53 am
5151 spacer
>>5150
Even better, buy it guilt-free knowing that Rolf himself won't see a penny from the sale.
>> No. 5152 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 12:04 pm
5152 spacer
I bought an original Savile autograph for a fiver a year or two ago. All the others have probably been burnt by now. It shall skyrocket in price!
>> No. 5153 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 12:31 pm
5153 spacer
I own paintings that I've painted. That doesn't really count though.
>> No. 5154 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 12:42 pm
5154 spacer

$_3.jpg
515451545154
There is a lot of nude artwork for sale on eBay, usually for 99p and of this calibre.
>> No. 5155 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 12:51 pm
5155 spacer
>>5154

Strangely grim.
>> No. 5156 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 1:23 pm
5156 spacer
>>5154
This is a /sfw/ work board, so I'd steer clear of anything spicier.
>> No. 5157 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 1:42 pm
5157 spacer
>>5156
Nudity in art isn't rude, unless you're a person of indecent taste who can't appreciate it.
>> No. 5158 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 4:09 pm
5158 spacer
>>5157
No it's not rude, but some prissy co-worker might think otherwise.
>> No. 5159 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 4:13 pm
5159 spacer
Nudity in art is so crass. Almost every modern piece has to have some woman doing the splits and showing her fanny. Maybe porn has skewed how I see things, or maybe all those page-3 girls and fanny-shots of Jordan getting out of a car has ruined it all for me, but honestly, I'm just tired of nudity everywhere.
>> No. 5160 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 4:42 pm
5160 spacer
>>5159
I agree. It's a new type of desperation to not be kitsch that is in itself kitsch.

There was a good programme about this on Radio 4 a while ago.
>> No. 5161 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 4:54 pm
5161 spacer
>>5159

The nude has its foundations in Classical art for practical reasons. Paintings usually depicted people doing things, and in order to portray scenes involving people in an ever more detailed and sophisticated way, a good knowledge of anatomy was desirable. Best way to learn anatomy was to study nudes.

There is also a long history of the nude as erotica, especially commissioned portrayals of women, but it's an inescapable aspect of human anatomy within art, not the other way around. This is why life drawing is still considered worthwhile in fine art.

I like a well done nude, but the eBay picture is a bit grotty, I admit.
>> No. 5162 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 4:57 pm
5162 spacer
>>5161

Also, Berger had some pretty interesting things to say, here:

https://www.youtube.com/v/m1GI8mNU5Sg
>> No. 5163 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 5:47 pm
5163 spacer
>>5162

If anyone hasn't seen Ways of Seeing, then do so at your first convenience. It is thrilling and vital, and seems to be more relevant now than when it was first broadcast.

https://www.youtube.com/v/0pDE4VX_9Kk
>> No. 5164 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 6:46 pm
5164 spacer

$_57.jpg
516451645164
>Rolf Harris Original Oil Painting On Canvas By Charlie Chittenden

>Worldwide Established Artist RRP £500

http://www.ebay.com/itm/121547402779?
>> No. 5165 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 7:45 pm
5165 spacer
A few Seb West originals (some painter from St. Ives in Cornwall) and a few drawings by a local artist. Also my mum draws and has a small gallery.
>> No. 5168 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 9:05 pm
5168 spacer

image_preview.jpg
516851685168
I'm not generally a big fan of visual arts but I went to school with this artist called Rebecca Westguard and she does nudes of big fat people. That doesn't seem tasteless. I guess because they're so unsexy.
>> No. 5169 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 9:09 pm
5169 spacer
>>5168
Phoowar I'd splash my paint on her easel IYKWIM
>> No. 5170 Anonymous
28th January 2015
Wednesday 9:16 pm
5170 spacer

image_preview (1).jpg
517051705170
>>5169

I often wondered why she won't paint anyone with a gym membership.
>> No. 5171 Anonymous
29th January 2015
Thursday 10:34 am
5171 spacer

image.jpg
517151715171
From what I've seen online you can get a decent Leonid Afremov original/reproduction for about £80-£100, but it's very unlikely to have much of a resale value because he churns out so much; right now he has around 1,500 items for sale on each of his eBay and Etsy stores and his own website, although there's probably a lot of duplication between the three. I haven't seen anything else worthwhile online for under £250 and at my local art dealer you'd be hard pressed (or is it hardpressed?) to find anything decent for under £750.
>> No. 5172 Anonymous
29th January 2015
Thursday 3:22 pm
5172 spacer
>>5154
The eyes elevate this from grot to comedy, IMO.
>> No. 5173 Anonymous
29th January 2015
Thursday 3:43 pm
5173 spacer
>>5172
The sloppy nose helps too. I think this is the first time I've seen a nude of someone who's had a stroke. Either that or the artist was having a stroke while he drew it, IYKWIM.

Rolf's now up to £45, I wonder how much the nonce enablers will finally pay for it. It doesn't end until Monday.
>> No. 5175 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 7:20 pm
5175 spacer

$_1.jpg
517551755175
>EROTIC ART DRAWING BY ASHLEY PETERSON - ' BALL GAMES '

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/261757094961?

The censorship on this is fantastic.
>> No. 5176 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 7:25 pm
5176 spacer
>>5175
Why is she sucking on that volumetric flask?
>> No. 5177 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 7:44 pm
5177 spacer
>>5176
She doing it to transfer heat, to overcome the enthalpy of formation, of the reactants.
>> No. 5178 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:04 pm
5178 spacer
>>5177
She can transfer heat to my reactants anytime, IYKWIM.
>> No. 5179 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:39 pm
5179 spacer
>>5178
I'd be careful if I were you, lad. I'm no anatomical expert but she appears to have one nubby finger and a thumb where her elbow should be.
>> No. 5180 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:52 pm
5180 spacer

$_57.jpg
518051805180
She has no teeth? Seriously?
>> No. 5181 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:53 pm
5181 spacer

$_57 (1).jpg
518151815181
>>5180

Neither does this one.
>> No. 5182 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:54 pm
5182 spacer
I can't wait to see my eBay "Inspired by your recent browsing history" section now.
>> No. 5183 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:55 pm
5183 spacer

$_57 (2).jpg
518351835183
Oh goodness. I think it burst.
>> No. 5185 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 8:58 pm
5185 spacer
>>5180>>5181
It may be his weak point. The Ancient Egyptians couldn't draw feet, pornolad can draw a clopper but can't manage teeth.
>> No. 5186 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 10:56 pm
5186 spacer
>>5180>>5181
Do you have these without the, err, red bit? For research purposes obv.
>> No. 5187 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 11:02 pm
5187 spacer
>>5186
If you look on the seller's eBay page you should find them; each listing has versions with and without the bright red cock.
>> No. 5188 Anonymous
7th February 2015
Saturday 11:19 pm
5188 spacer

Untitled.png
518851885188
>>5182
>> No. 5189 Anonymous
15th February 2015
Sunday 8:28 pm
5189 spacer

$_1.jpg
518951895189
I don't understand why one of the nipples has been redded out, unless there's something utterly depraved that bumders do to them which I'm unaware of.
>> No. 5190 Anonymous
15th February 2015
Sunday 8:39 pm
5190 spacer
>>5189
Only one of them needs a first-class stamp, obviously.
>> No. 5191 Anonymous
16th February 2015
Monday 12:15 am
5191 spacer
>>5190
That's exactly it, the large red box is the parcel they're about to send.
>> No. 5192 Anonymous
16th February 2015
Monday 4:53 am
5192 spacer
>>5189
I feel curiously compelled to see the uncensored version. Is this from one of those awful eBay listings? Can we have the link please?
>> No. 5193 Anonymous
16th February 2015
Monday 7:30 am
5193 spacer
>>5192

It's the same seller as the rest. Look at their other items for sale.
>> No. 5194 Anonymous
16th February 2015
Monday 10:55 am
5194 spacer
>>5192

It's under completed listings. That's why you didn't see it. I thought maybe be was licking a blobble of spunk and that's why it got censored but no, it's just a nipple.
>> No. 5403 Anonymous
22nd May 2016
Sunday 10:45 pm
5403 spacer

il_570xN.959110080_7ijt.jpg
540354035403
£3.18 on Etsy.

https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/276617260/original-akt-zeichnung-nude-erotik
>> No. 5404 Anonymous
22nd May 2016
Sunday 11:10 pm
5404 spacer
Why is most "art" online drawn by the plebs full of crudely drawn naked women, tits, cocks and fannies?

No fucking imagination.
>> No. 5405 Anonymous
22nd May 2016
Sunday 11:26 pm
5405 spacer

pompeii_1736060c[1].jpg
540554055405
>>5404
It's neoclassical innit.
>> No. 5406 Anonymous
23rd May 2016
Monday 3:12 am
5406 spacer
>>5181
This reminds me of that Star Wars pornography by Shabby Blue. In fact it could almost be a trace.
>> No. 5442 Anonymous
17th January 2017
Tuesday 9:38 pm
5442 spacer

il_570xN.1126316883_438j.jpg
544254425442
Clint Eastwood, apparently. £45.

https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/490279163/are-ya-feeling-lucky-punk?
>> No. 5443 Anonymous
17th January 2017
Tuesday 10:14 pm
5443 spacer
>>5442
>are ya feeling lucky, punk?
The guy selling it obviously is.
>> No. 5444 Anonymous
17th January 2017
Tuesday 10:44 pm
5444 spacer

$_1.jpg
544454445444
Why would anyone buy this?

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/322350798084
>> No. 5445 Anonymous
17th January 2017
Tuesday 10:55 pm
5445 spacer
>>5442
Don't disappear down the Etsy hole - you'll be stuck there all night at the sheer lunacy of it all.
>> No. 5446 Anonymous
17th January 2017
Tuesday 11:01 pm
5446 spacer
>>5444
Why would anyone not buy it?
>> No. 5447 Anonymous
17th January 2017
Tuesday 11:09 pm
5447 spacer
>>5446
I can't figure out what the woman in the centre is actually meant to be doing and the naked woman behind her seems to have her legs somehow going through the middle of that bed. Also, the man on the left appears to have a black and white straw inserted into his skull.
>> No. 5448 Anonymous
18th January 2017
Wednesday 3:12 am
5448 spacer

41RoaaYYljL.jpg
544854485448
>>5444

https://www.amazon.co.uk/PAM-ST-CLEMENT-Canvas-Signed-Artist/dp/B003BRMOIU
>> No. 5449 Anonymous
18th January 2017
Wednesday 6:53 am
5449 spacer
>>5448
The questions and answers on that are hilarious.

>Q: Are rumours of this clock screaming "Fraaaannnnnkkkkk" on the hour every hour accurate or unsubstantiated?

>A: Very accurate
>> No. 5450 Anonymous
18th January 2017
Wednesday 8:53 am
5450 spacer

51EaslW3pEL[1].jpg
545054505450
>>5448

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Box-Canvas-Print-Paul-Ross/dp/B001N6W8U0
>> No. 5451 Anonymous
18th January 2017
Wednesday 3:56 pm
5451 spacer
Fucking Pat the Clock is peering out at me from my Facebook ads now.
>> No. 5452 Anonymous
18th January 2017
Wednesday 4:22 pm
5452 spacer
>>5451

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Life-form-Prostate-Examination-Simulator/dp/B007FSAFVY/
>> No. 5453 Anonymous
18th January 2017
Wednesday 5:28 pm
5453 spacer
>>5450
Didn't it turn out he was into weird sex games or something? I don't fancy Googling 'Paul Ross sex games'.
>> No. 5454 Anonymous
18th January 2017
Wednesday 6:08 pm
5454 spacer

51cyWy ZYpL._SY400_.jpg
545454545454
>>5452
The recommended items are interesting.
>> No. 5455 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 7:49 pm
5455 spacer

Screenshot_2017-01-27-19-45-51.png
545554555455
Thanks, lads. These are the items related o what I've viewed on Amazon.
>> No. 5456 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 9:23 pm
5456 spacer
>>5455
What on earth is a cyberskin?
>> No. 5457 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 9:35 pm
5457 spacer
>>5456
A trademark for a type of rubber that's packed full of BPA and other nasty chemicals.
>> No. 5458 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 9:51 pm
5458 spacer
>>5457
This isn't even a food product and you're scaremongering about plastic? OH NO CHEMICALS DID YOU KNOW COCA-COLA CAN DISSOLVE RUST
>> No. 5459 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 9:57 pm
5459 spacer
>>5458
You're putting your willy in there.
>> No. 5460 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 9:58 pm
5460 spacer
>>5458

The smell alone should be enough to give you a hint that it's not a good idea to stick your dick in it.
>> No. 5461 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 10:04 pm
5461 spacer
>>5460

THAT'S NOT STOPPED ME IN THE PAST

ban me god please

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 5462 Anonymous
28th January 2017
Saturday 11:39 pm
5462 spacer

annies pic.jpg
546254625462
i don't understand art i dated a artist for 3 years and i have one of her collages on my shithouse wall. i like things i can tell what they are but some of her stuff was mental but she sells plenty.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 5467 Anonymous
24th April 2017
Monday 2:24 pm
5467 spacer
Only £7.33.

https://www.artfinder.com/product/nude-dirty-with-fingerprints/
>> No. 5468 Anonymous
24th April 2017
Monday 3:30 pm
5468 spacer
I realised yesterday that art occurs only in the minds of people. The creators intended meaning is irrelevant as far as perception goes. Its what we see that matters; what we make it mean. Art is a portal to our own minds. If we can-not see art in something, our thoughts are not deep enough to interpret it. To interpret ourselves.

Or is it that the creators communication of intention is art? Wouldn't that only make understandable 'art' 'good'?

I started out thinking I understood. Now I just don't know. I can see it all together in an intricately crafted maelstrom but trying to pick out a single point sends it all to chaos.
>> No. 5469 Anonymous
24th April 2017
Monday 3:45 pm
5469 spacer
>>5468
Isn't that true of everything non-noumenal?
>> No. 5470 Anonymous
24th April 2017
Monday 4:01 pm
5470 spacer
>>5468

Your statement rings with very similar views to that of Roland Barthes in his essay 'The Death of the Author'. Personally I dislike it because I feel it leads to an arrogance in the view that their interpretation is the truth and that the authors opinion is irrelevant.

I take the position that art is a form of communication, and all communication is ultimately an attempt to convey one set of ideas to another person which has various problems because of misunderstandings of shared meanings and bias. To me a master piece is a work that conveys the author’s intention as perfectly as possible to another mind. This line of analysis will lead you to the conclusion that James Joyce was a pretentious over rated cunt, however.
>> No. 5471 Anonymous
24th April 2017
Monday 4:05 pm
5471 spacer
>>5469
>non-noumenal

I don't see what Linkin Park have got to do with all of this.
>> No. 5472 Anonymous
4th June 2017
Sunday 10:01 pm
5472 spacer

b5e4b805e619bde0662e0954126a893c.jpg
547254725472
i love this
>> No. 5473 Anonymous
5th June 2017
Monday 4:40 pm
5473 spacer
I was tidying up yesterday and came across my copy of *The Art of Bruce Nicolls*. He's a schizophrenic alcoholic and it's a book of his child-like scrawlings. I bought it for £3 whilst waiting for the bus one evening in Fulham from his friend and editor of the book.
>> No. 5479 Anonymous
10th July 2017
Monday 10:28 pm
5479 spacer
>>5472 this is by david hanjani
>> No. 5480 Anonymous
10th July 2017
Monday 10:30 pm
5480 spacer
>>5472 this piece is by david hanjani
>> No. 5481 Anonymous
10th July 2017
Monday 10:32 pm
5481 spacer
>>5480
Yeah thanks David we'd have figured that out if we'd cared to reverse search it.
>> No. 5482 Anonymous
10th July 2017
Monday 10:37 pm
5482 spacer

untitledII 2017 bydavidhanjani.jpg
548254825482
>>5481 janks fren here is a new one too!! just made it, enjOIII
>> No. 5483 Anonymous
10th July 2017
Monday 10:39 pm
5483 spacer
>>5482
You really don't understand how the Internet works. Who writes themselves an article on Urban Dictionary? That's not that what's for. That's not what this website is for.
>> No. 5484 Anonymous
11th July 2017
Tuesday 6:42 am
5484 spacer

$_1.jpg
548454845484
It seems that pornolad is now experimenting with colour.

This one appears to be David and Samantha Cameron in their younger days.
>> No. 5537 Anonymous
21st May 2018
Monday 11:01 pm
5537 spacer
>>5484
Rather not be reminded of that peanut headed man.
>> No. 5564 Anonymous
29th July 2019
Monday 7:03 pm
5564 spacer

A-Warm-Winter_1-1200x1200.jpg
556455645564
How easy would it be to have a go at creating my own artwork?

I doubt I've got the talent to do anything too intricate, but I don't see how something like this with a palette knife would be out of the realms of possibility with a little bit of practice and research.
>> No. 5565 Anonymous
29th July 2019
Monday 7:06 pm
5565 spacer
>>5564


>> No. 5589 Anonymous
25th May 2020
Monday 10:23 pm
5589 spacer

Screenshot_20200525_222151_com.android.chrome.jpg
558955895589
Someone in the local area Facebook group is trying to flog their paintings. I can't even.
>> No. 5590 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 7:51 am
5590 spacer
>>5589
If they're under 10 then that's acceptable.
>> No. 5591 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 8:22 am
5591 spacer
>>5590
By my reckoning they're pushing 40.
>> No. 5592 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 8:54 am
5592 spacer

1588526559614.jpg
559255925592
>>5589
I'm getting a similar vibe to pic relatd.
>> No. 5593 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 9:11 am
5593 spacer
>>5589

The price is right. Isn't like they are being delusional with their value.
>> No. 5594 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 10:15 am
5594 spacer

Screenshot_20200526_101422_com.android.chrome.jpg
559455945594
>>5593
The elephant squirting a rainbow out of its trunk haunts me.
>> No. 5595 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 11:00 am
5595 spacer
>>5594
The cow might be passable with larger brush strokes.
>> No. 5596 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 6:48 pm
5596 spacer
>>5589
Some of these aren't half bad.

Probably because of covid this is the first time she's picked up a pen in years, she just needs to avoid the childish and cartoony animal pics, and focus on the landscapes and the more abstract stuff like the giraffe and cow in these ones: >>5594

The price for the better ones is fine as long as those frames are included.
Anyway at the end of the day art is worth what people will pay for it, I'd rather have one of these on display in my house than the tacky mass-produced prints they sell in shops like the Range for twice the price.
>> No. 5597 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 8:53 pm
5597 spacer
Got a link? I wonder if she'd have a go drawing my fursona smashing Judy Hopps up the wrong 'un in the ZPD locker rooms.
>> No. 5600 Anonymous
22nd September 2021
Wednesday 11:28 am
5600 spacer

s-l400.jpg
560056005600
The Rolf Harris picture in the OP is back up for sale. They're asking £350 for it.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/114999137682
>> No. 5601 Anonymous
22nd September 2021
Wednesday 6:21 pm
5601 spacer
>>5600

This was not touched by Rolf Harris, it is just an authorised printed copy.
>> No. 5602 Anonymous
22nd September 2021
Wednesday 6:23 pm
5602 spacer
>>5601
He must have signed it very carefully if he never touched it.
>> No. 5603 Anonymous
22nd September 2021
Wednesday 6:45 pm
5603 spacer
>>5601

>This was not touched by Rolf Harris

For once.






I'll get my coat.
>> No. 5604 Anonymous
22nd September 2021
Wednesday 8:11 pm
5604 spacer
>>5600

Is that frame really worth £347.80?
>> No. 5618 Anonymous
23rd February 2022
Wednesday 12:49 pm
5618 spacer

dug.jpg
561856185618
Is this real?

https://facebook.com/Stephs-CanvasesPhotoframes-110756564844820/
>> No. 5619 Anonymous
23rd February 2022
Wednesday 1:16 pm
5619 spacer
>>5618
A few years back my mum did something like this with the family photos. I remember her being somewhat shocked when I pointed out that she'd destroyed a significant amount of photos of me as a child to make a naff collage.
>> No. 5650 Anonymous
23rd May 2023
Tuesday 2:35 pm
5650 spacer
Bet it's worth a fortune now that he's dead.
>> No. 5651 Anonymous
23rd May 2023
Tuesday 3:30 pm
5651 spacer
>>5650
Stick it on a Union Flag backing, write something like "Sick semper nonces" over it in red ink, sell it for a fortune on Facebook marketplace.
>> No. 5652 Anonymous
23rd May 2023
Tuesday 5:54 pm
5652 spacer
I still have my Savile autograph >>5152 and have since come to massively regret this 'investment' with the realisation I'd be essentially profiting off of child abuse. Dunno what to do with it now.
>> No. 5653 Anonymous
23rd May 2023
Tuesday 6:29 pm
5653 spacer
>>5652

Burn it on livestream as a fundraiser for the NSPCC.

Or flog it on eBay and spend the money on Polish cans, I'm not the boss of you.
>> No. 5654 Anonymous
23rd May 2023
Tuesday 8:46 pm
5654 spacer
Gary Glitter, Jimmy Savile and Rolf Harris go to an Irish pub, barman says "ahhh, not yew tree again."
>> No. 5665 Anonymous
28th August 2023
Monday 4:02 pm
5665 spacer

Waterhouse_Hylas_and_the_Nymphs_Manchester_Art_Gal.jpg
566556655665
Did artists in them days paint nude women without pubic hair or have they just faded over time? Would a professional restorer have to master the art of painting pubes back on?
>> No. 5666 Anonymous
28th August 2023
Monday 4:28 pm
5666 spacer
>>5665
The women never had pubes in the paintings, and the men all had tiny cocks. [spoiler]The artists used children as models[/spoilers]. Why does this thread have so many kiddy-fiddly posts?
>> No. 5667 Anonymous
28th August 2023
Monday 6:34 pm
5667 spacer
>>5666
I think most of the posts line up with Rolf Harris being in the news for one reason or another. Rolf getting done for diddling. Rolf dying as a diddler. That sort of thing.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password